A randomized phase II non-comparative study of Ispinesib given weekly or every three weeks in metastatic colorectal cancer. A California Cancer Consortium Study (CCC-P)

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3595-3595 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. B. El-Khoueiry ◽  
S. Iqbal ◽  
D. A. Singh ◽  
S. D’Andre ◽  
R. K. Ramanathan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Sensory Neuropathy ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Significant Activity ◽  
Heavily Pretreated ◽  
And Function

3595 Background: Ispinesib(SB-715992) is a polycyclic, nitrogen-containing heterocycle that inhibits the mitotic kinesin spindle protein (KSP). KSP is essential for mitotic spindle assembly and function during mitosis, and is a rational target of anti-cancer therapy. This phase II study used two different dosing schedules; the primary objective was to determine the response rate (RR) and the secondary objectives were to determine time to tumor progression (TTP), progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and toxicity. Methods: Patients (pts) were randomized to receive (Arm A) ispinesib 7 mg/m2 every week for 3 weeks, every 28 days or (Arm B) 18 mg/m2 every 21 days. Response was assessed every 6 weeks. Chemotherapy was administered until disease progression or intolerance. Results: A total of 64 pts were accrued. The median number of cycles was 2 for both arms. Five pts had stable disease and 48 had progressive disease. PFS was 49 days in Arm A (44 to 51) and 37 days in Arm B (35 to 42 days). The most common grade 3/4 toxicities in arms A and B respectively included neutropenia (3 and 20), nausea and vomiting (3 and 1), neurologic (1 and 2). Of these, only 1 pt had febrile neutropenia and 1 pt had peripheral sensory neuropathy. The toxicity data is not available on 2 patients. Eleven pts are not evaluable for response yet. Conclusions: Ispinesib did not demonstrate significant activity in heavily pretreated patients with advanced/metastatic colorectal cancer at the dose and schedule employed in this trial. Correlative studies are in progress. Supported by NO1 CM17101 [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

A phase II trial of salvage treatment with gemcitabine and S-1 combination in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3595-3595
Author(s):  
Sun Jin Sym ◽  
Junshik Hong ◽  
Hee Kyung Ahn ◽  
Jinny Park ◽  
Eun Kyung Cho ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Disease Control ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Heavily Pretreated

3595 Background: We conducted a phase II trial of gemcitabine with S-1 to evaluate the activity and toxicity of such a combination in heavily pre-treated patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who have progressed after treatment with fluoropyrimidines-, oxaliplatin- and irinotecan-containing regimens. Methods: 36 pts were enrolled, with the following characteristics: 19 females (53%), median age 57 (28-72), 30 EOGO PS 0-1 (83%). S-1 was given orally (30 mg/m2) b.i.d for 14 consecutive days and gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2) was given on days 1 and 8, every 21 days, until disease progression and for a maximum of 9 cycles. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Results: The median number of cycles was 5 (range 1-9), ORR was 16.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 4.5-28.9%) and disease control rate was 61.1% (95% CI 45.2-77.0%) with 6 partial responses and 16 stable diseases. Median duration of disease control was 5.8 months (95% CI 4.1-7.5 months). Median progression-free survival was 3.7 months (95% CI 2.2-5.2 months) and median overall survival was 10.0 months (95% CI 7.4-12.7 months). Grade 3-4 toxicities were rare (neutropenia 12%, anemia 11%, leucopenia 6%, thrombocytopenia 3% and diarrhea 3%). Conclusions: Combination chemotherapy with gemcitabine and S-1 was a convenient, well tolerated and efficacious for heavily pre-treated pts with mCRC. This regimen warrants further evaluation in pts with good PS but no further treatment options.

A phase II trial of salvage treatment with gemcitabine and S-1 combination in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14137-e14137
Author(s):  
Sun Jin Sym ◽  
Junshik Hong ◽  
Minkyu Jung ◽  
Jinny Park ◽  
Eun Kyung Cho ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Disease Control ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Heavily Pretreated ◽  
Number Of Cycles

e14137 Background: We conducted a phase II trial of gemcitabine with S-1 to evaluate the activity and toxicity of such a combination in heavily pre-treated patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who have progressed after treatment with 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin and irinotecan. Methods: Between Dec 2009 and Nov 2011, 23 pts were enrolled, with the following characteristics: 12 males and 11 females, median age 57 years (28-72). S-1 was given orally (30 mg/m2) b.i.d for 14 consecutive days and gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2) was given on days 1 and 8, every 21 days, until disease progression and for a maximum of 9 cycles. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Results: The median number of cycles was four (range 1-9). OR was 8.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0-20.2) and disease control rate was 56.5% (95% CI 36.4-76.9) with two partial responses and eleven stable diseases. Median duration of disease control was 8.5 months (95% CI 3.8-13.2). Median progression-free survival was 3.2 months (95% CI 1.9-4.5) and median overall survival was 11.8 months (95% CI 4.0-19.5). Grade 3-4 toxicities were neutropenia (8%) and thrombocytopenia (4%). Conclusions: Combination chemotherapy with gemcitabine and S-1 was well tolerated and efficacious for refractory mCRC pts.

Cetuximab Plus Irinotecan in Heavily Pretreated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Progressing on Irinotecan: MABEL Study

2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (33) ◽  
pp. 5335-5343 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hansjochen Wilke ◽  
Robert Glynne-Jones ◽  
Josef Thaler ◽  
Antoine Adenis ◽  
Peter Preusser ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Practice Setting ◽  
Community Practice ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Intention To Treat ◽  
Heavily Pretreated ◽  
N 93

Purpose This large, multinational study aimed to confirm in a community practice setting the efficacy and safety of cetuximab plus irinotecan in patients with epidermal growth factor–expressing metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who had recently failed an irinotecan-containing regimen. Patients and Methods The primary objective was to determine the progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 12 weeks. The initial cetuximab dose was 400 mg/m2 and was followed weekly by 250 mg/m2; irinotecan (according to prestudy regimen) was given weekly (125 mg/m2 weekly for 4 of 6 weeks), every 2 weeks (180 mg/m2 each), or every 3 weeks (350 mg/m2 each). Results The intention-to-treat/safety population comprised 1,147 treated patients who received irinotecan weekly (n = 93); every 2 weeks (n = 670); every 3 weeks (n = 356); or another dose (n = 28). The PFS rate at 12 weeks was 61%, and the median survival was 9.2 months. Treatment was generally well tolerated. The most common treatment-related grades 3 to 4 adverse events were diarrhea (19%), neutropenia (10%), rash (7%), and asthenia (6%). The rate of grades 3 to 4 infusion-related reactions (IRRs; composite adverse event category) was 1% for patients who received both antihistamine and corticosteroid premedication. Conclusion Tolerability (except IRR incidence), PFS rate, and overall survival rate were in line with previous results. At 1%, the rate of IRRs in patients who received prophylactic premedication with both antihistamine and corticosteroid is lower than previously reported. MABEL clearly confirms in a community practice setting the efficacy and safety of cetuximab plus irinotecan in the treatment of mCRC.

A phase II trial of salvage treatment with gemcitabine and S-1 combination in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 488-488 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sun Jin Sym ◽  
Junshik Hong ◽  
Hee Kyung Ahn ◽  
Jinny Park ◽  
Eun Kyung Cho ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Disease Control ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Ecog Ps

488 Background: We conducted a phase II trial of gemcitabine with S-1 to evaluate the activity and toxicity of such a combination in heavily pre-treated patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who have progressed after treatment with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), oxaliplatin and irinotecan. Methods: 34 pts were enrolled, with the following characteristics: 17 (50%) females, median age 57 years (28-72), 28 (82%) ECOG PS 0-1. S-1 was given orally (30 mg/m2) b.i.d for 14 consecutive days and gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2) was given on days 1 and 8, every 21 days, until disease progression and for a maximum of 9 cycles. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Results: The median number of cycles was four (range 1-9). ORR was 14.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.8-26.6) and disease control rate was 58.8% (95% CI 42.2-75.3) with five partial responses and fifteen stable diseases. Median duration of disease control was 5.1 months (95% CI 3.3-7.0). Median progression-free survival was 3.2 months (95% CI 2.3-4.1) and median overall survival was 11.8 months (95% CI 7.0-16.5). Grade 3-4 toxicities were neutropenia (12%), anemia (12%), thrombocytopenia (3%) and diarrhea (3%). Conclusions: Combination chemotherapy with gemcitabine and S-1 was well tolerated and efficacious for heavily pre-treated mCRC pts, and could be an alternative for pts with good PS but no further treatment options.

Intravenous weekly high-dose infusion of 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid in previously heavily pretreated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 766-766
Author(s):  
Gudrun Piringer ◽  
Verena Huber ◽  
Sonja Burgstaller ◽  
Martin Weninger ◽  
Andreas Karrer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Folinic Acid ◽  
Retrospective Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Median Number ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Dose Infusion ◽  
Heavily Pretreated ◽  
Pretreated Patients

766 Background: Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) usually receive multiple lines of treatment. Using a present day standard 1st line chemotherapy combination a progression free survival in the range of 8-12 months can be obtained. With consecutive treatment lines the median survival has now exceeded the 2-year landmark. In case of disease progression after two or more lines of treatment, the survival is about 4-6 months with best supportive care alone. However, some patients are still able and willing to receive further therapy. In the present retrospective analysis the efficacy of a weekly intravenous high-dose infusion of 5-Fluorouracil and folinic acid in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic CRC beyond the standard chemotherapy lines was evaluated. Methods: The Klinikum Wels-Grieskirchen collects data on all CRC patients since July 2006 in a clinical tumor registry. In this retrospective analysis pretreated CRC patients that were treated with the Ardalan-regimen (500mg/m2 folinic acid as 1 hour infusion followed by 2.600mg/m25-Fluorouracil as 24-hour infusion) have been evaluated. Results: A total of 23 evaluable patients with a median age of 66 years received the Ardalan-regimen as 2nd (4.4%), 3rd (13%), 4th (13%), 5th (52.2%), 6th (4.4%) or 7th (13%) line treatment. The median number of cycles received was 9 (range 2-18) and the Ardalan-regimen was started within 13-56 months (median 26 months) after the diagnosis of metastatic disease. Fourteen (60.9%) and nine (39.1%) out of these patients were women and men, respectively. 60.9% (14 patients) had a tumor located in the colon and 39.1% had rectal cancer. 17.4% of patients had stable disease and 65.2% of patients had progressive disease after 3 months of therapy. In 4 patients response according to RECIST criteria was not evaluable. Median overall survival since the start of the Ardalan-regimen was 6.7 months. Conclusions: Patients with advanced metastatic CRC can be candidates for multiple lines of therapy. In previously heavily pretreated patients, the Ardalan-regimen is able to control the disease in a limited proportion of patients.

Sorafenib and irinotecan combination for pre-treated RAS-mutated metastatic colorectal cancer patients: A multicentre randomized phase II trial (NEXIRI 2).

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 635-635 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emmanuelle Samalin ◽  
Christelle De La Fouchardiere ◽  
Simon Thezenas ◽  
Valérie Boige ◽  
Hélène Senellart ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Fixed Dose ◽  
Randomized Phase Ii ◽  
Heavily Pretreated ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Patients

635 Background: Sorafenib and irinotecan (NEXIRI regimen) showed promising activity with a disease control rate (DCR) of 65% in heavily pretreated mutated (mt) KRAS metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients in a phase I/II trial (Samalin et al. 2014).This multicentre randomized phase II trial aimed to determine the 2-month progression-free survival rate (2-PFS) of NEXIRI versus irinotecan or sorafenib monotherapy in mtRAS mCRC patients after failure of all approved active drugs at the time of the study. Methods: Patients PS ≤ 1 with progressive measurable and non-resectable mtKRAS (then RAS) mCRC pre-treated with irinotecan, oxaliplatin, fluoropyrimidines and bevacizumab (none regorafenib), were randomized in 3 arms: NEXIRI (irinotecan IV 120 (C1), 150 (C2) and 180mg/m² (C3) if diarrhea grade < 1 in a biweekly regimen combined with a fixed dose of sorafenib, 400mg twice daily) versus irinotecan alone (180mg/m²) versus sorafenib alone until progression or toxicity, with cross over to NEXIRI at progression for the monotherapy arms. The primary endpoint was the 2-PFS (RECIST v1.1). Pharmacokinetic, pharmacogenetics and pathologic translational studies were undertaken. Results: We included 173 patients (median age 62 [31-82]; PS 0/1: 38/61%) between 2012/09 and 2014/07 in 17 French centres. Main results are shown below (median follow-up 17.5 months). Conclusions: We confirmed the NEXIRI regimen efficacy in a randomized study for refractory mtRAS mCRC patients. These results justify comparing this combination to regorafenib or TAS 102 monotherapies in this population. Ancillary studies are ongoing to identify biomarkers. Clinical trial information: NCT01715441. [Table: see text]

Maintenance treatment with cetuximab versus observation in RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: Results of the randomized phase II PRODIGE 28-time UNICANCER study.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 15-15
Author(s):  
Valerie Boige ◽  
Eric FRANCOIS ◽  
Meher BEN Abdelghani ◽  
Jean Marc Phelip ◽  
Valerie Le Brun-Ly ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Tumor Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Circulating Tumor Dna ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Randomized Phase Ii

15 Background: Compared to observation, maintenance therapy with a fluoropyrimidine +/- bevacizumab showed significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) but not in overall survival (OS) in patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and disease control after first-line doublet chemotherapy (CT) +/- bevacizumab. Few studies are available on the role of maintenance therapy after induction anti-EGFR-based CT, and the benefit from anti-EGFR maintenance monotherapy during CT-free intervals (CFI) in patients with RAS wild-type (wt) mCRC. Methods: RAS wt unresectable mCRC patients with controlled disease after FOLFIRI + cetuximab (8 cycles) were randomized (1:1) to receive maintenance with bi-weekly cetuximab alone (arm A) or observation (arm B) until disease progression (PD)/unacceptable toxicity/death. Randomization was stratified according to tumor response, center, baseline Köhne Score, CEA and platelet count. In case of tumor progression during the CFI, FOLFIRI + cetuximab was to be reintroduced for 8 cycles, followed by a new CFI. Tumor response was assessed per RECIST1.1 every 8 weeks. The primary objective of this multicenter non-comparative randomized phase II trial was 6-month PFS rate after initiation of maintenance therapy. A total of 134 randomized and evaluable patients (67 per arm) were required (Fleming’s one-step design, one-sided α=5%, β=20%, H0: 40%; H1: 55%). Secondary endpoints were overall response rate (ORR), time to strategy failure, PFS, OS, safety, quality of life, circulating tumor cells and circulating tumor DNA detection and dynamic changes during treatment. Results: From January 2014 to April 2019, 214 patients were included and 139 randomized (67 arm A/72 arm B) in 35 centers. Baseline characteristics were: males, 67%/69%; median age, 64/68 years; ECOG PS 0, 54%/46%; previous adjuvant therapy, 25%/14%; single metastatic site, 58%/47%; right-sided primary, 24%/18%. The ORR in the overall and the randomized population was 55% and 72%, respectively. The median follow-up was 30 months. The 6-month PFS rate after initiation of maintenance therapy was 30% 95%CI[19; 42] in the maintenance arm, and 6% 95%CI[2;14] in the observation arm, with a median PFS of 5.3 95%CI[3.7;6.5] and 2.0 95%CI[1.8;2.8] months, respectively. Any grade treatment-related toxicity, including skin rash (40%/4%), diarrhea (33%/8%), and hypomagnesemia (46%/10%) was more frequent in arm A. Conclusions: Based on the study hypothesis, the cetuximab maintenance arm did not meet the primary objective. However, the clinically meaningful difference in PFS without any overlap in the confidence intervals between the two arms warrants further investigation. Clinical trial information: NCT02404935.

Multicenter phase Ib/II study of biweekly trifluridine/tipiracil with bevacizumab combination for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to standard therapies (BiTS study).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 647-647
Author(s):  
Masahito Kotaka ◽  
Hironaga Satake ◽  
Koji Oba ◽  
Yoshinori Kagawa ◽  
Hisateru Yasui ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Statistical Power ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Ib ◽  
Multicenter Phase ◽  
Heavily Pretreated ◽  
Recommended Phase Ii Dose ◽  
Ecog Ps

647 Background: Trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) plus bevacizumab (Bmab) combination therapy has shown a promising activity with manageable safety profile in patients (pts) with heavily pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The aim of this multicenter, phase Ib/II study was to assess the activity and safety of biweekly FTD/TPI with Bmab combination for pts with mCRC who were refractory or intolerant to standard therapies. Methods: Inclusion criteria were ≥ 20 years; histologically confirmed unresectable mCRC; refractory or intolerant to fluoropyrimidine, irinotecan, oxaliplatin, anti-VEGF therapy, and anti-EGFR therapy (for tumors with wild-type RAS); ECOG PS 0 or 1; evaluable lesion according to the RECIST version 1.1. Phase Ib part is designed to determine the recommended phase II dose (RP2D), and pts received the RP2D in phase Ib part were included in efficacy and safety populations. The primary endpoint in phase II part was an investigator assessed progression-free survival rate at 16 weeks (16w-PFS) with a hypothesis of 15% considered unacceptable and 38.7% deemed promising. Given a one-sided α of 0.025 and statistical power of 90%, a minimum of 40 pts were required for phase II part. Results: From October 2017 to January 2018, totally 46 pts were enrolled (6 pts in phase Ib and 40 pts in phase II). The RP2D was determined to be 5 mg/kg for Bmab and 30 mg/m2 for FTD/TPI in phase Ib. Of the 44 eligible pts (median age, 69; male, 55%; PS 0, 57%; right-sided primary, 29.5%), 16w-PFS rate was 40.9 % (95% CI: 26.3 to 56.8 %) and the null hypothesis of 16w-PFS rate ≤ 15% was rejected (p < 0.0001). Response rate and disease control rate were 0 % (95 %CI: 0 to 6.6 %) and 59.1 % (95%CI: 43.3 to 73.7 %), respectively. With a median follow up of 5.86 months (range, 1.53-9.79), median PFS was 4.25 months (95% CI: 2.54 to 5.57). Grade 3 or higher adverse events were hypertension (40.9%), neutropenia (11.4 %), leucopenia (11.4 %), anemia (9.1 %), anorexia (9.1 %), nausea (6.8 %), hyperbilirubinemia (6.8 %) and proteinuria (6.8 %). Conclusions: Bi-weekly FTD/TPI plus Bmab showed promising anti-tumor effect with acceptable toxicities. Clinical trial information: UMIN000029198.

scholarly journals Dual VEGF inhibition with sorafenib and bevacizumab as salvage therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer: results of the phase II North Central Cancer Treatment Group study N054C (Alliance)

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 175883592091091 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hao Xie ◽  
Jacqueline M. Lafky ◽  
Bruce W. Morlan ◽  
Philip J. Stella ◽  
Shaker R. Dakhil ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Salvage Therapy ◽  
Standard Therapy ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Heavily Pretreated ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Endothelial Growth Factor

Background: Bevacizumab (BEV), a monoclonal antibody against vascular endothelial growth factor-A (VEGF-A), is a standard component of medical therapy of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Activation of alternative angiogenesis pathways has been implicated in resistance to BEV. This phase II study examines the activity of combined vertical blockade of VEGF signaling with sorafenib and BEV as salvage therapy in patients with progressive disease (PD) on all standard therapy in mCRC. Methods: mCRC patients with documented PD on standard therapy, received sorafenib (200 mg orally twice daily, days 1–5 and 8–12) and BEV (5 mg/kg intravenously, day 1) every 2 weeks. Primary endpoint was 3-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate and secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), response rate (RR), safety, and feasibility. Results: Of the 83 patients enrolled, 79 were evaluable. Of these, 42 (53%) were progression-free at 3 months. Median PFS was 3.5 months and median OS was 8.3 months. One patient had a partial response and 50 patients (63.3%) had at least one stable tumor assessment. Of 79 evaluable patients, 54 (68%) experienced grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) at least possibly related to treatment. Most frequent grade 3/4 AEs were: fatigue (24.1%), hypertension (16.5%), elevated lipase (8.9%), hand-foot skin reaction (8.9%), diarrhea (7.6%), and proteinuria (7.6%). Reasons for treatment discontinuation were PD (72%), AEs (18%), patient refusal (8%), physician decision (1%), and death (1%). Conclusions: The combination of BEV and sorafenib as salvage therapy in heavily pretreated mCRC patients is tolerable and manageable, with evidence of promising activity. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00826540, URL: http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00826540

Phase II trial of oral S-1 plus bevacizumab for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to standard chemotherapies (CCOG-1105 study).

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 841-841
Author(s):  
Kazuhiro Ezaka ◽  
Goro Nakayama ◽  
Hiroyuki Yokoyama ◽  
Takanori Matsui ◽  
Shinichi Umeda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Previous Treatment ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Japanese Patients ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Mutant Type ◽  
Number Of Treatment

841 Background: The aim of this multicenter, single-arm phase II trial was to investigate the efficacy and safety of S-1 plus bevacizumab (BEV) as a salvage treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) refractory to standard chemotherapies. Methods: Patients who had unresectable mCRC with mutant-type KRAS; were refractory to fluoropyrimidine, irinotecan, oxaliplatin; and had previous treatment with BEV were enrolled and received S-1 plus BEV therapy (bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kg on day 1 and S-1 40-60 mg bid on day 1-14, every 3 weeks). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), and secondary end points included overall survival (OS), tumor response, and safety. Results: A total of 27 patients were enrolled. After a median follow-up period of 12.3 months, the events of disease progression and death occurred in 26 patients (96%) and 20patients (74%), respectively. The median number of treatment cycles was 3 (range, 1-17 cycles). Median PFS was 2.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.2-2.4 months), and the median OS was 7.7 months (95% CI, 4.3-10.1 months). The overall response and disease control rates were 0% and 33%, respectively. The median tumor shrinkage rate (DpR) was -15% (range, -59 to 15%). The frequencies of hematological and non-hematological adverse events above grade three were 25% and 8%, respectively. Conclusions: S-1 plus BEV therapy could be feasible salvage line treatment for Japanese patients with mCRC refractory to standard chemotherapies. Clinical trial information: UMIN000006476.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document