Method of detection of local recurrence in patients following breast conserving surgery and its utility for surveillance

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 611-611
Author(s):  
B. Taback ◽  
N. Hansen ◽  
K. Conway ◽  
A. Giuliano
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Local Recurrence ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Ductal Carcinoma ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Breast Conserving Surgery ◽  
Conclusive Evidence ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Asymptomatic Patients

611 Background: It is estimated that approximately 10% of all breast cancer patients will develop local recurrence (LR) at 10 years. Routine surveillance for detection of early breast cancer recurrence is widely performed despite lack of conclusive evidence for an improvement in patient quality of life or potential for cure. A number of historical studies evaluating the effectiveness of routine screening for LR following treatment for early-stage breast cancer have suggested that the diagnosis of LR is more frequent during a routine visit and occurring in asymptomatic patients. However, differentiating the method of detection is not often elucidated. In this study we evaluated the manner in which patients presented with an isolated LR in clinical practice. Methods: Our routine patient follow-up consists of physical exam and mammogram every 6 mos for the first 2 years following breast conserving surgery (BCS) and yearly thereafter. We queried our prospectively collected breast cancer database (1632 patients from July 1986 - July 2004) for patients with an isolated LR following BCS (n=59 (3.6%); two patients had bilateral LRs). Medical records were not available for three patients. Results: At a median follow-up of 45 mos (range: 5–122 mos) there were 58 evaluable LRs: 15 DCIS, 31 infiltrating ductal carcinoma (IDC), 6 infiltrating lobular (ILC), 2 mixed IDC/ILC, 3 invasive cancers NOS and 1 unknown. Patient presentation was as follows: 25 were diagnosed by self-exam, 28 on screening mammogram, 2 were diagnosed by physician (includes one referral), and 3 unknown. Mammogram detected recurrences were more frequent among patients with DCIS whereas self-detected recurrences were more common in patients with IDC (79% vs 33% and 21% vs 67%, respectively; P<0.2). Mean tumor size was larger in self-presentation (2.1 cm; range: 0.8–4.5 cm) than in mammogram detected group (1.6 cm; range 0.4–6 cm). Conclusions: These findings demonstrate the value of mammography as compared to patient detected LRs. Whether a survival advantage exists remains uncertain. Nevertheless routine physician examination in this setting is highly insensitive and its further utility must be considered when devising cost-effective strategies for surveillance of breast cancer patients. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

scholarly journals 113P Impact of local recurrence on disease-specific survival in breast cancer patients who underwent breast-conserving surgery

2020 ◽  
Vol 31 ◽  
pp. S54
Author(s):  
D.G. Tiezzi ◽  
L. de Mattos ◽  
L.F. Orlandini ◽  
F.J. Candido Dos Reis ◽  
H.H. Carrara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Local Recurrence ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Breast Conserving Surgery ◽  
Disease Specific Survival ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Disease Specific

10-year follow-up of the efficacy of clodronate on bone mineral density (BMD) in early stage breast cancer

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 676-676 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Saarto ◽  
L. Vehmanen ◽  
C. Blomqvist ◽  
I. Elomaa
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Bone Loss ◽  
Postmenopausal Women ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Lumbar Vertebrae ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Mineral Density

676 Background: We have previously reported that clodronate prevents bone loss in breast cancer patients (JCO 1997;15:1341, BJC 1997;75(4):602 and EJC 2001;37:2373). Here we report the 10-year follow-up data. Methods: 268 pre- (PRE) and postmenopausal (POST) node positive breast cancer patients were randomized to clodronate (CL), orally 1.6 g daily, or control groups for 3 years. PRE were treated with adjuvant chemotherapy and POST with antiestrogens (AE), tamoxifen 20 mg or toremifene 60 mg, for 3 years. The BMD of the lumbar vertebrae L1–4 (BMDLS) and femoral neck (BMDFN) was measured before the treatment and at 1, 2, 3, 5 and 10 years. 93 patients were eligible for 10-year analyses: 53 PRE and 40 POST. 132 patients had metastatic disease or died and 39 were either lost to follow-up or had to be excluded because having diseases or medications that influences bone metabolism. Results: PRE: BMDLS decreased -12.4% in the control and −8.7% in the CL group in 10 years: from 0 to 3 years −6.9 % vs. −4.2% and from 3 to 10 years −5.5% and −4.5%, respectively. BMDFN decreased −8.8% and −7.2%: from 0 to 3 years −2.9% vs. −2.6% and from 3 to 10 years −5.9% vs. −4.6%, respectively. POST: BMDLS decreased −3.0% in the AE and −1.7% in the AE+CL group in 10 years: from 0 to 3 years −1.5% vs. + 1.2% and from 3 to 10 years −1.5% vs. −2.9%, respectively. BMDFN decreased −7.7% and −6.0%: from 0 to 3 years −0.1% vs. +1.9% and from 3 to 10 years −7.6% vs. −7.9%, respectively. These differences do not reach statistical significance. At 10-years 18 patients had osteoporosis in LS and 15 in FN. Only 4 patients who had osteoporosis at 10 years had normal BMD before the therapy. Conclusions: As reported previously, clodronate prevents the bone loss during treatment in pre- and postmenopausal women. This beneficial effect seems to be maintained at least for 7 years after treatment termination in premenopausal. In postmenopausal women the effect seems to diminish within time. Due to small numbers of patients these differences are no longer statistically significant. Patients at risk of developing osteoporosis are among those who has pretreatment osteopenia i.e. baseline BMD measurement has predictive value. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Early-stage male breast cancer: A 10-year experience

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e11630-e11630
Author(s):  
N. Gercovich ◽  
E. Gil Deza ◽  
M. Russo ◽  
C. Garcia Gerardi ◽  
C. Diaz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Male Breast Cancer ◽  
Ductal Carcinoma ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Male Breast ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Breast Cancers ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients

e11630 Introduction: Male breast cancer is very rare, representing only between 0.7% and 1% of all breast cancers, and only half of them are early stage cases. Objective: The present study has been designed with the aim of studying retrospectively the clinical onset and evolution of male invasive breast cancer patients (stages I and II) treated at IOHM between 1997 and 2008. Methods: The records of 3,000 breast cancer cases followed between 1997 and 2008 were searched, looking for male stage I and II breast cancer patients. A database was designed following the recommendations of the Directors of Surgical Pathology of the USA. The information registered encompassed: adjuvant treatments, recurrence date and date of final consultation or death. Results: Twelve pts were identified. Mean age (range)= 66 yo (50–89 yo). Tumoral type= Invasive Ductal Carcinoma 12 pt. Tumoral subtype= NOS 9 pt (75%) Apocrine 2 pt (17%) Micropapillar 1 pt (8%). Nottingham´s grade= Grade 2: 8 pt, Grade 3: 3 pt, N/A=1 pt. Stage= I= 6 pt, II=6 pt. ER (Positve= 9 pt, Negative=1 pt, N/A= 2 pt). PR (Positve= 8 pt, Negative= 2 pt, N/A=2 pt). Her2neu (0+= 3 pt, 1+= 3 pt, 2+= 2 pt, N/A= 4 pt). Surgery= Mastectomy= 11 pt, Lumpectomy 1= pt. Radiotherapy=5 pt. Adjuvance= No=2 pt, Hormonotherapy (HT)= 3 pt, Chemotherapy (CHT) = 3 pt, CHT+HT= 4 pt. Recurrence= Yes= 2 pt, No= 10 pt. Survival: Dead= 1 pt, Alive =11 pt. Mean Time To Progression= Stage I =66 months, Stage II =42 months. Global survival: Stage I =66 months, Stage II =52 months. Conclusions: 1. Twelve stage I and II male breast cancer patients were identified out of 3000 (0.4%) breast cancer cases diagnosed and followed in the past 10 years at the IOHM. 2. Mastectomy was the surgical procedure in 11 of the 12 cases 3. Ten pt underwent adjuvant treatment. 4. With a mean follow up time of 60 months, all stage I patients are alive and there were no recurrences. Two of the 6 stage II pts progressed and one died. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

scholarly journals Postoperative radiotherapy after conservative surgery for early breast cancer: 5-year results

2004 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-33
Author(s):  
Jasmina Mladenovic ◽  
Marko Dozic ◽  
Nenad Borojevic
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Early Breast Cancer ◽  
Systemic Therapy ◽  
Postoperative Radiotherapy ◽  
Breast Conserving Surgery ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Disease Free

BACKGROUND: Breast conserving surgery followed by postoperative radiotherapy, as alternative to radical mastectomy, has been accepted as an optimal method for loco- regional treatment of the majority of women with early stage of breast carcinoma. The aim of the study was to evaluate the results of postoperative radiotherapy after breast conserving surgery in the Institute for oncology and radiology of Serbia. METHODS: During the 3-year period, 109 breast cancer patients with stage I and II were treated with postoperative radiotherapy after breast conserving surgery. Ninety- four patients underwent quadrantectomy with axillary node dissection, and 15 patients underwent only tumorectomy. After surgery all patients received postoperative radiotherapy to the whole breast with tumor dose 50 Gy in 15 fractions every second day. In 52 patients radiotherapy was given to the regional lymphatics with tumor dose 45 Gy in 15 fractions every second day. Twenty-eight patients received a booster dose (10 Gy) to the tumor bed. Adjuvant systemic therapy was administered depending on the nodal involvement and steroid receptors content: 17 patients received adjuvant chemotherapy (CMF or FAC), 18 received adjuvant hormonal therapy (tamoxifen or ovarian ablation), and 6 patients received both chemo- and hormonotherapy. RESULTS: After median follow-up period of 62 months, there was no evidence of loco- regional recurrence in anyone of patients. Distant metastases occurred in 7 patients (6.4%) with median disease free interval of 27.6 months. At last follow-up 91 patients (83.4%) were alive, 4 patients (3.7%) were dead of disease, and the same number was dead of other causes. The 5-year overall survival rate was 92.9% and disease-free survival rate was 92.7%. CONCLUSION: According to our results the combined surgery and radiotherapy approach provides good local control of early breast cancer patients. Postoperative radiotherapy after breast conserving surgery with or without adjuvant systemic therapy has important role in adjuvant treatment of early breast cancer.

Second Malignancies After Treatment of Early-Stage Breast Cancer: Lumpectomy and Radiation Therapy Versus Mastectomy

2000 ◽  
Vol 18 (12) ◽  
pp. 2406-2412 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward Obedian ◽  
Diana B. Fischer ◽  
Bruce G. Haffty
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Hormone Therapy ◽  
Detailed Analysis ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Contralateral Breast ◽  
Second Malignancies ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients

PURPOSE: To determine the risk of second malignancies after lumpectomy and radiation therapy (LRT), and to compare it with that in a similar cohort of early-stage breast cancer patients undergoing mastectomy without radiation (MAST). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 1970 and December 1990, 1,029 breast cancer patients at our institution underwent LRT. A cohort of 1,387 breast cancer patients who underwent surgical treatment by mastectomy (MAST), and who did not receive postoperative radiation during the same time period, served as a comparison group. Second malignancies were categorized as contralateral breast versus nonbreast. In the cohort of patients undergoing LRT, a detailed analysis was carried out with respect to age, disease stage, smoking history, radiation therapy technique, dose, the use of chemotherapy or hormone therapy, and other clinical and/or pathologic characteristics. RESULTS: As of March 1999, the median follow-up was 14.6 years for the LRT group and 16 years for the MAST group. The 15-year risk of any second malignancy was nearly identical for both cohorts (17.5% v 19%, respectively). The second breast malignancy rate at 15 years was 10% for both the MAST and LRT groups. The 15-year risk of a second nonbreast malignancy was 11% for the LRT and 10% for the MAST group. In the subset of patients 45 years of age or younger at the time of treatment, the second breast and nonbreast malignancy rates at 15 years were 10% and 5% for patients undergoing LRT versus 7% and 4% for patients undergoing mastectomy (P, not statistically significant). In the detailed analysis of LRT patients, second lung malignancies were associated with a history of tobacco use. There were fewer contralateral breast tumors in patients undergoing adjuvant hormone therapy, although this did not reach statistical significance. The adjuvant use of chemotherapy did not significantly affect the risk of second malignancies. CONCLUSION: There seems to be no increased risk of second malignancies in patients undergoing LRT using modern techniques, compared with MAST. Continued monitoring of these patient cohorts will be required in order to document that these findings are maintained with even longer follow-up periods. With nearly 15 years median follow-up periods, however, these data should be reassuring to women who are considering LRT as a treatment option.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document