scholarly journals Pediatric Phase I and Pharmacokinetic Study of Erlotinib Followed by the Combination of Erlotinib and Temozolomide: A Children's Oncology Group Phase I Consortium Study

2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (30) ◽  
pp. 4921-4927 ◽  
Author(s):  
Regina I. Jakacki ◽  
Marta Hamilton ◽  
Richard J. Gilbertson ◽  
Susan M. Blaney ◽  
Jean Tersak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Study ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Receptor Expression ◽  
Dose Finding ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Studies ◽  
Mixed Response

Purpose We conducted a phase I and pharmacokinetic study of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor erlotinib as a single agent and in combination with temozolomide in children with refractory solid tumors. Patients and Methods Erlotinib was administered orally once daily to cohorts of three to six children for a single 28-day course. Patients then received the combination of daily erlotinib and temozolomide daily for 5 days for all subsequent 28-day courses. An oral erlotinib solution was administered during the dose-finding phase and a tablet formulation was subsequently studied at the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD). Pharmacokinetic studies and ERBB-receptor expression and signaling studies were performed. Results Forty-six patients, median age 11.5 years, received erlotinib at doses of 35, 50, 65, 85, or 110 mg/m2/d. At 110 mg/m2/d, two of four patients had dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) consisting of rash and hyperbilirubinemia, whereas one of six patients developed dose-limiting rash at 85 mg/m2/d. The most frequent non-DLTs included diarrhea, rash, and hyperbilirubinemia. The combination of erlotinib and temozolomide was well tolerated. The median apparent erlotinib clearance was 3.1 L/h/m2 and the median terminal half-life was 8.7 hours. One patient with a neurocytoma had stable disease for 19 months, two patients with neuroblastoma remained on study for 23 and 24 months, and one patient with myoepithelioma had a mixed response. Conclusion The recommended phase II dose of erlotinib in recurrent pediatric solid tumors is 85 mg/m2/d, either alone or in combination with temozolomide.

Phase I Trial and Pharmacokinetic Study of Pemetrexed in Children With Refractory Solid Tumors: The Children's Oncology Group

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (12) ◽  
pp. 1505-1511 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suman Malempati ◽  
H. Stacy Nicholson ◽  
Joel M. Reid ◽  
Susan M. Blaney ◽  
Ashish M. Ingle ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Folic Acid ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Study ◽  
Phase I Trial ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Vitamin B ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Studies ◽  
Purine Nucleotides ◽  
Phase Ii Studies

Purpose We report results of a phase I trial and pharmacokinetic study of pemetrexed (LY231514) in children and adolescents with refractory solid tumors. Pemetrexed is a novel antifolate that inhibits multiple enzymes necessary for the biosynthesis of thymidine and purine nucleotides. The purpose of this study was to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), and pharmacokinetic properties of pemetrexed in children. Patients and Methods Pemetrexed was administered as a 10-minute intravenous infusion every 21 days. Patients received vitamin B12 and folic acid supplementation as well as dexamethasone prophylaxis. Cohorts of three to six children were enrolled at dose levels of 400, 520, 670, 870, 1,130, 1,470, 1,910, and 2,480 mg/m2. Pharmacokinetic studies were performed during the first course of treatment. Results Thirty-three patients (31 assessable) with a median age of 12 years were enrolled. DLT occurred in one of six patients at 1,470 mg/m2 and two of four patients at 2,480 mg/m2. The MTD was 1,910 mg/m2. The primary DLTs were neutropenia and rash. No objective antitumor responses were seen. Mean plasma clearance, half-life, and steady-state volume of distribution values were 2.3 L/h/m2, 2.5 hours, and 5.4 L/m2, respectively. Conclusion Pemetrexed is well-tolerated in children with refractory solid tumors at doses similar to the MTD in adults. The recommended dose for phase II studies is 1,910 mg/m2 administered every 21 days with dexamethasone, folic acid, and vitamin B12 supplementation.

scholarly journals Pediatric Phase I Trial and Pharmacokinetic Study of Vorinostat: A Children's Oncology Group Phase I Consortium Report

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (22) ◽  
pp. 3623-3629 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maryam Fouladi ◽  
Julie R. Park ◽  
Clinton F. Stewart ◽  
Richard J. Gilbertson ◽  
Paula Schaiquevich ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Mononuclear Cells ◽  
Drug Disposition ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Studies ◽  
Peripheral Blood Mononuclear ◽  
Higher Doses

Purpose The purpose of this study was to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), and pharmacokinetics of vorinostat administered as a single agent and in combination 13-cis retinoic acid (13cRA) in children with refractory solid tumors; to evaluate the tolerability of the solid tumor MTD in children with refractory leukemias; and to characterize the pharmacokinetics of a vorinostat suspension in children. Patients and Methods Vorinostat was administered orally daily starting at 180 mg/m2/d with escalations planned in 30% increments. Pharmacokinetic studies were performed with the initial dose. Acetyl-histone (H3) accumulation was assessed by Western blotting of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC). Results Sixty-four patients were enrolled on this multipart trial. In patients with solid tumors, the MTD was 230 mg/m2/d with dose-limiting neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and hypokalemia at 300 mg/m2/d. DLTs observed with the combination of 13cRA and vorinostat included thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, anorexia, and hypertriglyceridemia, resulting in a MTD of vorinostat 180 mg/m2/d 4 times per week and 13cRA 80 mg/m2/dose twice per day, days 1 through 14 every 28 days. Wide interpatient variability was noted in vorinostat disposition, with area under the concentration-time curves at 230 mg/m2/d for the capsule (range, 1,415 to 9,291 ng/mL × hr) and oral suspension (range, 1,186 to 4,780 ng/mL × hr). Significant accumulation of acetylated H3 histone in PBMC was observed after administration of vorinostat, particularly at higher doses. One patient with neuroblastoma experienced a complete response to the combination. Conclusion In children with recurrent solid tumors, vorinostat is well-tolerated at 230 mg/m2/d, with a modest dose reduction being required when combining vorinostat with 13cRA. Drug disposition is similar to that observed in adults.

scholarly journals EPCT-19. A PHASE I STUDY OF RIBOCICLIB AND EVEROLIMUS FOLLOWING RADIATION THERAPY IN CHILDREN WITH NEWLY DIAGNOSED NON-BIOPSIED DIFFUSE PONTINE GLIOMAS (DIPG) AND RB+ BIOPSIED DIPG AND HIGH GRADE GLIOMAS (HGG)

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. iii307-iii307
Author(s):  
Mariko DeWire ◽  
James Leach ◽  
Christine Fuller ◽  
Peter de Blank ◽  
Trent Hummel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Studies ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
High Grade Gliomas ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Expansion Cohort

Abstract Genomic aberrations in the cell cycle and mTOR pathways have been reported in diffuse pontine gliomas (DIPG) and high-grade gliomas (HGG). Dual inhibition of CDK4/6 (ribociclib) and mTOR (everolimus) has strong biologic rationale, non-overlapping single-agent toxicities, and adult clinical experience. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and/or recommended phase two dose (RP2D) of ribociclib and everolimus administered during maintenance therapy following radiotherapy was determined in the phase I study as a rolling 6 design. Ribociclib and everolimus were administered once daily for 21 days and 28 days, respectively starting two-four weeks post completion of radiotherapy. All HGG patients and any DIPG patient who had undergone biopsy were screened for RB protein by immunohistochemistry. Eighteen eligible patients enrolled (median age 8 years; range: 2–18). Six patients enrolled at dose levels 1,2, and 3 without dose limiting toxicities (DLT). Currently, five patients are enrolled at dose level 3 expansion cohort. The median number of cycles are 4.5 (range: 1–20+). Among the expansion cohort, one dose limiting toxicity included a grade 3 infection and one patient required a dose reduction in course 3 due to grade 3 ALT and grade 4 hypokalemia. The most common grade 3/4 adverse events included neutropenia. Preliminary pharmacokinetic studies on 12 patients suggest an impact of ribociclib on everolimus pharmacokinetics. The MTD/RP2D of ribociclib and everolimus following radiotherapy in newly diagnosed DIPG and HGG is anticipated to be 170 mg/m2/day x 21 days and 1.5 mg/ m2/day every 28 days which is equivalent to the adult RP2D.

Dose-Finding Phase I Clinical and Pharmacokinetic Study of Orally Administered Irinotecan in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors

2006 ◽  
Vol 12 (12) ◽  
pp. 3774-3781 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isa E.L.M. Kuppens ◽  
Eric Dansin ◽  
Henk Boot ◽  
Celine Feger ◽  
Sylvia Assadourian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Study ◽  
Dose Finding ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors

Phase I and Pharmacokinetic Study of Docetaxel and Irinotecan in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors

2000 ◽  
Vol 18 (20) ◽  
pp. 3545-3552 ◽  
Author(s):  
Corinne Couteau ◽  
Marie-Laure Risse ◽  
Michel Ducreux ◽  
Florence Lefresne-Soulas ◽  
Alessandro Riva ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Febrile Neutropenia ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Study ◽  
Topoisomerase I ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase Ii Studies ◽  
Grade 3

PURPOSE: We conducted a phase I and pharmacokinetic study of docetaxel in combination with irinotecan to determine the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), and the dose at which at least 50% of the patients experienced a DLT during the first cycle, and to evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetic profiles in patients with advanced solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with only one prior chemotherapy treatment (without taxanes or topoisomerase I inhibitors) for advanced disease were included in the study. Docetaxel was administered as a 1-hour IV infusion after premedication with corticosteroids followed immediately by irinotecan as a 90-minute IV infusion, every 3 weeks. No hematologic growth factors were allowed. RESULTS: Forty patients were entered through the following seven dose levels (docetaxel/irinotecan): 40/140 mg/m2, 50/175 mg/m2, 60/210 mg/m2, 60/250 mg/m2, 60/275 mg/m2, 60/300 mg/m2, and 70/250 mg/m2. Two hundred cycles were administered. Two MTDs were determined, 70/250 mg/m2 and 60/300 mg/m2; the DLTs were febrile neutropenia and diarrhea. Neutropenia was the main hematologic toxicity, with 85% of patients experiencing grade 4 neutropenia. Grade 3/4 nonhematologic toxicities in patients included late diarrhea (7.5%), asthenia (15.0%), febrile neutropenia (22.5%), infection (7.5%), and nausea (5.0%). Pharmacokinetics of both docetaxel and irinotecan were not modified with the administration schedule of this study. CONCLUSION: The recommended dose of docetaxel in combination with irinotecan is 60/275 mg/m2, respectively. At this dose level, the safety profile is manageable. The activity of this combination should be evaluated in phase II studies in different tumor types.

Sequences of topotecan and cisplatin: phase I, pharmacologic, and in vitro studies to examine sequence dependence.

1996 ◽  
Vol 14 (12) ◽  
pp. 3074-3084 ◽  
Author(s):  
E K Rowinsky ◽  
S H Kaufmann ◽  
S D Baker ◽  
L B Grochow ◽  
T L Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Topoisomerase I ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
In Vitro Studies ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Studies ◽  
Sequence Dependence ◽  
Renal Tubular

PURPOSE A phase I and pharmacologic study was performed to evaluate the feasibility of administering the topoisomerase I (topo I) inhibitor topotecan (TPT) in combination with cisplatin (CDDP) in minimally pretreated adults with solid tumors. The study was designed to evaluate the magnitude of the toxicologic and pharmacologic differences between the two sequences of drug administration. MATERIALS AND METHODS TPT was administered as a 30-minute infusion daily for 5 days and CDDP was given either before TPT on day 1 or after TPT on day 5. Each patient was treated with both schedules on an alternating basis every 3 weeks. Sequential dose escalation of TPT or CDDP resulted in three dosage permutation of TPT/CDDP (mg/m2): 0.75/50, 1/50, and 0.75/75. After the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) level was achieved, the feasibility of using granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) to permit further dose escalation was studied. To examine the interaction of TPT and CDDP in vitro, human A549 lung cancer cells were exposed to these agents concurrently and sequentially. RESULTS Dose-limiting neutropenia and thrombocytopenia resulted after the doses of TPT or CDDP were increased to greater than 0.75 and 50 mg/m2, respectively, without and with G-CSF. The sequence of CDDP before TPT induced significantly worse neutropenia and thrombocytopenia than the alternate sequence. In vitro studies failed to provide any evidence for the differences in the cytotoxicity of these two sequences. Instead, pharmacokinetic studies suggested that the differences in toxicity were due, in part, to lower TPT clearance and exposure when CDDP preceeds TPT, possibly due to subclinical renal tubular toxicity induced by CDDP. CONCLUSION The sequence of CDDP before TPT at doses of 50 and 0.75 mg/m2, respectively, is recommended for subsequent clinical trials in tumor types in which both agents have significant single-agent activity. The potential for sequence-dependent cytotoxic, toxicologic, and pharmacologic effects should be evaluated in concurrent clinical and laboratory studies in the course of developing combination chemotherapy regimens that consist of topo I-targeting agents and other antineoplastic agents, particularly DNA-damaging agents.

Phase I evaluation of AZD2171, a highly potent and selective inhibitor of VEGFR signaling, in combination with selected chemotherapy regimens in patients with advanced solid tumors

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3034-3034 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. M. Lorusso ◽  
E. Heath ◽  
M. Valdivieso ◽  
M. Pilat ◽  
A. Wozniak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Selective Inhibitor ◽  
Minor Response ◽  
Heavily Pretreated ◽  
Grade 3

3034 Background: AZD2171 is an oral, potent, selective inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR). Trials have demonstrated that inhibition of the VEGF pathway, in combination with certain chemotherapy, provides benefit to patients with a broad range of solid tumors. Methods: This Phase I trial was conducted in heavily pretreated solid tumor patients. In a single protocol, escalating doses of AZD2171 were evaluated (20, 30 and 45 mg) in combination with four separate chemotherapy regimens: mFOLFOX6 (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2; 5-FU 400 mg/m2; leucovorin 400 mg/m2 q2 weeks; Arm 1); irinotecan 300 mg/m2 q3 week (Arm 2); docetaxel 75 mg/m2 (Arm 3) and pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 (Arm 4). The primary objective was to evaluate safety and tolerability of the combinations and secondary objective to evaluate pharmacokinetic (PK) interaction and clinical efficacy. Maximum tolerated dose (MTD) toxicity was defined through two cycles. Results: 46 patients have been enrolled: 28/35 evaluable for efficacy/toxicity. The MTD has been reached in two arms: Arm 2 - 20 mg AZD2171 and Arm 4 - 30 mg AZD2171. Arm 3 enrollment continues at 45 mg AZD2171. Two dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed in eight patients at 30 mg AZD2171 in Arm 1. Enrollment of an additional cohort of less heavily pre-treated patients is ongoing to determine the tolerability of 30 mg AZD2171 with FOLFOX. DLTs have included grade 3 fatigue in Arms 1, 2 & 4; grade 3 diarrhea in Arm 1; grade 3 hand-foot syndrome & grade 4 neutropenic fever in Arm 2; and grade 3 hypertension in Arm 4. AZD2171 did not appear to have a major effect on the PK profile of any chemotherapy regimen tested. Steady-state values are comparable with AZD2171 monotherapy. There have been 13 responses (minor response, n=5; partial response, n=6; complete response, n=2; stable disease ≥ 4 cycles, n=6) in heavily pretreated patients, some having demonstrated resistance to identical chemotherapies. Duration of response has been impressive (4-22+ cycles). Conclusions: AZD2171 combinations have been well tolerated with expected toxicities and encouraging responses. [Table: see text]

Phase I/II study of sorefenib and erlotinib for patients with recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) (NABTC 05–02)

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2005-2005
Author(s):  
M. Prados ◽  
M. Gilbert ◽  
J. Kuhn ◽  
K. Lamborn ◽  
T. Cloughesy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Outcome Data ◽  
Recurrent Glioblastoma ◽  
Dose Finding ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Studies ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Prior Chemotherapy ◽  
Grade 3

2005 Background: Single agent targeted therapy has been disappointing in GBM. Combination therapy simultaneously targeting both EGFR and the MAP kinase pathway may be more effective. Methods: The NABTC conducted a phase I/II study of sorafenib (VEGFR/PDGFR/Raf inhibitor) in combination with erlotinib (EGFR inhibitor) in recurrent GBM. Eligibility criteria included histologically proven GBM, radiologic progression, > 18 yrs old, KPS > 60, adequate bone marrow reserve, and organ function. There was no limit on the number of prior therapies for phase I and no more than two prior relapses for phase II. No enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs were allowed. Dose-finding used a standard 3 + 3 design and the MTD was defined as the dose with DLTs in 1/6 or fewer patients. The primary endpoint for the phase II component was PFS6 (p0 = 15%; p1 = 35%). A 2-stage design was used. If > 4 of the initial 19 patients achieved PFS6, an additional 14 patients would be accrued for a total of 33 patients. Results: In phase I, 17 patients were enrolled. Median age 50 years (35–69); median prior chemotherapy 1 (1–3). The initial doses were sorafenib 200 mg bid and erlotinib 100mg qd. MTD was 400 mg bid of sorafenib daily combined with 100 mg of erlotinib daily. At this dose 1/6 evaluable patients had a DLT (grade 4 lipase). Other grade 3 or 4 toxicities included transaminitis, hypertension, hypophosphatemia, and increased lipase. Pharmacokinetic studies showed no alterations in sorafenib PK, but no accumulation of erlotinib, suggesting a drug-drug interaction with sorafenib altering erlotinib metabolism or clearance. In phase II, 19 patients were accrued to stage I. Median age 51 years (30–75); median prior chemotherapy 2 (range 1–3). Phase II toxicity and outcome data are not yet mature but will be available at the time of presentation. Conclusions: This combination was moderately well-tolerated. MTD was below other combination phase I studies. Sorafenib affected the PK of erlotinib preventing drug accumulation. Phase II toxicity and outcome data will be reported. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals A Phase I, dose-finding and pharmacokinetic study of olaparib (AZD2281) in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors*,†

2012 ◽  
Vol 103 (3) ◽  
pp. 504-509 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noboru Yamamoto ◽  
Hiroshi Nokihara ◽  
Yasuhide Yamada ◽  
Yasushi Goto ◽  
Maki Tanioka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Study ◽  
Japanese Patients ◽  
Dose Finding ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors

A phase I study of IMC-11F8, a fully human anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) IgG1 monoclonal antibody in patients with solid tumors. Interim results

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3024-3024 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Kuenen ◽  
E. Witteveen ◽  
R. Ruijter ◽  
A. Ervin-Haynes ◽  
M. Tjin-A-ton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Monoclonal Antibody ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Igg1 Monoclonal Antibody ◽  
Initial Cohort ◽  
To Receive

3024 Background: This ongoing phase I study is being conducted to determine the safety profile and recommended dose of IMC-11F8, a fully-human IgG1 monoclonal antibody that targets the EGFR. Methods: Patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors who are refractory to or have no available standard therapy are eligible to receive IMC-11F8 intravenously either weekly or every other week for 6 weeks (1 cycle). The initial cohort of patients will receive 100 mg of IMC-11F8. In the absence of a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), dose escalation will be 200, 400, 600, 800, and 1000 mg in successive cohorts. Prior to the initial cycle, pts receive one IMC-11F8 infusion at their assigned cohort followed by a 2-week pharmacokinetic (PK) period. Pts with stable disease or better after cycle 1 are eligible to receive additional cycles of IMC-11F8. Results: 31 of 40 pts have been enrolled in the 100-, 200-, 400-, 600-, and 800-mg cohorts. Pt characteristics are M/F 20/11, median age 58 years (37 - 76), median ECOG score 1 (0–2). No DLTs have been observed. Only grade 1/2 skin rashes were reported. The most frequent adverse events were nausea, vomiting, fatigue, and headache. No infusion reactions were observed. 2 pts (1 confirmed) have achieved a PR, 1 pt with melanoma in the 200-mg cohort with 39+ weeks of weekly IMC-11F8 treatment and 1 pt with rectal cancer in the 400-mg cohort with 20+ weeks of IMC-11F8 administered every other week. 5 pts in the 200- to 600-mg cohorts have stable disease and have received from 11+ to 35+ weeks of IMC-11F8 treatment. A noncompartmental analysis of 20 pts demonstrated that IMC-11F8 exhibits nonlinear PK. As IMC-11F8 escalated from 100 to 600 mg, T1/2 increased from 67 to 84 hrs, Cmax increased from 30 to 368 μg/mL, AUCinf increased from 1753 to 67295, and CL decreased from 57.0 to 8.9 mL/hr. Conclusions: These interim results indicate that IMC-11F8 is well tolerated in this patient population. Although a maximum tolerated dose has not been established, IMC-11F8 has shown activity at two different dose levels. [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document