scholarly journals Pediatric Phase I Trial and Pharmacokinetic Study of Vorinostat: A Children's Oncology Group Phase I Consortium Report

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (22) ◽  
pp. 3623-3629 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maryam Fouladi ◽  
Julie R. Park ◽  
Clinton F. Stewart ◽  
Richard J. Gilbertson ◽  
Paula Schaiquevich ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Mononuclear Cells ◽  
Drug Disposition ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Studies ◽  
Peripheral Blood Mononuclear ◽  
Higher Doses

Purpose The purpose of this study was to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), and pharmacokinetics of vorinostat administered as a single agent and in combination 13-cis retinoic acid (13cRA) in children with refractory solid tumors; to evaluate the tolerability of the solid tumor MTD in children with refractory leukemias; and to characterize the pharmacokinetics of a vorinostat suspension in children. Patients and Methods Vorinostat was administered orally daily starting at 180 mg/m2/d with escalations planned in 30% increments. Pharmacokinetic studies were performed with the initial dose. Acetyl-histone (H3) accumulation was assessed by Western blotting of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC). Results Sixty-four patients were enrolled on this multipart trial. In patients with solid tumors, the MTD was 230 mg/m2/d with dose-limiting neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and hypokalemia at 300 mg/m2/d. DLTs observed with the combination of 13cRA and vorinostat included thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, anorexia, and hypertriglyceridemia, resulting in a MTD of vorinostat 180 mg/m2/d 4 times per week and 13cRA 80 mg/m2/dose twice per day, days 1 through 14 every 28 days. Wide interpatient variability was noted in vorinostat disposition, with area under the concentration-time curves at 230 mg/m2/d for the capsule (range, 1,415 to 9,291 ng/mL × hr) and oral suspension (range, 1,186 to 4,780 ng/mL × hr). Significant accumulation of acetylated H3 histone in PBMC was observed after administration of vorinostat, particularly at higher doses. One patient with neuroblastoma experienced a complete response to the combination. Conclusion In children with recurrent solid tumors, vorinostat is well-tolerated at 230 mg/m2/d, with a modest dose reduction being required when combining vorinostat with 13cRA. Drug disposition is similar to that observed in adults.

scholarly journals Pediatric Phase I and Pharmacokinetic Study of Erlotinib Followed by the Combination of Erlotinib and Temozolomide: A Children's Oncology Group Phase I Consortium Study

2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (30) ◽  
pp. 4921-4927 ◽  
Author(s):  
Regina I. Jakacki ◽  
Marta Hamilton ◽  
Richard J. Gilbertson ◽  
Susan M. Blaney ◽  
Jean Tersak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Study ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Receptor Expression ◽  
Dose Finding ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Studies ◽  
Mixed Response

Purpose We conducted a phase I and pharmacokinetic study of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor erlotinib as a single agent and in combination with temozolomide in children with refractory solid tumors. Patients and Methods Erlotinib was administered orally once daily to cohorts of three to six children for a single 28-day course. Patients then received the combination of daily erlotinib and temozolomide daily for 5 days for all subsequent 28-day courses. An oral erlotinib solution was administered during the dose-finding phase and a tablet formulation was subsequently studied at the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD). Pharmacokinetic studies and ERBB-receptor expression and signaling studies were performed. Results Forty-six patients, median age 11.5 years, received erlotinib at doses of 35, 50, 65, 85, or 110 mg/m2/d. At 110 mg/m2/d, two of four patients had dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) consisting of rash and hyperbilirubinemia, whereas one of six patients developed dose-limiting rash at 85 mg/m2/d. The most frequent non-DLTs included diarrhea, rash, and hyperbilirubinemia. The combination of erlotinib and temozolomide was well tolerated. The median apparent erlotinib clearance was 3.1 L/h/m2 and the median terminal half-life was 8.7 hours. One patient with a neurocytoma had stable disease for 19 months, two patients with neuroblastoma remained on study for 23 and 24 months, and one patient with myoepithelioma had a mixed response. Conclusion The recommended phase II dose of erlotinib in recurrent pediatric solid tumors is 85 mg/m2/d, either alone or in combination with temozolomide.

scholarly journals EPCT-19. A PHASE I STUDY OF RIBOCICLIB AND EVEROLIMUS FOLLOWING RADIATION THERAPY IN CHILDREN WITH NEWLY DIAGNOSED NON-BIOPSIED DIFFUSE PONTINE GLIOMAS (DIPG) AND RB+ BIOPSIED DIPG AND HIGH GRADE GLIOMAS (HGG)

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. iii307-iii307
Author(s):  
Mariko DeWire ◽  
James Leach ◽  
Christine Fuller ◽  
Peter de Blank ◽  
Trent Hummel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Studies ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
High Grade Gliomas ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Expansion Cohort

Abstract Genomic aberrations in the cell cycle and mTOR pathways have been reported in diffuse pontine gliomas (DIPG) and high-grade gliomas (HGG). Dual inhibition of CDK4/6 (ribociclib) and mTOR (everolimus) has strong biologic rationale, non-overlapping single-agent toxicities, and adult clinical experience. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and/or recommended phase two dose (RP2D) of ribociclib and everolimus administered during maintenance therapy following radiotherapy was determined in the phase I study as a rolling 6 design. Ribociclib and everolimus were administered once daily for 21 days and 28 days, respectively starting two-four weeks post completion of radiotherapy. All HGG patients and any DIPG patient who had undergone biopsy were screened for RB protein by immunohistochemistry. Eighteen eligible patients enrolled (median age 8 years; range: 2–18). Six patients enrolled at dose levels 1,2, and 3 without dose limiting toxicities (DLT). Currently, five patients are enrolled at dose level 3 expansion cohort. The median number of cycles are 4.5 (range: 1–20+). Among the expansion cohort, one dose limiting toxicity included a grade 3 infection and one patient required a dose reduction in course 3 due to grade 3 ALT and grade 4 hypokalemia. The most common grade 3/4 adverse events included neutropenia. Preliminary pharmacokinetic studies on 12 patients suggest an impact of ribociclib on everolimus pharmacokinetics. The MTD/RP2D of ribociclib and everolimus following radiotherapy in newly diagnosed DIPG and HGG is anticipated to be 170 mg/m2/day x 21 days and 1.5 mg/ m2/day every 28 days which is equivalent to the adult RP2D.

Phase I Trial of Intravenous Administration of PV701, an Oncolytic Virus, in Patients With Advanced Solid Cancers

2002 ◽  
Vol 20 (9) ◽  
pp. 2251-2266 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew L. Pecora ◽  
Naiyer Rizvi ◽  
Gary I. Cohen ◽  
Neal J. Meropol ◽  
Daniel Sterman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Intravenous Administration ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Repeat Dose ◽  
Tumor Cell Membrane ◽  
Dosing Regimens ◽  
Higher Doses

PURPOSE: PV701, a replication-competent strain of Newcastle disease virus, causes regression of tumor xenografts after intravenous administration. This phase I study was designed to define the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and safety of single and multiple intravenous doses of PV701 as a single agent in patients with cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-nine patients with advanced solid cancers that were unresponsive to standard therapy were enrolled. Four PV701 intravenous dosing regimens were evaluated: (1) single dose: one dose every 28 days; (2) repeat dose: three doses in 1 week every 28 days; (3) desensitizing: one lower dose followed by two higher doses in 1 week every 28 days; and (4) two week: one lower dose followed by five higher doses over 2 weeks every 21 days. RESULTS: A 100-fold dose intensification was achieved over 195 cycles. A first-dose MTD of 12 × 109 plaque-forming units (PFU)/m2 was established for outpatient dosing. After an initial dose of 12 × 109 PFU/m2, patients tolerated an MTD for subsequent doses of 120 × 109 PFU/m2. The most common adverse events were flu-like symptoms that occurred principally after the first dose and were decreased in number and severity with each subsequent dose. Tumor site–specific adverse events and acute dosing reactions were also observed but not cumulative toxicity. Objective responses occurred at higher dose levels, and progression-free survival ranged from 4 to 31 months. Tumor tissue from one patient was obtained after 11 months of therapy and showed evidence of PV701 particles budding from the tumor cell membrane by electron microscopy and a pronounced lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate by histologic examination. CONCLUSION: PV701 warrants further study as a novel therapeutic agent for cancer patients.

Phase 1/2 study of eprenetapopt (APR-246) in combination with pembrolizumab in patients with solid tumor malignancies.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS3161-TPS3161
Author(s):  
Ecaterina Elena Dumbrava ◽  
Amit Mahipal ◽  
Xin Gao ◽  
Geoffrey Shapiro ◽  
Jason S. Starr ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Mononuclear Cells ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Tumor Growth Inhibition ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Peripheral Blood Mononuclear

TPS3161 Background: The p53 pathway has been implicated in antitumor immunity, including antigen presentation and T-cell proliferation. Loss of p53 function can increase resistance to immunotherapy across many tumor types. Eprenetapopt (eprenet) is a small molecule that stabilizes the folded structure of p53, resulting in activation of mutant p53 and stabilization of wild-type (WT) p53. It also targets the cellular redox homeostasis, resulting in induction of apoptosis in tumor cells. In vivo, mice carrying supernumerary copies of the TP53 gene harbor a pro-inflammatory tumor microenvironment, an effect recapitulated in TP53 normal-copy mice treated with eprenetapopt. Combining eprenetapopt and anti-PD1 or anti-CTLA4 therapy resulted in enhanced tumor growth inhibition and improved survival in TP53 WT mice inoculated with B16 melanoma and MC38 colon adenocarcinoma cells . Based on these results, we hypothesized that eprenet-induced p53 stabilization may augment response to immunotherapy. To test this hypothesis, we are conducting a phase 1b/2 study of eprenet in combination with pembrolizumab (eprenet+pembro) in pts with solid tumors. Methods: The primary objectives are to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) and to assess the safety and tolerability of eprenet+pembro in pts with advanced solid tumors. The secondary objectives are to estimate the anti-tumor activity and to describe the pharmacokinetics of the combination. Exploratory objectives include assessing predictive and pharmacodynamic markers of response. The study includes a safety lead-in with a 3+3 dose de-escalation design for pts with advanced solid tumors with known tumor TP53 mutation status ( TP53 WT is acceptable) (max 18 pts), followed by expansion cohorts in pts with NSCLC, gastric/GEJ and urothelial cancer (max 100 pts). In expansion, pts with urothelial and gastric cancers must be naïve to anti-PD-1/ L1 therapy. Eprenet is given IV once daily on Days 1–4 while pembro is administered on Day 3 of each 21-day cycle. The RP2D of eprenet+pembro is considered the dose at which ≤ 1 of 6 pts in a cohort has a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Primary endpoints are occurrence of DLTs, adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs with eprenet+pembro. Key secondary endpoints are best objective response, progression free survival and overall survival. Exploratory endpoints include gene mutations by next generation sequencing (including TP53), mRNA expression, multiplex immunohistochemistry and transcriptomics, multiplex flow cytometry on peripheral blood mononuclear cells and cytokines in serum. Continuous monitoring of toxicity will be conducted. The trial opened in May 2020 and is actively enrolling patients. Clinical trial information: NCT04383938.

Sequences of topotecan and cisplatin: phase I, pharmacologic, and in vitro studies to examine sequence dependence.

1996 ◽  
Vol 14 (12) ◽  
pp. 3074-3084 ◽  
Author(s):  
E K Rowinsky ◽  
S H Kaufmann ◽  
S D Baker ◽  
L B Grochow ◽  
T L Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Topoisomerase I ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
In Vitro Studies ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Studies ◽  
Sequence Dependence ◽  
Renal Tubular

PURPOSE A phase I and pharmacologic study was performed to evaluate the feasibility of administering the topoisomerase I (topo I) inhibitor topotecan (TPT) in combination with cisplatin (CDDP) in minimally pretreated adults with solid tumors. The study was designed to evaluate the magnitude of the toxicologic and pharmacologic differences between the two sequences of drug administration. MATERIALS AND METHODS TPT was administered as a 30-minute infusion daily for 5 days and CDDP was given either before TPT on day 1 or after TPT on day 5. Each patient was treated with both schedules on an alternating basis every 3 weeks. Sequential dose escalation of TPT or CDDP resulted in three dosage permutation of TPT/CDDP (mg/m2): 0.75/50, 1/50, and 0.75/75. After the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) level was achieved, the feasibility of using granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) to permit further dose escalation was studied. To examine the interaction of TPT and CDDP in vitro, human A549 lung cancer cells were exposed to these agents concurrently and sequentially. RESULTS Dose-limiting neutropenia and thrombocytopenia resulted after the doses of TPT or CDDP were increased to greater than 0.75 and 50 mg/m2, respectively, without and with G-CSF. The sequence of CDDP before TPT induced significantly worse neutropenia and thrombocytopenia than the alternate sequence. In vitro studies failed to provide any evidence for the differences in the cytotoxicity of these two sequences. Instead, pharmacokinetic studies suggested that the differences in toxicity were due, in part, to lower TPT clearance and exposure when CDDP preceeds TPT, possibly due to subclinical renal tubular toxicity induced by CDDP. CONCLUSION The sequence of CDDP before TPT at doses of 50 and 0.75 mg/m2, respectively, is recommended for subsequent clinical trials in tumor types in which both agents have significant single-agent activity. The potential for sequence-dependent cytotoxic, toxicologic, and pharmacologic effects should be evaluated in concurrent clinical and laboratory studies in the course of developing combination chemotherapy regimens that consist of topo I-targeting agents and other antineoplastic agents, particularly DNA-damaging agents.

Phase I study of topotecan in combination with cyclophosphamide in pediatric patients with malignant solid tumors: a Pediatric Oncology Group Study.

1998 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 945-952 ◽  
Author(s):  
R L Saylors ◽  
C F Stewart ◽  
W C Zamboni ◽  
D A Wall ◽  
B Bell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Pediatric Patients ◽  
Wilms Tumor ◽  
Systemic Exposure ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Studies ◽  
Phase Ii Trials ◽  
Pediatric Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Limiting Toxicity

PURPOSE To determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicity of topotecan when combined with cyclophosphamide in pediatric patients with recurrent or refractory malignant solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 33 patients received cyclophosphamide (250 mg/m2/dose) followed by topotecan in escalating doses (0.6 to 0.75 mg/m2/dose), each given as a 30-minute infusion daily for 5 days. A total of 154 fully assessable treatment courses were given to these patients. RESULTS Neutropenia was the dose-limiting toxicity of the therapy at both topotecan dose levels. The addition of filgrastim allowed escalation of the topotecan dose to the 0.75-mg/m2 level with acceptable neutropenia. Other significant toxicities were anemia and thrombocytopenia. Nonhematopoietic toxicity of grades > or = 3 was not observed. Responses were reported in patients with Wilms' tumor (one complete response [CR], one partial response [PR]), neuroblastoma (one CR, one PR), rhabdomyosarcoma (one PR), and osteosarcoma (one PR). Pharmacokinetic studies indicate that cyclophosphamide administered on the schedule used in this study did not alter topotecan disposition on day 5. As with previous studies, a pharmacodynamic relation between systemic exposure and myelosuppression was noted. CONCLUSION The combination of topotecan and cyclophosphamide shows activity in a wide variety of pediatric solid tumors and can be given with acceptable hematopoietic toxicity with the use of filgrastim support. We recommend that pediatric phase II trials use cyclophosphamide 250 mg/m2 followed by topotecan 0.75 mg/m2 daily for 5 days with filgrastim for amelioration of neutropenia.

Phase I trial of paclitaxel in children with refractory solid tumors: a Pediatric Oncology Group Study.

1993 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. 2324-2329 ◽  
Author(s):  
C A Hurwitz ◽  
M V Relling ◽  
S D Weitman ◽  
Y Ravindranath ◽  
T J Vietti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Peripheral Neuropathy ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Plasma Concentrations ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Preliminary Evidence ◽  
Clonic Seizure ◽  
Fine Motor ◽  
Phase Ii Trials

PURPOSE A phase I study was performed to describe the principal toxicities and identify the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of Taxol (paclitaxel; Bristol-Myers Squibb Co, Wallingford, CT) in children with therapy-resistant solid tumors. Additionally, the pharmacokinetic disposition of Taxol in children was studied, and preliminary evidence of the activity of Taxol against pediatric solid tumors was assessed. PATIENTS AND METHODS Twenty-four-hour continuous infusions of Taxol were administered every 21 days to children (median age, 12 years; range, 2 to 22) with refractory solid tumors. Doses ranged from 200 to 420 mg/m2, there was no intrapatient dose escalation. RESULTS A total of 62 courses of Taxol were administered to 31 patients. Two patients developed acute anaphylaxis during their second infusion of taxol at doses of 200 mg/m2 and 350 mg/m2, respectively. No other allergic reactions were documented. Myelosuppression occurred at all dose levels, but was of short duration (< or = 7 days) and did not appear to increase with consecutive courses or at higher dosage levels. A stocking-and-glove peripheral neuropathy became evident at doses > or = 290 mg/m2. Dose-limiting neurotoxicity occurred at 420 mg/m2 and comprised a significant fine-motor and peripheral neuropathy in one patient, and a tonic-clonic seizure in another. End-of-infusion plasma concentrations ranged from 0.40 to 6.4 mumol/L, and were not found to be dose-dependent over the range of doses studied. A complete response was documented in one patient, partial response in two, and minimal response in one for an overall response rate of 13%. CONCLUSION Neurotoxicity was dose-limiting when Taxol was administered by 24-hour continuous infusion to pediatric patients with relapsed solid tumors. In this population, the recommended dose for phase II trials is 350 mg/m2/d.

Multi-Agent Phase I Trials in Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL).

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 4528-4528
Author(s):  
Richard Sposto ◽  
Elizabeth A. Raetz ◽  
Charles P. Reynolds ◽  
Paul S. Gaynon
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Phase I Trial ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Phase I Trials ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background: Single agent phase I trials with conventional methodology may not be suitable for children with relapsed leukemia. Accrual of children with ALL in relapse to single-agent phase I trials is poor due to clinical urgency and a &gt; 30% likelihood of complete response (CR) with a variety conventional agents combinations (Br J Haematol.2005; 131(5): 579) with the option of hematopoietic stem cell transplant in remission. As most drugs are ultimately used in combination, a Phase I trial testing a new agent in combination with conventional agents would seem most useful and might increase accrual. However, with conventional phase I methodologies determination of a maximum tolerated dose is complicated by the toxicities of the accompanying conventional agents and by the background morbidity of relapsed leukemia. Methods: The Children’s Oncology Group (COG) study, AALL01P2, employed vincristine, prednisone, doxorubicin, and pegylated asparaginase for children with ALL in first marrow relapse. We determined the incidence of conventional non-hematologic dose limiting toxicities (DLT’s) and modeled the impact on a hypothetical phase I trial of a candidate agent with no additional toxicity. Results: Among 111 patients on AALL01P2, 19% had conventional non-hematologic DLT’s. Induction therapy was judged clinically acceptable. With a traditional Phase I escalation scheme that accepts 0/3 and 1/6 DLT’s at a dose-level and rejects 2/3 and 2/6 DLT’s, an agent that adds no morbidity would be rejected as too toxic at any dose 30% of the time. Conclusion: Background morbidity confounds identification of an acceptable dose of a non-toxic new agent tested in combination with conventional drugs for recurrent ALL. We propose a modification to the traditional Phase I design that increases the DLT thresholds to 1/3 and 2/6, which effectively compensates for background toxicity and reduces the chance of falsely rejecting an acceptable agent.

Phase I evaluation of AZD2171, a highly potent and selective inhibitor of VEGFR signaling, in combination with selected chemotherapy regimens in patients with advanced solid tumors

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3034-3034 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. M. Lorusso ◽  
E. Heath ◽  
M. Valdivieso ◽  
M. Pilat ◽  
A. Wozniak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Selective Inhibitor ◽  
Minor Response ◽  
Heavily Pretreated ◽  
Grade 3

3034 Background: AZD2171 is an oral, potent, selective inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR). Trials have demonstrated that inhibition of the VEGF pathway, in combination with certain chemotherapy, provides benefit to patients with a broad range of solid tumors. Methods: This Phase I trial was conducted in heavily pretreated solid tumor patients. In a single protocol, escalating doses of AZD2171 were evaluated (20, 30 and 45 mg) in combination with four separate chemotherapy regimens: mFOLFOX6 (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2; 5-FU 400 mg/m2; leucovorin 400 mg/m2 q2 weeks; Arm 1); irinotecan 300 mg/m2 q3 week (Arm 2); docetaxel 75 mg/m2 (Arm 3) and pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 (Arm 4). The primary objective was to evaluate safety and tolerability of the combinations and secondary objective to evaluate pharmacokinetic (PK) interaction and clinical efficacy. Maximum tolerated dose (MTD) toxicity was defined through two cycles. Results: 46 patients have been enrolled: 28/35 evaluable for efficacy/toxicity. The MTD has been reached in two arms: Arm 2 - 20 mg AZD2171 and Arm 4 - 30 mg AZD2171. Arm 3 enrollment continues at 45 mg AZD2171. Two dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed in eight patients at 30 mg AZD2171 in Arm 1. Enrollment of an additional cohort of less heavily pre-treated patients is ongoing to determine the tolerability of 30 mg AZD2171 with FOLFOX. DLTs have included grade 3 fatigue in Arms 1, 2 & 4; grade 3 diarrhea in Arm 1; grade 3 hand-foot syndrome & grade 4 neutropenic fever in Arm 2; and grade 3 hypertension in Arm 4. AZD2171 did not appear to have a major effect on the PK profile of any chemotherapy regimen tested. Steady-state values are comparable with AZD2171 monotherapy. There have been 13 responses (minor response, n=5; partial response, n=6; complete response, n=2; stable disease ≥ 4 cycles, n=6) in heavily pretreated patients, some having demonstrated resistance to identical chemotherapies. Duration of response has been impressive (4-22+ cycles). Conclusions: AZD2171 combinations have been well tolerated with expected toxicities and encouraging responses. [Table: see text]

Phase I dose-escalation study to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of CEP-9722 (a PARP1-2 inhibitor) as single‑agent and in combination with temozolomide in patients with advanced solid tumors (NCT00920595).

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3052-3052 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mario Campone ◽  
Ruth Plummer ◽  
Peter Stephens ◽  
Zahir Brakchi ◽  
Louiza Aissat-Daudigny ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Mononuclear Cells ◽  
Excision Repair ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Recommended Dose ◽  
Parp Inhibition ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Pharmacokinetics And Pharmacodynamics ◽  
Grade 3

3052 Background: Poly-ADP-ribose (PAR) polymerases (PARPs) are essential in cellular processing of DNA damage via the base excision repair pathway. CEP-9722, an orally available PARP1-2 inhibitor, demonstrated single-agent antitumor activity and synergy with temozolomide (TMZ) in xenograft models. This phase I study evaluated the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of CEP-9722 in monotherapy and combination with TMZ. Methods: Adult patients with advanced solid tumors were enrolled in cohorts of 3-6 patients to receive a 14-day cycle of CEP-9722 (days 1-5), followed by 28-day cycles of CEP-9722 (days 1-5) plus TMZ (150 mg/m2 days 1-5). The dose of CEP-9722 was 150 mg/day in the first cohort and was escalated depending on the occurrence of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) during cycles 1 and 2. The safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics (PAR levels in peripheral blood mononuclear cells) of CEP-9722 were analyzed. Results: Overall, 26 patients (18F,8 M) 18 to 71 years of age were enrolled in 5 cohorts of 3-9 patients and treated with CEP-9722 at 150-1000 mg/day. The MTD of CEP-9722 in combination with TMZ (150 mg/m2) was reached at 1000 mg/day. The recommended dose was 750 mg/day. A total of 9 patients were treated at the recommended dose. DLTs were observed in 2 patients during cycle 1 (1 grade 3 myositis at 750 mg/day and 1 grade 3 asthenia at 1000 mg/day) and 2 patients during cycle 2 (1 grade 3 asthenia at 300 mg/day and 1 persistent grade 2 weight loss at 1000 mg/day). Overall during this study, 4 grade 3 treatment-related adverse events were observed. The pharmacokinetics showed high intra- and inter-patient variability at all doses. The pharmacodynamic analysis demonstrated PARP inhibition at all doses, but the high inter- and intra-patient variability prevented any conclusion regarding a dose / PARP inhibition relationship. Conclusions: TheMTD of CEP-9722 when administered with TMZ was 1000 mg days 1-5 and the combination CEP-9722/TMZ was well tolerated. In addition, a clear signal of PARP inhibition was demonstrated.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document