Breast cancer: Draining lymph node of vaccination site targeted by adjuvant GM-CSF in an autologous vaccine

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 13506-13506
Author(s):  
E. Garcia-Giralt ◽  
E. Lasalvia-Prisco ◽  
S. Cucchi ◽  
M. Aghazarian ◽  
J. Larrañaga ◽  
...  

13506 Background: We have reported the sensitization against Tumor Associated Antigens (TAA) and the tumor antiprogressive effect of Autologous Thermostable Hemoderivative-Cancer Vaccine (ATH-CV) in breast cancer patients (E. Garcia-Giralt et al ASCO, 2006). Systemic immune response elicited by TAA is started by a locoregional immune response at the microenvironment constituted by the antigens source and the draining lymph node. The antigens source can be a tumor or a vaccination site and respectively, the draining lymph node is the sentinel lymph node (SLN) or the Sentinel Immunized Node (SIN). Tolerogenic or protective locoregional immune response is decisional because it starts a corresponding systemic immune response, tolerogenic or protective. GM-CSF is a conditioner of SLN and SIN, switching the locoregional immune responses from tolerogenic to protective (ML Disis et al Blood, 1996; AJ Cochran et al Nat Rev Immunology, 2006). Therefore, to optimize the ATH-CV antitumoral effect, we have explored GM-CSF as a locoregional adjuvant. Methods: Thirty six M1 breast cancer patients, ER+,HER 2-, hormone and chemotherapy resistant, performance status = 2, and CA 15–3 rising level, were included in this prospective, IRB-approved phase I/II trial. Patients were 3-group (G) randomized (12 each), submitted to different treatments: G1, no additional oncology treatment; G2, ATH-CV; G3, ATH-CV plus GM-CSF at vaccination site 150 μg/day, 5 days. Statistic assessment (Student’s t-test) was performed at the 30-day end point: ATH sensitization by Delayed Type Hypersensibility test (DTH) and Lymphocyte Proliferative Assay (LPA); PSA serum level and immunophenotyping of lymph node cells in biopsies of SIN scintigraphy-localized. Results: Significant differences (p<0.05): DTH test > 5 mm: G1, 0/12; G2, 3/12 and G3, 6/12. LPA > 2.0: G1, 0/12; G2, 4/12 and G3, 7/12. Immunophenotyping: MHC-II+CD83+ (Mature Dendritic Cells):G3>G2>G1. 30 days CA 15–3 increase: G1>G2>G3. No relevant toxicities were evidenced. Conclusions: In advanced breast cancer, ATH-CV sensitization and tumor antiprogressive effect were potentiated by GM-CSF as local adjuvant. Increase of SIN mature dendritic cells is suggested as mechanism of action. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 175883592095835
Author(s):  
Wei-Ping Li ◽  
Hong-Fei Gao ◽  
Fei Ji ◽  
Teng Zhu ◽  
Min-Yi Cheng ◽  
...  

Background and aims: Male breast cancer is an uncommon disease. The benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of male breast cancer patients has not been determined. The aim of this study was to explore the value of adjuvant chemotherapy in men with stage I–III breast cancer, and we hypothesized that some male patients may safely skip adjuvant chemotherapy. Methods: Male breast cancer patients between 2010 and 2015 from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results database were included. Univariate and multivariate Cox analyses were used to analyse the factors associated with survival. The propensity score matching method was adopted to balance baseline characteristics. Kaplan–Meier curves were used to evaluate the impacts of adjuvant chemotherapy on survival. The primary endpoint was survival. Results: We enrolled 514 patients for this study, including 257 patients treated with chemotherapy and 257 patients without. There was a significant difference in overall survival (OS) but not in breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) between the two groups ( p < 0.001 for OS and p = 0.128 for BCSS, respectively). Compared with the non-chemotherapy group, the chemotherapy group had a higher 4-year OS rate (97.5% versus 95.2%, p < 0.001), while 4-year BCSS was similar (98% versus 98.8%, p = 0.128). The chemotherapy group had longer OS than the non-chemotherapy group among HR+, HER2–, tumour size >2 cm, lymph node-positive male breast cancer patients ( p < 0.05). Regardless of tumour size, there were no differences in OS or BCSS between the chemotherapy and non-chemotherapy cohorts for lymph node-negative patients (OS: p > 0.05, BCSS: p > 0.05). Adjuvant chemotherapy showed no significant effects on both OS and BCSS in patients with stage I (OS: p = 0.100, BCSS: p = 0.858) and stage IIA breast cancer (OS: p > 0.05, BCSS: p > 0.05). Conclusion: For stage I and stage IIA patients, adjuvant chemotherapy could not improve OS and BCSS. Therefore, adjuvant chemotherapy might be skipped for stage I and stage IIA male breast cancer patients.


Breast Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
María Belén Giorello ◽  
Ayelén Matas ◽  
Pablo Marenco ◽  
Kevin Mauro Davies ◽  
Francisco Raúl Borzone ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document