Clinical validation of in vitro drug sensitivity microarray data: Regimen-specific signatures predict pathological complete response to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer in a randomized trial (EORTC 10994/BIG 00–01)

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 544-544
Author(s):  
H. R. Bonnefoi ◽  
A. Potti ◽  
M. Piccart ◽  
L. Mauriac ◽  
M. Tubiana-Hulin ◽  
...  

544 Background: We previously described gene expression signatures that predict sensitivity to common chemotherapeutic agents and published promising results of their applicability in patients (Nature Med 2006). The goal of this study was to confirm their validity in a larger series of breast cancer patients with hormone-receptor negative (HR negative) since these tumours are more sensitive to chemotherapy. We used pathological complete response as a surrogate for chemosensitivity. We analyzed samples from a subset of patients included in a recently completed large neoadjuvant phase III trial. The trial compares a non-taxane regimen (fluorouracil + epirubicin + cyclophosphamide × 6; FEC arm) with a taxane regimen (docetaxel × 3 then epirubicin + docetaxel × 3; T->ET arm). Methods: RNA prepared from frozen samples obtained at diagnosis were hybridized to Affymetrix arrays. In vitro single agent signatures generated using a metagene approach were combined to obtain a FEC and a T->ET regimen-specific signatures. Predictions were blinded to patient outcome. With both signatures we calculated the receiver operating curve, its AUC, and the cut-point with maximal Youden index- accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), sensitivity (Sens), negative predictive value (NPV) and specificity (Spec). Results: Samples from 124 patients (55 pCR) with HR negative tumours underwent a successful gene-expression array: 65 patients were treated in FEC arm and 59 patients in T->ET arm. The results are summarized below. Conclusions: We have validated the approach of using regimen-specific genomic signatures developed in vitro, in the context of a multicenter randomized trial. These results support the activation of a prospective trial comparing the conventional random choice of chemotherapy versus a specific array based approach. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]

Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 1133 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudia Mazo ◽  
Stephen Barron ◽  
Catherine Mooney ◽  
William M. Gallagher

Determining which patients with early-stage breast cancer should receive chemotherapy is an important clinical issue. Chemotherapy has several adverse side effects, impacting on quality of life, along with significant economic consequences. There are a number of multi-gene prognostic signatures for breast cancer recurrence but there is less evidence that these prognostic signatures are predictive of therapy benefit. Biomarkers that can predict patient response to chemotherapy can help avoid ineffective over-treatment. The aim of this work was to assess if the OncoMasTR prognostic signature can predict pathological complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and to compare its predictive value with other prognostic signatures: EndoPredict, Oncotype DX and Tumor Infiltrating Leukocytes. Gene expression datasets from ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer patients that had pre-treatment biopsies, received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and an assessment of pCR were obtained from the Gene Expression Omnibus repository. A total of 813 patients with 66 pCR events were included in the analysis. OncoMasTR, EndoPredict, Oncotype DX and Tumor Infiltrating Leukocytes numeric risk scores were approximated by applying the gene coefficients to the corresponding mean probe expression values. OncoMasTR, EndoPredict and Oncotype DX prognostic scores were moderately well correlated according to the Pearson’s correlation coefficient. Association with pCR was estimated using logistic regression. The odds ratio for a 1 standard deviation increase in risk score, adjusted for cohort, were similar in magnitude for all four signatures. Additionally, the four signatures were significant predictors of pCR. OncoMasTR added significant predictive value to Tumor Infiltrating Leukocytes signatures as determined by bivariable and trivariable analysis. In this in silico analysis, OncoMasTR, EndoPredict, Oncotype DX, and Tumor Infiltrating Leukocytes were significantly predictive of pCR to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in ER-positive and HER2-negative breast cancer patients.


2017 ◽  
Vol 54 (4) ◽  
pp. 202-209 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michal Jarzab ◽  
Monika Kowal ◽  
Wieslaw Bal ◽  
Malgorzata Oczko-Wojciechowska ◽  
Justyna Rembak-Szynkiewicz ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fanli Qu ◽  
Zongyan Li ◽  
Shengqing Lai ◽  
XiaoFang Zhong ◽  
Xiaoyan Fu ◽  
...  

BackgroundBreast cancer patients who achieve pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) have favorable outcomes. Reliable predictors for pCR help to identify patients who will benefit most from NAC. The pretreatment serum albumin-to-alkaline phosphatase ratio (AAPR) has been shown to be a prognostic predictor in several malignancies, but its predictive value for pCR in breast cancer is still unknown. This study aims to investigate the predictive role of AAPR in breast cancer patients and develop an AAPR-based nomogram for pCR rate prediction.MethodsA total of 780 patients who received anthracycline and taxane-based NAC from January 2012 to March 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess the predictive value of AAPR and other clinicopathological factors. A nomogram was developed and calibrated based on multivariate logistic regression. A validation cohort of 234 patients was utilized to further validate the predictive performance of the model. The C-index, calibration plots and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to evaluate the discrimination, calibration and clinical value of the model.ResultsPatients with a lower AAPR (<0.583) had a significantly reduced pCR rate (OR 2.228, 95% CI 1.246-3.986, p=0.007). Tumor size, clinical nodal status, histological grade, PR, Ki67 and AAPR were identified as independent predictors and included in the final model. The nomogram was used as a graphical representation of the model. The nomogram had satisfactory calibration and discrimination in both the training cohort and validation cohort (the C-index was 0.792 in the training cohort and 0.790 in the validation cohort). Furthermore, DCA indicated a clinical net benefit from the nomogram.ConclusionsPretreatment serum AAPR is a potentially valuable predictor for pCR in breast cancer patients who receive NAC. The AAPR-based nomogram is a noninvasive tool with favorable predictive accuracy for pCR, which helps to make individualized treatment strategy decisions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document