scholarly journals Prevalence of Lymphedema in Women With Breast Cancer 5 Years After Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy or Axillary Dissection: Objective Measurements

2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (32) ◽  
pp. 5213-5219 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah A. McLaughlin ◽  
Mary J. Wright ◽  
Katherine T. Morris ◽  
Gladys L. Giron ◽  
Michelle R. Sampson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Risk Factors ◽  
Body Weight ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Sentinel Lymph Node ◽  
Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy ◽  
Lymph Node Biopsy ◽  
Axillary Lymph ◽  
Node Biopsy

Purpose Sentinel lymph node biopsy was adopted for the staging of the axilla with the assumption that it would reduce the risk of lymphedema in women with breast cancer. The aim of this study was to determine the long-term prevalence of lymphedema after SLN biopsy (SLNB) alone and after SLNB followed by axillary lymph node dissection (SLNB/ALND). Patients and Methods At median follow-up of 5 years, lymphedema was assessed in 936 women with clinically node-negative breast cancer who underwent SLNB alone or SLNB/ALND. Standardized ipsilateral and contralateral measurements at baseline and follow-up were used to determine change in ipsilateral upper extremity circumference and to control for baseline asymmetry and weight change. Associations between lymphedema and potential risk factors were examined. Results Of the 936 women, 600 women (64%) underwent SLNB alone and 336 women (36%) underwent SLNB/ALND. Patients having SLNB alone were older than those having SLNB/ALND (56 v 52 years; P < .0001). Baseline body mass index (BMI) was similar in both groups. Arm circumference measurements documented lymphedema in 5% of SLNB alone patients, compared with 16% of SLNB/ALND patients (P < .0001). Risk factors associated with measured lymphedema were greater body weight (P < .0001), higher BMI (P < .0001), and infection (P < .0001) or injury (P = .02) in the ipsilateral arm since surgery. Conclusion When compared with SLNB/ALND, SLNB alone results in a significantly lower rate of lymphedema 5 years postoperatively. However, even after SLNB alone, there remains a clinically relevant risk of lymphedema. Higher body weight, infection, and injury are significant risk factors for developing lymphedema.

Axillary Recurrence after Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Breast Cancer

2010 ◽  
Vol 76 (10) ◽  
pp. 1127-1129 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine Dauphine ◽  
Denis Nemtsev ◽  
David Rosing ◽  
Hernan I. Vargas
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Sentinel Lymph Node ◽  
Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Lymph Node Biopsy ◽  
Axillary Recurrence ◽  
Axillary Lymph ◽  
Node Biopsy

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is routinely performed as an axillary staging procedure for breast cancer. Although the reported false-negative rate approaches 10 per cent, this does not always lead to axillary recurrence. We previously reported an axillary recurrence rate of 1 per cent at a median follow-up of 2 years. Our objective is to determine the rate of axillary recurrence with longer follow-up. A retrospective review of patients with invasive breast cancer and a negative SLNB treated between 2001 and 2005 was performed. Cases where neoadjuvant therapy was used or where isolated tumor cells (ITCs) were found were included, whereas those with fewer than 18 months of follow-up were excluded. One (0.7%) out of 139 patients had an axillary recurrence after a median follow-up of 52 months. No patient who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy or with ITCs had axillary recurrence. Twelve (8.6%) patients have died, with death attributed to breast cancer in three. Our study demonstrates that axillary recurrence after SLNB remains a rare event after a median follow-up of 52 months, despite including potentially higher risk scenarios such as where neoadjuvant chemotherapy is used and ITCs are found. Therefore, axillary lymph node dissection can safely be avoided in patients where SLNB is negative.

scholarly journals Risk Factors for Lymphedema After Breast Surgery: a Prospective Cohort Study in the Era of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sira Salinas Huertas ◽  
A. Luzardo-González ◽  
S. Vazquez-Gallego ◽  
Sonia Pernas ◽  
C. Falo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Risk Factors ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Sentinel Lymph Node ◽  
Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy ◽  
Lymph Node Biopsy ◽  
Node Biopsy ◽  
Axillary Radiotherapy

Abstract Introduction: We aimed to investigate the incidence of lymphedema after breast cancer treatment, to analyze the risk factors involved, and to improve existing protocols for the prevention of lymphedema. Patients and methods: This was a prospective cohort study of 232 patients undergoing surgery for breast cancer at our institution between September 2013 and February 2018. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) or axillary lymphadenectomy (ALND) were mandatory in this cohort. Lymphedema was diagnosed by circumferential measurements and truncated cone calculations. Patients and tumor characteristics, as well as local and systemic therapies, were analyzed as possible risk factors for lymphedema. Results: In total, 201 patients met the inclusion criteria and had a median follow-up of 31 months (range, 1–54 months). Most cases of lymphedema cases appeared in the first 2 years. 13.9% developed lymphedema: 31% after ALND and 4.6% after SLNB (p < 0.01), and 46.7% after mastectomy and 11.3% after breast-conserving surgery (p < 0.01). The lymphedema rate increased when axillary radiotherapy (RT) was added to radical surgery: 4.3% for SLNB alone, 6.7% for SLNB + RT, 17.6% for ALND alone, and 35.2% for ALND + RT (p < 0.01). In the multivariate analysis, the only risk factors associated with the development of lymphedema were ALND and mastectomy, which had hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) of 7.28 (2.92–18.16) and 3.9 (1.60–9.49), respectively. Conclusions: The main risk factors for lymphedema were the most radical surgeries (ALND and mastectomy), while the risk associated with these appeared to be worsened by the addition of axillary radiotherapy. A follow-up protocol in patients with ALND for at least two years, where these risk factors are recognized, is necessary to guarantee a comprehensive control of lymphedema that provides early detection and treatment.

Patients with Breast Cancer and Negative Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy without Additional Axillary Lymph Node Dissection: A Follow-Up Study of up to 5 Years

Oncology ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 72 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 27-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Domènech ◽  
Ana Benitez ◽  
María Teresa Bajén ◽  
María Jesús Pla ◽  
Miguel Gil ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Sentinel Lymph Node ◽  
Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy ◽  
Lymph Node Biopsy ◽  
Axillary Lymph ◽  
Node Dissection ◽  
Follow Up Study ◽  
Node Biopsy

scholarly journals Risk factors for lymphedema after breast surgery: A prospective cohort study in the era of sentinel lymph node biopsy

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
S. Salinas-Huertas ◽  
A. Luzardo-González ◽  
S. Vázquez-Gallego ◽  
S. Pernas ◽  
C. Falo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Risk Factors ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Sentinel Lymph Node ◽  
Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy ◽  
Breast Surgery ◽  
Lymph Node Biopsy ◽  
Node Biopsy ◽  
Axillary Radiotherapy

INTRODUCTION: The Objective was to investigate the incidence of lymphedema after breast cancer treatment and to analyze the risk factors involved in a tertiary level hospital. METHODS: Prospective longitudinal observational study over 3 years post-breast surgery. 232 patients undergoing surgery for breast cancer at our institution between September 2013 and February 2018. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) or axillary lymphadenectomy (ALND) were mandatory in this cohort. In total, 201 patients met the inclusion criteria and had a median follow-up of 31 months (range, 1–54 months). Lymphedema was diagnosed by circumferential measurements and truncated cone calculations. Patients and tumor characteristics, shoulder range of motion limitation and local and systemic therapies were analyzed as possible risk factors for lymphedema. RESULTS: Most cases of lymphedema appeared in the first 2 years. 13.9% of patients developed lymphedema: 31% after ALND and 4.6% after SLNB (p < 0.01), and 46.7% after mastectomy and 11.3% after breast-conserving surgery (p < 0.01). The lymphedema rate increased when axillary radiotherapy (RT) was added to radical surgery: 4.3% for SLNB alone, 6.7% for SLNB + RT, 17.6% for ALND alone, and 35.2% for ALND + RT (p < 0.01). In the multivariate analysis, the only risk factors associated with the development of lymphedema were ALND and mastectomy, which had hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) of 7.28 (2.92–18.16) and 3.9 (1.60–9.49) respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The main risk factors for lymphedema were the more radical surgeries (ALND and mastectomy). The risk associated with these procedures appeared to be worsened by the addition of axillary radiotherapy. A follow-up protocol in patients with ALND lasting at least two years, in which special attention is paid to these risk factors, is necessary to guarantee a comprehensive control of lymphedema that provides early detection and treatment.

Evaluating One Day versus Two Days Preoperative Lymphoscintigraphy Protocols for Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Breast Cancer

2015 ◽  
Vol 81 (5) ◽  
pp. 454-457 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael G. Mount ◽  
Nicholas R. White ◽  
Christophe L. Nguyen ◽  
Richard K. Orr ◽  
Robert B. Hird
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Sentinel Lymph Node ◽  
Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy ◽  
Axillary Lymph Node ◽  
Lymph Node Biopsy ◽  
Axillary Lymph ◽  
Axillary Lymph Node Metastases ◽  
Node Biopsy ◽  
Node Negative Breast Cancer

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is used to detect axillary lymph node metastases in breast cancer. Preoperative radiocolloid injection with lymphoscintigraphy (PL) is performed before SLNB. Few comparisons between 1- and 2-day PL protocols exist. Opponents of a 2-day protocol have expressed concerns of radiotracer washout to nonsentinel nodes. Proponents cite lack of scheduling conflicts between PL and surgery. A total of 387 consecutive patients with clinically node-negative breast cancer underwent SLNB with PL. Lymphoscintigraphy images were obtained within 30 minutes of radio-colloid injection. Axillary lymph node dissection was performed if the sentinel lymph node (SLN) could not be identified. Data were collected regarding PL technique and results. In all, 212 patients were included in the 2-day PL group and 175 patients in the 1-day PL group. Lymphoscintigraphy identified an axillary sentinel node in 143/212 (67.5%) of patients in the 2-day group and 127/175 (72.5%) in the 1-day group ( P = 0.28). SLN was identified at surgery in 209/212 (98.6%) patients in the 2-day group and 174/175 (99.4%) in the 1-day group ( P = 0.41). An average of 3 SLN was found at surgery in the 2-day group compared with 3.15 in the 1-day group ( P = 0.43). SLN was positive for metastatic disease in 54/212 (25.5%) patients in the 2-day group compared with 40/175 (22.9%) in the 1-day group ( P = 0.55). A 2-day lymphoscintigraphy protocol allows reliable detection of the SLN, of positive SLN and equivalent SLN harvest compared with a 1-day protocol. The timing of radiocolloid injection before SLNB can be left at the discretion of the surgeon.

Cost comparison of two surgical strategies in the treatment of breast cancer: Sentinel lymph node biopsy versus axillary lymph node dissection

2004 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 449-454 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lionel Perrier ◽  
Karima Nessah ◽  
Magali Morelle ◽  
Hervé Mignotte ◽  
Marie-Odile Carrère ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Sentinel Lymph Node ◽  
Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy ◽  
Medical Costs ◽  
Lymph Node Biopsy ◽  
Axillary Lymph ◽  
Node Dissection ◽  
Direct Medical Costs ◽  
Node Biopsy

Objectives: The feasibility and accuracy of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in the treatment of breast cancer is widely acknowledged today. The aim of our study was to compare the hospital-related costs of this strategy with those of conventional axillary lymph node dissection (ALND).Methods: A retrospective study was carried out to determine the total direct medical costs for each of the two medical strategies. Two patient samples (n=43 for ALND; n=48 for SLNB) were selected at random among breast cancer patients at the Centre Léon Bérard, a comprehensive cancer treatment center in Lyon, France. Costs related to ALND carried out after SLNB (either immediately or at a later date) were included in SLNB costs (n=18 of 48 patients).Results: Total direct medical costs were significantly different in the two groups (median 1,965.86€ versus 1,429.93€, p=0.0076, Mann-Whitney U-test). The total cost for SLNB decreased even further for patients who underwent SLNB alone (median, 1,301€). Despite the high cost of anatomic pathology examinations and nuclear medicine (both favorable to ALND), the difference in direct medical costs for the two strategies was primarily due to the length of hospitalization, which differs significantly depending on the technique used (9-day median for ALND versus 3 days for SLNB, p<0.0001).Conclusions: A lower morbidity rate is favorable to the generalization of SLNB, when the patient's clinical state allows for it. From an economic point of view, SLNB also seems to be preferred, particularly because our results confirm those found in two published studies concerning the cost of SLNB.

scholarly journals Controversial Indications for Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Breast Cancer Patients

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hazem Assi ◽  
Eman Sbaity ◽  
Mahmoud Abdelsalam ◽  
Ali Shamseddine
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Sentinel Lymph Node ◽  
Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy ◽  
Recurrent Breast Cancer ◽  
Lymph Node Biopsy ◽  
Axillary Lymph ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Node Biopsy

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) emerged in the 1990s as a new technique in the surgical management of the axilla for patients with early breast cancer, resulting in lower complication rates and better quality of life than axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Today SLNB is firmly established in the armamentarium of clinicians treating breast cancer, but several questions remain. The goal of this paper is to review recent work addressing 4 questions that have been the subject of debate in the use of SLNB in the past few years: (a) What is the implication of finding micrometastases in the sentinel nodes? (b) Is ALND necessary in all patients who have a positive SLNB? (c) How accurate is SLNB after neoadjuvant therapy? (d) Can SLNB be used to stage the axilla in locally recurrent breast cancer following breast surgery with or without prior axillary surgery?

scholarly journals Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Pathology and 2-Year Postsurgical Recurrence of Breast Cancer in Kenyan Women

2018 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Nathan R. Brand ◽  
Ronald Wasike ◽  
Khalid Makhdomi ◽  
Rajendra Chauhan ◽  
Zahir Moloo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Estrogen Receptor ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Sentinel Lymph Node ◽  
Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy ◽  
Lymph Node Biopsy ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Node Biopsy

Purpose The goal of this study was to describe the pathologic findings and early follow-up experience of patients who underwent a sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) at Aga Khan University Hospital (AKUH) between 2008 and 2017. Patients and Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of women with breast cancer who underwent an SLNB at AKUH between 2008 and 2017. The SLNB was performed on patients with stage I and stage II breast cancer, and identification of the sentinel lymph node was made by radioactive tracer, blue dye, or both, per availability and surgeon preference. Demographic, surgical, and pathologic data, including immunohistochemistry of the surgical sample for estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, were abstracted from the patient records. Follow-up data were available for a subset of patients. Results Between 2008 and 2017, six surgeons performed SLNBs on 138 women, 129 of whom had complete records and were included in the study. Thirty-one of 129 (24%) had a positive SLNB, including 10 of 73 (14%) with stage I and 21 of 56 (38%) with stage II disease. Seventy-eight patients (60%) received systemic adjuvant chemotherapy and 79 (62%) received radiation therapy, and of the 102 patients who were estrogen receptor positive, 86 (85%) received endocrine therapy. Seventy-nine patients were observed for > 2 years, and, of these, four (5.1%) had a regional recurrence. Conclusion The SLNB positivity rates were similar to those of high-income country (HIC) cohorts. However, preliminary data suggest that recurrence rates are elevated at AKUH as compared with those of HIC cohorts, perhaps because of a lower use of radiotherapy and chemotherapy at AKUH compared with HIC cohorts or because of differences in the characteristics of the primary tumor in patients at AKUH as compared with those in HICs.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document