scholarly journals American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Update on Chemotherapy for Stage IV Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (36) ◽  
pp. 6251-6266 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher G. Azzoli ◽  
Sherman Baker ◽  
Sarah Temin ◽  
William Pao ◽  
Timothy Aliff ◽  
...  

The purpose of this article is to provide updated recommendations for the treatment of patients with stage IV non–small-cell lung cancer. A literature search identified relevant randomized trials published since 2002. The scope of the guideline was narrowed to chemotherapy and biologic therapy. An Update Committee reviewed the literature and made updated recommendations. One hundred sixty-two publications met the inclusion criteria. Recommendations were based on treatment strategies that improve overall survival. Treatments that improve only progression-free survival prompted scrutiny of toxicity and quality of life. For first-line therapy in patients with performance status of 0 or 1, a platinum-based two-drug combination of cytotoxic drugs is recommended. Nonplatinum cytotoxic doublets are acceptable for patients with contraindications to platinum therapy. For patients with performance status of 2, a single cytotoxic drug is sufficient. Stop first-line cytotoxic chemotherapy at disease progression or after four cycles in patients who are not responding to treatment. Stop two-drug cytotoxic chemotherapy at six cycles even in patients who are responding to therapy. The first-line use of gefitinib may be recommended for patients with known epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation; for negative or unknown EGFR mutation status, cytotoxic chemotherapy is preferred. Bevacizumab is recommended with carboplatin-paclitaxel, except for patients with certain clinical characteristics. Cetuximab is recommended with cisplatin-vinorelbine for patients with EGFR-positive tumors by immunohistochemistry. Docetaxel, erlotinib, gefitinib, or pemetrexed is recommended as second-line therapy. Erlotinib is recommended as third-line therapy for patients who have not received prior erlotinib or gefitinib. Data are insufficient to recommend the routine third-line use of cytotoxic drugs. Data are insufficient to recommend routine use of molecular markers to select chemotherapy.

2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (11) ◽  
pp. 1515-1523 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi-Hsin Liang ◽  
Yu-Yun Shao ◽  
Bin-Chi Liao ◽  
Ho-Sheng Lee ◽  
James Chih-Hsin Yang ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Matthew Peters ◽  
Edward S. Kim ◽  
Vera Hirsch

PURPOSE Guidelines recommend testing for EGFR mutation at diagnosis of advanced non–small-cell lung cancer to guide treatment. Two surveys, 18 months apart, aimed to identify changes in EGFR mutation testing and treatment practices in non–small-cell lung cancer. METHODS The first survey of 562 physicians from Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, South Korea, Spain, Taiwan, the United Kingdom, and the United States was conducted between December 2014 and January 2015. The second, between July and August 2016, surveyed 707 physicians in the same countries with the addition of China; China was excluded from year-on-year comparisons. RESULTS Globally (excluding China), physicians requested EGFR mutation testing in 80% (excluding China; 2015: 81%) of patients before first-line therapy. In 2016, 18% of results were not received before initiating treatment, a significant improvement over 2015 (23%). Reasons for not testing included tumor histology, insufficient tissue, poor performance status, and long turnaround time, although this had significantly improved in 2016 from 2015. Prolonging of survival/extending life was deemed the most important therapy goal in first-line treatment of both cohorts. CONCLUSION Improvements in availability of test results before first-line therapy were seen, but incomplete implementation of guidelines is still observed, resulting in a large proportion of patients not receiving tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment on the basis of mutation status. The reasons for not testing remained the same, year-on-year: tumor histology, insufficient tissue, poor performance status, and long test turnaround time. Receiving timely results must be addressed, if treatment parity for eligible patients can be achieved. Physician education and closer guideline concordance are key steps to improve outcomes.


2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (13) ◽  
pp. 1493-1504 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Lim ◽  
Carl Samuelsen ◽  
Amanda Golembesky ◽  
Sulena Shrestha ◽  
Li Wang ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document