Gene expression differences between disseminated tumor cells and tumor cells from overt bone metastases in patients with metastatic breast cancer

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1040-1040
Author(s):  
R. J. Broom ◽  
E. Amir ◽  
T. Cawthorn ◽  
O. Freedman ◽  
D. Gianfelice ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Gene Expression ◽  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Bone Metastases ◽  
Tumor Cells ◽  
Disseminated Tumor Cells ◽  
Genetic Alterations ◽  
Differentially Expressed ◽  
Primary Tumors ◽  
Ct Guided

1040 Background: Despite extensive work evaluating molecular differences between primary tumors, circulating tumor cells, disseminated tumor cells (DTCs) and established metastases, it is not apparent which genetic alterations are required to form viable, independent bone metastases (BM). A major limitation in exploring the genetic differences between DTCs and established BM is the paucity of fresh BM tissue available. Methods: Ten breast cancer patients with BM underwent a CT-guided BM biopsy and a bone marrow aspiration (for DTCs). Tumor cells were enriched by immunomagnetic separation and RNA was extracted from each sample. Gene expression profiling was conducted using Illumina Human Ref-8 bead arrays. Microarray data was analyzed using BeadStudio software to identify differentially expressed genes. Ingenuity Pathway Analysis software was used to identify genes integral to specific pathways involved in tumor dissemination. Results: The yield of analyzable malignant cells from BM and bone marrow aspirates was 60% and 80%, respectively. A signature of 133 genes was identified that was differentially expressed between the two sample types. Paired analysis of samples from the same patients identified a subset of 161 genes, of which 52 overlapped with the initial unmatched signature. Several genes relevant to breast cancer metastasis to bone (i.e., osteopontin, CTGF, parathyroid hormone receptor, EGFR) were significantly over-expressed in the BM compared to the DTCs. Conclusions: Results suggest that there are specific subsets of genes, which are required for DTCs in the bone marrow to form overt BM. A number of genes identified are already known to participate in osteolytic BM formation. This signature may allow identification of patients at increased risk for developing BM. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Estrogen receptor (ER) status of disseminated tumor cells in the bone marrow of breast cancer patients

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 21013-21013
Author(s):  
F. N. Tanja ◽  
N. Krawczyk ◽  
D. Wallwiener ◽  
S. Becker ◽  
E. Solomayer
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Tumor Cells ◽  
Primary Tumor ◽  
Hormone Receptor ◽  
Primary Breast Cancer ◽  
Disseminated Tumor Cells ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Primary Tumors

21013 Background: The presence of disseminated tumor cells (DTC) in bone marrow (BM) of primary breast cancer patients is associated with poor prognosis. These patients may benefit from adjuvant endocrine therapy since cytotoxic agents are not able to completely eliminate DTCs as previously shown. Only patients with hormone receptor positive breast cancer are eligible for hormonal treatment. The ERa status is routinely defined in primary tumor tissue. However, the ERa status of DTC may differ compared to the primary tumor. Therefore, the aims of this study were (1) to determine the ERa status of DTC in BM of breast cancer patients, (2) and to compare the ERa status of DTC and corresponding primary tumors. Methods: BM aspirates from 251 primary breast cancer patients were included into the study. A double immunofluorescence staining procedure was established for the identification of cytokeratin-positive (CK)/ERa positive cells. ERa status of the primary tumor was immunohistochemically assessed using the same antibody against ERa. Results: In 105 of 251 (42%) breast cancer patients CK-positive cells could be detected in BM. The number of detected cells ranged between 1 and 13 / cells per 2*106 mononuclear cells. Disseminated tumor cells demonstrated ERa positivity in 13 (12%) of these 105 patients. The ERa expression on DTC was heterogeneous in 10 of 13 (79%) patients. Concordance rate of ERa status between primary tumor and DTC was 27%. Only 11 of 83 patients with ER a positive tumors had also ERa positives DTC. Conclusions: (1)The hormone receptor status between primary tumor and corresponding DTC is disconcordant. (2)This discrepancy may explain the rate of non-responders to adjuvant endocrine therapy despite ER-positive primary tumors. (3)These patients may benefit from adjuvant therapy regimens based on antibody strategies or bisphosphonates. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

scholarly journals Detection of disseminated tumor cells in bone marrow predict late recurrences in operable breast cancer patients

BMC Cancer ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kjersti Tjensvoll ◽  
Oddmund Nordgård ◽  
Maren Skjæveland ◽  
Satu Oltedal ◽  
Emiel A. M. Janssen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Tumor Cells ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Disseminated Tumor Cells ◽  
Operable Breast Cancer ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Primary Tumors ◽  
Post Surgery

Abstract Background Operable breast cancer patients may experience late recurrences because of reactivation of dormant tumor cells within the bone marrow (BM). Identification of patients who would benefit from extended therapy is therefore needed. Methods BM samples obtained pre- and post-surgery were previously analysed for presence of disseminated tumor cells (DTC) by a multimarker mRNA quantitative reverse-transcription PCR assay. Updated survival analyses were performed on all patient data (n = 191) and in a subgroup of patients alive and recurrence-free after 5 years (n = 156). DTC data were compared to the mitotic activity index (MAI) of the primary tumors. Median follow-up time was 15.3 years. Results Among the 191 patients, 49 (25.65%) experienced systemic relapse, 24 (49%) within 5–18 years after surgery. MAI and pre- and post-operative DTC status had significant prognostic value based on Kaplan–Meier analyses and multiple Cox regression in the overall patient cohort. With exclusion of patients who relapsed or died within 5 years from surgery, only pre-operative DTC detection was an independent prognostic marker of late recurrences. High MAI (≥10) did not predict late recurrences or disease-specific mortality. Conclusion Pre-operative DTC detection, but not MAI status, predicts late recurrences in operable breast cancer.

Identification of patients at high risk of recurrent disease development by detection of HER2-positive disseminated tumor cells in bone marrow of patients with HER2-negative tumors.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 633-633
Author(s):  
Rebecca Aft ◽  
Chidananda Mudalagiriyappa ◽  
Sreeraj Pillai ◽  
Kathryn Trinkaus ◽  
Timothy Fleming ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Tumor Cells ◽  
Disseminated Tumor Cells ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Her2 Expression ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Primary Tumors

633 Background: A subpopulation of patients with HER2-negative tumors benefit from HER2 therapy. HER2 expression can be discordant between primary tumors and metastases. We have examined the bone marrow (BM) of early stage breast cancer patients for HER2-expression by disseminated tumor cells (DTCs) and the association with disease recurrence. Methods: BM was collected from clinical stage II-III breast cancer prior to treatment between 2007-2011. Gene expression of ERBB2 was determined by multiplex PCR (Fluidigm Biomark [FB]). Positive expression was defined as at least 1.4 fold above a pool of normal BM. Expression was confirmed by single gene PCR and Nanostring nCounter (NC) assays. Cox proportional model was used to estimate hazard ratios (HR). Results: BM from 74 patients was analyzed. Median follow-up was 3.4 years (range 8 months-84 months). 24% of the patients developed metastatic disease. For ERBB2 detection, there was excellent correlation between NC and the FB assays (kappa=0.87, 95% CI [0.62, 1.00]). Nine patients expressed ERBB2 in their BM. Five of the 9 patients had Her2-positive tumors and were treated with trastuzumab. One of 5 (20%) of these patients relapsed whereas 75% (3 of 4) of the patients with HER2-negative tumors but ERBB2-positive DTCs relapsed. Patients with HER2-negative tumors/ERBB2-positive BM were found to have a greater hazard of recurrence than patients with HER2-negative tumors/ERBB2-negative BM or ERBB2-positive DTCs treated with trastuzumab (p=.0069; Table). Those patients with ERBB2-positive BM who did not receive trastuzumab had a decreased disease free survival (p=.016). Conclusions: We have found discordant expression of HER2/ERBB2 in tumors and BM of stage II-III breast cancer patients. The presence of ERBB2 expressing DTCs in patients with HER2-negative tumors identifies a subset of patients at increased risk of recurrence who may benefit from targeted HER2-therapy. [Table: see text] .

Disseminated tumor cells in bone marrow of breast cancer patients–Comparison of immunocytochemistry and RT-PCR

2006 ◽  
Vol 66 (S 01) ◽  
Author(s):  
T Fehm ◽  
S Becker ◽  
MJ Banys ◽  
G Becker-Pergola ◽  
S Duerr-Stoerzer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Tumor Cells ◽  
Disseminated Tumor Cells ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Rt Pcr

Perioperative Activation of Disseminated Tumor Cells in Bone Marrow of Patients With Prostate Cancer

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (10) ◽  
pp. 1549-1556 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dorothea Weckermann ◽  
Bernhard Polzer ◽  
Thomas Ragg ◽  
Andreas Blana ◽  
Günter Schlimok ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Tumor Cells ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Systemic Disease ◽  
Disseminated Tumor Cells ◽  
Comparative Genomic ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Primary Tumors ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis

Purpose The outcome of prostate cancer is highly unpredictable. To assess the dynamics of systemic disease and to identify patients at high risk for early relapse we followed the fate of disseminated tumor cells in bone marrow for up to 10 years and genetically analyzed such cells isolated at various stages of disease. Patients and Methods Nine hundred bone marrow aspirates from 384 patients were stained using the monoclonal antibody A45-B/B3 directed against cytokeratins 8, 18, and 19. Log-rank statistics and Cox regression analysis were applied to determine the prognostic impact of positive cells detected before surgery (244 patients) and postoperatively (214 patients). Samples from primary tumors (n = 55) and single disseminated tumor cells (n = 100) were analyzed by comparative genomic hybridization. Results Detection of cytokeratin-positive cells before surgery was the strongest independent risk factor for metastasis within 48 months (P < .001; relative risk [RR], 5.5; 95% CI, 2.4 to 12.9). In contrast, cytokeratin-positive cells detected 6 months to 10 years after radical prostatectomy were consistently present in bone marrow with a prevalence of approximately 20% but had no influence on disease outcome. Characteristic genotypes of cytokeratin-positive cells were selected at manifestation of metastasis. Conclusion Cytokeratin-positive cells in the bone marrow of prostate cancer patients are only prognostically relevant when detected before surgery. Because we could not identify significant genetic differences between pre- and postoperatively isolated tumor cells before manifestation of metastasis, we postulate the existence of perioperative stimuli that activate disseminated tumor cells. Patients with cytokeratin-positive cells in bone marrow before surgery may therefore benefit from adjuvant therapies.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document