Safety and efficacy of neratinib (HKI-272) in combination with paclitaxel in patients with solid tumors

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3557-3557 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Chow ◽  
Z. Jiang ◽  
R. Epstein ◽  
I. Bondarenko ◽  
A. Awada ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Disease Stabilization ◽  
Tumor Measurements ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Tumor Types ◽  
Age Range

3557 Background: Neratinib (HKI-272) is a potent irreversible pan-ErbB inhibitor of the tyrosine kinase receptors, erbB-1,-2 and -4. In this phase 1 study, a combination dose of neratinib plus paclitaxel that is tolerable was determined in patients (pts) with solid tumors, and safety and preliminary efficacy were assessed in pts with erbB-2+ metastatic breast cancer. Methods: In this open label, 2-part study, ascending multiple daily oral doses of neratinib (160 mg, 240 mg) were administered in combination with IV paclitaxel 80 mg/m2, if tolerable, or 70 mg/m2 on days 1, 8 and 15. Pts with solid tumors and pts with only metastatic erbB-2+ breast cancer are enrolled in part 1 and 2, respectively. Tumor measurements were made at screening and at every 8 weeks (2 cycles) by modified RECIST criteria. Timed blood samples were collected for neratinib and paclitaxel plasma concentration determination, and PK analyses were performed using a noncompartmental method. Results: Data for 54 pts as of 30 Oct 2008 are presented (median age [range] of 51.5 [20–74] yrs; 91% female; 26 % with prior trastuzumab treatment of median duration [range] 32.5 [10–52] wks; 15% with prior lapatinib treatment). Tumor types in part 1 included breast, endometrial, cervical, colorectal and esophageal cancer. There were no dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) at the 240 mg neratinib-80 mg/m2 paclitaxel dose, and as standard doses of neratinib and paclitaxel were reached, there was no reason for further escalation. Neratinib-related AEs, any grade in ≥10% of pts included diarrhea (50%), neutropenia (17%), rash (13%), nausea (11%) and vomiting (11%). Neratinib- related AEs, grade ≥3 in ≥2% of pts were diarrhea (20%), neutropenia (9%) and dehydration (4%). Only 2 pts (at the 240 mg neratinib-80 mg/m2 paclitaxel dose) had dose reductions due to diarrhea. In 35 efficacy evaluable pts, 5 had confirmed partial response (PR). Confirmed clinical benefit (PR and prolonged disease stabilization) was seen in 2 pts in part 1, 1 pt with endometrial cancer and 1 pt with cervical cancer. Conclusions: This combination of 240 mg neratinib and 80 mg/m2 paclitaxel was tolerable with a toxicity profile similar to that observed for neratinib, and had promising antitumor activity in pts with solid tumors and erbB-2 + breast cancer. [Table: see text]

Safety and efficacy of neratinib (HKI-272) in combination with vinorelbine in patients with solid tumors

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14554-e14554
Author(s):  
S. A. Limentani ◽  
A. Awada ◽  
L. Dirix ◽  
J. Beck ◽  
V. Dieras ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Duration Of Treatment ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Level Data ◽  
Tumor Measurements ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Age Range

e14554 Background: Neratinib (HKI-272) is a potent irreversible pan-ErbB tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Preclinical studies have shown synergistic antitumor activity with the combination of trastuzumab plus vinorelbine in metastatic breast cancer.The recommended dose of neratinib in monotherapy is 240 mg. In this phase 1 study, a combination dose of neratinib plus vinorelbine that is tolerable was determined in patients (pts) with solid tumors. Methods: This is an open-label, 2-part study of ascending multiple daily oral doses of neratinib (160 mg, 240 mg) in combination with 25 mg/m2 IV vinorelbine (administered on days 1, 8 every 3 wks). Tumor measurements were made every 6 wks by modified RECIST criteria. Results: 6 pts have been treated at each dose level. Data for 12 pts (5 pts still ongoing) as of 30 Oct 2008 are presented (median age [range] of 53.5 [38–75] yrs; 83% female). The median duration of treatment [range] was 1.9 [1.5–2.7] m. There was only 1 dose limiting toxicity (DLT) of grade 3 neuropathy (pt had preexisting grade 1 neuropathy) at 160 mg neratinib-25 mg/m2 vinorelbine, so the dose was escalated to 240 mg neratinib- 25 mg/m2 vinorelbine. In this cohort, there were no DLTs, and since the neratinib and vinorelbine doses reached full standard doses there was no need for further dose escalation. AEs, any causality, all grades in ≥ 15% of pts included diarrhea (92%), nausea (67%), constipation (50%), fatigue (42%), vomiting and anthralgia (33% each), abdominal pain and anorexia, (25% each), anemia and neutropenia (17% each). Grade ≥3 AEs that occurred in ≥1 pt included neutropenia (2 pts), pneumonia (1 pt) and peripheral neuropathy (2 pts). Preliminary efficacy data show that 1 pt with stomach cancer had stable disease, lasting ≥21 weeks. Conclusions: The combination of 240 mg neratinib and 25 mg/m2 vinorelbine was found to be tolerable and to demonstrate early evidence of clinical benefit in pts with solid tumors, to be assessed further in pts with metastatic ErbB-2+ breast cancer in part 2. [Table: see text]

A phase 1 trial of FID-007, a novel nanoparticle paclitaxel formulation, in patients with solid tumors.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3021-3021
Author(s):  
Jacob Stephen Thomas ◽  
Diane Habib ◽  
Diana L. Hanna ◽  
Irene Kang ◽  
Syma Iqbal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Topical Therapy ◽  
Maculopapular Rash ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Multiple Tumor ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Tumor Types ◽  
Dose Proportional

3021 Background: FID-007 (FID) consists of paclitaxel encapsulated in a polyethyloxazoline (PEOX) polymer excipient designed to enhance PK, biodistribution, and tolerability. In addition to allowing the drug to remain in solution until it can enter a cancer cell, the PEOX nanoparticle preferentially delivers paclitaxel to the tumor through the leaky hyperpermeable vasculature. In xenograft studies, FID reduced or limited tumor growth in multiple tumor types including lung, gastric, breast, pancreatic, and ovarian cancer. FID was more effective at lower or comparable taxane doses with fewer side effects. We present the first-in-human trial of FID. Methods: The study is evaluating the safety, PK, and efficacy of FID in pts with advanced solid tumors. The primary objective is to determine the MTD and RP2D. Pts received FID in doses between 15mg/m2 and 125mg/m2 using a standard 3+3 dose escalation design. FID was given IV on Days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Eligibility included ECOG 0-2, adequate organ function, and no more than 3 prior lines of cytotoxic therapy for advanced disease. Results: Twenty-five pts were treated across 6 dose levels. Median age was 62 (44-76). ECOG PS was 2 in 1 pt and 1 in 64%. Median number of cycles was 2 (1-16). There were 2 DLTs of grade 3 rash at 100 mg/m2. Given the transient nature of the rash and response to topical therapy, DLT definition was modified to exclude grade 3 rash that lasts ≤ 7 days and additional patients were treated at 100 mg/m2 which was deemed tolerable. There was 1 DLT of grade 3 neutropenia at 125 mg/m2. All grade treatment related adverse events (TRAEs) in ≥ 25% of pts were rash (64%), alopecia (52%), pruritus (44%), anemia (44%) leukopenia, fatigue (40% each), dysgeusia, anorexia, nausea (32% each), and neutropenia (28%). Grade 3/4 TRAEs occurring in > 1 pt were anemia (20%), neutropenia, leukopenia, and maculopapular rash (16%). There were no treatment discontinuations due to toxicity. Twenty-two pts were evaluable for response by RECIST 1.1 with a PR rate of 14% (PR in pancreatic, biliary tract and NSCLC) and disease control rate of 59%. PK is linear and dose proportional. There is no paclitaxel accumulation after weekly dosing, and the t1/2 is between 18-26 hours. Conclusions: FID has a manageable safety profile with MTD not reached. Accrual is continuing at 125 mg/m2. PK is linear, dose proportional and comparable to that of nab-paclitaxel. There is preliminary evidence of anti-tumor activity in heavily pre-treated pts across different tumor types. Enrollment in dose escalation continues. Combination studies with immunotherapeutic agents are planned. Clinical trial information: NCT03537690.

Antitumor activity of dostarlimab in patients with mismatch repair-deficient/microsatellite instability–high tumors: A combined analysis of two cohorts in the GARNET study.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2564-2564
Author(s):  
Dominique Berton ◽  
Susana N. Banerjee ◽  
Giuseppe Curigliano ◽  
Sara Cresta ◽  
Hendrik-Tobias Arkenau ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Microsatellite Instability ◽  
Mismatch Repair ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Tumor Types

2564 Background: Dostarlimab is an investigational, humanized programmed death 1 (PD-1) receptor monoclonal antibody that blocks interaction with the PD-1 ligands, PD-L1 and PD-L2. GARNET (NCT02715284) is a phase 1 study assessing the antitumor activity and safety of dostarlimab monotherapy in patients with solid tumors. Methods: This multicenter, open-label, single-arm study is being conducted in 2 parts: dose escalation and expansion. Here we report on the 2 expansion cohorts that enrolled mismatch repair–deficient/microsatellite instability–high (dMMR/MSI-H) patients. Cohort A1 enrolled patients with advanced or recurrent dMMR/MSI-H endometrial cancer (EC), and cohort F enrolled patients with advanced or recurrent dMMR/MSI-H or POLε-hypermutated non-EC solid tumors, mainly gastrointestinal (GI) tumors (99 [93.4%] had GI tumors, including 69 [65.1%] with colorectal cancer). Patients received 500 mg IV of dostarlimab every 3 weeks for 4 cycles, then 1000 mg IV every 6 weeks until disease progression or discontinuation. The primary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) and duration of response (DOR) by RECIST v1.1. Here we report ORR and DOR, by individual cohort and as an overall population, in patients with dMMR tumors identified by immunohistochemistry testing. Results: For this interim analysis, an efficacy analysis was performed for the patients who had baseline measurable disease and ≥6 months of follow-up in the study (N = 209). The ORR was 41.6% (95% CI, 34.9%–48.6%) for the combined A1+F dMMR cohorts (Table). Responses were durable, and median DOR has not been reached in either cohort (median follow-up: cohort A1, 16.3 months; cohort F, 12.4 months). A total of 267 patients were included in the safety population (all patients who received ≥1 dose; cohort A1, N = 126; cohort F, N = 141). Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were consistent across tumor types. Overall, the most frequently reported any-grade TRAEs were asthenia (13.9%), diarrhea (13.5%), and fatigue (11.2%). The most common grade ≥3 TRAEs were anemia (2.2%), lipase increased (1.9%), alanine aminotransferase increased (1.1%), and diarrhea (1.1%). No deaths were attributed to dostarlimab. Conclusions: Dostarlimab demonstrated durable antitumor activity in patients with dMMR solid tumors, with consistent antitumor activity seen across endometrial and nonendometrial tumor types. The safety profile was manageable, with no new safety signals detected. Most TRAEs were low grade and were similar across cohorts. Clinical trial information: NCT02715284. [Table: see text]

Phase I trial of SU014813 in patients (pts) with advanced solid malignancies

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3521-3521 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. M. Fiedler ◽  
G. Giaccone ◽  
P. Lasch ◽  
I. Van der Horst ◽  
N. M. Brega ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Primary Study ◽  
Vegf Receptor ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Solid Malignancies ◽  
Disease Stabilization ◽  
Continuous Dose ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Tumor Types

3521 Background: SU014813 is an oral multi-targeted small molecule RTK inhibitor of VEGFRs, PDGFRs, sKIT & FLT-3 at nM concentrations. This study was designed to determine the safety, PK, PD, & preliminary efficacy of SU014813. Methods: Cohorts of pts with (w/) relapsed or refractory solid tumors received oral SU014813 at 25, 50, 100, 150, 200, or 250 mg on a 4 wks on/1 wk off (4/1), or 100 or 150 mg on a continuous dose (CD) schedule. The MTD was defined as the highest dose at which 0 of 3 or 1 of 6 pts encountered DLT during Cycle 1. Primary study endpoints included safety & PK. Plasma VEGF receptor & ligand concentrations were measured by ELISA & antitumor activity was assessed by CT scan. Results: 77 pts (57 M, 20 F; mean age 54.3 yrs) w/ chemorefractory solid tumors (22 CRC, 12 NSCLC, 12 sarcoma, 6 RCC,25 other) were enrolled. The rate of grade 3/4 AEs increased at doses above 100 mg w/hypertension & fatigue occurring in 18 % & 12 % of pts, diarrhea (9%) & thrombocytopenia (5%). The MTD was determined to be 100 mg CD, which was well-tolerated w/ manageable G3 diarrhea (n=2/6). PK was generally dose-proportional; at 100 mg CD, Cmax = 255 ng/mL, Tmax = 3 h, C24h = 63 ng/mL. SU014813 decreased plasma VEGFR2 & R3 concentrations in a dose- dependent manner (50–200 mg doses) but rebounded off treatment (4/1 schedule). Plasma VEGF generally increased after treatment but effects were variable. Twelve pts had an objective response at =50 mg daily dose levels; 1 pt w/ RCC had CR (183 days [d]);11 pts had PR (2 RCC, 2 thymoma, 2 NSCLC, 1 CRC, 4 other)(median 235 d; range 35- 470); 14 pts had stable disease (SD; median 178 d, range 58–554). Seven other pts who did not meet RECIST response criteria had long disease stabilization (median 200 d; range 180 - 440). Conclusions: SU014813 has a manageable safety & tolerability profiles at the doses studied. The MTD & recommended Ph II dose were determined to be 100 mg CD, as SU014813 had linear PK, modulated plasma VEGF receptors consistent with RTK inhibition, & demonstrated encouraging preliminary activity w/ durable responses across several tumor types. [Table: see text]

Epacadostat plus nivolumab in patients with advanced solid tumors: Preliminary phase I/II results of ECHO-204.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3003-3003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raymond P. Perez ◽  
Matthew John Riese ◽  
Karl D. Lewis ◽  
Mansoor N. Saleh ◽  
Adil Daud ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase 1 ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Common Grade ◽  
Open Label Phase ◽  
Study Population ◽  
N Dose ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Tumor Types ◽  
Preliminary Phase ◽  
Clinical Trial Information

3003 Background: ECHO-204 is an ongoing, open-label, phase 1/2 (P1/2) study of epacadostat (E; potent and selective oral inhibitor of the immunosuppressive enzyme indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1) plus PD-1 inhibitor nivolumab (N) in patients (pts) with advanced cancers (NSCLC, MEL, OVC, CRC, SCCHN, B-cell NHL [including DLBCL], GBM). Preliminary P1/2 safety and tolerability outcomes for the overall study population and P2 response for select tumor types (SCCHN, MEL, OVC, CRC) are reported. Methods: In P1 dose escalation, pts received E (25, 50, 100, 300 mg BID) + N (3 mg/kg Q2W); in P2 cohort expansion, pts received E (100 or 300 mg BID) + N (240 mg Q2W). Safety/tolerability was assessed in pts receiving ≥1 E + N dose. Response was assessed in RECIST v1.1 evaluable pts; for recently enrolled pt subgroups, only preliminary DCR (CR+PR+SD) is presented. Results: As of 29OCT2016,241 pts (P1, n = 36; P2, n = 205) were enrolled. No DLT was observed in P1. Most common TRAEs (≥15%) in pts treated with E 100 mg (n = 70) and E 300 mg (n = 135) were rash (33% and 22%, respectively), fatigue (26% and 31%), and nausea (24% and 19%). Rash was the most common grade ≥3 TRAE in E 100 mg and E 300 mg subgroups (10% and 12%). TRAEs led to discontinuation in 7% (E 100 mg) and 13% (E 300 mg) of pts. There were no TR-deaths. For the 23 recently enrolled, efficacy-evaluable SCCHN pts treated with E 300 mg, preliminary DCR was 70% (n = 16). Of 30 MEL pts, 8 were treated with E 100 mg and 22 were more recently enrolled and treated with E 300 mg. ORR (CR+PR) and DCR in MEL pts treated with E 100 mg were 75% (n = 6; all PR) and 100% (n = 8; 2 SD), respectively. Preliminary DCR in MEL pts treated with E 300 mg was 64% (n = 14). Of 29 OVC pts, 18 were treated with E 100 mg and 11 with E 300 mg.ORR and DCR for OVC pts treated with E 100 mg were 11% (n = 2; 2 PR) and 28% (n = 5; 3 SD); for 11 OVC pts treated with E 300 mg, ORR and DCR were 18% (n = 2; 2 PR) and 36% (n = 4; 2 SD).For 25 CRC pts (all E 100 mg), ORR and DCR were 4% (n = 1; PR) and 24% (n = 6; 5 SD).Safety/efficacy evaluations are ongoing for all cohorts. Conclusions: E + N was generally well tolerated up to the maximum E 300-mg dose. P2 ORR/DCR outcomes are promising, particularly in SCCHN and MEL pts. Updated data will be presented at the meeting. Clinical trial information: NCT02327078.

scholarly journals Surufatinib Plus Toripalimab in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors: A Single-Arm, Open-Label, Phase 1 Trial

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanshuo Cao ◽  
Ming Lu ◽  
Yu Sun ◽  
Jifang Gong ◽  
Jie Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Fixed Dose ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase 1 Trial ◽  
Open Label Phase ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract BackgroundPreclinical studies have supported a potential synergistic antitumor activity between surufatinib and anti-programed death ligand-1 (PD-L1). We describe here the results of a single-arm, open-label phase 1 trial to evaluate the safety, preliminary efficacy, and pharmacokinetics (PK) in patients with advanced solid tumors treated with surufatinib combined with toripalimab, an inhibitor of PD-L1.MethodsThis is an open-label, dose escalation and expansion study in patients with solid tumors who had failed standard therapies or had no effective treatment. In the dose escalation stage, 3 cohorts of patients were treated with surufatinib, at dose levels of 200, 250, or 300 mg once daily (QD) in combination with a fixed dose of toripalimab 240 mg, every 3 weeks (Q3W), to evaluate maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). Additional patients were enrolled in the dose expansion phase to further assess the efficacy, safety, and PK profile.ResultsFrom April 1, 2019 to July 10, 2020, 31 patients were screened, of which 28 patients were enrolled. One patient in the 300 mg cohort experienced dose limited toxicity (DLT), a grade 3 hyperthyroidism. The top 3 most common treatment-related adverse events of ≥ grade 3 were transaminases increased (17.9%), hypertension (14.3%) and blood bilirubin increased (10.7%). No treatment-related death or treatment discontinuation was identified. The RP2D was determined to be surufatinib 250 mg QD plus toripalimab 240 mg Q3W. Overall objective response rate was 22.2% [95% confidential interval (CI) 8.6‒42.3], and disease control rate reached 81.5% (95% CI 61.9‒93.7). ConclusionsSurufatinib plus toripalimab was well-tolerated, with no unexpected safety signals, and showed promising antitumor activity in patients with advanced solid tumors. Trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov, NCT03879057; Registered March 18, 2019, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03879057

A phase I study of vorinostat (VOR) in combination with capecitabine (CAP) in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3576-3576 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Tang ◽  
A. Oza ◽  
C. Townsley ◽  
L. Siu ◽  
G. Pond ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Zinc Ion ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Prior Therapy ◽  
Disease Stabilization ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Tumor Types

3576 Background: VOR (suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid; SAHA) is a small molecule inhibitor of histone deacetylase (HDAC) that binds directly to the enzyme’s active site in the presence of a zinc ion. Aberrant HDAC activity has been implicated in a variety of cancers. The combination of 5-fluorouracil and VOR is synergistic in preclinical tumor models. Methods: This phase I study evaluated safety, tolerability, and the recommended phase II dose (RPTD) of VOR and CAP in pts with advanced solid tumors. VOR was administered orally daily while CAP was administered orally bid on days 1–14 of a 21 d cycle. Results: Three dose levels have been evaluated (VOR (mg/d)/CAP (mg/bid)): 300/750, 300/1,000 and 400/1,000. Twenty-three pts have been treated: 6M/17F, median age 59 (range 41–73), ECOG 0:1:2 = 9:13:1, prior therapy 1:2:3 or more = 3:7:13. Pts had colorectal cancer (n=6), nasopharyngeal (n=3) and various other tumors. A total of 104 cycles have been administered, with median = 2 (range 1–15). One dose limiting toxicity (DLT) (grade 3 diarrhea) occurred in 6 patients at dose level 1. No DLT were observed at dose level 2, and 2 DLTs (grade 3 fatigue and grade 3 nausea/vomiting) occurred at dose level 3. RPTD was determined to be VOR 300 mg/d and CAP 1,000 mg/bid. Most common toxicities of any grade and at least possibly attributable (n=22) are: thrombocytopenia (59% of pts), fatigue (55%), nausea (55%), vomiting (50%), hypoalbuminemia (45%), anemia (41%), diarrhea (41%), anorexia (41%), elevated creatinine (36%), lymphopenia (36%), hyponatremia (36%), and hyperglycemia (36%). Common grade 3 toxicities included: hand-foot syndrome (23% of pts), diarrhea (14%), fatigue (14%), and lymphopenia (14%). One pt died on study from ventricular fibrillation due to sotalol and hypocalcemia from pre-existing hypoparathyroidism. Five patients with various tumor types had PR (2 confirmed, 3 unconfirmed) (2 nasopharyngeal, 1 each of ovarian, endometrial and squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck). In addition, disease stabilization was seen in 12 patients. Conclusions: VOR and CAP are well tolerated, and this combination is active in several tumor types. Further evaluations of VOR and CAP are warranted. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

A phase I, open-label, nonrandomized, pharmacokinetic study of trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) in Chinese patients with solid tumors.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14079-e14079
Author(s):  
Xicheng Wang ◽  
Jianfeng Zhou ◽  
Yan Li ◽  
Yuping Ge ◽  
Yanping Zhou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Chinese Patients ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Inactive Metabolite ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Experienced Grade ◽  
Clinical Trial Information

e14079 Background: Trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) is an oral combination of an antineoplastic thymidine-based nucleoside analog, trifluridine (FTD), and the thymidine phosphorylase inhibitor, tipiracil (TPI). Trifluridine/tipiracil is demonstrated as a valid treatment choice for Asian and Western patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer refractory or intolerant to standard chemotherapies in earlier studies. Its pharmacokinetic (PK) profile was also investigated in American and Japanese phase 1 studies, but never in Chinese pts. This study was conducted to investigate the PK profile of Trifluridine/tipiracil in a Chinese population with solid tumors. Methods: Pts who has responded poorly to existing standard treatment received Trifluridine/tipiracil (35 mg/m2/dose), orally BID, on days 1-5 and days 8-12 every 4 weeks until one of discontinuation criteria was met. Blood samples for PK analysis of FTD (the active compound), fluorothymine (FTY, inactive metabolite) and TPI were collected after single and multiple doses of Trifluridine/tipiracil on days 1 and 12 of cycle 1. The safety, tolerability, and antitumor activity of Trifluridine/tipiracil were also assessed as secondary endpoints. Results: A total of 15 pts were administered Trifluridine/tipiracil and analyzed for PKs. The PKs of FTD, FTY, and TPI in Chinese pts were comparable to those in Japanese pts. Compared with American pts, although the AUC0-t of TPI on day 12 was significantly lower in Chinese pts, the Cmax and AUC0-t of FTD were not significantly different. Thirteen (86.7%) pts reported treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), and eight (53.3%) pts experienced grade 3 TEAEs, of which anemia and fatigue were most frequently (≥10% of patients) reported. Grade 4 or 5 TEAEs were not observed. Conclusions: The PKs of Trifluridine/tipiracil in Chinese pts were comparable to those in Japanese pts. The exposure of FTD was showed without significant difference between Chinese, Japanese and American pts. Trifluridine/tipiracil was well-tolerated in Chinese pts and had the similar safety profile in comparison with previous studies. Clinical trial information: NCT02261532.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document