Zoledronic acid (ZOL) treatment (Rx) of ≥2 years in patients (pts) with metastatic bone disease (MBD) or multiple myeloma (MM): Six-month results from the LOTUZ study

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9630-9630
Author(s):  
L. Duck ◽  
M. Delforge ◽  
C. Doyan ◽  
H. Wildiers ◽  
K. MacDonald ◽  
...  

9630 Background: The bisphosphonate (BP) ZOL is frequently used to prevent skeletal-related events (SRE) in cancer pts. However, data are limited on its use beyond 2 years. LOTUZ is among the first studies to examine Rx and outcomes in pts with ZOL Rx for >2y. We report 6-month results. Methods: Prospective (18m), multicenter (50), pharmacoepidemiologic study. Baseline (0m) and 6m data available on 205 pts (of 298 enrolled), all free from osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) at 0m. Prior to ZOL Rx, 27.8% had non-ZOL BP Rx. Mean pre-enrollment BP duration was 42 mo (23–145) with 38 mo (23–80) for ZOL. Results: Mean age: 64 y (38–88); M/F: 29/71%; 67.8% with MBD vs 32.2% MM. 89.3% continued ZOL RX 0–6m; 90% with dose 4mg. From 0–6m, 10 pts (4.8%) developed ONJ (4 with MM, 6 with MBD): 5 mild, 3 moderate, 2 severe (median BP duration: 38.4, 46.5, and 34.8 months, respectively). Five pts with ONJ continued on ZOL RX 0–6m (3 mild, 2 moderate). 4/10 pts with ONJ had baseline dental conditions or procedures, 8/10 at 6m (only 1/10 at neither). SREs and pain levels remained constant 0–6m compared to 6m prior to baseline (see Table ). Conclusions: Beyond 2y, 90% of pts were continued on ZOL. SREs did not increase, but ONJ was diagnosed in 10/205 pts 0–6m, of which 5 were on ZOL RX beyond 24m. Long-term data are needed to better understand the risk/benefit of long-term ZOL Rx. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]

2021 ◽  
pp. 107815522199603
Author(s):  
Christina Billias ◽  
Megan Langer ◽  
Sorana Ursu ◽  
Rebecca Schorr

Objective To determine the incidence of skeletal-related events among multiple myeloma patients who received chemotherapy without a bone-modifying agent (zoledronic acid and denosumab) versus those who received chemotherapy with a bone-modifying agent. The secondary objective was to determine the incidence of skeletal-related events in patients without any prior history of skeletal-related events and who were treated with zoledronic acid every four weeks versus those who received zoledronic acid at an extended interval of every twelve weeks. Additional secondary objectives included the incidence of nephrotoxicity, hypocalcemia and osteonecrosis of the jaw in all patients. Methods This institutional review board-approved, retrospective cohort study included patients 18 to 89 years old with a diagnosis of multiple myeloma, who were being treated with chemotherapy between July 1, 2016 and October 31, 2019. Safety and efficacy were assessed through analysis of pertinent data collected: patient demographics, baseline skeletal-related events, development of new skeletal-related events, number and type of bone-modifying agent doses administered, and drug-related toxicities such as nephrotoxicity, hypocalcemia, and osteonecrosis of the jaw. Results A total of 73 patients were included. New skeletal-related events occurred in 12 patients (27%) in the chemotherapy without a bone-modifying agent group and in 5 patients (17%) in the chemotherapy with a bone-modifying agent group (OR = 0.56, 95% CI [0.172–1.8]; P = 0.32). The incidence of skeletal-related events was similar among patients receiving zoledronic acid every four weeks versus every twelve weeks in patients without a prior skeletal-related event (N = 0 vs. N = 2 respectively; P = 0.47). There were no statistically significant differences observed in each of the three secondary safety endpoints: incidence of hypocalcemia, nephrotoxicity and osteonecrosis of the jaw. Conclusion Multiple myeloma patients receiving chemotherapy without a bone-modifying agent had higher rates of skeletal-related events compared to those being treated with chemotherapy and a bonemodifying agent. Our results highlight the benefit of utilizing bonemodifying agents for the prevention of skeletal-related events in all multiple myeloma patients being treated with chemotherapy.


Author(s):  
Nutrisia Aquariushinta Sayuti ◽  
Tri Murti Andayani ◽  
Dwi Endarti ◽  
Kartika Widayati

Zoledronic acid and ibandronic acid are listed in the Indonesian national formulary to prevent skeletal-related events (SRE) in patients diagnosed with bone metastasis in multiple myeloma (MM), with limited evidence to compare their effectiveness. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness and safety of zoledronic acid and ibandronic acid in delaying SRE. The method was the retrospective, with data obtained from the multicenter study for MM patients with bone metastasis (aged over 18 years), based on medical records between January 2016 and December 2018. Patients were assigned to zoledronic acid and ibandronic acid groups. The clinical outcome was the next SRE which consists of vertebral/bone fracture, spinal cord compression leading to the need for surgery or radiation, and adverse event (AE) due to 2 years of drugs usage. Result of this research was made up of a total of seventy (70) patients with  40  in the zoledronic acid group, and 30 in ibandronic acid. At median treatment duration of 8 months (range: 2 – 24 month), SRE incident in zoledronic acid and ibandronic acid were 20.0 % and 23.3 % respectively. Furthermore, their mean SRE free survival times were 21 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 19 - 23 months], and 19 months [95% CI, 16 – 22 months], respectively. Also, their time intervals were not significantly different (p>0.05). The osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) was AE which occurred more in zoledronic acid than ibandronic acid. The conclusion was zoledronic acid tends to delay SRE time compared to ibandronic acid, although more ONJ occur.


Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 2967-2967
Author(s):  
Ramón García-Sanz ◽  
Albert Oriol ◽  
Javier De La Rubia ◽  
Luis Palomera ◽  
Paz Ribas ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 2967 Zoledronic Acid (ZOL) has demonstrated up to half a year improvement in survival of multiple myeloma patients. This conjoins with prior experimental studies to support a potential anti-myeloma effect for bisphosphonates. However, the in vivo effect can be confounded with the concomitant use of chemotherapy and new drugs, as well as with competing risks that emerge from the beneficial effect of bisphosphonates on the skeletal related events and its relationship with survival. Accordingly, the real anti-tumor effect of ZOL remains to be elucidated in clinical practice, for example in patients free of the disturbing effect of chemotherapy. New therapies provide an 80–90% response rate in MM, although most patients ultimately relapse. During relapse, many patients show an initial re-positivization or re-growth of the M-component (biochemical relapse) that is usually not accompanied by clinical symptoms. The usual decision at this point is not to treat such patients. Thus, these asymptomatic patients represent a perfect group to explore the antitumor benefit of ZOL in the absence of any other cytotoxic therapy. Aim: To analyze the anti-tumor effect of ZOL in the absence of any other cytotoxic drug in MM patients under asymptomatic biochemical relapse. Primary end-point was Symptomatic Progression Free Survival (sPFS). Secondary evaluation variables were response rate, skeletal related events and time to next chemotherapy. Patients and methods: 192 patients are calculated to be recruited in a randomized, prospective, open label phase IV trial in which a group of patients receive ZOL (4 mg iv./4 wk, 12 doses) and Best Supportive Care (BSC) and the rest only BSC. All patients are monitorized every 4 wk. Results: This is an interim analysis corresponding to the first 93 patients included in the trial: 49 treated with ZOL and 44 without ZOL. Asymptomatic Biochemical Relapse was confirmed in all patients who had a median age of 68 yr (40–87) and a male female distribution of 50/43. M-component distribution was IgG (69%), IgA (29%) and only light chain (2%). Relapse had presented after 1, 2 or 33 lines of therapy in 67%, 22% and 11% of cases, respectively. Prior treatment had always included transplant (65%), bortezomib (33%), IMiDs (33%), or a combination of them. Lytic bone lesions were present in 66% of patients and one or two skeletal related events (SRE) had presented prior to the inclusion in the trial in 31% of cases. FISH/cytogenetics was abnormal in 49% of cases: t(11;14) 18%, Rb deletion (alone) 16%, del(p53) 9%, t(4;14) 6% and t(14;x) 4%. After randomization, both groups of patients were well balanced in terms of prognostic features, prior response, and time from diagnosis and relapse to the inclusion in the trial. 25 patients have completed the program and four terminated before completion due to patient refusal (n=2) and development of other diseases (n=2). 31 patients are still ongoing and 38 have progressed before 12 mo of treatment, with a median sPFS of 287 days (9.4 months) with similar results between the two arms (271 vs. 308 days for patients receiving or not receiving ZA, respectively; 12-month projected sPFS was 47% vs. 42%, respectively). Interestingly, patients not treated with ZOL progressed with more advanced bone disease (8 cases of new bone lesions or re-growth of prior lesions, 1 spinal cord compression, and 2 cases of hypercalcemia) vs. patients treated with ZOL (two cases re-growth of bone lesions, p<0.01). By contrast, patients treated with ZOL progressed more frequently with decrease o Hb level below 10 g/dL (13 vs. 8 cases). There were 7 SRE that presented only in the group of patients treated without ZOL (p=0.005) Conclusions: Zoledronic Acid therapy in MM with asymptomatic relapse seems to reduce the risk of progression with symptomatic bone disease and SREs. The possible antitumor effect of Zoledronic Acid alone in biochemical relapses cannot be elucidated yet. This interim analysis supports the continuation of the trial to reach a higher number of patients and longer follow-up. Disclosures: García-Sanz: Novartis Oncology: Grant Support Other. De La Rubia:Celgene, Janssen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Granell:Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria.


2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 18506-18506
Author(s):  
G. Teoh ◽  
D. Tan ◽  
C. Chuah ◽  
W. Hwang ◽  
R. Yiu ◽  
...  

18506 Background: Although dexamethasone (Dex), thalidomide (Thal) and zoledronic acid (Zol) have frequently been combined for the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM), the ideal dosing schedule is unknown. We previously reported that lower doses of Dex and Thal can be effectively combined with high-frequency dosing of Zol (Haematologica 2005). Methods: This “dtZ” regimen - which comprises weekly Dex 20 mg OM for 4 days, Thal 50 mg ON, and 3-weekly Zol 4 mg - resulted in an impressive response rate (RR) of 61.6% and near complete remission (nCR)/complete remission (CR) rate of 7.7% in 26 patients with relapsed/refractory MM. Results: In this present study, we treated 22 newly diagnosed MM patients with “dtZ” and report an even more impressive RR of 100.0% and nCR/CR rate of 20–35%. The median time to response was 1.8 months and median time to maximum response was 2.2 months. The median time to progression (TTP) has not been achieved yet. As expected, low-dose Dex/Thal resulted in lower (18.1%) grade 3 or 4 toxicities. These were all infections; which lead to further dose-reduction of Dex. There were no thromboembolic events, despite the fact that aspirin was not routinely given. Of particular interest, 3- weekly Zol was not associated with any significant decrease in renal function, and none of our patients developed osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ). In fact, at the time of writing of this abstract, more than 1,000 doses of Zol had been administered in a 3-weekly fashion to these as well as other patients, and only 1 patient developed ONJ. This patient who had already received greater than 20 doses of Zol healed uneventfully after receiving appropriate outpatient dental treatment, and subsequently received another 8 doses of Zol with no recurrence of ONJ. Conclusion: In conclusion, the Zol-based “dtZ” regimen is potentially a highly-effective and safe frontline regimen for MM. Using Zol every 3 weeks with lower doses of Dex and Thal does not appear to increase the rate or severity of nephrotoxicity or ONJ. Although we do not know exactly why every patient responded to “dtZ”, we speculate that this could be due to a critical balance that has been achieved between the anti-MM, anti-osteoclastic and immunostimulatory effects of the individual drugs of the combination. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document