HER-2/neu expression in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM)

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e13035-e13035
Author(s):  
S. Gupta ◽  
H. Sheikh ◽  
C. Schneider ◽  
X. Zhang ◽  
A. Padmanabhan ◽  
...  

e13035 Background: Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is a disease in which very few cytotoxic chemotherapy agents have been shown to have activity. This is partly due to their inability to cross the blood brain barrier. Trials with bevacizumab, a VEGF inhibitor that disrupts tumor angiogenesis, have demonstrated activity against this otherwise chemotherapy resistant disease. This has led to interest in other biologic agents that target angiogenic pathways for the treatment of GBM. Over-expression of HER-2/neu by human tumor cells is closely associated with increased angiogenesis and expression of VEGF. Lapatinib is a recently available low molecular weight immunotherapeutic agent that targets HER-2/neu proteins. In a recent study, breast cancer patients treated with lapatinib and capcitabine had decreased brain metastases indicating that lapatinib may cross the blood brain barrier and thus have potential in the treatment of malignant gliomas. Limited studies have evaluated HER-2/neu gene expression in GBM and the results are inconsistent. We evaluated the expression of Her-2/neu protein in 41 consecutive GBM cases to explore the potential utility of targeting this pathway. Methods: Archival histopathologic sections from 41 patients (age 26–89 years) with a diagnosis of GBM from 2004–2008 were reviewed. The diagnosis was confirmed and optimal sections were selected. Immunohistochemistry was performed on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections using the primary antibody against HER-2/neu (clone 4B5, Ventana). The results were evaluated by three independent investigators. Interpretation was performed using the semi-quantitative criteria (Score 0 to 3+) currently used for primary breast carcinomas. Results: 38 out of 41 cases showed no immunohistochemical staining with HER-2/neu antibody (score 0). Three cases demonstrated weak, incomplete membrane staining of rare tumor cells (score 1+) and were interpreted as negative. The positive and negative controls worked properly. Conclusions: Our study indicates that there is no significant immunohistochemical over-expression of HER-2/neu protein in GBM. This suggests that HER-2/neu over-expression is not a significant oncogenic pathway in GBM, and therefore may not be a potential therapeutic target in this disease. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii28-ii28
Author(s):  
S Weil ◽  
E Jung ◽  
D Domínguez Azorín ◽  
J Higgins ◽  
J Reckless ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUND Glioblastomas are notoriously therapy resistant tumors. As opposed to other tumor entities, no major advances in therapeutic success have been made in the past decades. This has been calling for a deeper biological understanding of the tumor, its growth and resistance patterns. We have been using a xenograft glioma model, where human glioblastoma cells are implanted under chronic cranial windows and studied longitudinally over many weeks and months using multi photon laser scanning microscopy (MPLSM). To test the effect of (new) drugs, a stable and direct delivery system avoiding the blood-brain-barrier has come into our interest. MATERIAL AND METHODS We implanted cranial windows and fluorescently labeled human glioblastoma stem-like cells into NMRI nude mice to follow up on the tumor development in our MPLSM model. After tumor establishment, an Alzet® micropump was implanted to directly deliver agents via a catheter system continuously over 28 days directly under the cranial window onto the brain surface. Using the MPLSM technique, the continuous delivery and infusion of drugs onto the brain and into the tumor was measured over many weeks in detail using MPLSM. RESULTS The establishment of the combined methods allowed reliable concurrent drug delivery over 28 days bypassing the blood-brain-barrier. Individual regions and tumor cells could be measured and followed up before, and after the beginning of the treatment, as well as after the end of the pump activity. Fluorescently labelled drugs were detectable in the MPLSM and its distribution into the brain parenchyma could be quantified. After the end of the micropump activity, further MPLSM measurements offer the possibility to observe long term effects of the applied drug on the tumor. CONCLUSION The combination of tumor observation in the MPSLM and concurrent continuous drug delivery is a feasible and reliable method for the investigation of (novel) anti-tumor agents, especially drugs that are not blood-brain-barrier penetrant. Morphological or even functional changes of individual tumor cells can be measured under and after treatment. These techniques can be used to test new drugs targeting the tumor, its tumor microtubes and tumor cells networks, and measure the effects longitudinally.


Author(s):  
A. Horaczek ◽  
G. Baumgartner ◽  
P. Grunert ◽  
K. Kitz ◽  
E. Knosp ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 117-128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joanna Macdonald ◽  
Delphine Denoyer ◽  
Justin Henri ◽  
Adelaide Jamieson ◽  
Ingrid J.G. Burvenich ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Apostolos A. Gkountas ◽  
Nickolas D. Polychronopoulos ◽  
George N. Sofiadis ◽  
Evangelos G. Karvelas ◽  
Leonidas A. Spyrou ◽  
...  

Nanoscale ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Puja Sandbhor ◽  
Jayant Goda ◽  
Bhabani Mohanty ◽  
Pradip Chaudhari ◽  
Shilpee Dutt ◽  
...  

The blood–brain barrier (BBB) and tumor heterogeneity have resulted in abysmally poor clinical outcomes in glioblastoma (GBM) with the standard therapeutic regimen.


2021 ◽  
Vol 28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonela Sofía Asad ◽  
Alejandro Javier Nicola Candia ◽  
Nazareno González ◽  
Camila Florencia Zuccato ◽  
Adriana Seilicovich ◽  
...  

Background: Glioblastoma constitutes the most frequent and aggressive primary malignant brain tumor in adults. Despite the advances in its treatment, its prognosis remains very poor. Gene therapy has been proposed as a complementary treatment, since it may overcome the problem of the blood-brain barrier for systemic therapies, allowing to target tumor cells and their tumor microenvironment locally, without affecting the normal brain parenchyma. In comparison with viral vectors, non-viral vectors became an attractive tool due to their reduced potential of biosafety risks, lower cost, higher availability and easy storage. Objective: In this article, we aimed to outline the current preclinical and clinical developments of non-viral delivery systems for therapeutic transgene delivery in malignant gliomas. Conclusion: Non-viral vectors are efficient tools for gene delivery since they exhibit reduced non-specific cytotoxicity and can go through several modifications in order to achieve high tumor tropism and the ability to cross the blood-brain barrier to access the tumor mass. However, further evaluations in preclinical models and clinical trials are required in order to translate it into the neuro-oncology clinic.


2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 304-318 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lynn Jena ◽  
Emma McErlean ◽  
Helen McCarthy

AbstractThe malignant brain cancer, glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), is heterogeneous, infiltrative, and associated with chemo- and radioresistance. Despite pharmacological advances, prognosis is poor. Delivery into the brain is hampered by the blood-brain barrier (BBB), which limits the efficacy of both conventional and novel therapies at the target site. Current treatments for GBM remain palliative rather than curative; therefore, innovative delivery strategies are required and nanoparticles (NPs) are at the forefront of future solutions. Since the FDA approval of Doxil® (1995) and Abraxane (2005), the first generation of nanomedicines, development of nano-based therapies as anti-cancer treatments has escalated. A new generation of NPs has been investigated to efficiently deliver therapeutic agents to the brain, overcoming the restrictive properties of the BBB. This review discusses obstacles encountered with systemic administration along with integration of NPs incorporated with conventional and emerging treatments. Barriers to brain drug delivery, NP transport mechanisms across the BBB, effect of opsonisation on NPs administered systemically, and peptides as NP systems are addressed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document