Predictive role of topoisomerase IIα, gp170, Bcl-2, tumor burden, and histology in neoadjuvant chemotherapy for soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10086-10086
Author(s):  
A. Comandone ◽  
P. Porrino ◽  
E. Berardengo ◽  
A. Linari ◽  
A. Boglione ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (11) ◽  
pp. 3542-3549 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Y. Zaidi ◽  
Cecilia G. Ethun ◽  
Thuy B. Tran ◽  
George Poultsides ◽  
Valerie P. Grignol ◽  
...  

ESMO Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. e000293 ◽  
Author(s):  
Herbert H. Loong ◽  
Kwan-Hung Wong ◽  
Teresa Tse

Together with surgery and radiotherapy, systemic treatment with cytotoxic chemotherapy and molecular targeted agents is one of the main therapeutic pillars in the treatment of soft-tissue sarcomas and is the mainstay of treatment in patients with advanced or metastatic disease. Unlike other more common malignancies such as breast and colorectal cancer, the role of chemotherapy when used in the adjuvant setting in soft-tissue sarcomas is less well defined. Results from prior studies have been conflicting, in part due to the heterogeneity and rarity of the disease, and large-scale meta-analysis has been performed to address this issue. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy, defined as the use of chemotherapy before definitive treatment with surgery or radiotherapy, has distinct theoretical and practical advantages, which can potentially be beneficial to the patient. However, the currently available evidence to support its use is even more scarce. In this review article, we describe the current established data behind the use of adjuvant chemotherapy in selected patients with localised soft-tissue sarcomas and, through extrapolation of available data, discuss the potential role of it when used in the upfront setting.


Author(s):  
Ira J. Spiro ◽  
Damian Dupuis ◽  
Herman Suit ◽  
Henry Mankin ◽  
Candace Jennings ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 391-401 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Baur ◽  
A. Stäbler ◽  
C. M. Wendtner ◽  
S. Arbogast ◽  
S. A. Rahman ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 50 (2) ◽  
pp. 497-510 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amandine Crombé ◽  
Cynthia Périer ◽  
Michèle Kind ◽  
Baudouin Denis De Senneville ◽  
François Le Loarer ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 2959-2959 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandro Pulsoni ◽  
Irene Della Starza ◽  
Maria Elena Tosti ◽  
Luca Vincenzo Cappelli ◽  
Giorgia Annechini ◽  
...  

Abstract Background. In localized follicular lymphoma (FL, stage I-II), BCL2/IGH+ cells can be detected in the peripheral blood (PB) and/or bone marrow (BM) in 66.7% of cases (Pulsoni et al, BJH 2007). We hereby analyzed the prognostic impact of MRD in localized FL and explored the possibility of a MRD-guided therapeutic approach on a series of patients with a long follow-up. Methods. Between April 2000 and February 2015, 67 consecutive patients with a confirmed histologic diagnosis of stage I/II FL followed at our Center were enrolled in the study. PB and BM samples were collected at enrollment in all patients and investigated by qualitative PCR to identify the presence of a BCL2/IGH rearrangement. Paraffin-embedded lymph nodes (LN) were studied when available. Patients who proved positive at baseline were studied for MRD every 6 months. Real-Time Quantitative PCR (RQ-PCR) was retrospectively performed according to material availability. All patients were treated with involved field radiotherapy (RT) (24-30 Gy); from 2005, patients who were MRD+ after RT received rituximab (R) (375 mg/m2, 4 weekly administration). The median follow-up is 67 months (17-183); 21 patients (31%) have relapsed after a median of 37 months (17-165) from diagnosis. Results. At baseline, a clonal marker was found by qualitative PCR in 48/67 cases (72%): 36 were MBR+ (54%), 6 mcr+ (9%), 6 showed a minor BCL2 rearrangement (9%), while 19 (28%) were negative. Fifteen of the latter 19 were analyzed by RQ-PCR and 4 proved MBR+. Of the 13 available LNs, 11 showed the same molecular marker identified in the PB/BM; 2 cases, negative in the PB/BM, showed a rearrangement in the LN only. After RT, 40/42 MBR+/mcr+ patients were analyzed: 20 resulted MRD-, while 20 persisted MRD+. Regardless of the post-RT MRD status, an equal number of relapses was recorded in both groups (7 each). R treatment was administered to the 20 MRD+ patients after RT. Sixteen (80%) achieved a MRD- status after R: over time, 7/16 patients converted to MRD+ and 4 relapsed, whilst 9/16 patients (56.2%) remain persistently MRD- and none has relapsed so far. To evaluate the impact of R, we considered a series of 27 patients MRD+ after RT or who were MRD- and became MRD+ during the follow-up. Of the 19 patients who received R (1 could not be studied), 15 (79%) did not relapse, while of the 8 untreated patients (pre-2005), 6 (75%) relapsed (p=0.025). Progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly longer for R-treated patients (p=0.0412) (Fig. 1). To define the predictive role of MRD in the entire cohort regardless of post-RT treatment, we considered the 39 patients with molecular follow-up. Thirteen have relapsed: 10/13 (77%) were MRD+ in the follow-up, including the pre-relapse time point, while 3 resulted persistently MRD-. Contrariwise, of the 26/39 patients in continuous remission, 18 (69%) were persistently MRD- while 8 were MRD+ (p=0.015). PFS was significantly better for MRD- patients (p=0.0163) (Fig. 2). RQ-PCR was performed in 30 MBR+ patients: 17 (57%) showed a tumor burden ≥10-5 and 13 <10-5. Tumor burden at diagnosis predicted the MRD clearance following RT: 9/13 (69%) cases with low tumor burden resulted MRD- after RT compared to 2/17 (12%) cases with high tumor burden (p=0.0027). Contrariwise, tumor burden did not predict the occurrence of relapse. Conclusions. Early stage FL at diagnosis can have a heterogenous disease extension: 2 of our cases were truly localized, showing a molecular marker only in the LN. However, in most cases the use of combined qualitative approaches, including canonical MBR/mcr and minor rearrangements, together with RQ-PCR has allowed to identify circulating BCL2/IGH+ cells (52/67 cases: 77.6%), despite a negative BM biopsy. RT induced a MRD negativity in 50% of BCL2/IGH+ patients, but this did not impact on clinical outcome. The administration of R in MRD+ patients decreased significantly the risk of a subsequent relapse and improved PFS. Regardless of treatment, MRD positivity during the follow-up is a predictor of relapse and PFS. Tumor burden at diagnosis is associated with MRD clearance after RT. We support the use of a MRD-driven treatment with anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies in patients with localized FL after RT. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2005 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 198-205
Author(s):  
Margaret von Mehren

Medical management of soft tissue sarcomas (STS) has been restricted by the limited availability of active drugs. A plethora of new oncologic agents are now available, many of which have specific therapeutic targets. Gemcitabine and docetaxel is a combination of drugs that have limited single-agent activity. Yondelis, a novel chemotherapeutic that binds DNA and functions partially by inhibiting transcription, is being tested alone and in combination with doxorubicin. Inhibitors of mTOR, a serine/threonine kinase that regulates cell cycle activation and cell growth, are also being tested. Growth factor receptor inhibitors are being evaluated in a variety of sarcomas that have been found to express the targets. In addition, a variety of agents are being assessed in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST). Single agents and agents combined with imatinib are being tested in imatinib-refractory and in metastatic GIST. The increased use of targeted agents underscores the need for understanding sarcoma biology.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document