Early response evaluation using 18F-FDG-PET/CT does not influence management of patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) treated with palliative intent

Aim The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of 18F-FDG-PET/CT on treatment decision making in metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) patients. Methods This study retrospectively evaluated 18F-FDG-PET/CT scans to monitor response of metastatic GIST patients treated with palliative intent. Data from the Dutch GIST Registry was used. Early scans (<10 weeks after start of treatment) and late scans (>10 weeks after start of treatment) were scored on the impact in change of treatment. Results Sixty-one PET/CT scans were performed for treatment evaluation in 39 patients with metastatic GIST of which 36 were early scans and 25 were late scans. Early PET/CT scans led to a change in management in 5.6% of patients and late PET/CT scans led to a change in management in 56% of patients. Change in management was more often seen after scans with lack of metabolic response (48% vs. 11% in scans with metabolic response, p=0.002). Neither metabolic response nor change in treatment were more often seen in patients with KIT mutations compared to patients with non-KIT mutations (metabolic response 65% KIT vs. 46% non-KIT, p=0.33, and change in management 28% KIT vs. 21% non-KIT, p=0.74). Conclusion 18F-FDG-PET/CT is not recommended for early response evaluation in an unselected patient population with metastatic GIST, since it does not influence treatment decisions. 18F-FDG-PET/CT, however, can be useful for late response assessment, especially in case of indeterminate CT results.

Worsening membranous nephropathy in a patient with GIST treated with sunitinib

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) are anticancer agents widely used for a variety of malignancies including gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST). Although generally well-tolerated, TKIs have been associated with a number of adverse events including hypertension, proteinuria and nephrotic syndrome. We present the case of a 70-year-old patient with metastatic GIST on long-standing sunitinib who developed hypertension, oedema and hypoalbuminemia with a rising serum creatinine and was found to have nephrotic syndrome. Workup revealed elevated antiphospholipase A2 receptor (PLA2R) antibody IgG titres and a kidney biopsy confirmed PLA2R-positive membranous nephropathy without findings of thrombotic microangiopathy. Cessation of sunitinib led to reduction in anti-PLA2R antibody IgG titres while resumption, due to concern for cancer progression, led to worsening symptoms. Treatment with rituximab led to undetectable anti-PLA2R IgG titres. We highlight the importance of maintaining a systematic approach for evaluating nephrotic syndrome and provide a case showing that TKIs can exacerbate underlying nephrotic syndrome.

A Nomogram Predicting Progression Free Survival in Patients with Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor Receiving Sunitinib: Incorporating Pre-Treatment and Post-Treatment Parameters

The present study aimed to construct a prognostic nomogram incorporating pre-treatment and post-treatment factors to predict progression-free survival (PFS) after use of sunitinib in patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) following imatinib intolerance or failure. From 2007 to 2018, 109 metastatic GIST patients receiving sunitinib at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taiwan, were enrolled. A prognostic nomogram to predict PFS was developed. Sixty-three male and forty-six female metastatic GIST patients, with a median age of 61 years (range: 15–91 years), received sunitinib. The median PFS for 109 patients is 9.93 months. For pre-treatment factors, male gender, body mass index more than 18.5 kg/m2, no sarcopenia status, higher lymphocyte count, lower platelet/lymphocyte ratio, good performance status, higher sunitinib dose, and non-liver metastasis were significantly associated with favorable PFS. For post-treatment factors, adverse events with hypertension, hand–foot skin reaction, and diarrhea were significantly associated with favorable PFS. However, only eight clinicopathological independent factors for PFS prediction were selected for prognostic nomogram establishment. The calibration curve for probability of PFS revealed good agreement between the nomogram prediction and actual observation. High risk patients will experience the lowest PFS. A prognostic nomogram integrating eight clinicopathological factors was constructed to assist prognostic prediction for individual patients with advanced GIST after sunitinib use.

Gastro-intestinal Stromal Tumor Complicated by an Acute Intestinal Occlusion: A Case Report

Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) are rares connective tumors, usually located in the stomach or small intestine. Derived from Cajal cells or one of their precursors. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) represent 1% to 2% of all neoplasms of the digestive tract, The average age is between 50 and 60 years old, most often occurring in the stomach, Their clinical symptomatology is variable according to the region affected or the size of the lesion, they are responsibles for digestive bleeding, pain, or abdominal mass, as well as an alteration in the general state of health. More rarely, the diagnosis is made on the occasion of an intestinal occlusion. the GIST complicated by occlusion due either to invagination of the tumour mass or to exophytic development of the tumour. In CT scans, they are manifested by a localised parietal tumour thickening of variable size with most often an exophytic development. Molecular biology plays an important role in this disease. The main treatment is radical surgery .The Imatinib has radically changed the prognosis of patients with unresectable and/or metastatic GIST. We report the case of a patient with a stromal tumour complicated by occlusion operated in emergency in the department of visceral surgical emergencies of Ibn Rochd UHC.

The management of metastatic GIST: current standard and investigational therapeutics

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is the most common mesenchymal tumor of the gastrointestinal tract. The majority of GISTs harbor gain of function mutations in either KIT or PDGFRα. Determination of the GIST molecular subtype upon diagnosis is important because this information informs therapeutic decisions in both the adjuvant and metastatic setting. The management of GIST was revolutionized by the introduction of imatinib, a KIT inhibitor, which has become the standard first line treatment for metastatic GIST. However, despite a clinical benefit rate of 80%, the majority of patients with GIST experience disease progression after 2–3 years of imatinib therapy. Second and third line options include sunitinib and regorafenib, respectively, and yield low response rates and limited clinical benefit. There have been recent FDA approvals for GIST including ripretinib in the fourth-line setting and avapritinib for PDGFRA exon 18-mutant GIST. This article aims to review the optimal treatment approach for the management of patients with advanced GIST. It examines the standard treatment options available but also explores the novel treatment approaches in the setting of imatinib refractory GIST.

Striving towards Normality in Daily Life: A Qualitative Study of Patients Living with Metastatic Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumour in Long-Term Clinical Remission

Background. This study explored how patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) experience the psychosocial challenges associated with their disease and its treatment, as well as how that experience influenced their practical, relational, vocational, and existential life. Methods. This qualitative study has an explorative design and applied a phenomenological and hermeneutical approach. We conducted in-depth, semistructured interviews with 20 patients with metastatic GIST in long-term clinical remission. The gathered data were interpreted using a thematic analysis. Results. Living with metastatic GIST, as well as the side effects of the required medication, led to changes that limited the participants’ daily life. They expressed how tiredness, impaired memory, and physical challenges were among the detrimental impacts of the disease on their family life, vocational life, social life, and leisure time. Adjustments were necessary to ensure they had sufficient energy to cope with the practical and relational aspects of everyday life. Feelings of uncertainty stemming from drug resistance, disease progression, and the possibility of early death were also experienced as challenging. Half the participants stated that it was difficult to keep negative mental health issues at bay, and all of them considered the time spent waiting for their scheduled follow-up scan to be burdensome. Conclusions. It is important to focus increased attention on how the daily practical and psychosocial life of patients with chronic cancer, including metastatic GIST, is affected by their disease. Doing so might provide health-care workers with clues regarding how best to guide and support such patients throughout their emotional journey and, therefore, to improve their quality of life. As new medical treatments can also prolong survival and induce long-term clinical remission in relation to several other forms of metastatic cancer, the findings concerning GIST reported in this study might have widespread implications.