A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled cross over trial of the effect on quality of life (QOL) of continuing dexamethasone beyond 24 hours following moderately emetogenic chemotherapy in women with breast cancer.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9020-9020
Author(s):  
J. L. Vardy ◽  
G. R. Pond ◽  
A. Dodd ◽  
D. Warr ◽  
B. Seruga ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e21699-e21699
Author(s):  
So Yeon Jeon ◽  
Hye Sook Han ◽  
Woo Kyun Bae ◽  
Moo-Rim Park ◽  
Sang-Cheol Lee ◽  
...  

e21699 Background: Olanzapine was found to be effective for preventing acute and delayed emesis in patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy by randomized phase 3 study. However, there is limited data for the efficacy of olanzapine combined with palonosetron and dexamethasone in patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC). Methods: We conducted randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to determine whether olanzapine could reduce the frequency of CINV and improve quality of life (QOL) in patients receiving palonosetron and dexamethasone for the prophylaxis of MEC induced nausea and vomiting. Two groups received either 10 mg of olanzapine orally or matching placebo daily on days 1 through 4. The primary end point was the complete response (no emesis and no use of rescue medication) for the acute phase (0-24 hours after chemotherapy). Secondary end points included the complete responses for the delayed (24-120 hours) and overall phase (0-120 hours), proportion of significant emesis (VAS ≥ 25 mm) for overall phase, use of rescue medications, and effect on QOL by Functional Living Index-Emesis (FLIE) questionnaire. Results: Fifty-six patients were randomized and fifty-four patients were evaluable (29 assigned to olanzapine, and 25 to placebo). The complete response rate was not significant between olanzapine and placebo group in the acute (96.5% vs. 88.0%, P = 0.326), delayed (69.0% vs. 48.0%, P = 0.118), and overall phase (69.0% vs. 48.0%, P = 0.118). However, the percentage of patients with significant emesis (17.2% vs. 44.0%, P = 0.032) and the use of rescue medications (0.03±0.19 vs. 1.88±2.88, P = 0.002) were significantly lower with olanzapine than with placebo in the overall phase. Furthermore, olanzapine group experienced a better QOL than the placebo group, as reported on the FLIE questionnaire (P = 0.015). Conclusions: Olanzapine in addition to palonosetron and dexamethasone significantly improved the management of emesis and QOL among previously untreated patients receiving MEC, although the efficacy was limited to reduce the frequency of CINV. Clinical trial information: NCT02400866.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandip Mukhopadhyay ◽  
Premnath Dutta ◽  
Sanatan Banerjee ◽  
Biswamit Bhattacharya ◽  
Supreeti Biswas ◽  
...  

Aims: Comparison of efficacy, safety and sedation between two doses of olanzapine in the control of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). Patients & methods: A prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled study was conducted, enrolling 68 patients receiving a single-day cycle of high and moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. Patients received either of olanzapine 5 mg or 10 mg from day 1 through 3 in addition to ondansetron and dexamethasone. Control of CINV, nausea, sedation, quality of life (QoL) and adverse events were compared. Results: Nausea, emesis control and improvement of QoL were similar in both groups. Sedation severity was 133% higher with 10 mg olanzapine. Conclusions: Lower dose olanzapine is effective to control CINV with significantly reduced sedation.


1998 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 389-395 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. J. Rusthoven ◽  
David Osoba ◽  
Charles A. Butts ◽  
Louise Yelle ◽  
Helen Findlay ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document