Efficacy of lanreotide 30 mg as symptomatic treatment in patients with inoperable bowel obstruction due to peritoneal carcinomatosis: A randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 242-242 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Mariani ◽  
J. Blumberg ◽  
L. Chauvenet
Keyword(s):  
Peritoneal Carcinomatosis ◽  
Bowel Obstruction ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Clinical Symptoms ◽  
Group Analysis ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Concomitant Treatment ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Significant Difference

242 Background: Somatostatin analogues in previous open label studies improved symptoms due to bowel obstruction in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis. This study assessed the efficacy and safety of lanreotide microparticles 30 mg as treatment of clinical symptoms in inoperable patients. Methods: Eighty cancer patients with inoperable digestive obstruction of malignant origin (mean age 62.3 years, 82.5% female) were randomized to receive one intramuscular injection either of lanreotide microparticles 30 mg (N=43) or placebo (N=37). The primary location of cancer was mostly genital (ovary 37.5%, uterus 13.8%) or digestive (colon 16.3%, stomach 11.3%, pancreas 6.3%). Most patients were fed by central parenteral route (80%) and were severely impaired (63.8% ECOG 3 or 4). The primary endpoint was the response rate at day 7 (responders defined as patients with ≤ 1 vomiting episode per day or no vomiting recurrence after removal of the NGT, for at least 3 consecutive days) assessed in a diary card in the intention to treat (ITT) population. Per protocol (PP) population mainly excludes concomitant treatment and inclusion criteria deviations defined during a blinded data review meeting. Results: In the ITT analysis, 41.9% of lanreotide 30mg treated patients were responders versus 29.7% for placebo. This difference was not statistically significant (odds ratio (OR) = 1.75 (95% CI [0.68; 4.49], p = 0.24, logistic regression). The predefinedPP (n= 49) sub group analysis did show a statistically and clinically significantly higher response rate in the lanreotide group (OR 3.60 (95% CI [1.03, 12.62], p = 0.045). There was no significant difference between the 2 treatment groups in secondary efficacy endpoints assessment but there were significant differences in favor of lanreotide in well-being using a visual analogue scale at D3 (p = 0.04), D6 (p = 0.04) and D7 (p = 0.01). No drug-related serious adverse event (SAE) or unexpected event was reported. Conclusions: Lanreotide 30 mg may decrease clinical symptoms and improve well-being in patients with inoperable bowel obstruction due to peritoneal carcinomatosis. [Table: see text]

Symptomatic Treatment With Lanreotide Microparticles in Inoperable Bowel Obstruction Resulting From Peritoneal Carcinomatosis: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase III Study

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (35) ◽  
pp. 4337-4343 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pascale Mariani ◽  
Joëlle Blumberg ◽  
Alain Landau ◽  
Daniela Lebrun-Jezekova ◽  
Estelle Botton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Peritoneal Carcinomatosis ◽  
Bowel Obstruction ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Symptomatic Treatment ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Primary Analysis ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Parallel Group ◽  
Intent To Treat

Purpose To investigate the somatostatin analog lanreotide as symptomatic treatment for inoperable bowel obstruction due to peritoneal carcinomatosis. Patients and Methods In all, 80 patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis, inoperable malignant digestive obstruction, and two or more vomiting episodes per day or nasogastric tube (NGT) who were previously treated with intravenous corticosteroids and proton pump inhibitors were randomly assigned to one 30-mg injection of lanreotide microparticles (n = 43) or placebo (n = 37) in a 10-day, double-blind, parallel-group phase. The primary end point was the proportion of patients responding on day 7 (one or fewer episodes of vomiting per day or no vomiting recurrence after NGT removal [for ≥ 3 consecutive days in both cases]). Vomiting frequency/NGT secretion volumes, nausea, abdominal pain, well-being, and safety were also assessed. Patients could then enter an open-label lanreotide-only phase. The study was conducted at 22 European hospitals. Results More patients receiving lanreotide than placebo were responders; this difference was not statistically significant for the intent-to-treat (ITT) population on the basis of diary cards (primary analysis; 41.9% [18 of 43] v 29.7% [11 of 37], respectively; odds ratio, 1.75; 95% CI, 0.68 to 4.49; P = .24) but was statistically significant for the corresponding supportive per protocol analysis (57.7% [15 of 26] v 30.4% [seven of 23]; P < .05) and ITT analysis, on the basis of investigators' assessments (50.0% [19 of 38] v 28.6% [10 of 35]; P < .05). Improvements in well-being were significantly greater with lanreotide on days 3, 6, and 7. No significant differences were observed for other secondary end points. Only two (mild/moderate) treatment-emergent adverse events were considered related to lanreotide. Conclusion These results show that lanreotide has some efficacy and is safe in the symptomatic treatment of patients with inoperable bowel obstruction due to peritoneal carcinomatosis.

scholarly journals Non-inferiority study of the efficacy of two hyaluronic acid products in post-extraction sockets of impacted third molars

2020 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyunwoo Yang ◽  
Junghun Kim ◽  
Jihong Kim ◽  
Dongwook Kim ◽  
Hyung Jun Kim
Keyword(s):  
Hyaluronic Acid ◽  
Tooth Extraction ◽  
Clinical Symptoms ◽  
Pain Reduction ◽  
Burning Sensation ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Blind Test ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Mouth Wash

Abstract Background Hyaluronic acid (HA) is well known to exert an anti-inflammatory effect during oral wound healing and is commonly applied after tooth extraction. However, no double-blind randomized controlled study comparing two hyaluronate mouthwash products has been conducted so far. The aim of this study was to comparatively analyze the efficacy of Mucobarrier® and Aloclair® in terms of clinical symptoms. Results A total of 112 patients were randomly assigned to assess the degree of discomfort, pain reduction, redness, burning sensation, and swelling between two groups on the day of surgery and 7 days later in a double blind test, with a total 56 Aloclair patients and 56 Mucobarrier patients. There was no statistically significant difference in the overall discomfort, degree of pain reduction, redness, burning sensation, and swelling between the Mucobarrier and Aloclair groups. Conclusion The local application of hyaluronic acid mouth wash after wisdom tooth extraction is beneficial in reducing overall discomfort and pain reduction, and the clinical utility of Mucobarrier® is no different from Aloclair®. Trial registration Institutional Review Board of Yonsei University College of Dentistry, 2-2018-0036. Registered 10 September 2018—prospectively registered, https://eirb.yuhs.ac/

scholarly journals THU0521 EVALUATION OF LIVER FIBROSIS IN PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS UNDER METHOTREXATE TREATMENT. UTILITY OF FIBROSCAN AND BIOMARKERS IN ROUTINE CLINICAL PRACTICE.

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 499.2-500
Author(s):  
A. De Diego Sola ◽  
M. Vaamonde Lorenzo ◽  
A. Castiella Eguzkiza ◽  
M. J. Sánchez Iturri ◽  
N. Alcorta Lorenzo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Metabolic Syndrome ◽  
Liver Fibrosis ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Type I ◽  
Concomitant Treatment ◽  
Duration Of Treatment ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Apri Score ◽  
The Mean

Background:Despite therapeutic advances in recent years, methotrexate (MTX) remains the gold standard for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Among the side effects that have been blamed on it are liver fibrosis (LF) and cirrhosis, although late studies have failed to show such a relation1,2. The only validated test in the diagnosis of LF is biopsy. Given the relevance of MTX in the treatment of RA, it is important to evaluate non-invasive diagnostic options for LF such as transitional elastography (FibroScan, FS).Objectives:To evaluate the percentage of LF in RA patients treated with MTX. Secondly, to assess the correlation between altered liver function, RA activity, and LF. To determine whether dose and/or duration of treatment with MTX may affect the development of LF in such patients.Methods:We did a prospective study between February 2019 and January 2020. Patients affected of RA treated with MTX were included. Patients with basal liver disease (hepatitis B, hepatitis C and steatohepatitis), alcohol consumption, type I diabetes mellitus, chronic renal failure, heart failure, obesity and concomitant treatment with leflunomide or antiretrovirals were excluded. Demographic, clinical, analytical and therapeutic variables were collected. Liver fibrosis was assessed by FS in kilopascals (kpa) and using the APRI score. RA activity was assessed by DAS28 score. Continuous variables are described with mean and standard deviation (SD), and qualitative variables are shown with absolute value and percentage. Spearman’s and Mann-Whitney’s U tests were used for the bivariate analysis.Results:Fifty patients were included (Table 1 and 2). Of these, 38 were women (76%) with mean age of 61.8 years (SD 11.7) and mean RA evolution time of 13.7 years (SD 8.2). The mean DAS28 at the visit was 2.39 (SD 1.1). The FS showed an average of 4.8 kpa (SD 2). The mean duration of treatment with MTX was 85.8 months (SD 93.3) and that of AD-MTX was 5414.6mg (SD 5011). Patients were divided into those with DA-MTX greater than 4000mg (21, 42%) and less than 4000mg (29, 58%) and no significant differences were found in terms of LF in FS (p 0.637) or APRI scale (p 0.806). No significant differences were found in terms of treatment duration either. Six patients (12%) had elevated aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and 9 (18%) had elevated alanine aminotransferase (ALT). No significant difference was found in FS values in relation to ALT, but it was with elevated AST (p 0.021). Similarly, differences were found in APRI based on AST (p 0.045). Metabolic syndrome was collected in 4 patients (8%) without significant differences with FS or APRI values. There were no significant differences in LF depending on gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT) values.Conclusion:FS and APRI score are useful for the determination of LF in RA patients treated with MTX. There is no evidence of a relationship between AD-MTX and LF by FS or APRI. AST values may be related to the presence of fibrosis as determined by FS or APRI. and the presence of the metabolic syndrome are not.References:[1]G.L. Erre, et al. Methotrexate therapy is not associated with increased liver stiffness and significant liver fibrosis in rheumatoid arthritis patients: A cross-sectional controlled study with real-time two-dimensional shear wave elastography. European Journal of Internal Medicine 69 (2019) 57–63. Internet.[2]R. Conway et al. Risk of liver injury among methotrexate users: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2015 Oct;45(2):156–62. Internet.Disclosure of Interests:None declared

Abstract TP146: Vagus Nerve Stimulation Paired With Rehabilitation To Improve Upper Limb Function

Stroke ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 48 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jesse Dawson ◽  
Theresa J Kimberley ◽  
Gerard E Francisco ◽  
Patricia Smith ◽  
Steven C Cramer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Vagus Nerve ◽  
Upper Extremity ◽  
Nerve Stimulation ◽  
Vagus Nerve Stimulation ◽  
Human Study ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Upper Limb Function ◽  
Significant Difference

Introduction: Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) paired with rehabilitation induces movement specific plasticity in rat motor cortex and improves forepaw function in a rat ischemic model compared to rehabilitation alone. A 20 subject first-in-human study in the UK indicated acceptable safety and feasibility of this approach in patients with arm weakness after stroke and showed a significant difference in favour of VNS paired with rehabilitation in the per-protocol analysis (Upper Extremity Fugl Meyer difference of 9.6 points for VNS vs. 3.0 Control; p = 0.038). We conducted a new, double-blind sham controlled study to further assess this technique. Methods: Subjects with chronic moderate to severe upper extremity hemiparesis secondary to ischemic stroke (Upper Extremity Fugl Meyer (UEFM) 20-50) were enrolled at four sites (3 US, 1 UK). After baseline assessments subjects were implanted with a vagus nerve stimulation device if all eligibility criteria were met. Following implantation, randomization was made to either paired VNS (1/2 second, 30 Hz., 0.8 mA, 100 uS stimulation with task-specific movement) or sham control (stimulation only on first 5 movements). All received the same intensive and task-specific rehabilitation and had 18 treatment sessions (2-hourly, 3 times a week for 6-weeks, approximately 50 repetitions per task and 300 to 400 repetition movements per session). Outcomes were assessed on the first and 30 th day following completion of the 6-week therapy course. Results: Sixteen patients (8 female) were implanted (8 VNS, 8 Control). Mean age (SD) was 63.2(6.9), with an average (SD) of 21.7 months (12.9) post stroke. One study related serious adverse event was reported (a wound infection that resolved with IV antibiotics). Blinded results (change in UEFM, WMFT, and UEFM responders for both groups) will be available and presented. Conclusions: A pivotal study of VNS paired with rehabilitation movements will be justified if preliminary results are confirmed.

scholarly journals Involvement of N-methyl-d-aspartate receptors in plasticity induced by paired corticospinal-motoneuronal stimulation in humans

2018 ◽  
Vol 119 (2) ◽  
pp. 652-661 ◽  
Author(s):  
Siobhan C. Dongés ◽  
Jessica M. D’Amico ◽  
Jane E. Butler ◽  
Janet L. Taylor
Keyword(s):  
Biceps Brachii ◽  
Motor Evoked Potentials ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Spinal Level ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Double Blind Placebo ◽  
Human Spinal Cord ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Antidromic Potentials ◽  
Dependent Mechanism

Plasticity can be induced at human corticospinal-motoneuronal synapses by delivery of repeated, paired stimuli to corticospinal axons and motoneurons in a technique called paired corticospinal-motoneuronal stimulation (PCMS). To date, the mechanisms of the induced plasticity are unknown. To determine whether PCMS-induced plasticity is dependent on N-methyl-d-aspartate receptors (NMDARs), the effect of the noncompetitive NMDAR antagonist dextromethorphan on PCMS-induced facilitation was assessed in a 2-day, double-blind, placebo-controlled experiment. PCMS consisted of 100 pairs of stimuli, delivered at an interstimulus interval that produces facilitation at corticospinal-motoneuronal synapses that excite biceps brachii motoneurons. Transcranial magnetic stimulation elicited corticospinal volleys, which were timed to arrive at corticospinal-motoneuronal synapses just before antidromic potentials elicited in motoneurons with electrical brachial plexus stimulation. To measure changes in the corticospinal pathway at a spinal level, biceps responses to cervicomedullary stimulation (cervicomedullary motor evoked potentials, CMEPs) were measured before and for 30 min after PCMS. Individuals who displayed a ≥10% increase in CMEP size after PCMS on screening were eligible to take part in the 2-day experiment. After PCMS, there was a significant difference in CMEP area between placebo and dextromethorphan days ( P = 0.014). On the placebo day PCMS increased average CMEP areas to 127 ± 46% of baseline, whereas on the dextromethorphan day CMEP area was decreased to 86 ± 33% of baseline (mean ± SD; placebo: n = 11, dextromethorphan: n = 10). Therefore, dextromethorphan suppressed the facilitation of CMEPs after PCMS. This indicates that plasticity induced at synapses in the human spinal cord by PCMS may be dependent on NMDARs. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Paired corticospinal-motoneuronal stimulation can strengthen the synaptic connections between corticospinal axons and motoneurons at a spinal level in humans. The mechanism of the induced plasticity is unknown. In our 2-day, double-blind, placebo-controlled study we show that the N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) antagonist dextromethorphan suppressed plasticity induced by paired corticospinal-motoneuronal stimulation, suggesting that an NMDAR-dependent mechanism is involved.

Effects of dehydroepiandrosterone on fatigue and well-being in women with quiescent systemic lupus erythematosus: a randomised controlled trial

2009 ◽  
Vol 69 (6) ◽  
pp. 1144-1147 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Hartkamp ◽  
R Geenen ◽  
G L R Godaert ◽  
M Bijl ◽  
J W J Bijlsma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Systemic Lupus ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Female Patients ◽  
General Fatigue ◽  
Mental Well Being

ObjectiveDehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) has been reported to improve fatigue and reduced well-being. Both are major problems in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), even with quiescent disease. Low serum DHEA levels are common in SLE. The present work investigates the effects of DHEA administration on fatigue, well-being and functioning in women with inactive SLE.MethodsIn a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled study, 60 female patients with inactive SLE received 200 mg oral DHEA or placebo. Primary outcome measures were general fatigue, depressive mood, mental well-being and physical functioning. Assessments were made before treatment, after 3, 6 and 12 months on medication, and 6 months after cessation of treatment.ResultsPatients from the DHEA and placebo group improved on general fatigue (p<0.001) and mental well-being (p=0.04). There was no differential effect of DHEA. The belief that DHEA had been used was a stronger predictor for improvement of general fatigue than the actual use of DHEA (p=0.04).ConclusionsThe trial does not indicate an effect of daily 200 mg oral DHEA on fatigue and well-being, and therefore DHEA treatment is not recommended in unselected female patients with quiescent SLE.Clinical Trials Registration Number NCT00391924

scholarly journals Efficacy of Lactobacillus paracasei HA-196 and Bifidobacterium longum R0175 in Alleviating Symptoms of Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS): A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study

Nutrients ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 1159 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erin D. Lewis ◽  
Joseph M. Antony ◽  
David C. Crowley ◽  
Amanda Piano ◽  
Renu Bhardwaj ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Irritable Bowel Syndrome ◽  
Bifidobacterium Longum ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Lactobacillus Paracasei ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Gi Symptoms ◽  
Irritable Bowel

Specific probiotic strains can alleviate the gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms and psychiatric comorbidities of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, the efficacy of Lactobacillus paracasei HA-196 (L. paracasei) and Bifidobacterium longum R0175 (B. longum) in reducing the GI and psychological symptoms of IBS was evaluated in 251 adults with either constipation (IBS-C), diarrhea (IBS-D), or mixed-pattern (IBS-M). Following a 2-week run-in period, participants were randomized to one of three interventions: L. paracasei (n = 84), B. longum (n = 83) or placebo (n = 81). IBS symptoms, stool frequency and consistency and quality of life were assessed by questionnaires. The differences from baseline in the severity of IBS symptoms at 4 and 8 weeks were similar between groups. Participants in this study were classified, after randomization, into subtypes according to Rome III. Within the L. paracasei group, complete spontaneous and spontaneous bowel movement frequency increased in participants with IBS-C (n = 10) after 8 weeks of supplementation (both p < 0.05) and decreased in participants with IBS-D (n = 10, p = 0.013). Both L. paracasei and B. longum supplementation improved the quality of life in emotional well-being and social functioning compared with baseline (all p < 0.05). In conclusion, L. paracasei and B. longum may reduce GI symptom severity and improve the psychological well-being of individuals with certain IBS subtypes.

scholarly journals The Effects of Propolis Extract Administration on HIV Patients Receiving ARV

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-83
Author(s):  
Erwin Astha Triyono ◽  
Sarah Firdausa ◽  
Heru Prasetyo ◽  
Joni Susanto ◽  
James Hutagalung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Placebo Group ◽  
Clinical Symptoms ◽  
Cd4 Count ◽  
Controlled Clinical Trial ◽  
Human Immune System ◽  
Hiv Patients ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Significant Difference

BACKGROUND: Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is an infectious disease that targets the human immune system by attacking cluster of differentiation (CD)4 cells. The use of propolis in HIV patients is expected to be safe and beneficial in terms of increasing endurance and immunity by its role in increasing CD4 level. This study aimed to analyze the influence of propolis supplementation in increasing the CD4 level in anti-retroviral (ARV)-treated HIV patients.METHODS: Double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted in 50 HIV patients who took regular ARV therapy. The subjects were divided into two groups, one group was treated with ARV and propolis, while another one was given ARV and placebo. The CD4 cell count was measured during pre-treatment, in the 3rd month, in the 6th month after treatment. The level of hemoglobin, leukocyte, and platelets were also measured. The SF-12 questionnaire was used to evaluate quality of life of the subject.RESULTS: Out of 50 subjects, 43 subjects completed the study, which were 19 subjects from the propolis group and 24 subjects from the placebo group. After 3-month of treatment, there was a statistically significant difference in the incrwase of CD 44 level in propolis group, while the increment was not significant in the placebo group. After 6-month treatment, the increase of CD4 level was occurred in both groups, propolis and placebo, however the increment was not statistically significant. The levels of hemoglobin, leukocyte, and platelets were not altered by the treatment and remained normal throughout the study. The quality of life was improved during the study; however, it was also not statistically significant. Mild adverse events occurred in 3 subjects which were relieved after the treatment stopped.CONCLUSION: Based on the result of this study, the administration of propolis on HIV patients receiving ARV bring significant difference in the increase of CD4 in propolis group from baseline to 3 month after the treatment. While in placebo group, this increment was not significant. At the end of study, CD4 count continued to rise up, however the increase was not statistically significant. There are no hemoglobin, leukocyte, platelets, and quality of life abnormalities. Therefore, it is necesary to do further research with a spesific CD4 count. However, it may be beneficial in relieving the clinical symptoms and quality of life of patient living with HIV.KEYWORDS: CD4, ARV, HIV, propolis

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document