Initial report of RTOG 9601, a phase III trial in prostate cancer: Effect of anti-androgen therapy (AAT) with bicalutamide during and after radiation therapy (RT) on freedom from progression and incidence of metastatic disease in patients following radical prostatectomy (RP) with pT2-3,N0 disease and elevated PSA levels.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1-1 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. U. Shipley ◽  
D. Hunt ◽  
H. R. Lukka ◽  
P. Major ◽  
N. M. Heney ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Liver Toxicity ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Cancer Control ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Initial Report ◽  
End Point ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Double Blinded

1 Background: To test if long term AAT when combined with RT in these patients (pts) with prostate cancer (PC) will improve cancer control outcomes as well as overall survival (OS). Methods: Post-RP pts with pT3,N0 or with pT2,N0 (and positive margins) who have an elevated PSA were entered on a phase III, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial of RT alone (64.8 Gy in 1.8 Gy fractions) vs RT + AAT (24 months of bicalutamide, 150mg daily) during and after RT. The primary end point is OS. Results: From 3/98 to 3/03, 771 eligible pts (median age 65) were randomized to RT + AAT (387) or RT alone (383). Pretreatment characteristics were balanced. 672 (87%) had a PSA nadir after RP of < 0.5 ng/mL. 655 (85%) had an entry PSA value of <1.6, 115 (15%) had an entry PSA of 1.6-3.9. Median follow-up was 7.1 years. Actuarial OS at 7 years was 91% for RT + AAT and 86% for RT alone. Too few primary end-point events have occurred to allow a statistical comparison between groups. Freedom from PSA progression (FFP) at 7 years was 57% for RT + AAT and 40% for RT alone (P < 0.0001); for 226 pts with GS < 7 were 63% and 50% (P<0.02), for 411 GS 7 these were 55% and 39% (P<0.0006), and for 134 GS 8-10 were 56% and 26% (P < 0.0008). The 7-yr cumulative incidence of metastatic PC was less in the RT and AAT arm, 7% vs 13% in the RT arm (p<0.041). Late grade 3-4 toxicities were similar in both arms. By category the combined grade 3-4 toxicities for RT + AAT and RT alone were: bladder 6% vs 5% bowel 2% vs 1%, cardiac 3% vs 2%. Gynecomastia (mostly grades 1-2) differed significantly, 89% vs15%. In the RT + AAT arm grade 3 was the highest liver toxicity, which occurred in 3 pts. Conclusions: The addition of 24 months of bicalutamide 150 mg daily during and after RT significantly improved FFP and reduced the incidence of metastatic PC without adding significantly to RT toxicity. The significance of benefit in OS, as well analysis of risk-stratified subsets, wait longer follow-up. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

scholarly journals Evaluating Intermittent Androgen-Deprivation Therapy Phase III Clinical Trials: The Devil Is in the Details

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 280-285 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maha Hussain ◽  
Catherine Tangen ◽  
Celestia Higano ◽  
Nicholas Vogelzang ◽  
Ian Thompson
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Statistical Power ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Androgen Deprivation ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
End Point ◽  
Phase Iii Clinical Trials ◽  
Noninferiority Trials ◽  
Phase Iii Trials

Purpose Intermittent androgen deprivation (IAD) has been widely tested in prostate cancer. However, phase III trials testing continuous androgen deprivation (CAD) versus IAD have reached inconclusive and seemingly contradictory results. Different design and conduct issues must be critically evaluated to better interpret the results. Patients and Methods Seven published phase III trials were examined for prespecified design and outcomes. Treatment specifications; primary end point; superiority versus noninferiority design assumptions, including magnitude of assumed versus observed noninferiority margin (NIM); duration of follow-up; and quality-of-life (QOL) outcomes were considered in terms of the results and conclusions reported. Results Five trials had a superiority and three had a noninferiority primary hypothesis. Only three trials had a uniform population and overall survival (OS) end point. All trials observed better outcomes in terms of OS and progression-free survival (PFS) than assumed at time of study design, translating into prespecified NIMs or hazard ratios that reflected larger absolute differences in OS or PFS between arms. Lower-than-expected event rates also reduced statistical power for the trials. Other factors, including length of follow-up, cause of death, QOL, and primary end point, and their impact on trial interpretation are discussed. Conclusion No trial to date has demonstrated survival superiority of IAD compared with CAD. Trials concluding IAD is noninferior to CAD were based on wide NIMs that included clinically important survival differences, not likely to be considered comparable by physicians or patients. Interim analyses relying on short follow-up and including a majority of non–prostate cancer deaths will favor a noninferiority conclusion and should be interpreted cautiously. Adequate follow-up is required to ensure capture of prostate cancer deaths in both superiority and noninferiority trials.

Results of a phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of pegfilgrastim (PEG) in patients (pts) receiving first-line FOLFOX or FOLFIRI and bevacizumab (B) for colorectal cancer (CRC).

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3575-3575
Author(s):  
Tamas Pinter ◽  
Esteban Abella ◽  
Alvydas Cesas ◽  
Adina Croitoru ◽  
Jochen Decaestecker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
First Line ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Clinically Significant ◽  
Grade 3

3575 Background: The literature reports that adding biologics to chemotherapy (ctx) may increase the incidence of clinically significant neutropenia. his trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of PEG in reducing the incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN) in pts with locally-advanced (LA) or metastatic (m)CRC receiving first-line treatment with either FOLFOX/B or FOLFIRI/B. Methods: Key eligibility: ≥ 18 years old; measurable, nonresectable CRC per RECIST 1.1. Pts were randomly assigned 1:1 to either placebo or 6 mg PEG ~24 h after ctx/B. The study treatment period included four Q2W cycles, but pts could continue their assigned regimen until progression. Pts were stratified by region (North America vs rest of world), stage (LA vs mCRC), and ctx (FOLFOX vs FOLFIRI). Estimated sample size (N = 800) was based on the expected incidence of grade 3/4 FN (primary endpoint) across the first 4 cycles of ctx/B, powered for PEG superiority over placebo. Other endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: 845 pts were randomized (Nov 2009 to Jan 2012) and received study treatment; 783 pts completed 4 cycles of ctx/B. Median age was 61 years; 512 (61%) pts were male; 819 (97%) had mCRC; 414 (49%) received FOLFOX, and 431 (51%) received FOLFIRI. Grade 3/4 FN (first 4 cycles) for placebo vs PEG was 5.7% vs 2.4%; OR 0.41; p = 0.014. A similar incidence of other ≥ grade 3 adverse events was seen in both arms (28% placebo; 27% PEG). See table for additional results. Conclusions: PEG significantly reduced the incidence of grade 3/4 FN in this pt population receiving standard ctx/B for CRC. Follow-up is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT00911170. [Table: see text]

Results of a phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of pegfilgrastim (PEG) in patients (pts) receiving first-line FOLFOX or FOLFIRI and bevacizumab (B) for colorectal cancer (CRC).

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. LBA445-LBA445 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tamas Pinter ◽  
Steve Abella ◽  
Alvydas Cesas ◽  
Adina Croitoru ◽  
Jochen Decaestecker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
First Line ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Clinically Significant ◽  
Grade 3

LBA445 Background: The literature reports that adding biologics to chemotherapy (ctx) may increase the incidence of clinically significant neutropenia. This trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of PEG in reducing the incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN) in pts with locally advanced (LA) or metastatic (m)CRC receiving first-line treatment with either FOLFOX/B or FOLFIRI/B. Methods: Key eligibility: ≥ 18 years old; measurable, nonresectable CRC per RECIST 1.1. Pts were randomly assigned 1:1 to either placebo or 6 mg PEG ~24 h after ctx/B. The study treatment period included four Q2W cycles, but pts could continue their assigned regimen until progression. Pts were stratified by region (North America vs rest of world), stage (LA vs mCRC), and ctx (FOLFOX vs FOLFIRI). Estimated sample size (N = 800) was based on the expected incidence of grade 3/4 FN (primary endpoint) across the first 4 cycles of ctx/B, powered for PEG superiority over placebo. Other endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: 845 pts were randomized (Nov 2009 to Jan 2012) and received study treatment; 783 pts completed 4 cycles of ctx/B. Median age was 61 years; 512 (61%) pts were male; 819 (97%) had mCRC; 414 (49%) received FOLFOX, and 431 (51%) received FOLFIRI. Grade 3/4 FN (first 4 cycles) for placebo vs PEG was 5.7% vs 2.4%; OR 0.41; p = 0.014. A similar incidence of other ≥ grade 3 adverse events was seen in both arms (28% placebo; 27% PEG). See Table for additional results. Conclusions: PEG significantly reduced the incidence of grade 3/4 FN in this pt population receiving standard ctx/B for CRC. Follow-up is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT00911170. [Table: see text]

Randomized Comparison of Imatinib Versus Imatinib Combination Therapies in Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukaemia (CML) Patients in Chronic Phase (CP): First Results of the Phase III (SPIRIT) Trial from the French CML Group (FI LMC)

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 183-183 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francois Guilhot ◽  
François-Xavier Mahon ◽  
Joelle Guilhot ◽  
Francoise Rigual-Huguet ◽  
Frederic Maloisel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Response Rate ◽  
Liver Toxicity ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Complete Analysis ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Muscle Cramps ◽  
Log Reduction ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Imatinib (IM) at 400 mg daily is the first line therapy for newly diagnosed CML patients (pts); however, less than 50% of major molecular responses (MMR) are obtained at 12 months. To improve these results, we designed a phase III, multicenter, open-label, prospective randomized trial. The reference arm was IM 400 mg daily (n=159). The 3 experimental arms were IM 600 mg daily (n=160), IM 400mg daily in combination with Ara-C, (20 mg/m2/day, days 15–28 of 28-day cycles)(n=158) and IM 400mg in combination with Peg-IFN alfa-2a (Peg-IFN2a, 90 μg weekly) (n=159). Treatment was delivered at least 12 months or until treatment failure (disease progression) or major toxicity. The primary endpoint is the overall survival. Other endpoints are: rate and duration of hematologic and cytogenetic responses, major (MCyR) and complete (CCyR), molecular response (major molecular response ie MMR) and the tolerability. Using treatment allocation ratio 1.1.1.1, randomization was stratified according to Sokal risk groups. The current interim analysis of the first 636 patients (α=0.85%, β=10%) at 1 year from randomization was planned in order to select the best experimental arm for further comparison with IM 400. The increased dose of IM or a combination regimen would be considered as promising if it increased the 4 log reduction response rate by at least 20 percentage points, e.g. from 15% to 35%, with an acceptable tolerability. Evaluation of molecular response up to 12 months was centralized, blinded and calculated according to International score (IS). Pts were recruited between 9/2003 and 10/2007.[median age 51 yrs (18–82), 62% of pts were male; Sokal distribution was low risk 33%, intermediate risk 41% and 27% high risk]. Median follow-up is 36 months (range 8–57) at the time of analysis. Overall, at 3 months 86 % of pts achieved complete hematologic response. The MCyR, CCyR and MMR rates at 6 and 12 months are: IM-400 IM-600 IM-Ara-c IM-PegIFN *p&lt; 10−2 (overall); ** p&lt;10−2 (overall) At 6 months (636 pts, ITT) MCyR 74% 79% 68% 74% CCyR * 48% 67% 55% 56% At 12months (562 evaluable pts) MCyR 64% 76% 77% 74% CCyR 57% 65% 66% 71% MMR at 6 months** 21% 33% 27% 39% MMR at 12 months 40% 52% 51% 61% Interestingly the rate of MMR at 6 months was significantly higher for IM-PegIFN as compared with IM-400 (p&lt;10−3). The 4-log reduction rate in the BCR-ABL/ABL transcript were 18%, 21%, 22%, 34%, for the IM-400, IM-600, IM-Ara-c and IM-PegIFN arms respectively. The corresponding numbers of undetectable (complete molecular response) pts were 2%, 2%, 3% and 9% at 12 months respectively. Grade 3/4 neutropenia and/or thrombocytopenia occurred in 8% of IM-400 pts, in 14% of IM-600 pts, in 41% of IMAra- c pts and in 40% of IM-PegIFN pts respectively. Grade 3/4 non hematological events were reported in 19% of IM-400 pts, in 30% of IM-600 pts, in 27% of IM Ara-c pts and in 31% of IM-PegIFN pts. Among them a relationship between treatment and event was suspected for 21 pts (13%) with IM-400 (7 liver toxicity; 7 oedema+muscle cramps), for 31 pts (19%) with IM-600 (7 liver toxicity, 11 oedema+ muscle cramps) for 36 pts (23%) with IM-Ara-c (2 liver toxicity; 10 gut side effect) and for 47 pts (29%) with IM-PegIFN (6 liver toxicity, 13 skin rash). Discontinuation of experimental treatment occurred within the first 6 and 12 months in 26% and 18% of IM-Ara-c pts and in 35% and 11% pts of IM-PegIFN pts respectively. Within the first 12 months 36% of 600-IM pts reduced their dosage. Although a substantial number of pts stopped PegIFN, this first analysis indicates the usefulness of a combination of IM-PegIFN for the initial treatment of pts with CML CP with a significant molecular response rate improvement. Complete analysis of the 636 pts with a follow-up of 12 months will be presented.

Phase I/II Study of Biweekly Paclitaxel and Radiation in Androgen-Ablated Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer

2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (18) ◽  
pp. 2973-2978 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas J. Sanfilippo ◽  
Samir S. Taneja ◽  
Abraham Chachoua ◽  
Herbert Lepor ◽  
Silvia C. Formenti
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Advanced Prostate Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Experienced Grade

Purpose To determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of concurrent paclitaxel and radiation therapy (RT) in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer. Materials and Methods Eligible patients had T2-4 tumors with Gleason scores greater than 7 and/or PSA levels greater than 10 ng/mL and/or had tumors with pathologic stage TxN1. Hormonal ablation was initiated 3 months before RT and was given for 9 months. RT was delivered daily (1.8 Gy) with concurrent twice-weekly paclitaxel (30 mg/m2). The whole pelvis was irradiated to 39.6 Gy. The radiation dose was escalated as follows: 63 Gy, 66.6 Gy, 70.2 Gy, and 73.8 Gy. The last RT dose level was fixed at 73.8 Gy. Results Between January 2000 and October 2006, 22 patients were enrolled. The median age was 59 years (range, 48 to 72 years); the median PSA level was 22.4 ng/mL (range, 2.8 to 113 ng/mL). The number of patients per stage was as follows: three with T1, eight with T2, 11 with T3, and five with pN1 = 5. No grade 3 toxicities occurred at 63 Gy. Grade 3 diarrhea occurred in three patients at 66.6 Gy. The protocol then was amended to treat the prostate volume first followed by the whole pelvis. No grade 3 toxicities were observed at 70.2 Gy. One patient experienced grade 3 diarrhea at 73.8 Gy. Five additional patients were treated to 73.8 Gy without grade 3 toxicity, which established the MTD for combined paclitaxel and RT at 73.8 Gy. At 38 months median follow-up (range, 9 to 87 months), 21 (95%) of 22 patients are alive. Six (27%) of 22 experienced recurrence. Conclusion Concurrent biweekly paclitaxel with RT is feasible, with an MTD of 73.8 Gy. Recovery of gonadal function occurs in the majority of patients. These results encourage testing in a phase III setting.

Phase III results of adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) versus wait-and-see (WS) in patients with pT3 prostate cancer following radical prostatectomy (RP)(ARO 96-02/AUO AP 09/95): Ten years follow-up.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Wiegel ◽  
Dirk Bottke ◽  
Detlef Bartkowiak ◽  
Claudia Bronner ◽  
Ursula Steiner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Progressive Disease ◽  
Hormonal Treatment ◽  
Late Toxicity ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Phase Iii Study ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Intent To Treat

4 Background: Adjuvant RT for pT3 R1 or R0 patients (pts.) after RP remains controversial. The EORTC-phase-III- study suggested a 20% better biochemical control (bNED) after 10 years for RT but no survival advantage. In contrast, the SWOG trial stated not only a gain in bNED but also an improved metastasis free and overall survival after 12 years follow-up. Now, 10-years results from the ARO 96-02 study are available, which are based on the most precisely defined cohort among the three trials. Methods: 385 men with prostate cancer were randomized to either 60 Gy RT (arm A; n=193) or WS (arm B; n=192) before achieving an undetectable PSA. Pts. were stratified for Gleason-score, margin status, neoadjuvant hormonal treatment and stage (pT3a+b vs. c). When the undetectable PSA-level after RP was not achieved, progressive disease was stated and the pts. left arm A/B. Data analysis was by intent-to-treat (ITT). PSA-progression for pts. with undetectable post-RP PSA was defined as two consecutive increasing PSA. The primary endpoint was bNED. The study was powered to demonstrate a 15% increase in bNED for RT. Results: 78 pts. (20%) did not achieve an undetectable PSA and were stated as progressive disease (arm A: 45 pts., arm B: 33 pts.). Additionally, 34 pts. (23%) from the RT-arm did not receive RT. Therefore, 114 pts. had RT (arm A) and 159 pts. WS (arm B). Median follow up was 111.3 months for arm A and 113.3 months for arm B . bNED at 10 years increased to 56% for arm A (RT) compared with 35% for arm B (WS) (hazard ratio= 0.51; p = 0.00002. Out of 307 ITT pts., 15 died from prostate cancer, 23 for other and 5 for unknown reasons. There was no significant profit from ART regarding the endpoints metastasis-free survival (p=0.56) or overall survival (p=0.59). Worst late side effects to the rectum were two grade 2 cases after ART. Grade ≥2 bladder toxicity occurred in 4 out of 148 ITT pts. No grade 4 events were reported. Conclusions: With only one grade 3 case of late toxicity, ART was safe in pT3 prostate cancer. At 10 years median follow up, it reduced the risk of bNED by 49%. The study was not powered to detect differences in OS. Clinical trial information: ARO 96-02/AUO AP 09/95.

scholarly journals Chinese Herbal Medicine Dingji Fumai Decoction for Ventricular Premature Contraction: A Real-World Trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Bo Liang ◽  
Fei-Hu Zou ◽  
Ling Fu ◽  
Hui-Ling Liao
Keyword(s):  
Herbal Medicine ◽  
Chinese Herbal Medicine ◽  
Clinical Symptoms ◽  
Medication Compliance ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Ventricular Premature Contraction ◽  
Traditional Chinese Medicine Syndrome ◽  
Chinese Herbal ◽  
Double Blinded

Background. Chinese herbal medicine Dingji Fumai Decoction (DFD) is widely clinically used for ventricular premature contraction (VPC). This real-word trial was designed to assess the safety and effectiveness of DFD for VPC. Methods. This was a double-blinded, randomized placebo-controlled trial. Patients with VPC were randomized (1 : 1) to treatment with DFD combined with metoprolol (DFD arm) or metoprolol combined with placebo (MET arm). A primary end point was a composite of clinical symptoms and signs determined by the traditionalChinese medicine syndrome score and the number of VPC determined by the Holter examination. Second outcomes were adverse events, medication compliance, and laboratory examination. Results. 144 patients were randomized to DFD arm (76 patients) or MET arm (68 patients), and 136 cases (71 in DFD arm and 65 in MET arm) finally completed this trial. After a 12-week follow-up, DFD arm significantly decreased traditional Chinese medicine syndrome score and the number of VPC compared with MET arm (P=0.003 and 0.034, respectively). There was no adverse drug effect and patient medication compliance was good. Conclusions. Superiority with DFD arm for VPC was demonstrated over MET arm for both the safety and effectiveness end points.

scholarly journals Carbon ion radiotherapy for prostate cancer with bladder invasion

BMC Urology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuhei Miyasaka ◽  
Hidemasa Kawamura ◽  
Hiro Sato ◽  
Nobuteru Kubo ◽  
Tatsuji Mizukami ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Therapeutic Benefit ◽  
Carbon Ion Radiotherapy ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Carbon Ion ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Bladder Invasion

Abstract Background The optimal management of clinical T4 (cT4) prostate cancer (PC) is still uncertain. At our institution, carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) for nonmetastatic PC, including tumors invading the bladder, has been performed since 2010. Since carbon ion beams provide a sharp dose distribution with minimal penumbra and have biological advantages over photon radiotherapy, CIRT may provide a therapeutic benefit for PC with bladder invasion. Hence, we evaluated CIRT for PC with bladder invasion in terms of the safety and efficacy. Methods Between March 2010 and December 2016, a total of 1337 patients with nonmetastatic PC received CIRT at a total dose of 57.6 Gy (RBE) in 16 fractions over 4 weeks. Among them, seven patients who had locally advanced PC with bladder invasion were identified. Long-term androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) was also administered to these patients. Adverse events were graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event version 5.0. Results At the completion of our study, all the patients with cT4 PC were alive with a median follow-up period of 78 months. Grade 2 acute urinary disorders were observed in only one patient. Regarding late toxicities, only one patient developed grade 2 hematuria and urinary urgency. There was no grade 3 or worse toxicity, and gastrointestinal toxicity was not observed. Six (85.7%) patients had no recurrence or metastasis. One patient had biochemical and local failures 42 and 45 months after CIRT, respectively. However, the recurrent disease has been well controlled by salvage ADT. Conclusions Seven patients with locally advanced PC invading the bladder treated with CIRT were evaluated. Our findings seem to suggest positive safety and efficacy profiles for CIRT.

Decreased fracture rate by mandating bone protecting agents in the EORTC 1333/PEACEIII trial combining Ra223 with enzalutamide versus enzalutamide alone: An updated safety analysis.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5002-5002
Author(s):  
Silke Gillessen ◽  
Ananya Choudhury ◽  
Alejo Rodriguez-Vida ◽  
Franco Nole ◽  
Enrique Gallardo Diaz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Safety Analysis ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Fracture Rate ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Continuous Administration ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Radium 223 ◽  
Safety Population

5002 Background: The randomized phase III EORTC-1333-GUCG (NCT02194842) trial compares enzalutamide vs. a combination of Radium 223 and enzalutamide in asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients. The premature unblinding of ERA223 (NCT02043678) in Nov 2017 due to a significant increase in the rate of fractures in the combination of abiraterone and Ra223 arm led to the implementation of the mandatory use of bone protecting agents (BPA) in the EORTC-1333-GUCG trial. Skeletal fractures, pathological or not, are a frequent and underestimated adverse event of systemic treatment of advanced prostate cancer. Whether this mandated use of BPA (zoledronic acid or denosumab) would mitigate the risk of fractures in this patient population was unclear. An early safety analysis (Tombal, ASCO, 2019) suggested that the risk of fractures was well controlled in both arms when patients receive BPA. We present here an updated analysis of fracture incidence with longer follow-up. Methods: As of 28/01/2021, a total of 253 patients (134 after making BPA mandatory) were randomized between enzalutamide/Ra223 and enzalutamide. The fracture rate was estimated with the cumulative incidence method in the safety population of 237 (122 after making BPA mandatory) treated patients. Death in absence of fracture was analyzed as competing risk and censoring was applied at last follow-up. Results: Overall, 69.5% of enzalutamide/Ra223 patients (95.2% after making BPA mandatory) and 73.1% of enzalutamide patients (95% after making BPA mandatory) received BPA on treatment: 13.6% in the enzalutamide/Ra223 arm and 21.8% in the enzalutamide arm did not use BPA at registration, but started during protocol treatment and 55.9% and 51.3% respectively, received BPA since entry. At 36.7 months median follow-up in patients without BPA and 23.1 months median follow-up in patients receiving BPA, a total of 39 patients reported a fracture. Among them, 30 patients (20 in enzalutamide/Ra223 arm) did not receive BPA and 9 (4 in the enzalutamide/Ra223 arm) received BPA (see table). Conclusions: The updated safety analysis confirms the early fracture rate results. In the absence of BPA, the risk of fracture is increased when RA223 is added to enzalutamide. Strikingly, in both arms, the risk remains almost abolished by a preventive continuous administration of BPA, thus stressing the importance of complying to international recommendations in terms of giving BPA to mCRPC patients. This study is sponsored by EORTC and supported by Bayer and Astellas. Clinical trial information: NCT02194842. [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document