Phase I dose-escalation trial of tremelimumab in combination with bicalutamide in patients with recurrent prostate cancer.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 174-174 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. M. Lang ◽  
M. J. Staab ◽  
G. Liu ◽  
G. Wilding ◽  
D. G. McNeel
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Clinical Stage ◽  
Hot Flashes ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Common Grade ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
One Year

174 Background: Antibodies targeting CTLA-4 have demonstrated anti-tumor efficacy in human clinical trials. The mechanism of this effect is presumably in part mediated by the expansion of tumor-specific T cells. Androgen deprivation (AD), the cornerstone of treatment for patients with metastatic prostate cancer, has been demonstrated to cause prostate tissue apoptosis and lymphocytic inflammation. We hypothesized that treatment with AD, followed by an anti-CTLA-4 antibody, could have benefit by augmenting a tumor-specific immune response elicited with AD. We report the initial results from the dose-escalation portion of a phase I trial evaluating tremelimumab in combination with high-dose bicalutamide. Methods: Eligible patients were those with clinical stage D0 prostate cancer (rising serum PSA but no evidence of metastatic disease). Subjects were treated in two courses, 3 months apart, in which they received bicalutamide 150 mg daily for 28 days and tremelimumab on day 29. Patients were treated in cohorts of six, defined by tremelimumab dose (3 mg/kg, 6 mg/kg, 10 mg/kg, 15 mg/kg). The primary endpoint of the trial was safety. Secondary endpoints included measures of PSA kinetics and identification of a maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Results: Eleven patients were enrolled and completed the dose-escalation portion of the trial and at least one year of follow up. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed in 2/5 subjects treated at 6 mg/kg, and included grade 3 diarrhea and a grade 3 skin rash. One of six subjects treated at 3 mg/kg tremelimumab required hospitalization for colitis. No other grade 3 or grade 4 events were observed. Common grade 1/2 events included fatigue, hot flashes, diarrhea, abdominal discomfort, rash, pruritis, and gynecomastia. Two patients experienced a prolongation in PSA doubling time detectable months after completing treatment. Conclusions: Tremelimumab, administered at 3 mg/kg every 3 months in combination with AD, was found to be the MTD and with reasonable safety in this population. The identification of patients with prolonged stable disease following treatment suggests that future studies could explore repetitive administration of this combination. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Phase I/II Study of Escalating Doses of Thalidomide in Conjunction with Bortezomib and High Dose Melphalan As a Conditioning Regimen for Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients with Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2154-2154
Author(s):  
Noa Biran ◽  
Shijia Zhang ◽  
Scott D. Rowley ◽  
David H. Vesole ◽  
Michele L. Donato ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Conditioning Regimen ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Common Grade ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
High Dose Melphalan

Abstract Background: A regimen of escalating doses of thalidomide, in combination with bortezomib and high dose melphalan (Mel/Vel/Thal) was evaluated as a conditioning regimen for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in patients (pts) with multiple myeloma (MM) in a phase I/II study. Methods: Patients received Mel/Vel/Thal as a second of tandem ASCT if they achieved <CR to their first ASCT (tandem), or as conditioning for a salvage ASCT (salvage). Exclusion criteria were dose-intense therapy within 56 days, uncontrolled infections, severe organ dysfunction, Karnofsky score <70%, or painful grade 2 or greater peripheral neuropathy. Conditioning consisted of Vel 1.6 mg/m2 intravenously on days -4 and -1 with Mel 200 mg/m2 on day -2. Thal was given on days -5 through -1 and was administered in a planned step-wise dose escalation of 600, 800 and 1000 mg (in cohorts of 3 pts). Dexamethasone (Dex) 10-20 mg was given prior to Vel and Mel. All pts received G-CSF every other day starting day +3 until engraftment. Serious adverse events (SAEs) were graded according to CTCAE version 3. Results: Twenty-nine pts were enrolled: 9 in the phase 1 dose-escalation phase and an additional 20 pts in phase 2. In the phase I portion, all pts experienced somnolence, with grade 3 occurring in 1 pt at the 800 mg/day dose. Subsequently, Dex 40 mg was given with first dose of Thal at the 1000 mg level with decreased severity of somnolence. No dose limiting toxicities defined as ≥ grade 4 non-hematological SAEs occurred in the phase I portion, allowing full dose escalation with 9 pts enrolled. The maximum tolerated dose for Thal was not reached and the 1000 mg dose was chosen for the phase 2 dose expansion. No regimen related mortality occurred in either phase I or phase II portion of the study. All SAEs except lethargy and dizziness occurred after ASCT and were not attributed to Thal. The most common grade 1 and 2 non-hematologic toxicities included nausea (65.5%), mucositis (51.7%), diarrhea (48.3%), somnolence (48.3%), lethargy (27.6%), and vomiting (17.2%). The most common grade 3 non-hematologic adverse events (AEs) were neutropenic fever (58.6%), mucositis (6.9%), and somnolence (13.8%), which increased risk of falls. SAEs included somnolence (13.8%), tumor lysis syndrome (3.4%), and engraftment syndrome (3.4%). All transplant-related SAEs resolved by day +28 after ASCT. All pts achieved prompt hematological recovery with the median time to ANC >500/uL 10 days (range, 8-14 days), and platelet >20,000 12 days (range 9-26 days). All pts received at least one ASCT prior to enrolling on the study. Seventeen pts (59%) had interim salvage chemotherapy between their upfront and Mel/Vel/Thal ASCT (i.e. received a salvage ASCT), with median time from first to salvage ASCT 29 months. The remaining 12 (41%) went directly from an upfront ASCT Mel-based ASCT to the Mel/Vel/Thal ASCT (tandem ASCT) within 6 months of the first ASCT. Twenty-seven (93%) were Durie-Salmon stage III, and 13 (44%) had >2 prior lines of therapy. Of those who had Mel/Vel/Thal as a salvage ASCT, 70% had ≥3 prior lines of therapy. The overall response rate (ORR) was 69% with 38% complete remission. ORR for Mel/Vel/Thal compared to upfront Mel ASCT was 69% versus 62% with 11 patients achieving CR with Mel/Vel/Thal compared to 5 patients with Mel alone (Figure 1). Ten of 27 evaluable patients (37%) had an upgrade in response in the Mel/Vel/Thal salvage ASCT compared to their upfront ASCT: 2 pts (7%) went from PD to PR, 1 (4%) from SD to CR, 1 (4%) from PR to VGPR; 3 (11%) from PR to CR and 2 (7%) from VGPR to CR. Median PFS and OS were 9.3 and 65.4 months, respectively, with a median follow-up of 17.8 months. Of those who underwent tandem Mel followed by Mel/Vel/Thal ASCT the median PFS was 14.9 months with a median OS not yet reached at time of analysis. For the 17 patients who received a salvage Mel/Vel/Thal ASCT, median PFS from their upfront ASCT was 11.9 months, compared to 9.1 months with the salvage Mel/Vel/Thal ASCT. Conclusions: High-dose Thal up to 1000 mg daily for 5 days can be safely combined with Vel and dose-intense Mel as an ASCT conditioning regimen with acceptable toxicities. Confirmation of potential synergistic effects of this combination regimen will require an appropriately designed phase III study. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Biran: BMS: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Skarbnik:Seattle Genetics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Gilead Sciences: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Siegel:Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Phase I and pharmacologic studies of the camptothecin analog irinotecan administered every 3 weeks in cancer patients.

1995 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 210-221 ◽  
Author(s):  
D Abigerges ◽  
G G Chabot ◽  
J P Armand ◽  
P Hérait ◽  
A Gouyette ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Half Life ◽  
Topoisomerase I ◽  
Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Phase Ii Studies ◽  
Grade 3

PURPOSE A phase I study was undertaken to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), principal toxicities, and pharmacokinetics of the novel topoisomerase I inhibitor irinotecan (CPT-11). PATIENTS AND METHODS Sixty-four patients meeting standard phase I eligibility criteria were included (24 women, 40 men; median age, 51 years; primary sites: colon, head and neck, lung, pleura; 60 of 64 had been previously treated). Pharmacokinetics was determined by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). RESULTS One hundred ninety CPT-11 courses were administered as a 30-minute intravenous (IV) infusion every 3 weeks (100 to 750 mg/m2). Grade 3 to 4 nonhematologic toxicities included diarrhea (16%; three hospitalizations), nausea and vomiting (9%), asthenia (14%), alopecia (53%), elevation of hepatic transaminases (8%), and one case of skin toxicity. An acute cholinergic syndrome was observed during CPT-11 administration. Diarrhea appeared dose-limiting at 350 mg/m2, but this was circumvented by using a high-dose loperamide protocol that allowed dose escalation. Dose-dependent, reversible, noncumulative granulocytopenia was the dose-limiting toxicity (nadir, days 6 to 9; median recovery time, 5 days). Grade 3 to 4 anemia was observed in 9% of patients. One patient died during the study, 8 days after CPT-11 treatment. Two complete responses (cervix, 450 mg/m2; head and neck, 750 mg/m2) and six partial responses in fluorouracil (5-FU)-refractory colon cancer were observed (260 to 600 mg/m2). Pharmacokinetics of CPT-11 and active metabolite SN-38 were performed in 60 patients (94 courses). CPT-11 plasma disposition was bi- or triphasic, with a mean terminal half-life of 14.2 +/- 0.9 hours (mean +/- SEM). The mean volume of distribution (Vdss) was 157 +/- 8 L/m2, and total-body clearance was 15 +/- 1 L/m2/h. The CPT-11 area under the plasma concentration versus time curves (AUC) and SN-38 AUC increased linearly with dose. SN-38 plasma decay had an apparent half-life of 13.8 +/- 1.4 hours. Both CPT-11 and SN-38 AUCs correlated with nadir leukopenia and granulocytopenia, with grade 2 diarrhea, and with nausea and vomiting. CONCLUSION The MTD of CPT-11 administered as a 30-minute IV infusion every 3 weeks is 600 mg/m2, with granulocytopenia being dose-limiting. At 350 mg/m2, diarrhea appeared dose-limiting, but high-dose loperamide reduced this toxicity and allowed dose escalation. For safety reasons, the recommended dose is presently 350 mg/m2 every 3 weeks; more experience must be gained to establish the feasibility of a higher dose in large multicentric phase II studies. However, when careful monitoring of gastrointestinal toxicities is possible, a higher dose of 500 mg/m2 could be recommended in good-risk patients. The activity of this agent in 5-FU-refractory colorectal carcinoma makes it unique and mandates expedited phase II testing.

Phase I dose and schedule finding study of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (D) and weekly docetaxel (T)

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 12012-12012 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. S. Shaye ◽  
A. B. El-Khoueiry ◽  
A. Garcia ◽  
D. Wei ◽  
S. Groshen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Salivary Gland Carcinomas ◽  
Common Grade ◽  
Grade 3

12012 Background: The combination of D and T has many potential applications, particularly in breast and ovarian cancers. A phase 3 trial is examining D + T versus T in first-line metastatic breast cancer ( NCT00091442 ). D has better tumor localization and penetration in solid tumors than conventional doxorubicin. In previous studies, the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of the combination was identified as D 30 mg/m2 and T 75 mg/m2 q4 weeks (wks), with a recommended dose and schedule of D 30 mg/m2 and T 60 mg/m2 q3wks without G-CSF. We conducted a phase I study to determine the MTD of D with weekly T. Our hypothesis was that the lower incidence of myelosuppression with weekly T would allow for higher doses of both drugs. Methods: There were 2 schedules. Arm A: D q4wks starting at 25 mg/m2 with weekly T for 3 wks starting at 30 mg/m2. Arm B: D q2wks starting at 15 mg/m2 with weekly T for 3 wks starting at 30 mg/m2. One cycle was 28 days. Standard 3+3 design was used with MTD defined as the highest dose level causing dose limiting toxicity (DLT) in ≥ 2/6 patients (pts). Results: 32 pts were treated; 13 females, 19 males, median age of 60 years. Median number of cycles administered was 2 (1–13) with a median follow-up of 11.5 months. Tumor types included lung (16%), thyroid (9%), esophagus (9%), nasopharynx, breast, colorectal, stomach and kidney (6% each). Arm A (13 pts) was closed after 2/7 evaluable pts at dose level 2 (D 33mg/m2; T 30 mg/m2) experienced DLT in the form of grade 3 stomatitis. The most common grade 3/4 toxicities were neutropenia (3/13), stomatitis (3/13) and fatigue (3/13). Arm B accrued 19 pts. The trial was closed at the highest planned dose in Arm B (D 20mg/m2 q2wks and T 35 mg/m2 weekly) with only 1/6 evaluable pts experiencing DLT in the form of grade 4 fatigue and weakness. The most common grade 3/4 toxicities in Arm B included neutropenia (5/19 pts), fatigue (5/19 pts) and stomatitis (2/19 pts). There was no grade 3/4 hand-foot syndrome or cardiotoxicity. 2 partial responses were observed in nasopharyngeal and salivary gland carcinomas, with 13 pts achieving stable disease. Conclusions: The combination of D q2 wks and T weekly for 3/4 wks is well tolerated and results in a higher dose intensity of both drugs than in previously evaluated regimens. [Table: see text]

A Q7D phase I study of TPI 287, a novel taxane, in advanced malignancies: Imaging studies, pharmacokinetics (PK) and circulating tumor cell (CTC) quantitation

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 12008-12008 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. J. Hwang ◽  
J. L. Marshall ◽  
S. Malik ◽  
H. Chun ◽  
T. Ahmed ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tumor Cell ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Circulating Tumor Cell ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Advanced Malignancies ◽  
Tumor Measurements ◽  
Grade 3

12008 Background: Taxanes have demonstrated activity across a broad range of cancers, but resistance remains an issue. TPI 287 is a third generation taxane designed to overcome issues of resistance secondary to mdr and mutant tubulin. The purpose of this Phase I study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose and pharmacokinetics of IV TPI 287. Methods: Phase I study: TPI 287 is administered IV on days 1, 8, 15 of a 28 day cycle (Q7D) with at least 3 patients treated per dose escalation, in a typical phase I design. Dosing began at 7 mg/m2 and has advanced to the fifth cohort of patients, who are being treated at a dose of 85 mg/m2. Tumor response is assessed after every second cycle via imaging and tumor measurements. Samples are collected for PK analysis and circulating tumor cell (CTC) quantitation. Results: Sixteen pts have been enrolled (9 males, median years = 60.11; 7 females, median years = 50.71: median number of previous chemotherapies = 4). Diagnoses included colorectal (4), prostate (3), breast, kidney, cervical, brain, lung, osteosarcoma, basal cell, endometrial, ovarian cancers. Of 16 pts, 8 and 5 have completed 1, 2 cycles, respectively. Only one drug related grade 3 adverse event (hypersensitivity reaction) occurred, at 14 mg/m2. No other reported toxicities are related to TPI 287. PK and CTC studies are ongoing. Conclusions: These initial results show that TPI 287 is well tolerated at a dose up to 56 mg/m2 administered Q7D, and dose escalation continues. [Table: see text]

A phase I dose escalation study of pemetrexed in patients with advanced head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC)

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6055-6055 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. H. Morrow ◽  
B. S. Glisson ◽  
L. E. Ginsberg ◽  
S. M. Lippman ◽  
M. S. Kies ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Cell Cancer ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Vitamin Supplementation ◽  
Dose Escalation Study ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Ecog Ps ◽  
Dose Levels ◽  
Neck Squamous Cell Cancer

6055 Background: Despite recent advances in therapy, patients (pts) with recurrent or metastatic HNSCC continue to demonstrate a poor median survival. In these pts, early trials with pemetrexed, a novel antimetabolite that acts upon several enzymes involved in pyrimidine and purine synthesis, have demonstrated promising efficacy and tolerability. Prior studies found that the administration of oral dexamethasone with pemetrexed reduced the incidence of skin rash. Later, vitamin supplementation (B12 and folic acid), given in addition to the dexamethasone, further diminished side effects. However, no trial has yet evaluated the appropriate steroid dose and its relation to the dosing of pemetrexed, in the setting of vitamin supplementation. We conducted a phase I trial to determine the maximum tolerated dose, toxicity, and preliminary efficacy of pemetrexed when given with different schedules of, or in the absence of, dexamethasone in pts with advanced HNSCC who had been treated with at least one or more chemotherapy regimens. Methods: Eligible pts had metastatic or recurrent HNSCC, prior treatment with one or more chemotherapy regimens, ECOG PS =2, and life expectancy >3 months. A conventional algorithm-based dose escalation design was applied, with three predefined dose levels (DL) of pemetrexed (500 mg/m2, 600 mg/m2, and 700 mg/m2) within each schedule of dexamethasone (none, 20 mg IV on day 1, and 4 mg orally bid for 3 days). Results: A total of 23 pts have been enrolled; 18 pts were evaluable. Median age was 57 years (range 47–82). Median ECOG PS was 1 (range 0–2), and 75% of pts were male. Number of prior chemotherapy regimens were as follows: 1 (40%), 2 (35%), 3 (15%), and 4 (10%). Preliminary data demonstrated only 2 treatment-related adverse events that were grade 3 or greater: anemia (DL1) and pneumonia (DL 1). In all, 13 pts have received pemetrexed with less than standard recommended dexamethasone dosing (none or IV), including 7 pts who received no dexamethasone. Of the 18 evaluable pts, 1 pt had a partial response and 2 pts had stable disease. Conclusions: This represents the first study that demonstrates that steroids may not be required as premedication with pemetrexed. Due to the limited toxicity observed, trial enrollment continues with dose escalation. [Table: see text]

A first-in-human phase I study to evaluate the fully human monoclonal antibody OMP-59R5 (anti-Notch2/3) administered intravenously to patients with advanced solid tumors.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3025-3025 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony W. Tolcher ◽  
Rashmi Chugh ◽  
Glenda Chambers ◽  
Villette Thorpe ◽  
Jakob Dupont ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tumor Growth ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Human Monoclonal Antibody ◽  
Notch Pathway ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Dose Escalation Study ◽  
Stem And Progenitor Cells ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Cancer Agent

3025 Background: The Notch pathway plays a central role in embryonic development, the regulation of stem and progenitor cells, and is implicated centrally in many human cancers. OMP-59R5 is a fully human IgG2 originally identified by binding to Notch2. It inhibits the signaling of both Notch2 and Notch3 receptors. Mouse xenograft studies using minimally-passaged, patient-derived xenografts show that OMP-59R5 impedes tumor growth and eliminates cancer stem cells (CSCs) in many tumor types. OMP-59R5 modulates the expression of stromal genes and genes associated with the function of tumor vascular pericytes. As such, OMP-59R5 is a novel anti-cancer agent that inhibits tumor growth through direct actions on tumor cells, including CSCs, and effects the stroma and vasculature. Methods: A phase I dose escalation study (3+3 design) was initiated in solid tumor patients. OMP-59R5 was administered to study safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), preliminary efficacy, and to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Results: Twenty-four patients have been enrolled in 5 dose-escalation cohorts at doses of 0.5, 1, 2.5, and 5mg/kg administered weekly (QW) and 5mg/kg administered every other week (QOW). The most frequently reported drug-related adverse events were: mild to moderate diarrhea, fatigue, nausea, vomiting, decreased appetite, and constipation. Diarrhea was dose related and occurred at doses ≥2.5mg/kg weekly and appears less pronounced with every other week dosing. Two dose-limiting toxicities (grade 3 diarrhea and grade 3 hypokalemia) occurred at 5mg/kg QW and 2.5mg/kg was established as an MTD for QW dosing. A QOW dosing schedule is currently under investigation. The PK of OMP-59R5 was characterized by fast and dose-dependent clearance. Two patients (Kaposi’s sarcoma at 5mg/kg and adenoid cystic carcinoma at 2.5mg/kg) had prolonged stable disease for ≥110 days. PD analyses for Notch pathway modulation are ongoing. Conclusions: OMP-59R5 is generally well tolerated. An MTD of 2.5mg/kg QW has been established and a QOW schedule is currently under study. Updated results will be presented.

Phase I/II trial of combination nab-paclitaxel and pemetrexed in advanced solid tumor patients (pts) with emphasis on non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e19147-e19147
Author(s):  
Jonathan Riess ◽  
Cheryl Ho ◽  
Angela M. Davies ◽  
Derick Lau ◽  
Primo Lara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Prior Therapy ◽  
Early Closure ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Recommended Phase Ii Dose

e19147 Background: Despite advances in targeted therapies, there is an ongoing need to develop new and effective cytotoxic drug combinations in NSCLC. Preclinical evaluation has demonstrated additive cytotoxicity of pemetrexed and taxanes. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of combining nab-paclitaxel (nP) and pemetrexed (P) in solid tumors with a focus on NSCLC for the phase II expansion. Methods: A 3+3 dose-escalation design was used to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the recommended phase II dose (RP2D). Three dose levels were tested: P 500 mg/m2 day 1 plus nP on day 1 at doses of 180, 220, and 260 mg/m2 every 21 days. Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) in cycle 1 was defined as: grade 4 platelets or grade 3 platelets with bleeding, neutropenia with fever or documented infection, or other grade ≥ 3 non-heme toxicity. Phase II eligibility included advanced NSCLC, ≤ 2 line prior therapy, PS 0-1, adequate organ function. Primary endpoint for further study was response rate (RR) ≥ 25%. Results: Planned dose escalation during the Phase I portion was completed without reaching the MTD. The RP2D was P 500 mg/m2 and nP 260 mg/m2. The phase II portion accrued 37 pts before early closure due to increasing use of first-line pemetrexed/platinum doublet therapy in non-squamous NSCLC. Phase II patient characteristics: median 63 (45-77); M:F 23:14; median cycles 3. In 31 assessable patients: 5 PR, 12 SD and 14 PD. Efficacy: RR =14%; disease control rate (DCR) = 46%; median survival time (MST) = 8.7 months. Pts in the DCR group had a MST of 15.4 vs 4 months in the PD group (p=0.02). Conclusions: P 500 mg/m2 day 1 with nP 260 mg/m2 was feasible and well tolerated. The phase II component demonstrated activity in second-line therapy of advanced NSCLC. Practice patterns have evolved; so further trials of this regimen are not planned. Clinical trial information: NCT00470548.

Phase I study of everolimus (RAD001) with irinotecan (Iri) and cetuximab (C) in second-line metastatic colorectal cancer: Hoosier Oncology Group GI05-102.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 523-523 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Myre ◽  
M. Yu ◽  
J. Picus ◽  
J. A. Bufill ◽  
W. A. Harb ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Infusion Reaction ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Stopping Rules ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Randomized Phase Ii ◽  
Common Grade ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Number Of Cycles ◽  
Ecog Ps

523 Background: Preclinically, mTOR and EGFR inhibitors are synergistic. We hypothesize that the mTOR inhibitor RAD001 would enhance efficacy and prevent resistance when added to an anti-EGFR agent. The purpose of the phase I portion of this study was to determine the safety and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of daily RAD001 combined with weekly Iri and C in mCRC. Methods: Pts who failed first-line therapy, including an Iri-regimen, were treated with Iri 125 mg/m2 weekly x 2 every 3 weeks, C 400 mg/m2 loading dose, then 250 mg/m2 weekly, and escalating doses of RAD001 orally: 5 mg qod, 5 mg qd and 10 mg qd during 21-day cycles, with a “3+3” design. The study was amended after the first 9 pts enrolled, to include stopping rules for excessive toxicity beyond what was expected for diarrhea, nausea/vomiting and febrile neutropenia due to Iri, and skin rash due to C. Enrollment excluded pts with UGT1A1*28, but allowed KRAS mutated mCRC. RAD001 PK was done on C2D1, and archival tumors were analyzed for pharmacodynamic markers. Results: 28 pts were enrolled, median age 61 y (25-77), 15 male, ECOG PS 0/1 (19/9). Reasons for treatment discontinuation were: PD (7), adverse events (AEs) (6), pt withdrawal, symptomatic deterioration and non-compliance (1 each). Prior to study's amendment* (n=9), 3 pts were not evaluable for DLT due to: Iri intolerance after one dose (1), non-compliance (1) and gr 3 C infusion reaction (1). DLTs and number of cycles are listed in Table. Following protocol amendment, 2 pts had DLT in cohort 3 (gr 3 mucositis), thus the MTD was 5 mg RAD001. The most common grade 3/4 AEs were: diarrhea (10), neutropenia (5), fatigue (4), acne-rash (4), mucositis (2), nausea (2), vomiting (1). Among 19 pts evaluable for response, there were 1 CR, 2 PR, (RR 16%), 9 SD (47%), 7 PD (37%). PK and pharmacodynamic data is ongoing. Conclusions: The MTD of RAD001 of 5 mg QD with Iri/C weekly is safe and clinically active. A randomized phase II study is near starting accrual. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]

Optimizing the use of androgen deprivation therapy in men with localized intermediate-risk prostate cancer in the era of modern dose-escalated radiation therapy.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 109-109
Author(s):  
Sagar Anil Patel ◽  
Kevin H. Nguyen ◽  
Alan K. Lee ◽  
David Jeffrey Demanes ◽  
Albert Chang
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Androgen Deprivation Therapy ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Clinical Stage ◽  
Androgen Deprivation ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Intermediate Risk ◽  
Risk Prostate Cancer ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Group D

109 Background: While level one evidence has shown an overall survival (OS) advantage with the addition of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) to radiotherapy (RT) for intermediate risk prostate cancer (PCa), the benefit in the era of modern dose escalation is controversial, especially given the heterogeneity within this risk group. We assessed the impact of adding ADT to high dose RT on OS for intermediate risk PCa stratified by number of intermediate risk factors (IRF). Methods: We identified 114,339 men with intermediate risk PCa (Gleason 7, clinical stage T1-2, PSA < 20 ng/mL) using the National Cancer Database. Men were stratified into the following subgroups based on the number of IRFs (Gleason 7, cT2b-c, PSA > 10-20 ng/mL): A) Gleason 3+4 and no other IRF, B) Gleason 4+3 and no other IRF, C) two IRFs, and D) three IRFs. The addition of ADT to dose-escalated external beam RT (DE-EBRT, ≥ 75.6 Gy), brachytherapy (BT), or combination EBRT+BT on OS was assessed within each subgroup using Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests in propensity score-matched cohorts in all men and subsequently only in those with Charlson-Deyo comorbidity index (CDI) of zero. Results: There was no OS benefit with the addition of ADT to DE-EBRT, BT, or EBRT+BT in groups A, B, and C, even after limiting the cohort to men with CDI = 0. However, in group D, the addition of ADT to DE-EBRT was associated with a trend for OS improvement in patients with CDI = 0 only (8-year OS with and without ADT 68.3% and 62.4%, respectively, log-rank P= .07). Conversely, there was a trend for OS decrement with the addition of ADT to DE-EBRT in men with CDI ≥ 1 (8-year OS with and without ADT 61.8% and 67.5%, respectively, log-rank P= .06). There was no OS benefit of ADT in group D treated with BT or EBRT+BT, regardless of comorbidity status. Conclusions: The OS benefit of ADT in men with intermediate risk PCa may be limited to those with 3 IRFs and minimal comorbidities treated with DE-EBRT. If prospectively validated, extreme dose escalation achieved with BT (alone or in combination with EBRT) may obviate the addition of ADT in all men with intermediate risk disease, especially in an era of advanced molecular imaging.

A multi-institutional phase I/II trial of focal salvage high-dose-rate brachytherapy for locally recurrent prostate cancer in patients treated with prior radiotherapy (F-SHARP).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS265-TPS265
Author(s):  
Abhishek A Solanki ◽  
William Adams ◽  
Kristin Baldea ◽  
Neil Desai ◽  
Ahmer Farooq ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Rate ◽  
Biochemical Recurrence ◽  
Toxicity Assessment ◽  
High Dose Rate ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Hdr Brachytherapy ◽  
Recurrent Tumor ◽  
Grade 3

TPS265 Background: Approximately 20% of patients with localized prostate cancer who undergo curative-intent radiotherapy develop a clinical recurrence after radiation. Half of these clinical recurrences are a local radio-recurrence (LRR). Patients with LRR have multiple potential salvage local therapy options, but there are limited data guiding management. Prospective clinical trials demonstrate 5-year freedom from biochemical recurrence of ~50-70% with salvage brachytherapy using primarily whole-gland low dose rate or high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy. However, the risk of severe grade ≥3 late toxicity is 5-15% in prior series, suggesting an opportunity to improve the therapeutic ratio. The F-SHARP trial was designed to study focal salvage HDR brachytherapy as a means to treat LRR after definitive radiotherapy and reduce the toxicity of re-irradiation. Methods: F-SHARP is a two-staged non-randomized phase I/II trial of focal salvage HDR brachytherapy for LRR prostate cancer. The study originated at a single center but will be opening at 3 other institutions in late 2020. Eligibility criteria include biopsy-proven local recurrence after curative radiation therapy (any form) for cT1-T3a N0 M0 prostate adenocarcinoma, no radiographic evidence of nodal or metastatic disease prior to enrollment on CT/MRI and bone scan (fluciclovine PET/CT encouraged), current IPSS ≤20, and no grade ≥3 CTCAE v 4.03 toxicity from prior RT. Initially, study HDR was delivered as a single fraction of up to 30 Gy to the target volume (gross recurrent tumor + 5 mm), with priority given to normal tissue constraints. Based on data in the definitive HDR brachytherapy setting suggesting inferior outcomes with single fraction HDR, a 2 fraction regimen (again delivering up to 30 Gy to the gross recurrent tumor + 5 mm) was added as an option as well. The primary endpoint is Grade ≥3 CTCAE V4.03 RT-related toxicity at 3 months. Assuming that the true toxicity rate in the population is 10% or less, the study has 81% power to reject the null hypothesis that the toxicity rate is 33% or higher. In the first stage, 7 patients will be accrued. If there are 2 or more toxic responses in these 7 patients, the study will be stopped for safety reasons. Otherwise, 17 additional patients will be accrued for a total of 24 patients to evaluate the primary endpoint. After completion of the 24 patient toxicity assessment, the cohort expands to 50 subjects to study freedom from biochemical recurrence (secondary endpoint). Other secondary endpoints include local control, freedom-from local failure, freedom from elsewhere-prostate control, freedom from distant metastasis, freedom from hormonal therapy, disease-free survival, cause-specific survival, and overall survival. The study has completed the initial 24 patient toxicity assessment and continues accrual in the expansion cohort. Clinical trial information: NCT03312972.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document