Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer: Experience at the Instituto Oncologico Nacional SOLCA Guayaquil.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15571-e15571
Author(s):  
Guillermo Paulson ◽  
Katherine Garcia ◽  
Mayra Santacruz ◽  
Ruth Ginger Engracia ◽  
Jose Francisco Mendoza

e15571 Background: Cervical cancer is the most common malignancy of women in Ecuador. The main problem of concomitant chemo-radiotherapy (CRT) is the delay in starting radiation therapy, economic and logistical problems for high demand in radiotherapy. It has been neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by CRT the main treatment at our center in order to find an alternative to long waits before the start of radiotherapy. The aim of this study was to determine the response to NACT followed by CRT in terms progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Methods: diagnosed with invasive cervical cancer locally advanced stage II-III were analyzed retrospectively reviewed clinical records of pre-existing data from 2008 to 2010. Results: after meeting the criteria of exclusion, leaving 116 cases. The median age: 49 years (range: 28-82 years). The histology was 73% (85) squamous cell carcinoma, 26% (30) adenocarcinoma and 0.9% (1) not specified. Patients with stage IIB: 81.9% (95), IIIA: 10.3% (12), IIIB: 7.8% (9). Of the 116 patients 69% (80) received NACT. The main NACT was paclitaxel 175mg/m2 + Cisplatin 75mg/m2 every 3 weeks 63.8% (74), the remaining group received another protocol, the median number of cycles of NACT was 5 (1 - 8 cycles), the start of radiotherapy since the conclusion of NACT was 53 days on average (1 to 285 days) and the main regimen of CRT concomitant was cisplatin 40mg/m2 weekly 47.5% (38). In the 49 patients who underwent NACT followed by CRT, a radiological study showed, complete response (CR) 38.8% (19), 18.4% partial response (PR) (9), disease progression (DP) 12.2% (6), stable disease (SD) 8.2% (4) and the end of treatment evaluation gynecological was performed and CR was obtained in 59.2% (29). Persistent or progressive disease after treatment was 22.4% (11), recurrence was 12.2% (6), local recurrence 2.0% (1), distant metastasis 10.2% (5). OS of NACT followed by CRT was 93.9% (46) and PFS was 65.3% (32), OS after CR was 96% (25 / 1) and then 91.7% PR (24 / 2) with p: 0.439. Conclusions: NACT followed by CRT is a valid option because it improves disease-related symptoms, but OS did not improve significantly even after CR.

2011 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 685-689 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yufeng Ren ◽  
Yanfang Li ◽  
Jihong Liu

Introduction:The commonly used administration schedule of irinotecan in combination therapy with cisplatin in cervical cancer was once weekly for 3 weeks. To some extent, this administration schedule may be inconvenient for patients who were far from hospital. The aim of the current study is to investigate the efficacy and toxicities of a modified shortened administration schedule for neoadjuvant chemotherapy with irinotecan and cisplatin in locally advanced cervical cancer.Methods:We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of patients with cervical cancer who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy with irinotecan and cisplatin delivered by the modified administration schedule at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center from November 2005 to May 2010. Irinotecan was administrated by intravenous infusion for 1 hour at a dose of 80 mg/m2on days 1 and 8. Cisplatin was administrated intravenously at a total dose of 60 to 70 mg/m2, which was infused on day 1 or was divided into 2 or 3 doses and given on days 1 to 2 or 3. The treatment was repeated every 3 weeks.Results:The total response rate was 78.8% (42/52), including a complete response and partial response rate of 11.5% (6/52) and 67.3% (35/52), respectively. Pathologically confirmed complete response was noted in 7.7% (4/52) of patients. Stable disease was observed in 17.3% (9/52) of patients and progression disease in 3.8% (2/52) of patients. Diarrhea and hematological toxicity were the major dose-limiting toxicities. Diarrhea occurred in 23.1% of patients with grades 1, 2, and 3 in 11.5%, 7.7%, and 3.8% of patients, respectively. No grade 4 diarrhea was noted. Grade 3/4 neutropenia developed in 7.7% (4/52) of patients. Grade 3/4 anemia occurred in 19.2% (10/52) of patients.Conclusions:The modified shortened administration schedule of combined therapy with irinotecan and cisplatin may be active against cervical cancer as neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The adverse effects could be controllable.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 415-415
Author(s):  
Arish Noor ◽  
Luis E. Aguirre ◽  
Kirsten Blue ◽  
Trenton Avriett ◽  
Estrella M. Carballido ◽  
...  

415 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have been approved in solid tumors with dMMR. However, only limited data are available for PDAC with dMMR given the rarity of dMMR in PDAC. We evaluated efficacy of ICIs in PDAC with dMMR. Methods: Retrospective clinical and pathologic data were collected for patients (pts) with pancreatic adenocarcinoma from May 2017 to June 2020 at Moffitt cancer center. Results: We identified 10 pts with dMMR PDAC. The median age was 64.5 years (range: 42-86) and 4 pts were male. 4 pts had resectable disease, 3 had locally advanced and 3 had metastatic disease at initial diagnosis. MSH6 deficiency (def) was found in 2 cases, PMS2 def in 2, MLH/PMS2 def in 5, and MSH2/MSH6 in 1. 7 pts were treated with ICIs. 3 pts had locally advanced and 4 had metastatic disease when they started ICIs. 5 received Pembrolizumab (pem), 1 received ipilimumab/ nivolumab (ipi/nivo), and 1 received pem then ipi/nivo after progressive disease (PD) on pem. The median number of prior lines of chemotherapy was 1 (range 0-2). 6 pts were evaluable, and 1 had rapid disease progression after 1 dose of pem. Among 6 evaluable pts, 3 had an objective response (1: complete response and 2: partial response), and 2 had stable disease (SD). Median progression-free survival was 8.2 mo, and median overall survival was not reached with median follow-up (FU) of 6.8 mo. The median duration of response was not reached with a median FU of 22.6 mo. The pt with CR remained disease-free for up to 22 months. The pt whose treatment was switched to ipi/nivo after PD on pem achieved SD > 4mo on ipi/nivo. While on immunotherapy, one patient with ipi/nivo developed immunotherapy associated rash requiring systemic steroids, and another on pem developed hypothyroidism requiring levothyroxine. Conclusions: This series suggest ICIs can provide durable clinical efficacy in pts with dMMR PDAC.


2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5587-5587
Author(s):  
M. Marinaccio ◽  
E. De Marino ◽  
E. Mele ◽  
R. Catacchio ◽  
C. Pellegrino ◽  
...  

5587 Background: Chemoradiotherapy is the standard treatment of advanced cervical cancer. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) may represent an alternative for locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC).This study was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy of NAC in young patients with squamous LACC. Methods: Since 2000 to 2008, 61 pts (mean age 43 yrs) with squamous LACC were treated with NAC and afterwards evaluated for radical surgery. Eligibility included proven histologically diagnosis of squamous cervical carcinoma, FIGO stage IB2/IIA>4cm/IIB, measurable disease, ECOG PS 0–2, no prior therapy and age under 49 years. All patients received TIP regimen (cisplatin 50 mg/m2 i.v. day 1, paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 over 3 hrs i.v.day1, ifosfamide 5,000 mg/m2 plus mesna 6,000 mg/m2 over 24 hrs i.v. day 1–2). Each cycle was repeated every 21 days. Patients were evaluated 4–6 weeks after the completion of the third cycle with the purpose to perform radical surgery according to clinical response. Results: 35pts (57.4%) were stage IB2; 9 (14.7%) were IIA >4cm; and 17 (27.9%) were IIB. After restaging the clinical results were: CR = 4/61 (6.6%), PR = 51/61 (83.6%); no response = 5/61 (8.2%); progression = 1/61 (1.6%). A total of 55 pts (90.1%) were eligible for surgery; 6/61 pts (9.8%) were submitted to curative radiotherapy (until 2004) or chemoradiotherapy. Pathological responses after surgery were: 4 pCR (7.3%); 46 pPR (83.6%); and 5 (9.1%) pPR with presence of positive surgical margins or metastatic lymph nodes. Out of 55 pts, 50 received 2 cycles of TIP regimen as a consolidation therapy before follow-up; 5 pts with incomplete pPR underwent radio/chemoradiotherapy. After NAC an overall downstaging of LACC was obtained in 50/61 pts (82.0%). In this group of pts at the median follow-up of 42 months (range 4–98) updated as of December 2008, the 3-years progression-free survival and overall survival are 85.9% and 82.0%, respectively. Conclusions: Our results indicate that TIP regimen-based NAC is an attractive option in young women with squamous LACC (IB2,IIA >4cm, IIB) that strongly desire surgery.The rate of patients with a prolonged remission of disease (82.0%) suggests that the clinical benefit of TIP regimen-based NAC followed by surgery may be comparable to chemoradiotherapy. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5515-5515 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Hitt ◽  
J. Grau ◽  
A. Lopez-Pousa ◽  
A. Berrocal ◽  
C. García-Giron ◽  
...  

5515 Background: we have previously reported that ICT plus CRT is more active than CRT alone in pts with unresectable LAHNC (Hitt et al: ASCO 2005, abstract 5578). Here we present new data of efficacy and time to progression (TTP) in this trial. Methods: Patients: eligible pts included those with unresectable LAHNC, measurable disease, adequate organ function and ECOG 0–1. Pts were stratified according to primary tumor site. Treatment: Induction chemotherapy regimens (3 cycles): PF : P 100 mg/m2 day (d) 1, then F 1000 mg/m2 c.i. d1–5 q 21d; TPF: T 75 mg/m2 d1, P 75 mg/m2 d1, F 750 mg/m2 c.i. d 1–5 q 21 d plus G-CSF and ciprofloxacin. Chemoradiotherapy: conventional RT up to 70 Gy plus P 100 mg/m2 d 1–22–43 Results: Patients: a total of 310 pts have been accrued. Pts/tumor characteristics (ECOG, age, primary site, T/N stage) were well balanced among the three arms. T/N stage: T3–4 (88%); N2–3 (63%); pharynx-oropharynx site (62%). Treatment: Median number of cycles of ICT: 3; median dose of RT: 70 Gy, median number of cycles of P during RT in three arms: 3. Efficacy: Complete Response: 70% (ICT + CRT) vs. 49% (CRT alone) (p = 0.01). The response rate was similar between TPF and PF. Time to progression (TTP) in months: 16 (TPF + CRT); 12 (PF + CRT) vs 8 (CRT alone) (log-Rank= 0.02). G 3/4 toxicity (NCI criteria): Febrile neutropenia: 21% (TPF); mucositis: 10% (PF). Mucositis was observed in 55% (TPF + CRT), 60% (PF + CRT) and 36% (CRT alone) of the pts, respectively Conclusions: The results of the present randomised clinical trial demonstrate that the combination of ICT + CRT significantly increases the complete response rate and prolongs TTP when compared to CRT alone in patients with unresectable LAHNC. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15553-e15553
Author(s):  
Carlo De Cicco Nardone ◽  
Francesco Plotti ◽  
Michela Angelucci ◽  
Roberto Montera ◽  
Patrizio Damiani ◽  
...  

e15553 Background: The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination of carboplatin and paclitaxel as neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in patients affected by locally advanced cervical cancer. Methods: Between June 2007 to May 2009, all patients with diagnosis of IB2-IIB cervical cancer were considered eligible for this protocol. All enrolled patients received 3 cycles of carboplatin (AUC6) and paclitaxel at 175 mg/mq in neadjuvant setting. The chemotherapy induced toxicity and response to the treatment were evaluated according to World Health Organization criteria. Results: We have enrolled 23 patients with diagnosis of locally advanced cervical cancer. A total of 22 patients completed planned 3 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. After 3 cycles of chemotherapy 9 out of 23 patients (42%) showed a complete response, 7 patients (35%) partial response, 5 patients (16%) stable disease and 2 patients (11%) showed disease progression. The most common toxicity was haematologic (43%), extra haematologic toxicities were nausea/vomiting, neuropathy and alopecia, that occurred in 45%, 13% and 25% respectively. No renal and grade 3 and 4 haematologic toxicities were registered. Conclusions: Our results suggest that the use of carboplatin, in neadjuvant setting, is a well tolerated drug, produces manageable toxicity with a response rate similar to standard cisplatin. Then, it rappresents a valid alternative in patients affected by locally advanced cervical cancer.


2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 56-64
Author(s):  
O. A. Smirnova ◽  
N. E. Bondarev ◽  
E. A. Ulrikh ◽  
N. A. Mikaya ◽  
A. S. Petrova ◽  
...  

Objective:to assess the efficacy of dose-intensive platinum-containing neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with FIGO stage IB2–IIB locally advanced cervical cancer.Materials and methods.We evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of 3 cycles of intravenous dose-intensive neoadjuvant chemotherapy with either AP regimen (cisplatin 75 mg/m2 and doxorubicin 35 mg/m2) or TP regimen (cisplatin 60 mg/m2 and paclitaxel 60 mg/m2).Results.The study included 105 patients (75 in the AP group and 30 in the TP group) aged between 27 and 63 years (mean age 44 years) with primary verified cervical cancer (T1–2B0–2Nx–0M0). Surgery was performed in 66 patients (88 %) from the AP group and 24 patients (80 %) from the TP group. Six patients (8 %) receiving AP regimen and 1 patient (3.3 %) receiving TP regimen developed disease progression. Four women (2.8 %) from the AP group developed relapses, whereas none of the patients from the TP group had relapses. Dose-intensive chemotherapy did not cause any significant complications at both chemotherapeutic and surgical stages. Our findings suggest that dose-intensive neoadjuvant chemotherapy is an effective method with an objective response rate of 84 % (63 cases) and 56.7 % (17 cases) in groups AP and TP respectively. Fifty-nine patients (78.7 %) receiving AP regimen had pathological response; of them, 7 participants (9.4 %) demonstrated pathological complete response (ypCR). In the TP group, 19 patients (63.3 %) had pathological response and 4 patients (13.4 %) had pathological complete response. Median follow-up time was 16.7 months (range: 3–29 months) in the AP group and 9.1 months (range: 2.8–12.7 months) in the TP group.Conclusion.Dose-intensive neoadjuvant chemotherapy can be considered as an alternative to standard treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer; however, further studies are needed due to the small sample size in this study.


2016 ◽  
Vol 26 (8) ◽  
pp. 1490-1496 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caterina Ricci ◽  
Giovanni Scambia ◽  
Rosa De Vincenzo

ObjectiveCervical cancer is the most common gynecological cancer occurring in pregnancy, creating a complex situation both for patient and physician. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is an innovative way of managing cervical cancer in pregnancy.MethodsIn our paper, we report a retrospective case series of 4 women treated with chemotherapy for invasive cervical cancer during pregnancy in our center over the last 5 years, and we summarize the available literature and guidelines.ResultsAll the cases were locally advanced cervical cancers that received chemotherapy with platinum and/or taxanes. All patients showed a good response to chemotherapy and a radical surgery was performed with no additional morbidities at the cesarean delivery time in 3 of 4 cases. Three of 4 patients are alive and have a good outcome with no recurrence of disease up to date. One patient died because of recurrent disease 2 years after the first-line treatment during pregnancy. All babies are alive and well up to date (maximum follow-up, 63 months).ConclusionsEven if there are no standardized practices in the treatment of cervical cancer in pregnancy, in our opinion, neoadjuvant chemotherapy can be a very useful strategy for patients and physicians facing the challenge.


2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 274-274
Author(s):  
R. Morales ◽  
C. Serrano ◽  
J. Bellmunt ◽  
B. Mellado ◽  
M. Guix ◽  
...  

274 Background: A four-weekly regimen of gemcitabine and cisplatin (GEMCIS) has similar activity and is less toxic than MVAC in advanced bladder cancer. However, full-dose cisplatin in unfit patients with impaired renal function is contraindicated and other carboplatin-based schedules have been developed. We have previously reported the feasibility of GEMCIS in a biweekly schedule in unfit patients with renal impairment. Here we report a multicenter retrospective study of this biweekly regimen in patients with impaired renal function. Methods: Between January 2004 and October 2009, 40 patients with locally advanced nonsurgically resectable or metastatic bladder cancer and impaired renal function were included. Treatment consisted of gemcitabine 2500 mg/m2 on day 1 and cisplatin 35 mg/m2 on day 1, every 14 days. Results: Median age of the patients was 73 years (range: 51-82 years). Median IK was 80% (range: 60-100%). Mean creatinine clearance was 49 ml/min (range:37-59 ml/min). Eight patients had previously received chemotherapy with gemcitabine and/or platinum based therapy. Metastatic localizations were: 17 lymph nodes, 10 pulmonary, 10 bone, 7 liver, 12 pelvic and 1 central nervous system. The median number of cycles/patient was 6 (1-13). Out of 36 patients evaluable for response, there was one complete response, 14 partial responses (ORR: 42%; 95% CI 27-58%), 11 stabilizations and 10 progressive diseases. Hematologic toxicities were grade 1 anaemia in 15 patients, grade 2 in 8; grade 3 in 2; grade 3 neutropenia in 5 patients and grade 4 in 1 patient; grade 3 plaquetopenia in 3 patients. Nonhematologic toxicities were grade 1-2 vomiting in 2 patients. Two patients showed a grade 2 hepatic toxicity. Worsening of the renal function was observed in two patients. Alopecia grade 1-2 was seen in three patients. There was one toxic death related to metabolic acidosis.The median progression-free survival is 15 weeks. The median OS from first cycle of GEMCIS is 35 weeks and 1-year OS is 43% (St error 9%). Conclusions: A two-weekly schedule of gemcitabine plus cisplatin is feasible, active, and generally well tolerated in an outpatient setting in unfit patients with poor renal reserve. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5603-5603
Author(s):  
Juan Fernando Cueva ◽  
Nieves Martinez Lago ◽  
Maria Vieito ◽  
Ezequiel Gonzalez Patino ◽  
Maria Teresa Curiel Garcia ◽  
...  

5603 Background: Although there has not been a direct comparison between neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation with chemoradiation alone, neoadjuvant chemotherapy is active in squamous cervical cancer. Methods: In this one arm phase II trial we accrued 25 patients from 2007 to 2012 diagnosed with squamous cervical cancer deemed poor candidates to initial chemoradiation (decided by a multidisciplinary committee). Patients had > 18 years of age, PS 0-1, adequate organ function an gave informed consent. They received neoadjuvant paclitaxel and cisplatin (80 and 33 mg/m2 respectively) on days 1,7, 15 of every 28 for two cycles and then external radiation in 1.8 Gy/ fraction with concurrent weekly cisplatin 40 mg/m2followed by brachytherapy in 5-6 applications. Dose intensity and toxicity was accrued, and both after neoadjuvant and chemoradiation patients were evaluated by RECIST 1.1 criteria for response with CT scan and pelvic MNR. Results: Baseline characteristics of the patients are listed in Table. 24 patients were evaluable for efficacy and safety. Response rate after neoadjuvant chemotherapy was 84 % (complete and partial responses in 24 and 60% of patients, respectively), without progression disease. Response rate after radiochemotherapy was 93 % (complete and partial responses in 52 and 41% of patients, respectively). After a mean of 29 months of follow up, 11 patients (45%) thus far have developed recurrent disease. Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 33 (23- 42) and 34+ m (29 – not reached). Treatment was well tolerated, without toxicities grade 3-4. Conclusions: Our weekly cisplatin-paclitaxel neoadjuvant regimen has been feasible and very effective in terms of dose delivery, tolerance and radiological responses without compromising definitive treatment with chemoradiation. If this approach is superior than the standard chemoradiation alone in this population should be explored in a randomized trial. [Table: see text]


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document