scholarly journals Phase II Study of Lenalidomide and Rituximab As Salvage Therapy for Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (5) ◽  
pp. 584-591 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xavier C. Badoux ◽  
Michael J. Keating ◽  
Sijin Wen ◽  
William G. Wierda ◽  
Susan M. O'Brien ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Salvage Therapy ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Venous Thromboembolic Event ◽  
Febrile Episode ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Common Grade ◽  
Venous Thromboembolic ◽  
Grade 3

Purpose Lenalidomide is an immunomodulatory drug active as salvage therapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). We combined lenalidomide with rituximab to improve response rates in patients with relapsed or refractory CLL. Patients and Methods Fifty-nine adult patients (age 42 to 82 years) with relapsed or refractory CLL were enrolled onto a phase II study of lenalidomide and rituximab. Patients had received prior fludarabine-based therapy or chemoimmunotherapy. Rituximab (375 mg/m2 intravenously) was administered weekly during cycle one and on day 1 of cycles three to 12. Lenalidomide was started on day 9 of cycle one at 10 mg orally and administered daily continuously. Each cycle was 28 days. Rituximab was administered for 12 cycles; lenalidomide could continue indefinitely if patients benefitted clinically. Results The overall response rate was 66%, including 12% complete responses and 12% nodular partial remissions. Time to treatment failure was 17.4 months. Median overall survival has not been reached; estimated survival at 36 months is 71%. The most common grade 3 or 4 toxicity was neutropenia (73% of patients). Fourteen patients (24%) experienced a grade 3 to 4 infection or febrile episode. There was one episode of grade 3 tumor lysis; one patient experienced renal failure during the first cycle of therapy, and one venous thromboembolic event occurred during the study. Conclusion The combination of lenalidomide and rituximab is active in patients with recurrent CLL and warrants further investigation.

Ofatumumab Added To Dexamethasone In Patients With Relapsed Or Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia. Results From a Phase II Study Of The Czech Leukemia Study Group For Life

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 2877-2877 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Doubek ◽  
Yvona Brychtova ◽  
Anna Panovska ◽  
Jakub Trizuljak ◽  
Ludmila Sebejova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
High Dose ◽  
In Vitro Testing ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract The treatment of relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) remains a challenging clinical issue despite remarkable improvements in prognostication and therapy. One emerging treatment option for relapsed/refractory CLL is the use of high-dose corticosteroids. High-dose methylprednisolone or dexamethasone combined with rituximab are active in relapsed/refractory CLL, but serious infections are frequent and progression-free survival (PFS) is short. The purpose of this clinical trial was to determine the efficacy and toxicity of ofatumumab-dexamethason (O-dex) combination in relapsed or refractory CLL population. The trial was an open-label, multi-center, non-randomized, phase II study. The O-dex regimen consisted of intravenous ofatumumab (Cycle 1: 300mg on day 1, 2000mg on days 8, 15, 22; Cycles 2-6: 1000mg on days 1, 8, 15, 22) and oral dexamethasone (40mg on days 1-4 and 15-18; Cycles 1-6). Premedication consisted of glucocorticoid, paracetamol, and antihistamine before each ofatumumab infusion. All patients received allopurinol, omeprazol, co-trimoxazole, and fluconazole for prophylaxis of tumor lysis syndrome and infections. The O-dex regimen was given for a minimum of 3 cycles, until best response, or a maximum of 6 cycles. Between July 2010 and December 2012, 32 patients (pts.) were recruited at 3 centers. Basic patient characteristics at the start of O-dex therapy were as follows: median age 66 years (range, 50-77); 24 males, 8 females; median CIRS score 7 (0-15); median previous treatment lines 3 (1-10); 30 (94%) pts. were pretreated with fludarabine and 12 (38%) with alemtuzumab; Rai III/IV stage was present in 20 (63%) pts.; 6 (19%) pts. had bulky lymphadenopathy; IgVH genes were unmutated in 30 (94%) pts.; del 11q was present in 6 (19%) and p53 defects (del 17p and/or TP53 mutation) in 8 (25%) pts. The median number of O-dex cycles administered was 6 (1-6). Twenty two (69%) pts. completed at least 3 cycles of therapy. The remaining 9 patients were prematurely discontinued due to CTCAE grade 3/4 infections (7 pts.), disease progression (1 pt.), or uncontrollable diabetes mellitus (1 pt.). Overall responses/complete remissions (ORR/CR) were achieved in 22/5 pts. (69/16%). One patient achieved minimal residual disease negativity (measured by 4-color flow cytometry) at the end of therapy. Median PFS was 10 months. In patients with p53 defects, ORR/CR were achieved in 5/2 pts. (63/25%). The Median PFS was 10.5 months for this subgroup. Median overall survival (OS) has not yet been reached. During therapy, CTCAE grade 3/4 toxicity consisted of bacterial infections (25%), ofatumumab infusion-related side-effects (9%), neutropenia (9%), hyperglycemia (6%), and anemia (3%). No reactivation of herpetic viral infection was observed during the course of therapy. Nine patients died during the follow-up as a result of disease progression (6 pts.), infections (2 pts.), or complications after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (1 relapsed pt.). The median CD20 antigen density in CLL cells was 4766 (881-18515) MESF (molecules of equivalent soluble fluorochrome) units at baseline. At the end of therapy, CD20 density had significantly decreased (median 821 MESF; 443-2637); nevertheless, it was high once more at relapse (median 6619 MESF; 628-21359). In vitro testing of malignant pts. cells sensitivity to dexamethasone and ofatumumab did not show synergistic or additive effect of these compounds in majority of patients. Also, in vitro testing did not clearly predict the outcome of O-dex therapy. Conclusions The O-dex regimen shows relatively high ORR and CR, with promising findings for PFS and OS (including pts. harboring p53 defects), as compared to published data on rituximab plus dexamethasone regimen or ofatumumab in monotherapy. The infectious toxicity in 1/4 of pts. represents the most frequent side effect for this regimen. The study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01310101). Disclosures: Doubek: GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding. Mayer:Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding; Glaxo: Consultancy, Research Funding.

A Phase II Study of Denileukin Diftitox (ONTAKR) in Patients with Fludarabine Refractory B-Cell Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 4824-4824 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip Kuriakose ◽  
Francesco Turturro ◽  
Jesus G. Berdeja ◽  
Robert Kerr ◽  
Asha Surendranathan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Electrolyte Imbalance ◽  
Close Monitoring ◽  
Denileukin Diftitox ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Transient Elevation

Abstract Therapeutic options for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) at relapse are limited because of myelosuppressive toxicity. Denileukin diftitox (ONTAK®, Ligand Pharmaceuticals) is a genetically engineered fusion protein comprising the enzymatically active domain of diphtheria toxin and the full length sequence of interleukin-2 (IL-2) targeting malignancies expressing the medium and high affinity IL-2 receptors. We designed a phase II study to evaluate the efficacy of ONTAK® in patients with fludarabine-refractory CLL, which is a follow-up to the previously published study (Frankel, et al, Clin. Cancer Res.2003; 9:3555). Denileukin diftitox was administered at a dose of 18μg/kg IV daily for 5 days every 3 weeks, for a maximum of 8 cycles. Thirteen patients have been treated so far, with 10 patients being evaluable for response (completed ≥ 3 cycles). Median age was 59 years (range 44–84), and 62% (8/13) were Rai stage III-IV, with a median of 3 prior therapies (range 1–6). The overall response was 40%, with 1 CR (10%, duration of response 5+ months) and 3 PR (30%, duration of response 3+, 3+ and 4+ months). Two responding patients (both PR) are still on study, while two (1 CR, 1 PR) were removed from study because of toxicities after 7 and 5 cycles, respectively. Four patients (40%) had progressive disease after cycles 3, 4, 4, and 7, respectively. One patient has completed four cycles and restaging studies are pending. Of the 3 patients not evaluable for response, two are still on study (having not completed 3 cycles), while one refused further treatment after 4 doses of cycle one. The grade 3/4 toxicities encountered were: neutropenia 4/13, thrombocytopenia 4/13, vascular leak syndrome 3/13, left ventricular cardiac dysfunction 1/13, hypotension 2/13, tachyarrhythmia 3/13, elevated PT 1/13, fatigue 1/13, rash 1/13, SIADH 1/13, constipation 1/13, vomiting 2/13, petechiae 1/13, transient elevation of GGT 1/13, transient elevation of AST/ALT 7/13, hyperglycemia 4/13, electrolyte imbalance 8/13, infection and/or febrile neutropenia 4/13, insomnia 1/13, visual disturbance 1/13, dyspnea 2/13, hypoxia 2/13. We conclude that denileukin diftitox has activity in CLL, with toxicities that can be managed with adequate premedication and close monitoring.

A Phase II Trial of Ofatumumab in Subjects with Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia,

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 3701-3701 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard R. Furman ◽  
Herbert Eradat ◽  
Christine Gabriella DiRienzo ◽  
Suzanne R Hayman ◽  
Craig C. Hofmeister ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Prior Therapy ◽  
Cd20 Expression ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Anti Cd20 ◽  
Waldenström's Macroglobulinemia

Abstract Abstract 3701 Background: Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia (WM) is an indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (B-NHL) characterized by production of a monoclonal IgM paraprotein and variable CD20 expression due to the downregulation of CD20 as B cells differentiate into plasma cells. Rituximab monotherapy (R) achieves an overall response rate (ORR) of 25–50% in therapy naïve and relapsed WM and is associated with IgM flares in 25–75% of patients (pts) that potentially lead to hyperviscosity due to a rapid rise in IgM. Ofatumumab (OFA) is a fully human monoclonal anti-CD20 antibody approved for the treatment of fludarabine and alemtuzumab-refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and has demonstrated activity in indolent B-NHL. Since OFA is active in CLL, with its low CD20 expression, we initiated a phase II single-arm trial of OFA in pts with WM. We report primary endpoint data from this study. Methods: Pts (age ≥ 18 years) with WM requiring therapy by 2nd International Workshop on WM (IWWM) criteria were eligible. Cycle 1 (C1) of therapy consisted of OFA 300 mg week 1 and 1000 mg weeks 2–4 (Treatment Group A [TGA]) or OFA 300 mg week 1 and 2000 mg weeks 2–5 (TGB). Premedication included acetaminophen and antihistamine (all infusions) and glucocorticoid (infusions 1 and 2). Pts with grade 3–4 infusion-related adverse events (AEs) during weeks 1 and 2 also received glucocorticoid during weeks 3–5. Pts with stable disease (SD) or a minor response (MR) at week 16 of cycle 1 were eligible to receive a re-dosing cycle (C2) consisting of OFA 300 mg week 1 and 2000 mg weeks 2–5. The primary endpoint was ORR assessed by 3rd IWWM criteria. Toxicity was assessed according to NCI-CTCAE, v 3.0. Results: Thirty-seven pts were enrolled between March 2009 and February 2011. Median age was 63 years (range 43–85); 22 pts were male. Median IgM level was 3.11 g/dL (range 0.81–8.64); median hemoglobin (hgb) was 9.8 g/dL (range 5.3–13.2). Nine pts were treatment naïve; 28 pts had received a median of 3 prior therapies (range 1–5) including R (25 pts) and purine analog (14 pts). The first 15 pts were enrolled in TGA and the next 22 pts in TGB; pt characteristics were similar in both groups. Thirty-four pts completed C1; 1 pt withdrew after 1 dose and 2 pts received only 3 doses due to serious AEs (SAEs). Eleven pts achieved partial response (PR) and 7 achieved MR after C1 (ORR=49%; 95% CI [32%, 66%]). Twelve pts received C2, after which 4 pts improved their response (1 MR to PR, 1 SD to PR, 2 SD to MR) and 1 nonevaluable pt attained MR. After C1 and C2, the ORR was 59% (13 PR, 9 MR; 95% CI [42%, 75%]). Responses were seen in 67% (6/9) of therapy naïve pts, 57% (16/28) of relapsed pts, 52% (13/25) of pts who had prior R, 75% (9/12) of R-naïve pts, 64% (16/25) of pts with IgM < 4 g/dL and 50% (6/12) of pts with IgM ≥ 4 g/dL. ORR was 47% (7/15) in TGA and 68% (15/22) in TGB. ORR in TGA was negatively affected by prior R exposure and IgM ≥ 4 g/dL, whereas ORR in TGB was not affected by prior therapy, prior R or IgM level. Fifteen of 26 (58%) pts with hgb < 11.0 g/dL experienced ≥ 3.0 g/dL increase in hgb (range 3.0–7.1). Infusion-related events occurred with dose 1 in 30 (81%) pts and with dose 2 in 21 (57%) pts; all infusion events were grade 1–2 except 4 grade 3 events (1 rash, 1 chest pain, 1 chest discomfort, 1 back pain). Fifteen pts developed 22 infections including 8 upper respiratory tract, 4 urinary tract (UTI) and 4 sinus infections; all infections were grade 1–2 except 1 grade 3 UTI. One pt developed grade 3 febrile neutropenia. In total, there were 14 grade 3–4 AEs (all grade 3). Five pts developed 8 SAEs possibly related to OFA. One pt withdrew due to grade 3 hemolytic anemia. Two pts with baseline IgM of 6.63 and 4.75 g/dL required plasmapheresis for grade 3 renal insufficiency and hyperviscosity symptoms, respectively, with resolution of symptoms and were able to complete C1. Two pts developed IgM flare, defined as > 25% rise in IgM followed by subsequent MR or PR. Conclusions: OFA is clinically active in pts with WM, with an acceptable toxicity profile and a lower incidence (5%) of IgM flare. The ORR to OFA was 59% (TGA 47%, TGB 68%) including a 50% ORR (TGA 17%, TGB 83%) in pts with IgM ≥ 4.0 g/dL. Pts' anemia responded to OFA with 58% of pts with baseline hgb < 11.0 g/dL experiencing ≥ 3.0 g/dL increase in hgb. TGB achieved ORR > 60% in all pt groups regardless of prior therapy or baseline IgM level. A higher dose of OFA appeared to be more effective in pts previously exposed to R or with baseline IgM ≥ 4.0 g/dL. Further study of OFA in WM is warranted. Disclosures: Furman: Genentech: Speakers Bureau; GlaxoSmithKline: Speakers Bureau. Off Label Use: • Ofatumumab is an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody approved for the treatment of fludarabine- and alemtuzumab-refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia, and is currently under development for the treatment of B-cell malignancies (chronic lymphocytic leukemia, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, Waldenstroms macroglobulinemia and follicular lymphoma), as well as autoimmune diseases (rheumatoid arthritis and multiple sclerosis). Eradat:Millennium: Speakers Bureau; Genentech, A Roche Company: Speakers Bureau. DiRienzo:GlaxoSmithKline: Employment. Leonard:GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy. Advani:GSK: Research Funding. Switzky:GlaxoSmithKline: Employment. Liao:GlaxoSmithKline: Employment. Shah:GSK: Employment. Lisby:Genmab A/S: Employment. Lin:GlaxoSmithKline: Employment.

Outcomes of Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) after Idelalisib Therapy Discontinuation

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 4155-4155 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacqueline C. Barrientos ◽  
Manmeen Kaur ◽  
Alexis Mark ◽  
Jaewon Chung ◽  
Nancy Driscoll ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Salvage Therapy ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Therapy Discontinuation ◽  
Progression Of Disease ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Extension Trial ◽  
Parent Trial

Abstract Objective Idelalisib is a first-in-class oral PI3Kd inhibitor approved for use in combination with rituximab in patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). We describe the characteristics, causes of discontinuation, and outcomes in patients who discontinued treatment after idelalisib therapy. Methods 38 R/R CLL patients participated in 5 idelalisib combination trials at the North Shore-LIJ Cancer Institute and were included in this analysis. The patients were enrolled from 2011 until 2014, and data were locked in March 1st, 2015. Patients were evaluated for time to therapy discontinuation and reasons for discontinuation. The majority of the patients had been heavily pretreated and 39% of the patients had a high risk prognostic marker including deletion of 11q or 17p. 21 R/R CLL patients participated in the Phase Ib trial of idelalisib in combination with several agents including Rituximab (R), Bendamustine (B) ± R, Fludarabine, Chlorambucil ± R, and Ofatumumab. The trial was designed for 48 weeks and patients were allowed to continue on an extension trial with idelalisib if still deriving benefit. Patients on the parent trial were on therapy a median of 335 days. 42% (11/21) continued in the extension trial at the end of the parent trial. Causes of discontinuation from initial 48-week trial included: grade 4 transaminitis (1) on day 64 with failed rechallenge at lower doses; Richter's transformation (1) on day 161; grade 3/4 diarrhea/colitis (4) on days 52, 231, 255, and 365; refractory/progressive CLL (2) on days 8 and 170; aplastic anemia (1) on day 172; and septic shock in a patient with uncontrolled autoimmune hemolytic anemia (1) on day 271. Of the patients on the extension trial, the median time on drug was 412 days with 27% (3/11) discontinuing due to grade 3/4 diarrhea/colitis; 36% (4/11) due to progression, 9% (1/11) due to pneumonia and subsequent progression 2 months later. Of the 3 patients that remain on study, their median time on therapy is 1072 days without evidence of toxicities. Of the 17 patients that participated in placebo-controlled phase III studies, 11 participated in R +/- idelalisib (study 116) and 6 on BR+/-idelalisib (study 115). Study 116 was unblinded during the trial: 35% (4/11) received idelalisib + R upfront. Of these, only 2 patients (50%) were able to continue on extension study as the other 2 patients developed pneumonitis and were taken off study early. One patient is continues on study at day 1011 whereas the second patient developed progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy on day 714 and died days after being taken off drug. 86% (6/7) of the remaining patients initially randomized to placebo crossed over to idelalisib at the time of confirmed progression. Of these, 14% (1/6) developed both colitis and later pneumonitis, 14% (1/6) withdrew consent, and 14% (1/6) had progression of disease. For blinded study 115 (BR+/-idelalisib), 6 patients participated: 33% (2/6) developed grade 3/4 diarrhea/colitis, 16% (1/6) developed pneumonitis, and 16% (1/6) has progressed. In our experience, none of the patients with severe diarrhea/colitis were able to maintain lower doses for a prolonged period of time without recurrent colitis or the development of pneumonitis. Since the start of these trials, 31% (12/38) of the patients have died: the overall survival after discontinuation for these patients varies widely from 0 to 303 days with a median overall survival of 64 days after discontinuation. Most patients with relapsed/refractory CLL who discontinued idelalisib early were difficult to treat and had poor outcomes. Over the course of the trials, the Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor ibrutinib was approved and used as salvage therapy in 10 patients with confirmed progression; except for 1 patient, all patients successfully achieved a prolonged response with ibrutinib suggesting salvage therapy with a targeted agent may be a reasonable therapeutic approach for patients after idelalisib failure. Interestingly, the rate of Richter's transformation was extremely rare in this study (2%). Conclusions This single-institution experience with idelalisib identifies baseline factors associated with therapy discontinuation, mainly grade 3/4 diarrhea/colitis and progression of disease as a reason for discontinuation from therapy. Our data suggest the use of ibrutinib may be a reasonable choice in patients after idelalisib failure. Disclosures Barrientos: ASH-AMFDP: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; NIH/NCATS: Research Funding. Off Label Use: idelalisib is approved in combination with rituximab only. I will discuss our experience of idelalisib in combination with other agents.

A randomized, double-blind, phase II study of first-line FOLFOX plus bevacizumab with onartuzumab versus placebo in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 663-663 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johanna C. Bendell ◽  
Howard S. Hochster ◽  
Lowell L. Hart ◽  
Irfan Firdaus ◽  
Joseph Ronald Mace ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
First Line ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Venous Thromboembolic Events ◽  
Venous Thromboembolic ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Tumor Types

663 Background: In mCRC, MET overexpression has been associated with poor prognosis and resistance to anti-VEGF therapy. We initiated a phase II study to evaluate the combination of onartuzumab (O), a ligand-blocking monoclonal antibody directed against the MET receptor, plus bevacizumab and FOLFOX, in first-line mCRC (GO27827; NCT01418222). Methods: This double-blind, randomized, multicenter phase II study randomized patients 1:1 to receive O (10 mg/kg iv) or placebo (P), plus mFOLFOX6 and bevacizumab (5 mg/kg iv). Stratification was by prior adjuvant therapy. All treatments were given on day 1–3 of a 2-week cycle. Oxaliplatin was given for up to 8–12 cycles; all other agents were continued until progression, unacceptable toxicity or death. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) in ITT and MET+ subgroup by immunohistochemistry (IHC). MET status was determined by central laboratory IHC evaluation, with scores of 2+ or 3+ considered MET+. Results: From September 2011 to November 2012, 194 patients were enrolled. A recommendation was made to stop O after an interim efficacy and safety analysis in September 2013, due to lack of efficacy. The final analysis (cut-off Feb 2014) found that O did not improve PFS vs. P in the ITT (HR 0.75 [0.52–1.08]; p=0.12) or MET IHC+ populations (n=79; HR 1.03 [0.56–1.89]; p=0.93), although improvement was noted in the MET IHC− population (n=108; HR 0.60 [0.37–0.97]; p=0.03). Neither overall survival (OS) nor response rate (RR) was improved with O vs. P in any of the groups (OS HR 0.96 [0.61–1.50], p=0.85 for ITT; OS HR 1.24 [0.63–2.43], p=0.54 for MET IHC+; OS HR 0.83 [0.44–1.56], p=0.56 for MET IHC−; RR 57.3% vs. 57.7% for ITT, 43.2% vs. 57.1% for MET IHC+, 66.1% vs. 60.8% for MET IHC−). More edema (65.7% vs. 12.9%) and venous thromboembolic events (30.3% vs. 16.1%) were seen with O vs. P, respectively. Grade ≥3 events were similar (86.9% vs. 84.9%) and events leading to discontinuation were increased (48.5% vs. 37.6%) with O vs. P. Conclusions: Adding onartuzumab to FOLFOX/bevacizumab did not prolong PFS in first-line unselected or MET IHC+ mCRC. A trend towards PFS benefit was seen in those with MET IHC− mCRC, contrary to prior reports in other tumor types. Clinical trial information: NCT01418222.

Randomized, open-label, phase II study comparing five-weekly S-1 plus cisplatin (SP) with tri-weekly capecitabine plus cisplatin (XP) in chemotherapy-naïve patients with HER2 negative advanced gastric cancer (AGC): OGSG 1105 HERBIS-4A trial.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 102-102
Author(s):  
Atsushi Takeno ◽  
Youichi Makari ◽  
Shunji Endo ◽  
Jin Matsuyama ◽  
Ryohei Kawabata ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Group 13 ◽  
Common Grade ◽  
Open Label Phase ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
To Receive

102 Background: This phase II study aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of XP compared to SP in the first-line treatment of HER2 negative AGC. Methods: Patients were randomly assigned to receive either SP (S-1 at 40–60 mg twice daily for 21 days plus cisplatin at 60 mg/ m2 on day 8, every 5 weeks) or XP (capecitabine 1,000 mg/m2 twice daily for 14 days plus cisplatin 80 mg/m2 on day 1, every 3 weeks). Primary endpoint was response rate (RR), and secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), time to treatment failure (TTF), and adverse events. Results: 84 eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive SP ( N = 41) or XP ( N = 43). No statistical difference was observed in overall RR between the SP and XP groups [51.2% (95% CI, 35.1% to 67.1%) vs. 53.5% (95% CI, 37.7% to 68.8%), P = 1.000]. Despite not significant, however, SP vs. XP showed a trend toward better PFS [median, 5.9 months vs. 4.1 months; hazard ratio (HR), 0.763; 95% CI, 0.462 to 1.259; P = .284] and OS (median, 13.5 months vs. 10.0 months; HR, 0.776; 95% CI, 0.485 to 1.244; P = .290). This trend in the SP vs. XP comparison was more pronounced in TTF (median, 4.5 months vs. 3.1 months; HR, 0.651; 95% CI, 0.421 to 1.006; P = .052). Common grade 3 to 4 hematological toxicities were neutropenia and anemia (SP group, 23% and 23%; XP group, 35% and 28%). Grade 3-4 anorexia and hyponatremia were more frequently seen in the XP group (31% and 16%) compared to the SP group (13% and 5%). Treatment-related deaths occurred in one patient (2.3%) in the XP group. Conclusions: XP failed to demonstrate the superior efficacy over SP. Higher incidence of severe toxicities by XP suggests SP as the standard 1st line chemotherapy for HER2 negative AGC in Japan. Clinical trial information: UMIN000006755.

A phase II study of enzalutamide (Enz) with dutasteride (Dut) or finasteride (Fin) in men ≥ 65 years with hormone-naive systemic prostate cancer (HNSPCa): Tolerability and geriatric asssessment (GA) results.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16518-e16518
Author(s):  
Jason Zittel ◽  
Chunkit Fung ◽  
Dilip Sankar Babu ◽  
Elizabeth A. Guancial ◽  
Deepak M. Sahasrabudhe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Geriatric Depression Scale ◽  
Depression Scale ◽  
Older Men ◽  
Geriatric Depression ◽  
Grade 5 ◽  
Common Grade ◽  
Grade 3

e16518 Background: Older men are at a high risk for adverse events (AEs) from androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). In this phase II study, we evaluated Enz and Dut/Fin in lieu of ADT for at-risk older patients with HNSPCa. Methods: Eligible patients were ≥65 years (y); at high risk of AEs from ADT by GA or treating physicians; metastatic (M1) or non-metastatic (M0) HNSPCa with a PSA doubling time ≤ 9 months and testosterone > 50ng/dl. They received Enz 160 mg/day and Dut 0.5 mg/day or Fin 5 mg/day until disease progression. GA was performed at baseline and week (wk) 61 and/or at the time of progression. GA included validated tests: Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL), fall history, Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA). The prevalence of impairment for each assessment was calculated; change in prevalence from baseline to wk 61 was analyzed using paired sample t-test. Results: 43 patients were enrolled in the study. Median age at enrollment was 78 y (range 66-94) and 93% were ECOG 0-1; 37% (n = 16) had M0 and 63% (n = 27) had M1 HNSPCa, with the majority (67%) having Gleason 6 or 7 disease. At baseline, 18.6% met the cutoff for impairment for IADLs, 53.7% for SPPB, 7.9% for GDS and 64.3% for MOCA; 9.8% had a recent fall. Median baseline PSA was 11.38 ng/ml (range: 2-145). At the time of analysis, 29 men (67.4%) remain on study treatment. 95.3%, 74.4% and 46.5% of patients reported at least one Grade 1, 2 or 3 AE respectively. No patient had a Grade 4 AE and one Grade 5 AE was reported but was an unrelated event. The most common Grade 3 AEs were hypertension (27.8%), GI (19.4%), and cardiac (8.3%); all Grade 3 GI AEs reported were deemed unrelated to the study drugs. Only impairment in ≥ 1 IADL showed a statistically significant increase in prevalence at wk 61 of treatment (40.6%) compared to baseline (18.6%, p = 0.036). Conclusions: For older men with HNSPCa, Enz with Dut/Fin demonstrated efficacy with reasonable toxicity profile, and no significant impact on the majority of GA domains. Clinical trial information: NCT02213107.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document