Ofatumumab Added To Dexamethasone In Patients With Relapsed Or Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia. Results From a Phase II Study Of The Czech Leukemia Study Group For Life

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 2877-2877 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Doubek ◽  
Yvona Brychtova ◽  
Anna Panovska ◽  
Jakub Trizuljak ◽  
Ludmila Sebejova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
High Dose ◽  
In Vitro Testing ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract The treatment of relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) remains a challenging clinical issue despite remarkable improvements in prognostication and therapy. One emerging treatment option for relapsed/refractory CLL is the use of high-dose corticosteroids. High-dose methylprednisolone or dexamethasone combined with rituximab are active in relapsed/refractory CLL, but serious infections are frequent and progression-free survival (PFS) is short. The purpose of this clinical trial was to determine the efficacy and toxicity of ofatumumab-dexamethason (O-dex) combination in relapsed or refractory CLL population. The trial was an open-label, multi-center, non-randomized, phase II study. The O-dex regimen consisted of intravenous ofatumumab (Cycle 1: 300mg on day 1, 2000mg on days 8, 15, 22; Cycles 2-6: 1000mg on days 1, 8, 15, 22) and oral dexamethasone (40mg on days 1-4 and 15-18; Cycles 1-6). Premedication consisted of glucocorticoid, paracetamol, and antihistamine before each ofatumumab infusion. All patients received allopurinol, omeprazol, co-trimoxazole, and fluconazole for prophylaxis of tumor lysis syndrome and infections. The O-dex regimen was given for a minimum of 3 cycles, until best response, or a maximum of 6 cycles. Between July 2010 and December 2012, 32 patients (pts.) were recruited at 3 centers. Basic patient characteristics at the start of O-dex therapy were as follows: median age 66 years (range, 50-77); 24 males, 8 females; median CIRS score 7 (0-15); median previous treatment lines 3 (1-10); 30 (94%) pts. were pretreated with fludarabine and 12 (38%) with alemtuzumab; Rai III/IV stage was present in 20 (63%) pts.; 6 (19%) pts. had bulky lymphadenopathy; IgVH genes were unmutated in 30 (94%) pts.; del 11q was present in 6 (19%) and p53 defects (del 17p and/or TP53 mutation) in 8 (25%) pts. The median number of O-dex cycles administered was 6 (1-6). Twenty two (69%) pts. completed at least 3 cycles of therapy. The remaining 9 patients were prematurely discontinued due to CTCAE grade 3/4 infections (7 pts.), disease progression (1 pt.), or uncontrollable diabetes mellitus (1 pt.). Overall responses/complete remissions (ORR/CR) were achieved in 22/5 pts. (69/16%). One patient achieved minimal residual disease negativity (measured by 4-color flow cytometry) at the end of therapy. Median PFS was 10 months. In patients with p53 defects, ORR/CR were achieved in 5/2 pts. (63/25%). The Median PFS was 10.5 months for this subgroup. Median overall survival (OS) has not yet been reached. During therapy, CTCAE grade 3/4 toxicity consisted of bacterial infections (25%), ofatumumab infusion-related side-effects (9%), neutropenia (9%), hyperglycemia (6%), and anemia (3%). No reactivation of herpetic viral infection was observed during the course of therapy. Nine patients died during the follow-up as a result of disease progression (6 pts.), infections (2 pts.), or complications after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (1 relapsed pt.). The median CD20 antigen density in CLL cells was 4766 (881-18515) MESF (molecules of equivalent soluble fluorochrome) units at baseline. At the end of therapy, CD20 density had significantly decreased (median 821 MESF; 443-2637); nevertheless, it was high once more at relapse (median 6619 MESF; 628-21359). In vitro testing of malignant pts. cells sensitivity to dexamethasone and ofatumumab did not show synergistic or additive effect of these compounds in majority of patients. Also, in vitro testing did not clearly predict the outcome of O-dex therapy. Conclusions The O-dex regimen shows relatively high ORR and CR, with promising findings for PFS and OS (including pts. harboring p53 defects), as compared to published data on rituximab plus dexamethasone regimen or ofatumumab in monotherapy. The infectious toxicity in 1/4 of pts. represents the most frequent side effect for this regimen. The study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01310101). Disclosures: Doubek: GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding. Mayer:Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding; Glaxo: Consultancy, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Long-Term Sustained Responses Following Ibrutinib Discontinuation after Frontline Therapy with Obinutuzumab Plus Ibrutinib in Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 33-34
Author(s):  
Paula A. Lengerke Diaz ◽  
Michael Y. Choi ◽  
Eider F. Moreno Cortes ◽  
Jose V. Forero ◽  
Juliana Velez-Lujan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Combination Regimen ◽  
Grade 3

Single oral targeted therapies have emerged as a standard of care in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). However, accessibility, side effects, and financial burden associated with long term administration limit their clinical use. Mainly, it is unclear in what clinical situation discontinuation of oral therapy can be recommended. The combination of type II anti-CD20 antibody obinutuzumab-Gazyva® with ibrutinib (GI) has shown a significant progression-free survival benefit in patients (pts) with CLL, including those with high-risk genomic aberrations. We conducted a phase 1b/2, single-arm, open-label trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of GI as first-line treatment in 32 CLL pts. We report the outcome in pts that discontinued ibrutinib (either after 3 years of sustained complete response (CR) as stipulated in the clinical protocol, or due to other reasons). CLL pts enrolled in this protocol were ≥65 years old, or unfit/unwilling to receive chemotherapy. Pts received GI for six cycles, followed by daily single-agent ibrutinib. The protocol was designed to ensure that pts with a sustained CR after 36 months were allowed to discontinue ibrutinib. The median age was 66 years (IQR 59-73), and 6% of the evaluated pts had 17p deletion. All pts were able to complete the six planned cycles of obinutuzumab. The combination regimen was well-tolerated, and the most common adverse events (>5% CTCAE grade 3-4) were neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and hyperglycemia. The rate and severity of infusion-related reactions (IRR) were much lower than expected (Grade≥ 3, 3%), and pts without IRR had lower serum levels of cytokines/chemokines CCL3 (P=0.0460), IFN-γ (P=0.0457), and TNF-α (P=0.0032) after infusion. The overall response rate was 100%, with nine pts (28%) achieving a CR, and four pts (12.5%) with undetectable minimal residual disease (uMRD) in the bone marrow, defined as <10-4 CLL cells on multicolor flow cytometry. At a median follow-up of 35.5 months (IQR 24.5-42.7) after starting treatment, 91% of the enrolled pts remain in remission with a 100% overall survival. Sixteen pts have completed a long-term follow-up of 36 months. Six pts showed CR, with three of them achieving uMRD in the bone marrow. Ten of these pts were in PR, and only one had disease progression and started treatment for symptomatic stage I disease with obinutuzumab plus venetoclax. In total, thirteen pts (41%) have stopped ibrutinib, with a median time on treatment prior to discontinuation of 35 months. Five (16%) of these pts had CRs and discontinued after 36 months. Eight additional pts (25%) had PRs and discontinued ibrutinib without being eligible: three pts discontinued prior to 36 months due to toxicities, and five pts discontinued after 36 months (3 due to side effects, and 2 due to financially driven decision). One patient eligible to discontinue ibrutinib, decided to remain on treatment despite sustained CR. After a median follow up time following ibrutinib discontinuation of 8 months (IQR 3.5-17), only two out of 13 pts have progressed (10 and 17 months after Ibrutinib discontinuation). None of the pts that stopped ibrutinib after achieving a CR have shown signs of disease progression. Of note, the pharmaceutical sponsor provided ibrutinib for the first 36 months, after which pts or their insurer became financially responsible. This particular scenario could bias the discontinuation pattern compared to a real world experience. It also provided us with a perspective about diverse factors affecting the treatment choices of pts. In summary, the obinutuzumab plus ibrutinib combination therapy was well-tolerated, with a much lower IRR rate. Efficacy compares favorably with historical controls with all pts responding to therapy, no deaths associated with treatment or disease progression, and a longer than expected time-to-progression after discontinuation of ibrutinib. The rate of ibrutinib discontinuation was higher than reported in the literature, most likely influenced by the protocol design and financial decisions driven by the switch from sponsor-provided ibrutinib to insurance or self-paid medication. Our observations regarding safety, efficacy and lack of disease progression after ibrutinib discontinuation are encouraging, and warrant confirmation in long-term prospective studies. Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier NCT02315768. Funding: Pharmacyclics LLC. Disclosures Choi: AbbVie: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Amaya-Chanaga:AbbVie: Ended employment in the past 24 months, Other: Research performed while employed as an investigator of this study at UCSD.. Kipps:Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Castro:Kite Pharma: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Fate Therapeutics: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Phase II Study of Lenalidomide and Rituximab As Salvage Therapy for Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (5) ◽  
pp. 584-591 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xavier C. Badoux ◽  
Michael J. Keating ◽  
Sijin Wen ◽  
William G. Wierda ◽  
Susan M. O'Brien ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Salvage Therapy ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Venous Thromboembolic Event ◽  
Febrile Episode ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Common Grade ◽  
Venous Thromboembolic ◽  
Grade 3

Purpose Lenalidomide is an immunomodulatory drug active as salvage therapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). We combined lenalidomide with rituximab to improve response rates in patients with relapsed or refractory CLL. Patients and Methods Fifty-nine adult patients (age 42 to 82 years) with relapsed or refractory CLL were enrolled onto a phase II study of lenalidomide and rituximab. Patients had received prior fludarabine-based therapy or chemoimmunotherapy. Rituximab (375 mg/m2 intravenously) was administered weekly during cycle one and on day 1 of cycles three to 12. Lenalidomide was started on day 9 of cycle one at 10 mg orally and administered daily continuously. Each cycle was 28 days. Rituximab was administered for 12 cycles; lenalidomide could continue indefinitely if patients benefitted clinically. Results The overall response rate was 66%, including 12% complete responses and 12% nodular partial remissions. Time to treatment failure was 17.4 months. Median overall survival has not been reached; estimated survival at 36 months is 71%. The most common grade 3 or 4 toxicity was neutropenia (73% of patients). Fourteen patients (24%) experienced a grade 3 to 4 infection or febrile episode. There was one episode of grade 3 tumor lysis; one patient experienced renal failure during the first cycle of therapy, and one venous thromboembolic event occurred during the study. Conclusion The combination of lenalidomide and rituximab is active in patients with recurrent CLL and warrants further investigation.

Long-Term Follow Up Of a Randomized Phase II Study Of The JAK2-Selective Inhibitor Fedratinib (SAR302503) In Patients With Myelofibrosis (MF)

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 4047-4047 ◽  
Author(s):  
Animesh Pardanani ◽  
Ayalew Tefferi ◽  
Catriona HM Jamieson ◽  
Nashat Y Gabrail ◽  
Claudia Lebedinsky ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Costal Margin ◽  
Spleen Volume ◽  
Randomized Phase Ii ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background We previously reported that patients with MF enrolled in a randomized Phase II study of fedratinib (SAR302503) (ARD11936; NCT01420770) had clinically meaningful reductions in splenomegaly and improvements in MF-associated constitutional symptoms after 24 weeks of treatment (Haematologica 2013;98:S1113). Here, we report updated efficacy and safety results from this study after 48 weeks of treatment (end of Cycle 12). Methods Patients with intermediate risk-2 or high-risk MF were randomized to receive once-daily fedratinib at doses of 300 mg, 400 mg, or 500 mg, for consecutive 4-weekly cycles, until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Eligible patients were aged ≥18 years, with palpable splenomegaly (5 cm below costal margin), and a platelet count ≥50 × 109/L. The primary measure for this study was percent change in spleen volume from baseline at the end of Cycle 3 (Blood 2012:120;Abstract 2837. Haematologica 2013;98:S1113). Endpoints for the current analysis included spleen response (≥35% reduction in spleen volume from baseline, assessed by a blinded independent central review by MRI), safety, and changes in bone marrow fibrosis (BMF). Results A total of 31 patients were randomized and treated: median age 63 years, 52% male, 58% primary MF, 58% high-risk MF, 90% JAK2V617F positive. The median numbers of treatment cycles were 12, 14, and 13 in the 300 mg, 400 mg and 500 mg dose groups, respectively, with median durations of exposure of 48.2, 56.2, and 52.4 weeks. At the cut-off date for this analysis, 21 patients (68%) remained on treatment; the most common reasons for treatment discontinuation were adverse events (AEs) (n=5) and withdrawal of consent (n=2). Overall, 58% (18/31) of patients achieved a spleen response at any time during treatment. The median spleen response duration was >35 weeks at all doses (Table). At Week 48, a spleen response was achieved by 30% (3/10), 80% (8/10), and 45% (5/11) of patients in the 300 mg, 400 mg, and 500 mg groups, respectively. Responses were generally maintained across all treatment groups. From Week 24 to Week 48 two additional patients achieved a spleen response (both in the 400 mg group), while one patient in the 500 mg group did not maintain a response (this patient had a fedratinib dose reduction to 200 mg). Changes in BMF up to Week 48 are being evaluated. The most common non-hematologic AE was diarrhea, with a Grade 3 rate of 13% (4/31 patients) but no Grade 4 cases were recorded. The rates of diarrhea decreased after the first cycle of treatment; from Cycle 2, the incidence of diarrhea (any grade) did not exceed 16% (5/31) at any cycle, and only one case of diarrhea was reported at Week 48 (end of Cycle 12). Anemia was the most-common hematologic toxicity, with a Grade 3 rate of 58% (18/31); no Grade 4 cases were reported. All Grades thrombocytopenia occurred in 55% (17/31) of patients, Grade 3 in three patients, and Grade 4 in two patients. Discontinuation of treatment due to AEs occurred in five patients over the 48 weeks (300 mg [n=2]; 400 mg [n=2]; 500 mg [n=1]), with two cases reported after Week 24 (dyspnea and leukocytosis [400 mg]; anemia and thrombocytopenia [500 mg]). There were 2 deaths (one in the 300 mg group due to unknown reasons [85 days after fedratinib discontinuation] and one in the 500 mg group due to disease progression [36 days after fedratinib discontinuation]). No cases of leukemic transformation were reported. Conclusions This updated analysis of the ARD11936 Phase II trial shows that treatment with fedratinib results in durable reductions in splenomegaly in patients with MF. No additional safety signals were observed with prolonged exposure to fedratinib. This study was sponsored by Sanofi. Disclosures: Pardanani: Sanofi, Bristol Myers Squibb, PharmaMar and JW Pharma: Clinical trial support Other. Jamieson:J&J, Roche: Research Funding; Sanofi: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Lebedinsky:Sanofi: Employment. Gao:Sanofi: Employment. Talpaz:Novartis, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Ariad, Deciphera: Research Funding; Novartis, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Ariad, Deciphera: Speakers Bureau.

A Phase Ib/II Study of Combined Obinutuzumab (Gazyva) and High-Dose Methylprednisolone (HDMP) As Treatment for Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL)

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 2051-2051 ◽  
Author(s):  
Januario E. Castro ◽  
Michael Y. Choi ◽  
Carlos I. Amaya-Chanaga ◽  
Natalie Nguyen ◽  
Colin MacCarthy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Phase Ib ◽  
High Dose Methylprednisolone ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract High-dose methylprednisolone (HDMP) and rituximab (R) is an effective non-myelosuppressive treatment regimen for patients (pts) with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Also, this combination has shown activity even in pts who have adverse leukemia-cytogenetics, such as del17p. Phase III studies have demonstrated that CLL pts treated with chlorambucil and obinutuzumab-Gazyva (G), another anti-CD20 mAb, had a superior outcome than comparable pts treated with R-chlorambucil. We hypothesized that G-HDMP is well-tolerated and effective in the treatment of pts with CLL. Accordingly, we initiated an open-label phase Ib/II clinical study. A total of 40 pts were enrolled in two cohorts of 20 pts each (previously untreated (PU) and relapsed/refractory (RR) CLL) and treated with HDMP 1 g/m2on Day 1-3 of cycles 1-4 (28 days/cycle) and G administered based on FDA dosing recommendations for 6 cycles. The pts had a median age of 67 years + 9.1 in the RR cohort and 63 years + 8.3 in the PU cohort. The median baseline absolute lymphocyte count was 30.7 + 7.3 x1,000/mm3 for pts in the RR cohort and 47.6 + 19.7 x1,000/mm3for pts in the PU cohort. Pts showed the following cytogenetic abnormalities: del(17p) in 30% RR vs. 0% PU, del(13q) in 60% RR vs. 70% PU, del(11q) in 20% RR vs. 35% PU, and trisomy 12 in 15% RR vs. 20% PU. Most AEs were grade 1-2 (RR=87%; PU=93%) without development of dose-limiting toxicities. Only two pts needed therapy discontinuation. One pt due to pulmonary embolism and the second pt due to asymptomatic gastrointestinal bleeding that required blood transfusion and resolved spontaneously. Grade 1-2 G-infusion-related reactions (IRR) were observed in 40% and 80% of pts in the RR and PU cohorts, respectively. Grade 3-4 IRR were observed in 10% of pts in the PU cohort only. We observed cytopenias (neutropenia grade 3-4: RR=55%, PU=40%; thrombocytopenia grade 3-4: RR=35%, PU=20%; and anemia grade 3-4: RR=0%, PU=0%). There were no cases of febrile neutropenia. Two pts (10%) in the RR cohort and one pt (5%) in the PU cohort developed infection grade 1-2 that was treated with oral antibiotics but did not require study treatment discontinuation. The most frequent non-hematological adverse events (AEs) were transaminitis, hyperglycemia, and electrolyte alterations (grade 1-2). There were no treatment related deaths in either cohort. The response assessment was performed in all 40 pts by iwCLL criteria. The ORR was 100% in the PU cohort and 95% in the RR cohort. 70% of the pts in the PU cohort and 85% of the pts in the RR cohort achieved a PR. CR was observed in 30% and 10% of the pts in the PU and RR cohorts, respectively. One pt (5%) in the RR cohort and four pts (20%) in the PU cohort achieved MRDneg status (<0.01% CLL in the bone marrow by multiparameter flow cytometry). Only one pt in the RR cohort achieved SD. At a median follow-up of 12.2 months, the RR cohort had a median Progression Free Survival (PFS) of 13.6 months and median Treatment Free Survival (TFS) of 14.7 months; the median Overall Survival (OS) has not been reached. In the PU cohort, the median PFS, TFS and OS have not been reached. One pt from the RR cohort and one pt from the PU cohort died during the follow-up period due to disease progression. G-HDMP was well tolerated and all 40 pts showed hematological and clinical responses during the study treatment without development of unexpected AEs. In both cohorts, most of IRR were grade 1-2 and severe IRR (grade 3-4) were much less compared with previously published data (G-chlorambucil / CLL-11 study). Compared to pts in the CLL-11 study, cytopenias appeared to be more frequent, however, the rate of infection and need for IV antibiotics or hospitalizations was lower. Of note, the eligibility criteria allowed pts with severe cytopenias and transfusion requirement to participate in our study. Response in PU pts were higher in terms of ORR, CR and CR-MRDnegativecompared with the data from the CLL-11 study and suggests a possible synergistic activity between G and HDMP. Overall, G-HDMP was well tolerated in the PU and RR CLL pts with a lower rate of IRR making this regimen more manageable in the outpatient setting. Responses were higher than previously reported in PU pts. Responses in RR pts appear to be comparable to our previous studies using R-HDMP. Our data supports G-HDMP as an alternative combination regimen for the treatment of CLL pts. Disclosures Kipps: Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Retrospective Analysis of the Experience with Rituximab and Methylprednisone In Elderly Patients with CLL

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 4636-4636
Author(s):  
Xavier Badoux ◽  
Ali M Al-Ameri ◽  
Susan O'Brien ◽  
William G. Wierda ◽  
Jan A. Burger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Partial Response ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Chromosome 17 ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Β2 Microglobulin ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 4636 Background: Single agent rituximab has limited activity in chronic lymphocytic at standard doses; however, the addition of rituximab to purine analogues, monoclonal antibodies or steroids has been shown to improve responses and response duration in patients with untreated and relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). The combination of rituximab and high dose methylprednisone has shown activity in patients with untreated and fludarabine-refractory CLL (Castro 2008, Castro 2009); however, there is limited reported experience with this regimen in elderly patients. These data prompted us to review our center's experience with rituximab in combination with high dose methylprednisone in elderly patients with CLL. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively identified 24 patients 65 years or older with CLL who received rituximab and methylprednisone between July 2002 and April 2010 at MD Anderson Cancer Center. Six patients received this treatment as initial therapy and 18 patients as salvage treatment. Rituximab 375–750 mg/m2 and methylprednisone 500–2000 mg were administered i.v. weekly for 4 weeks. Three patients received further maintenance treatment with rituximab 375–750 mg/m2 and methylprednisone 500 mg/m2 every month or every 3 months until failure of response. Responses were assessed according to 2008 NCI-WG criteria. Estimated progression free survival and OS were analyzed from time of treatment to progression or death using Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Results: The median age was 71 (65 – 87) years and 17 of 24 (71%) had Rai stage III or IV disease. Two patients had concomitant autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA), one patient had immune thrombocytopenic purpura and AIHA was the indication for therapy in one patient. Median β2-microglobulin was 7.7 (2.3 – 21) mg/l and 5 patients had chromosome 17 abnormalities. Previously treated patients had received a median of 3 (1 – 7) prior treatments and 6 (32%) pts were refractory to fludarabine. Responses were observed in 4 of 6 untreated patients (ORR 67%) and included 3 clinical complete responses unconfirmed by bone marrow biopsy (CRu, 50%) and 1 partial response. The estimated median PFS and OS in this group were 13 and 55 months, respectively. Among patients who received rituximab and methylprednisone as salvage therapy, 7 patients achieved a partial response (ORR 39%), 10 (50%) patients failed treatment, 1 patient (6%) received another therapy after 1 cycle for lack of response and 1 patient (6%) was lost to follow-up. In the salvage group, estimated median PFS and OS were 4 and 18 months, respectively. Four deaths occurred 3, 5, 11 and 12 months after rituximab and methylprednisone without further therapy; 3 patients had progressive CLL and the cause of death was unknown in 1 patient. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, anemia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 6 (33%), 3 (14%) and 1 (5%) of evaluable patients. Four patients (17%) experienced grade 3 or 4 infections (3 pneumonia and 1 colonic abscess), 5 patients experienced minor infections and 3 patients experienced viral reactivations (1 CMV, 1 HSV, 2 VZV). There were four grade 3 or 4 non-hematological adverse events including grade 4 gastrointestinal and pulmonary hemorrhage (1), colitis (1), steroid myopathy (1) and peripheral edema (1). All grade 3 or 4 complication occurred in salvage patients. Conclusions: Based on our experience, rituximab and methylprednisone therapy can be safely administered to older patients with CLL. As previously reported by Castro et al, higher response rates were seen in untreated patients, whereas responses were less frequent and shorter lasting in patients with relapsed disease, although this group had high risk disease based on β2-microglobulin levels. Additional studies are required to explore the benefit of this regimen in elderly patients with CLL. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Ofatumumab and lenalidomide in patients with relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia. O'Brien:Celgene: Consultancy; Genentech BioOncology: Consultancy. Wierda:Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech BioOncology: Advisory Board, Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Estrov:Celgene: Consultancy. Keating:Celgene: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy. Ferrajoli:Celgene: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding.

Combination of Ofatumumab and Lenalidomide In Patients with Relapsed Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Initial Results of a Phase II Trial

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 2464-2464 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xavier Badoux ◽  
Susan O'Brien ◽  
William G. Wierda ◽  
Stefan Faderl ◽  
Zeev Estrov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Fish Analysis ◽  
Significant Activity ◽  
Superficial Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 2464 Frontline chemoimmunotherapies induce high response rates in patients with CLL. Once disease recurs, however, effective treatment options are limited and new therapeutic modalities and combinations are needed. Ofatumumab is a fully humanized anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody which produces an overall response rate (ORR) of 47%–58% in patients with fludarabine-refractory CLL (Wierda W. et al, 2010). Lenalidomide, an immunomodulatory agent, induces an ORR of 32–47% in patients with relapsed/refractory CLL, (Chanan-Khan A.A. et al. 2006; Ferrajoli A. et al. 2008). The rationale for combining ofatumumab and lenalidomide is based on their single agent efficacy, distinct and potentially complimentary mechanisms of action and non-overlapping toxicity profiles. Furthermore, the combination of lenalidomide and rituximab has shown significant activity in patients with relapsed disease (Ferrajoli et al. 2009). We, therefore, designed a phase II study to evaluate efficacy and tolerability of ofatumumab and lenalidomide given in combination in patients with relapsed CLL. Patients with active disease were eligible if they had received prior treatment with purine analog-based therapy, had an ECOG/WHO performance status of 0–2, adequate renal (creatinine clearance > 30ml/min) and hepatic function (total bilirubin < to 2 mg/dl and ALT < 2 × ULN). Patients with any neutrophil count were eligible, whereas patients with platelet counts < 30,000 mm3, positivity for HIV, active hepatitis B or C or recent history of tuberculosis were excluded from participation. In this trial ofatumumab is administered intravenously weekly for four consecutive weeks (300mg week 1, 1,000 mg week 2 and all subsequent doses), then monthly for months 2–6 and once every two months for months 7–24. Lenalidomide is given orally at the dose of 10 mg daily, starting on day 9 and continued daily. Allopurinol at the dose of 300mg daily is given during the first two weeks of treatment as tumor lysis prophylaxis. Treatment duration is 24 months, and responses are assessed after 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months of therapy. Thus far 26 of the 40 planned patients have been accrued to this study and we present an analysis of response and toxicity for the first 16 patients that have been on study for at least 3 months. The median age of the patients is 62 yrs (45–82). Eight patients (50%) had Rai stage III-IV disease. The median Beta-2M level was 4.4 mg/dL (2–6.1). The median number of prior treatments was 2 (1–8). Four patients (25%) were refractory to fludarabine and all pts had received prior rituximab. Nine patients (56%) had unmutated IGHV genes, 5 patients (31%) had chromosome 17p deletion and 3 patients (19%) had 11q deletion as detected by FISH analysis. Responses were evaluated according to the 2008 IWCLL criteria: 10 of the 16 evaluable patients achieved a response [2 CR (13%), 8 PR (50%)] for an ORR of 63%. Four patients with stable disease are continuing on treatment. One patient discontinued therapy and did not return for response assessment and another patient progressed. All patients are alive. The most common grade 3–4 treatment related adverse events observed were: neutropenia (8 pts, 50%) and anemia (2 pts, 13%). One patient (6%) developed grade 2 superficial vein thrombosis. Lenalidomide-associated tumor flare reaction was limited to grade 1 in 2 patients (13%) while a grade 3 infusion reaction was observed in 1 patient (6%) during the first ofatumumab administration. Three grade 3 infectious episodes occurred: 2 cases of pneumonia and 1 case of parotiditis. None of the patients received routine antibiotic prophylaxis. The median daily dose of lenalidomide tolerated was 5 mg/day (2.5–10 mg). In conclusion, our initial analysis indicates that the combination of ofatumumab and lenalidomide is therapeutically active in patients with relapsed CLL. This treatment is well tolerated. Neutropenia is the most common toxicity observed. Enrollment is ongoing, and updated results will be provided. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Ofatumumab and lenalidomide in patients with relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia. O'Brien: GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy. Wierda: GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Estrov: Celgene Corporation: Consultancy. Keating: Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Honoraria. Ferrajoli: Celgene Corporation: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding.

Phase II Study of Dasatinib In Patients with Relapsed Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 4488-4488 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali M Al-Ameri ◽  
Xavier Badoux ◽  
Alessandra Ferrajoli ◽  
William G. Wierda ◽  
Luis Fayad ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Hematological Toxicity ◽  
Abl Kinase ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 4488 Src-family kinases (SFK) are described to be over expressed in CLL resulting in increased BCR signaling. Aberrant activation of the SFK, Lyn, leads to defective apoptosis of CLL cells in-vitro. C-Abl kinase is also overexpressed in CLL cells compared to normal B-lymphocytes. Since dasatinib is a dual Src and c-abl kinase inhibitor with in-vitro pro-apoptotic properties in CLL cells, we investigated the activity of dasatinib in patients (pts) with CLL. We designed a phase II study of dasatinib in pts with relapsed CLL/SLL and T-PLL. Pts were eligible if they were previously treated and had indication for therapy according to NCI-working group criteria. All pts had adequate performance status, renal and liver function prior to therapy. Treatment consisted of dasatinib 50mg given orally twice daily. In case of suboptimal response the dose of dasatinib could be increased up to a maximum dose of 70mg twice daily. Dose reductions to 20mg twice daily were permitted for toxicity. Pts were assessed for treatment response according to 1996 NCI-WG criteria. Seventeen pts have been enrolled in this study. The median age was 67 years (42-83 years), 9 (52%) had Rai stage III-IV, median beta-2 microglobulin levels was 5.9 (3.0 – 11.8) mg/L. The median number of prior treatments was 4 (1 – 8). An objective response (PR) was observed in 1 patient, 13 pts had no objective response and 3 pts were not evaluable for response due to early discontinuation of therapy (0-3 days). Fourteen pts remained on therapy for a median of 2 (0-19) months with 4 pts discontinuing due to disease progression and 9 pts discontinuing due to adverse events and lack of response. Hematological toxicities consisted of grade 3–4 neutropenia in 76% of the pts, grade 3–4 thrombocytopenia in 44% of pts and grade 1–2 anemia in 80%. Non-hematological toxicity consisted of grade 3–4 fatigue in 1 patient and grade 3 pleural effusions in another patient. Grade 1 and 2, toxicities included flushing 38%, headache 38%, fatigue 46% anorexia and nausea 46%, and diarrhea 23%. Several pts showed evidence of biological activity. Treatment with dasatinib lacks efficacy in pts with heavily pretreated CLL. Responses occurred in only 6% of pts and dasatinib administration was associated with a high incidence of neutropenia. Disclosures: O'Brien: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding.

Phase II study of vorinostat (V) in combination with idarubicin and high-dose cytarabine (IA) as front-line therapy in patients (pts) with high-risk myelodyplsatic syndrome (MDS) or acute myeloid leukemia (AML)

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7004-7004
Author(s):  
E. Jabbour ◽  
S. Faderl ◽  
F. Ravandi ◽  
M. Konopleva ◽  
S. Verstovsek ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Ex Vivo ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Front Line ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Grade 3

7004 Background: Standard induction therapy for pts with AML has not changed over the last 2 decades nor has the outcome of these pts. We demonstrated in vitro and ex vivo that the combination of an histone deacetylase inhibitor with anthraycline is synergistic (Blood 2006;108:1174); an effect that could be mediated by activation of DNA damage/repair pathways, and found that such combination is safe in phase 1 trial (Blood 2007;110:1842). We designed a phase II study of V with IA as front-line therapy for MDS/AML. Methods: Pts with untreated int-2/high-risk MDS or AML ages 15–65 with adequate liver and renal functions and PS, and EF ≥ 50% were eligible. Pts with CBF were excluded. Initial dose of V was 500 mg orally TID for 3 days followed on day 4 by IA (I:12 mg/m2/dx3; A:1.5g/m2/dx4 over 24 hrs). After induction and if in CR, pt can receive 5 cycles of consolidation with V at the same dose and IA (I:8 mg/m2/dx2; A:0.75g/m2/dx3 over 24 hours) followed by 1 year of maintenance with V. The study was powered to demonstrate improvement in PFS at 7 months and acceptable toxicity. Prior to formal initiation of the phase II, the study had a “run-in” phase to confirm the safety of the triple combination. Correlative studies include analysis of DNA repair/damage pathways. Results: 22 pts have been registered. 3 pts with relapsed/refractory AML were treated in the run-in phase. No excess toxicity was observed; 2 achieved CR and 1 CRp. Following these, 19 pts were enrolled on the phase 2 portion. 17 pts were evaluable. Median age was 49 years. Median WBC at presentation was 12.75 x 109/L. Cytogenetic analysis were abnormal in 12 (71%), complex in 10 (59%). 8 (47%) had secondary disease. 4 (23%) were Flt-3 positive. No unexpected grade 3/4 toxicities have been observed. The CR rate was 82%. 1 pt acheived a marrow CR and 2 pts died during induction. CR were universally associated with CG response. All Flt-3+ pts achieved a CR. Only 2 pts (14%) have relapsed (4 and 5 months). The median PFS has not been reached. Conclusions: The combination of IA and V is safe and active in AML/MDS. No stopping rule has been met. Results will be compared with those of a parallel IA study at MDACC. Correlative analysis are ongoing. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Long-Term Follow up of Front-Line Therapy with Ofatumumab, High Dose Methylprednisolone and Lenalidomide (HiLO trial) for Treatment-Naïve Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3150-3150
Author(s):  
Ariel Felipe Grajales-Cruz ◽  
Julio C. Chavez ◽  
Elyce P. Turba ◽  
Lisa Nodzon ◽  
Francisco Perez Leal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Treatment Phase ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Front Line ◽  
High Dose Methylprednisolone ◽  
Treatment Naïve ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background: New targeted therapies continue to show improved efficacy in various stages of chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL), sparing patients from chemoimmunotherapy. However, cure remains elusive. Here, we present a front-line alternative based on a combination of high-dose methylprednisolone (HDMP) and ofatumumab, followed by consolidative therapy with lenalidomide plus ofatumumab. Methods: This is a phase II, single-center study in patients with treatment-naive (TN) CLL/SLL. During the first treatment phase (cycles 1-3) patients received HDMP 1000 mg/m2 IV and ofatumumab 2000 mg (300 mg given week 1 then 2000 mg for a total of 12 doses) IV infusions weekly x 4 doses in cycle 1 of a 28 day cycle, then every 2 weeks for cycles 2 and 3. During the second treatment phase (cycles 4-12), patients received renally adjusted lenalidomide 5-10 mg daily and ofatumumab 2000mg IV once every 8 weeks. Growth factor support was permitted at the discretion of treating physician. Prophylactic medications included allopurinol for tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) 3 days before C1D1 through C1; and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and fluconazole through cycle 4, and acyclovir through C12. Patients received aspirin 81 mg/day as thrombosis prophylaxis while on lenalidomide. Patients were assessed for response by iwCLL 2008 criteria (including imaging assessment) after completion of cycles 3 and 12. The study allowed continuation of lenalidomide if patients achieved complete (CR), partial (PR) response or stable disease (SD). Primary endpoints were efficacy, adverse events (AEs) profile, and time-to-treatment failure (TTF). Results: Between January 2012 and September 2015, the study enrolled a total of 45 patients. Median follow-up was 50.4 (5.6-72.8) months. The median age was 62.6 (48.2-86.1) years. Chromosomal analysis by FISH demonstrated Del17p in 8 (17.8%), Del11q (+/- others, except Del17p) in 10 (22.2%), Trisomy 12 (+/- others, except Del17p and Del11q) in 8 (17.8%), Del13q in 10 (22.2%), no mutations in 9 (20%) patients. The IGHV status was unmutated in 34 (75.6%) cases. Indications to start treatment were: symptomatic lymphadenopathy, symptomatic splenomegaly, anemia, and thrombocytopenia in 5 (11.1%), 10 (22.2%), 12 (26.7%), and 18 (40%), respectively. The median duration of treatment was 35.6 (2.7-66.9) months. Reasons for treatment discontinuation were: progressive disease (PD) in 9 (20%), AEs in 15 (33.3%), transplantation in 3 (6.7%), consent withdrawal in 1 (2.2%), and secondary malignancies in 2 (4.4%) cases. The overall response rates (PR+CR) at 3, 12, 24, 36, and 48 months were 75.6%, 77.8%, 66.7%, 44.4%, and 37.8%, respectively. The CR rates at 3, 12, 24, 36, and 48 months were 2.2%, 11.1%, 20%, 17.8%, and 13.3% respectively. Fifteen patients remain in PR/CR and on treatment at the time of this analysis. The intention-to-treat median TTF was 45.2 (2.9-69.7) months, and was not different among high risk groups such as Del17p, Del11q and/or unmutated IgHV. In patients who discontinued for reasons other than PD the median duration of response without treatment was 30.7 (9.8-69.7) months. Three (6.7%) patients underwent allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation after a median of 3 (3 - 4) treatment cycles. Treatment was well tolerated with grade 3/4 infusion reaction in 1 (2.2%) patient. Grade 3/4 treatment-related hematological AEs were neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia in 33 (73.3%), 5 (11.1%), and 1 (2.2%), respectively. Grade 3/4 infections occurred in 6 (13.3%) patients. No grade 3/4 tumor flares were observed, and there were no cases of TLS or thrombosis. Conclusion: The combination of ofatumumab, HDMP and lenalidomide is effective and well tolerated in treatment-naive CLL/SLL, even when poor prognostic features are present. Disclosures Komrokji: Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Locke:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Other: Scientific Advisor; Cellular BioMedicine Group Inc.: Consultancy; Kite Pharma: Other: Scientific Advisor. Kharfan-Dabaja:Seattle Genetics: Speakers Bureau; Incyte Corp: Speakers Bureau; Alexion Pharmaceuticals: Speakers Bureau. Sokol:Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy.

scholarly journals MCRN¯003/MYX·1: A Single Arm Phase II Study of High-Dose Weekly Carfilzomib Plus Cyclophosphamide and Dexamethasone in the Treatment of Relapsed Multiple Myeloma after 1-3 Prior Therapies

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1984-1984 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher P. Venner ◽  
Richard Leblanc ◽  
Irwindeep Sandhu ◽  
Darrell J. White ◽  
Andrew R Belch ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Refractory Disease ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Dosing Strategies ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background: Carfilzomib, a second generation proteosome inhibitor, is effective in the treatment of relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Recent phase II and phase III trials have demonstrated the efficacy of weekly dosing strategies. The aim of this study was to examine high dose once weekly carfilzomib in combination with weekly dexamethasone and low dose weekly cyclophosphamide (wCCD) in RRMM. It was hypothesized that this may offer a potent yet convenient and more financially viable triplet-based treatment option than existing combinations. Methods: The MCRN-003/MYX.1 multi-centre single arm phase II clinical trial is run through the Myeloma Canada Research Network (MCRN) with support from the Canadian Cancer Trials Group (CCTG). Patients who had at least one but not more than three prior lines of therapy and who did not have proteosome inhibitor (PI) refractory disease were eligible. Treatment consists of carfilzomib (20 mg/m2 day 1 of first cycle then escalated to 70 mg/m2 for all subsequent doses) given on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle, plus weekly oral dexamethasone 40 mg and cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m2 capped at 500 mg on days 1, 8, 15 and 22. Treatment continues until progression or intolerance, except for cyclophosphamide which is discontinued after 12 cycles. The total sample size of 76 patients includes a 6 patient lead-in phase where safety at 70 mg/m2 was evaluated. The primary objective was to observe an overall response rate (ORR) ≥ 80% after 4 cycles of protocol therapy. Secondary endpoints include safety, toxicity, kinetics of and maximal response depth and overall survival. This analysis is based on the locked data base of 2018 July 13. Results: Of the 76 patients accrued 1 was subsequently determined to be ineligible on the basis of bortezomib refractory disease, and 1 did not receive any protocol therapy due to a cardiac event occurring post-study registration but prior to treatment commencement. All patients who received therapy were included in the analysis as per protocol inclusive of the bortezomib exposed patient. Among these 75 patients, median age was 66 years with 33% being > 70 years of age. Thirty-seven percent were female. Thirty-nine percent received 1 prior line, 44% received 2 prior lines and 17% received 3 prior lines of therapy. High risk cytogenetics [(t4;14), t(14;16) and del P53] were identified in 32%. Twenty percent had ISS stage III disease and 11% had R-ISS stage III disease. Prior PI and immunomodulatory drug exposure was noted in 87% and 81% respectively. Within the first 4 cycles of therapy 84% (95% CI, 76-92%) of patients achieved PR or better, with ≥ VGPR achieved in 52% and ≥ CR in 9% (table 1, p = 0.0006). There was a trend toward a better ORR after 4 cycles based on the presence or absence of high-risk cytogenetics (75% vs 94% respectively, p = 0.051) not meeting statistical significance. The median duration of follow-up at the time of data analysis was 13.9 months (range 0.2 to 22.8 months). 18 patients have died with an estimated 1-year OS of 80%. The cause of death as assessed by the investigator was myeloma in 13 patients with 3 dying from a cause possibly or probably related to the study intervention. During the first 4 cycles of treatment, non-hematologic toxicity ≥ grade 3 occurred in 33% of patients; most commonly infection (16%) and fatigue (7%). Grade 3/4 anemia was observed in 17%, thrombocytopenia in 33% and neutropenia in 20%. Grade 3 or greater hypertension was seen in 4%, dyspnea in 1%, pulmonary edema in 1% and thrombotic microangiopathy in 4%; all resolved with no long-term sequelae. To date 37 (49%) patients have discontinued carfilzomib, 11 due to toxicity and 16 due to disease progression. Conclusion: This prospective phase II study demonstrates that wCCD is a safe and effective regimen in the treatment of RRMM. The study met its primary endpoint demonstrating a ≥ 80% ORR after 4 cycles of therapy. These results compare favourably to published phase III data examining weekly carfilzomib and dexamethasone as well as the established twice-weekly dosing strategies. This regimen will be a useful triplet-based option for RRMM especially in patients refractory to immunomodulatory agents who would otherwise be ineligible for the carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone combination. Disclosures Venner: Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria. Leblanc:Celgene Canada: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen Canada: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda Canada: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Sandhu:Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Bioverativ: Honoraria. White:Amgen, Celgene, Janssen, Takeda: Honoraria. Chen:Amgen: Honoraria. Louzada:Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; amgen: Honoraria; pfizer: Honoraria. Hay:Amgen: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Kite: Research Funding.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document