A first-in-human phase I trial of AR-12, a PDK-1 inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumors.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2608-2608 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joaquin Mateo ◽  
Johann Sebastian De Bono ◽  
Ramesh K. Ramanathan ◽  
Maryam B. Lustberg ◽  
Andrea Zivi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Food Effect ◽  
Platelet Rich Plasma ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Study Drug ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Pyruvate Dehydrogenase Kinase ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation Study

2608 Background: AR-12 (OSU-03012) is an oral celecoxib analogue lacking COX-2 inhibitory activity that inhibits pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase isoenzyme 1 (PDK-1), AKT and impacts the endoplastic reticulum stress pathway. Preclinical studies indicate antitumor activity of AR-12 in various models and enhanced activity in combination. We completed a first in human clinical trial to determine its safety and tolerability, maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase II dose (RD). Secondary objectives included assessment of tumor response, pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) including food effect. Methods: Patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors, ECOG PS 0-1, and adequate organ function were recruited in a modified 3+3 dose-escalation study. Pts received a run-in dose of AR-12 to analyze PK-PD and food effect, followed by continuous daily (QD) dosing in 28-day cycles. A twice daily (BID) cohort was initiated based on safety data. PD analysis was performed in platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and paired tumor biopsies when feasible. Results: 35 pts received at least one dose of study drug; 30 were evaluable for dose limiting toxicities (DLT) at dose ranges 100-3200mg QD and 800-1600mg BID. No DLT were observed in the QD cohort; DLT in the BID cohort are listed in table 1. Drug-related events (NCI-CTCAE v3) included rash (G2-2pts; G3-1pt), fatigue (G2-2pts; G3-4pts), nausea (G2-7pts; G3-1pt) and bloating (G2-1pt). Cmax after single dose was dose-proportional but high PK variability was observed, likely due to inadequate disintegration and dissolution of the formulation in the stomach. At RD, partial GSK3ß inhibition in PRP after 4 hours suggests AKT-pathway modulation. Best response (RECIST v1.0) was stable disease >6 cycles for 2 pts. Conclusions: The RD based on safety data is 800mg BID. Signs of pathway modulation were observed in concordance with the expected mechanism of action but were short-lasting. Considering limited drug absorption and PK variability, a new formulation of the drug will be developed to overcome these limitations. Clinical trial information: NCT00978523. [Table: see text]

Phase I dose escalation study of E7080, a novel anti-angiogenic multikinase inhibitor, in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 14099-14099
Author(s):  
K. Yamada ◽  
Y. Fujiwara ◽  
N. Yamamoto ◽  
Y. Yamada ◽  
S. Suzuki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Growth Factor ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Japanese Patients ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Circulating Endothelial Cells ◽  
Severe Toxicity ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation Study ◽  
Multikinase Inhibitor ◽  
Angiogenic Proteins

14099 Background: E7080 selectively inhibits receptor phosphorylation of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), platelet- derived growth factor (PDGF), fibroblast growth factor (FGF) and suppresses tumor angiogenesis and growth in preclinical studies. Methods: E7080 was orally administered to Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors twice daily by a 2 week-on 1 week-off schedule. The primary objectives were to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and the recommended dose for further study. The secondary objectives were to evaluate pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacogenomics, and efficacy. Results: Twelve patients have been enrolled into cohorts of 1, 2, 4 or 8 mg/day. Major toxicities were hypertension and hyperlipidemia. Thus far, no DLTs or severe toxicities were reported. PK analysis in cohorts of 1, 2 and 4 mg/day showed the dose-proportional increase of Cmax and AUC. Three patients in cohorts of 1 and 2 mg/day experienced long stable disease (SD) for 18 weeks or longer. One patient with colorectal cancer in 4 mg/day cohort showed significant tumor shrinkage of multiple pulmonary metastasis. Biomarkers such as plasma angiogenic proteins and cytokines, circulating endothelial cells and circulating endothelial progenitor cells are exploratively evaluated. Conclusions: E7080 is well tolerated at doses up to 8 mg/day by a 2 week-on 1 week-off schedule. Some patients experienced clinical benefit without severe toxicity. MTD has not been reached and enrollment is ongoing. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

A phase I dose escalation study of sunitinib plus capecitabine in patients with advanced solid tumors

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3592-3592 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Sweeney ◽  
C. Verschraegen ◽  
G. Chiorean ◽  
F. Lee ◽  
S. Jones ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Antiangiogenic Therapy ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation Study ◽  
Curative Therapy ◽  
Grade 3

3592 Background: Sunitinib malate (SU) is an oral, multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor of VEGFRs, PDGFRs, KIT, RET, and FLT3, approved internationally for the treatment of advanced RCC and imatinib-resistant or -intolerant GIST. This phase I study assesses the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics (PK) of SU in combination with capecitabine (C). Methods: Pts with advanced solid tumors not amenable to curative therapy, previously treated with =2 prior chemotherapy regimens, and ECOG PS =1 were eligible. Prior antiangiogenic therapy was not permitted. Three SU schedules were evaluated: 4 wks on treatment followed by 2 wks off in 6-wk cycles (4/2 schedule); 2 wks on followed by 1 wk off in 3-wk cycles (2/1 schedule), and continuous dosing (CD schedule). In all cases C was administered orally bid on days 1–14. SU and C doses were alternately escalated in serial pt cohorts to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of SU for all schedules using a standard 3 + 3 design. PK and antitumor efficacy were also assessed. Results: A total of 50 pts have been enrolled; 28 pts have been treated on the 4/2 schedule: SU 50 mg + C 1,000 mg/m2, and SU 37.5 mg + C 1,250 mg/m2 were not tolerated. Dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) included: grade 3 myalgia (n=1), grade 3 fatigue (n=2), and grade 3 hand- foot syndrome (n=2). The MTD for the 4/2 schedule was SU 37.5 mg/day + C 1,000 mg/m2. No DLTs nor dose reductions were observed among 9 pts treated at the MTD. Preliminary PK data do not indicate drug-drug interactions between SU and C. 3 pts (1 each with breast cancer, neuroendocrine carcinoma, and thyroid carcinoma) achieved confirmed partial responses. On the 2/1 schedule patients are being accrued to SU 37.5 or 50 mg + C 1,000 mg/m2 and doses of SU 37.5 mg + C 1,000 mg/m2 or SU 25 mg + C 1,250 mg/m2 are being explored on the CD schedule. Conclusions: The combination of SU 37.5 mg/day (4/2 schedule) with C 1,000 mg/m2 in pts with advanced solid tumors appears tolerable. SU may be administered in combination with C with no apparent drug-drug interaction. Subsequent cohorts will define the MTD of SU administered on the 2/1 and CD schedules. Further studies of this combination in breast cancer are warranted. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Phase I study of volasertib (BI 6727) combined with afatinib (BIBW 2992) in advanced solid tumors.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2521-2521
Author(s):  
Marc Peeters ◽  
Jean-Pascal H. Machiels ◽  
Korinna Pilz ◽  
Marina De Smet ◽  
Natalja Strelkowa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Febrile Neutropenia ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Volume Of Distribution ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation Study ◽  
Ecog Ps ◽  
Anti Tumor Activity

2521 Background: Volasertib is a potent and selective cell cycle kinase inhibitor that induces mitotic arrest and apoptosis by targeting Polo-like kinases (Plk). Volasertib and afatinib, an irreversible ErbB family blocker, have shown single agent anti-tumor activity and manageable safety profiles in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors. This dose escalation study was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of two combination schedules of volasertib and afatinib in pts with advanced solid tumors refractory to or not amenable to standard therapy. Methods: In a 3 + 3 design, cohorts of 3–6 pts received volasertib 150–300 mg IV d1 Q3W + afatinib 30–50 mg PO QD d2–21 Q3W (Schedule A) or afatinib 50–90 mg d2–6 Q3W (Schedule B). Up to 12 additional pts were enrolled at the MTD. Primary endpoint was the MTD per schedule. Secondary endpoints included pharmacokinetics (PK), safety and efficacy (RECIST). Results: 57 pts (median 58 yr; ECOG PS 0/1/2: 35%/60%/5%) were treated (n=29, Schedule A; n=28, Schedule B). MTD was volasertib 300 mg/afatinib 30 mg (Schedule A) and volasertib 300 mg/afatinib 70 mg (Schedule B). Cycle 1 dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) were experienced by 5 (Schedule A) and 7 (Schedule B) pts. Most common DLTs were diarrhea (n=5), neutropenia (n=3), fatigue (n=2) and decreased ejection fraction (n=2) in Schedule A, and thrombocytopenia (n=6), neutropenia (n=5), diarrhea (n=4) and febrile neutropenia (n=3) in Schedule B. Most common grade 3/4 adverse events were neutropenia (n=8), thrombocytopenia (n=6), diarrhea (n=3) and febrile neutropenia (n=3). Volasertib exhibited multi-exponential PK behavior with a long half-life (130 hr), moderate clearance (900 mL/min) and large volume of distribution (Vss >6000 L). Co-administration of volasertib and afatinib had no effect on the PK profile of either drug. Two pts in Schedule A (volasertib 300 mg/afatinib 30 mg) achieved partial responses (tumor types: NSCLC, head and neck). Conclusions: MTD of volasertib was 300 mg Q3W combined with afatinib 30 mg d2-21 (Schedule A) or afatinib 70 mg d2-6 (Schedule B). Both agents could be combined at previously shown active single agent doses. At the MTD, treatment was manageable and showed preliminary anti-tumor activity. Clinical trial information: NCT01206816.

Phase I trial of chloroquine (CQ)/hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) in combination with carboplatin-gemcitabine (CG) in patients with advanced solid tumors.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3027-3027 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nagla Fawzy Abdel Karim ◽  
Imran Ahmad ◽  
Ola Gaber ◽  
Ihab Eldessouki ◽  
Olugbenga Olanrele Olowokure ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Therapeutic Option ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Late Phase ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation Study ◽  
Grade 3

3027 Background: Autophagy is a catabolic process triggered in cells during periods of stress to enable their survival. Established tumors utilize autophagy to survive periods of metabolic or hypoxic stress. Inhibition of early stage autophagy can rescue cancer cells, while inhibition of late stage autophagy will lead to cell death due to accumulation of damaged organelles. The antimalarial drugs CQ and HCQ inhibit late phase autophagy. The goal of our study is to assess the safety, tolerability and activity of combining CQ/HCQ with CG in advanced solid tumor patients who either progressed on other therapies or in whom CG is a therapeutic option. Methods: This single institution phase 1 dose-escalation study was designed to evaluate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of CQ, later substituted with HCQ, in combination with CG in patients with previously treated advanced solid tumors. Secondary objectives were to determine ORR, PFS and OS. A starting dose of 50 mg of CQ/HCQ was used in conjunction with CG, and increased in increments of 50 mg in each dose cohort. Grade 3 or greater toxicity that is treatment-related, and was not self-limited, or controlled in less than 7 days was considered dose limiting toxicity (DLT). Results: Twenty-three patients were enrolled with a median follow up of 6 months. HCQ 100 mg was found to be the MTD in combination with CG with ≥Grade 3 thrombocytopenia and/or neutropenia as dose-limiting. Median OS was 11 months, and the 1- and 3- year overall survival rates were 30% and 7%, respectively. Median progression free survival was 5 months and the 6-, 12-, and 18-months progression-free survivals were 48%, 21% and 14%, respectively (Table). Conclusions: The MTD identified for CQ/HCQ was lower than previously reported with concomitant use of chemotherapeutic regimes, likely due to the myelosuppressive nature of CG. Clinical trial information: NCT02071537. [Table: see text]

A phase Ib clinical trial on intratumoral administration of autologous CD1c (BDCA-1)+ myeloid dendritic cells (myDC) in combination with ipilimumab (IPI) and avelumab (AVE) plus intravenous low-dose nivolumab (NIVO) in patients with advanced solid tumors.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14012-e14012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia Katharina Schwarze ◽  
Gil Awada ◽  
Louise Cras ◽  
Ramses Forsyth ◽  
Ivan Van Riet ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Total Dose ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Tumor Antigens ◽  
Study Drug ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Myeloid Dendritic Cells ◽  
Primary Endpoints ◽  
Anti Tumor Activity

e14012 Background: Intratumoral (IT) myDC play a pivotal role in initiating antitumor immune responses and "re-licensing” of antitumor cytotoxic T-lymphocytes within the tumor microenvironment. IT injection of anti-PD-L1 IgG1 mAb AVE and anti-CTLA-4 IgG1 mAb IPI may reduce the number of regulatory T cells and lyse PD-L1+ tumor cells, thereby releasing tumor antigens that can be captured and processed by IT co-administered CD1c (BDCA-1)+ myDC, reinvigorating the cancer immunity cycle. Methods: Patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors who failed standard therapy were eligible for IT injections of ≥1 non-visceral metastasis with IPI (max total dose of 10 mg) and AVE (max total dose of 40 mg) plus IV NIVO (10 mg) on day 1 followed by IT injection of autologous, non-substantially manipulated CD1c (BDCA-1)+ myDC on day 2. Administration of AVE, IPI, and NIVO was repeated every 14 days thereafter. Primary endpoints were safety and feasibility. Repetitive FNA cytology/IHC of treated lesions was performed. Results: In this ongoing trial, 6 pts (3x melanoma, 1x epithelial ovarian carcinoma, 2x triple negative breast carcinoma) were treated with IT injection of a median of 27,2x106 (range 10-43x106) CD1c (BDCA-1)+ myDC and a median of 5 (range 2-10) study drug administrations. At time of this analysis 3 pts are evaluable for response: an ongoing PR ( > 8 months) was documented in a melanoma pt who previously progressed on PD-1 and CTLA-4 inhibitors. In 2 other melanoma pts regression of the injected metastases coincided with progression of non-injected metastases. Adverse events consisted of transient grade(G)2 local pain at injection site in 2 pts, G1 pruritus in 2 pts, G2 pneumonitis in 1 pt, G1 rash in 1 pt, and pruritus and redness of the skin overlaying the injected lesion in 1 pt. Analysis of cytology/IHC results is ongoing. Conclusions: IT injection of autologous CD1c (BDCA-1)+ myDC with IT co-injection of AVE and IPI plus IV low-dose NIVO is feasible and tolerable and resulted in encouraging early signs of anti-tumor activity in injected as well as non-injected lesions. Clinical trial information: NCT03707808.

Dose escalation and expansion cohort study for DS-8895a in patients with advanced solid tumors.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 99-99 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taroh Satoh ◽  
Kohei Shitara ◽  
Satoru Iwasa ◽  
Kensei Yamaguchi ◽  
Kei Muro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Japanese Patients ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Igg1 Monoclonal Antibody ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Expansion Cohort

99 Background: Erythropoietin-producing hepatocellular receptor A2 (EPHA2) is overexpressed on the cell surface of many tumors and is associated with poor prognosis, suggesting EPHA2 as a target for cancer therapy. DS-8895a is an afucosylated, humanized anti-EPHA2 IgG1 monoclonal antibody with potent cytotoxicity. We report results from a phase I clinical trial to determine safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of DS-8895a in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors (NCT02004717). Methods: Step 1 (dose escalation cohort) had patients with advanced solid tumors and comprised of six dose levels (0.1–20 mg/mL, intravenous infusion, every 2 weeks [Q2W]) with a 28-day dose limiting toxicity (DLT) evaluation period. Step 2 (expansion cohort) patients had gastric or esophageal cancer confirmed to be EPHA2 positive by immunohistochemistry. Dose level in Step 2 was determined based on results obtained in Step 1. We evaluated safety, PK, potential biomarkers including circulating NK cells and cytokines, and tumor response. Results: Maximum tolerated dose was not reached in Step 1 (n = 22). DS-8895a was administered at 20 mg/kg Q2W in Step 2 (n = 15). Among 37 patients in the safety analysis set, adverse events (AEs) were reported in 97.3% (64.9% drug-related); 35.1% presented grade ≥ 3 AEs (8.1% drug-related). Dose delay and study discontinuation due to AEs (treatment related: grade 4 platelet decrease, hypoesthesia, hypotension, peripheral coldness, nausea, and vomiting) were observed in one and four patients (20 mg/kg), respectively. Infusion-related reactions occurred in 51.4% of patients resulting in 10 dose interruptions with one discontinuation. Serum inflammatory cytokines were transiently increased 4 h from the end of infusion drug administration. Serum DS-8895a maximum and trough concentrations increased dose-dependently. Biomarkers had no apparent relationship to best overall response. Seven patients in Step 1 achieved stable disease; in Step 2, six patients achieved stable disease and one patient achieved partial response. Conclusions: DS-8895a was safe and well tolerated up to 20 mg/kg. The PK of DS-8895a was dose-dependent as expected. Clinical trial information: NCT02004717.

Lurbinectedin (LUR) in combination with Irinotecan (IRI) in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors: Updated results from a phase Ib-II trial.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3514-3514
Author(s):  
Santiago Ponce Aix ◽  
Gregory Michael Cote ◽  
Alejandro Falcon Gonzalez ◽  
Juan Manuel Sepulveda ◽  
Elizabeth Jimenez Aguilar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Fixed Dose ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase Ib ◽  
Starting Dose ◽  
Ecog Ps ◽  
Dose Levels

3514 Background: LUR is a novel agent that exerts antitumor activity through inhibition of trans-activated transcription and modulation of tumor microenvironment. Preclinical synergism/additivity in combination with IRI has been reported, thus prompting the conduct of this clinical trial. Methods: Phase Ib-II trial to evaluate escalating doses of LUR on Day (D) 1 plus a fixed dose of IRI 75 mg/m2 on D1 and D8 every 3 weeks (q3w) in pts with advanced solid tumors (+/- G-CSF, if dose-limiting toxicities [DLTs] were neutropenia). Starting dose was LUR 1.0 m/m2 + IRI 75 mg/m2. Results: 77 pts have been treated to date at 5 dose levels, 51 of them at the recommended dose (RD). Baseline characteristics of all 77 pts were: 48% females, 68% ECOG PS=1; median age 57 years (range, 19-75 years); median of 2 prior lines (range, 0−4 lines). The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was LUR 2.4 mg/m2 + IRI 75 mg/m2 with G-CSF, and the RD was LUR 2.0 mg/m2 + IRI 75 mg/m2 with G-CSF. DLTs in Cycle 1 occurred in 2/3 evaluable pts at the MTD and 3/13 evaluable pts at the RD, and comprised omission of IRI D8 infusion due to grade (G) 3/4 neutropenia (n=3 pts) or G2-4 thrombocytopenia (n=2). At the RD (n=51), common G1/2 non-hematological toxicities were nausea, vomiting, fatigue, diarrhea, anorexia and neuropathy. G3 non-hematological toxicities (diarrhea 10%, fatigue 10%) and G3/4 hematological abnormalities (neutropenia 49%, thrombocytopenia 10%) were transient. Conclusions: The combination of LUR and IRI had acceptable tolerance, with no unexpected toxicities. Transient myelosuppression was dose-limiting. The RD is LUR 2.0 mg/m2 on D1 + IRI 75 mg/m2 on D1 and D8 q3w with G-CSF. Antitumor activity was observed at the RD in SCLC pts, as well as in endometrial carcinoma pts. Hints of activity were also observed in STS pts. Updated results will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT02611024 . [Table: see text]

Bevacizumab (B) plus everolimus (E) and panitumumab (P) in refractory advanced solid tumors

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3551-3551
Author(s):  
L. A. Howard ◽  
K. E. Bullock ◽  
J. C. Bendell ◽  
H. E. Uronis ◽  
G. Vlahovic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Study Drug ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Exposure Dose ◽  
Egfr Inhibitors ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Minor Response ◽  
Level 1

3551 Background: In preclinical models, VEGF, mTOR, and EGFR inhibitors have anti-tumor and anti-angiogenesis effects as monotherapies and in combination. B inhibits VEGF; E inhibits mTOR; P inhibits EGFR. There is also potential for interaction between the pathways. Previously BE and BE + erlotinib were evaluated and showed signs of clinical activity. Methods: Patients (pts) with refractory advanced solid tumors were accrued in a phase I dose escalation of B + E + P on a 28d cycle. Dose levels are shown in the table below. DLT was defined as any treatment-related grade 4 heme, grade 3/4 non-heme adverse event (AE), or receiving <85% any study drug in Cycle 1. Blood, skin, and tumor biopsies pre- and on-treatment were collected for correlative biomarkers of angiogenesis. Results: At this time, 12 pts (3M: 9F) are evaluable for toxicity; 9 for efficacy. Median age: 54 years (range 23–72). 9 of 12 pts had prior B exposure. Dose level 1 was expanded due to 1/3 DLT, with total of 3/6 DLT (Grade (Gr) 3 mucositis (n=2), Gr3 hypokalemia (n=1)). Dose level -1 had 3/3 DLT (Gr3, Gr4 mucositis (n=2), Gr3 non-acneform rash (n=1)). Dose level -2 had 0/3 pts DLT. Gr 3–4 related toxicities in cycle 2+: hypokalemia (n=4); hypophosphatemia (n = 1); hypomagnesemia (n = 1); diarrhea (n=1); hoarseness (n=1). Other events of interest were: Gr1–2 mucositis (n=7); Gr1 hyperlipidemia (n=5); Gr1–2 hyperglycemia (n=4); Gr2 hypertension (n=2); Gr1–2 neutropenia (n=5); Gr1–2 thrombocytopenia (n=5). 8/9 evaluable pts had SD as best response (median 26 wks, range 8+ to 32+ wks): 1 pt with pancreatic cancer and progression on 2 prior EGFR inhibitors had prolonged 32+ wk SD. There was 1 minor response (23.3%) in a pt with bevacizumab-refractory ovarian cancer (32+ wks). No CR or PR were seen. Conclusions: B + E + P at full doses has dose limiting toxicities of rash and mucositis. B 10 mg/kg q2wks + E 5 mg q48h + P 4.8 mg/kg q2wks is the maximum tolerated dose. This dose is currently being expanded in 20 patients with extensive pre- and on-treatment biomarker analyses. Updated clinical and biomarker data will be presented. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]

A phase I dose-escalation study of volasertib (BI 6727) combined with nintedanib (BIBF 1120) in advanced solid tumors.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2556-2556 ◽  
Author(s):  
Filippo G. De Braud ◽  
Stefano Cascinu ◽  
Gianluca Spitaleri ◽  
Korinna Pilz ◽  
Laura Clementi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Day Treatment ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation Study

2556 Background: Volasertib (V) is a potent and selective cell cycle kinase inhibitor that induces mitotic arrest and apoptosis by targeting Polo-like kinases. Nintedanib (N) is a triple angiokinase inhibitor of VEGF, PDGF, and FGF receptors. Both have shown clinical activity with a manageable safety profile in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors. This study was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of V combined with N in these pts. Methods: Cohorts of 3–6 pts received V (100–450 mg IV Q3W) + oral standard dose N (200 mg BID continuously, except V infusion day). Treatment continued until clinical progression. Up to 12 pts were treated at the MTD for additional safety data. Primary endpoint was the MTD; secondary endpoints were pharmacokinetics (PK), overall safety, and preliminary efficacy. Results: 30 pts were treated (median age, 56.5 yr; ECOG PS 0/1/2, 33%/60%/7%; ≥3 prior therapies, 87%). At V doses >200 mg, 7 pts experienced 13 dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) during cycle 1: increased alanine aminotransferase [ALT] or aspartate aminotransferase [AST], neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. The MTD was V 300 mg (Table). At the MTD, the most common all grade (Gr) adverse events (AEs) were neutropenia (69%), asthenia and thrombocytopenia (62% each), increased ALT, increased AST and diarrhea (54% each). Median (range) duration on treatment was 4 (1–18) cycles. Treatment was discontinued due to progressive disease (80%), DLT (3%) and other non-AE related reasons (17%). 2 objective responses were observed (1 complete [breast cancer] and 1 partial [NSCLC]), both with the 300 mg dose. 6 pts had SD for ≥ 6 mo. PK data will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions: MTD of V + standard dose N (200 mg BID) was determined to be 300 mg Q3W (the same as the recommended phase II single agent dose of V in solid tumors). This combination had a manageable safety profile without unexpected or overlapping toxicities and showed preliminary antitumor activity. Clinical trial information: NCT01022853. [Table: see text]

Preliminary efficacy from an ongoing phase 1 dose escalation study of seclidemstat (SP-2577) in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors (AST).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3073-3073
Author(s):  
Sant P. Chawla ◽  
Victoria S. Chua-Alcala ◽  
Jasgit C. Sachdev ◽  
David S. Wages ◽  
David D. Stenehjem ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Dose Escalation Study ◽  
Phase 1 Trial ◽  
Ongoing Phase

3073 Background: Lysine-specific demethylase 1 (LSD1) is an epigenetic enzyme that is aberrantly expressed in many solid tumors. High levels of LSD1 expression are often correlated with poor patient prognosis due to LSD1’s role in cancer cell proliferation, metastasis, and chemoresistance. Seclidemstat is a novel, selective, reversible and oral LSD1 inhibitor capable of inhibiting both LSD1’s catalytic and scaffolding functions. We report preliminary efficacy in AST from an ongoing phase 1 trial. Methods: SALA-003-AC19 (NCT03895684) is a phase 1 trial of single agent SP-2577 in pts with AST. All pts had progressive disease (PD) at time of study entry. Pts received oral SP-2577 twice a day under fasting condition, in 28-day cycles (C). The primary objective is safety and tolerability. Secondary objectives are to determine maximum-tolerated dose, preliminary efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics. Results: As of December 30, 2020, 19 pts with AST (10 sarcoma, 2 prostate, 2 ovarian, 2 pancreatic, 1 renal, 1 cervical, 1 breast) were enrolled. Pts received escalating doses of SP-2577 from 150 to 600 mg BID and the dose escalation is ongoing. The median age was 63 years (range, 21–79). 42% were male, and pts had received a median of 4 (range, 1–8) prior systemic therapies. The most common (>5%) grade 3 treatment-related adverse events were GI related including diarrhea (5.3%) and abdominal pain (5.3%). No grade 4 events were reported and there were no treatment-related deaths. Safety data will be presented after completion of phase 1. Three pts had at least one dose reduction. Among the 13 pts who were evaluable for response at end of C2, 7 pts (54%) had best response of stable disease (SD) with median time to progression (TTP) of 4.3 months (range, 2.1–11.5). Four of the 7 pts had genetic abnormalities that may demonstrate increased sensitization to SP-2577 according to preclinical studies. Characteristics of 7 pts with SD at C2 and beyond are shown in the table. Conclusions: Seclidemstat has shown activity among advanced sarcoma pts with a manageable safety profile. The dose escalation is ongoing and preliminary clinical data supports further exploration in FET-translocated sarcoma as single agent and in combination therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT03895684. [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document