Randomized phase II trial of extended versus standard neoadjuvant therapy for esophageal cancer, NCCTG (Alliance) trial N0849.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4026-4026 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven R. Alberts ◽  
Gamini S. Soori ◽  
Qian Shi ◽  
Dennis A. Wigle ◽  
Robert P. Sticca ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Event ◽  
Neoadjuvant Therapy ◽  
Interim Analysis ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Pathologic Complete Response ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Surgical Specimen

4026 Background: Patients (pts) with locally advanced esophageal or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma commonly receive neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (chemo-RT). Despite this approach the rate of recurrence remains high. Given the difficulties of postoperative therapy, the efficacy of extended neoadjuvant therapy was assessed. Methods: Eligibility criteria included T3-4,N0 – Tany,N(+) disease amenable to radiation and surgery. Pts were randomized to either arm A (docetaxel 60 mg/m2 day 1 , oxaliplatin [Oxal] 85 mg/m2 day 1, and capecitabine 1250 mg/m2/day days 1-14 x 2 cycles [DOC] followed by 5-FU 180 mg/m2/day continuous IV through radiation + Oxal 85 mg/m2 days 1,15,29 + 50.4 Gy radiation (chemo-RT)) or arm B (chemo-RT alone). Randomization was stratified by ECOG PS (0/1 vs 2) and stage (II vs III/IVA). Primary endpoint was pathologic complete response (PCR) rate, defined as no gross or microscopic tumor identified in the surgical specimen. Interim analysis assessed efficacy and futility of the experimental intervention. Wilcoxon rank sum and Fisher’s exact tests were used to compare clinical/pathologic factors between arms. Results: Baseline and stratification factors were well balanced between arms. Of 42 pts included in the interim analysis (86% male; age [median 63, range 38-88], 100% PS 0/1; 71% stage III; 55% esophagus, 40% GEJ; 36% measurable disease), 4 and 1 pts in arms A and B, respectively, did not have surgery due to death (A, 2), progressive disease (A, 1), alternative treatment (A, 1) or adverse event (B, 1). Among 21 arm A pts, 21, 20, and 19 pts started 1st cycle of DOC, 2nd cycle of DOC and chemo-RT, respectively. All arm B pts received chemo-RT. 33% (7/21) of arm A and 48% (10/21) of arm B pts achieved PCR (p=0.53). Among pts undergoing surgery, 94% (16/17) and 100% (20/20) of arm A and B pts had complete resection (p=0.46). 38% and 24% of arm A and B pts experienced at least one grade 4+ adverse event at least possibly related to treatment (p=0.51). Conclusions: Extended neoadjuvant therapy in pts with locally advanced esophageal or GEJ adenocarcinoma failed to improve the PCR rate. Follow-up in regard to survival and rate of recurrence is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT00938470.

Association of total neoadjuvant therapy with favorable clinical outcomes in patients with locally advanced esophageal and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinomas (LA-GEJ CA).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 231-231
Author(s):  
Lauren Jurkowski ◽  
Aditya Varnam Shreenivas ◽  
Sakti Chakrabarti ◽  
Mandana Kamgar ◽  
James P. Thomas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Neoadjuvant Therapy ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Pathologic Complete Response ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Metabolic Imaging ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Curative Intent

231 Background: Both peri-operative chemotherapy and neoadjuvant chemoradiation have been shown to improve outcomes in patients (pts) with LA-GEJ CA compared to surgery alone. Rates of post-operative chemotherapy delivery remain suboptimal. Total neo-adjuvant therapy (TNT) in LA-GEJ CA - induction chemotherapy (IC) followed by concurrent chemoradiation (CRT) - may improve systematic delivery of neoadjuvant therapy and result in favorable clinical outcomes. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed medical records of 135 pts with LA-GEJ CA at our institution between 2/2007 and 11/2019; pertinent clinical data were abstracted with Institutional Review Board approval. Patients treated with IC and curative-intent CRT with ≥40 Gy dose of radiation for adenocarcinoma were included in this analysis (N = 59). Doublet or triplet IC regimens utilizing 5-Flurouracil(5-FU), Cisplatin/Oxaliplatin and Docetaxel were commonly administered while combinations of Carboplatin +Paclitaxel or 5-FU + Oxaliplatin were used in CRT. Clinical complete response (CCR) was defined as metabolic imaging and endoscopic biopsies negative for residual malignancy after completion of TNT. Patients were followed from diagnosis to recurrence and overall survival. Survival probabilities were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared between groups using a log-rank test. Results: Out of 59 evaluable pts, 69% were clinical stage T3, 71% were node positive. 37 pts (63%) underwent surgery, R0 resection rate was 89% (33/37), pathologic complete response (pCR) rate was 19% (7/37). Among the pts who did not undergo surgery, 41% (9/22) opted to forego surgery since they attained a CCR. For the entire cohort, median Disease-Free Survival (mDFS), median Overall Survival (mOS), and 3-yr OS were 2.4 yrs, 4.7 yrs, and 67% respectively. Pts who did not undergo surgery had a mDFS, mOS, and 3-yr OS of 1.5 yrs, 4.2 yrs, and 59% respectively. Median DFS, mOS, and 3-yr OS of patients who underwent surgery were 3.5 yrs, 5.8 yrs and 72% respectively. Patients who achieved a CCR and opted to forego surgery (N = 9) had a 3 -yr DFS of 42% vs 83% for pts (N = 7) who demonstrated a pCR after curative intent tri-modality therapy. (P = 0.0099) Interestingly, the same group that achieved CCR and opted out of surgery had 3yr OS of 89% vs 83% of those who demonstrated a pCR (p = 0.0042). Conclusions: TNT for pts with LA-GEJ CA is associated with high rates of R0 resection as well as excellent DFS and OS compared to historical controls, warranting prospective evaluation. The remarkable DFS and OS in patients who opted to forego surgery due to achieving CCR is reflective of the local and systemic control rendered by this approach. Careful characterization and close longitudinal follow-up of patients who achieve CCR may help identify a subgroup of LA-GEJ CA pts who may benefit from surgery sparing approaches.

Multicenter, randomized phase II study of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy in esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4005-4005
Author(s):  
Manish A. Shah ◽  
Khaldoun Almhanna ◽  
Syma Iqbal ◽  
Prashant Thakkar ◽  
Bryan J. Schneider ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Pathologic Complete Response ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Type I ◽  
Immune Microenvironment ◽  
Tumor Immune Microenvironment ◽  
Grade 3

4005 Background: Recent transformative studies in the treatment of EAC support adjuvant nivolumab for patients with residual disease following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) (Checkmate 577) and pembrolizumab (P) with chemotherapy in untreated metastatic disease (Keynote 590). We hypothesized that pre-operative P combined with CRT can further improve outcomes in patients with locally advanced EAC. Methods: Patients with cT3-4Nx or T2N1 M0 EAC or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma eligible for curative surgery were randomized (1:1) to receive either full-dose paclitaxel (T)/ carboplatin (C) or T/C + P induction therapy. All patients then received CRT with weekly T/C, RT 41.4Gy in 23 fractions, and P every 3 weeks. Following resection, patients received P for one year. The primary endpoint is rate of major pathologic response (MPR), defined as pathologic complete response or near complete response ( < 10% residual cancer), with 80% power and 0.1 one-sided significance level to detect the difference between a MPR proportion of 30% (historical control) and an alternative hypothesis of 47% (with preoperative P). Tissue was collected for tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) analysis including bulk and single cell RNA(scRNA) expression analysis, DNA sequencing, and flow cytometry. Results: From 8/4/17 to 10/26/20, 40 patients were enrolled: median age 68 [38-81], male 32, esophagus/GEJ type I (n = 16), GEJ II/III (n = 24). CRT was well tolerated, with no grade 3-4 adverse events attributed to P. Notable toxicity included grade 3-4 pneumonitis (13%), anastomotic leak (13%), infection (35%). In 31 evaluable patients to date, the MPR rate was 50.0% (95% CI, 32.7%-67.3%). 1-yr disease free survival was 100% for patients with MPR vs. 31.8% without MPR, p = 0.002. Esophageal/GEJ type I cancers had a significantly higher MPR rate when compared with GEJ type II/III (76.9% vs 37.5%, p = 0.03). scRNA seq on > 100,000 tumor cells revealed EAC/GEJ type I had higher infiltration of activated dendritic cells (p = 0.12), whereas GEJ tumors have significantly higher infiltration of activated B cells (p = 0.02). Conclusions: The addition of P to preoperative CRT for EAC is safe and associated with a significantly higher MPR rate compared to historical data. We found MPR to be significantly enriched in EAC/GEJ type I tumors compared with GEJ II/III, associated with important differences in the baseline tumor immune microenvironment. Clinical trial information: NCT02998268.

Predictors of pathologic response to preoperative chemotherapy and concurrent radiotherapy for locally advanced breast cancer

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e11545-e11545
Author(s):  
R. Venkitaraman ◽  
S. G. Ramanan ◽  
K. R. Rajalekshmy ◽  
T. G. Sagar ◽  
V. Shanta
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Advanced Breast Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced Breast Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Pathologic Complete Response ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Pathologic Response ◽  
Advanced Breast ◽  
Concurrent Radiotherapy

e11545 Background: Combined modality treatment is essential for acheiving optimal results in the management of locally advanced breast cancer (LABC). Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is considered a promising approach for LABC. Pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant treatment for LABC predicts prolonged survival. Aim: To determine the rate of pathologic complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy for locally advanced breast cancer and to identify the predictors of pCR. Methods: Female patients with noninflammatory LABC received neo-adjuvant chemotherapy with concurrent radiotherapy, and then underwent mastectomy and axillary clearance. The pathologic response was analysed with respect to the baseline clinical factors and the receptor status on immunohistochemical studies of the initial biopsy specimen. Results: Of the 296 patients included in the study, 286 underwent mastectomy. Ninety-two (31 %) patients achieved a pCR. The significant predictor of a pCR was Oestrogen receptor negative status (p = 0.025), while progesterone receptor negative status (p=0.069 ), HER2 status (p= 0.62), age (p= 0.074), stage (p=0.6), grade (p=0.86), type of chemotherapy (p=0.37) and number of cycles of chemotherapy (p = 0.23) did not predict for pathologic response. Clinical complete response predicted for a pathologic complete response (p=0.0001). Conclusions: Neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy results in good pathologic complete response rates in LABC. High pathologic compete response rates are achieved in patients with endocrine receptor negative disease, with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, which might result in improved outcome in this high risk subset of patients. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Initial experience using percutaneous irreversible electroporation (IRE) in the treatment of locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (LAPC) with vascular encasement.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 291-291 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Joel Hosein ◽  
Katuska J Barbery ◽  
Evelyn Perez-Rojas ◽  
Tatiana Froud ◽  
Caio Max S. Rocha Lima ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neoadjuvant Therapy ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Irreversible Electroporation ◽  
Pathologic Complete Response ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation ◽  
Pancreatic Tumors ◽  
Percutaneous Ablation ◽  
Initial Experience

291 Background: Neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy can convert some patients (pts) with borderline or unresectable LAPC to resectability. Persistent vascular encasement after neoadjuvant therapy usually contraindicates resection. IRE using the Nanoknife is more versatile than other ablative modalities in that tumors abutting vascular structures can be treated with IRE without compromise of the vessels or concern for the heat sink effect of nearby blood flow. Methods: We examined the records of pts referred for IRE for LAPC. The procedures were all done percutaneously under general anesthesia using a standard protocol. The primary endpoint was safety. Secondary endpoints included survival and resection rate after the procedure. Results: Between 12/2010 and 8/2011, 8 pts with biopsy-proven PC underwent percutaneous ablation of pancreatic tumors using IRE. The median age was 53 years (range 51-72), the median time from diagnosis to IRE was 8.8 months (range 2.4-29.2) and the median tumor size treated was 2.8cm (range 2.5-6.8). All pts had prior chemotherapy and 7 had prior radiation, with a median of 2 lines of prior therapies (range 1-4). Two pts went to surgery after IRE after 4 and 5 months respectively. Both had margin-negative (R0) resections and one had a pathologic complete response. Both remain disease-free at 1 and 5 months after resection respectively. Among the 6 remaining pts, 2 were lost to follow-up, one had progressive disease after 3 months and 3 remain under follow-up to determine resectability. One of these 3 pts had a negative follow-up PET scan and surgery is planned. The procedure was complicated by a spontaneous pneumothorax during anesthesia in one patient, and another developed pancreatitis; both recovered completely. Conclusions: Percutaneous ablation of pancreatic tumors appears to be feasible and safe using the IRE modality. In our initial experience, 2 out of 8 pts with unresectable LAPC due to persistent vascular encasement after neoadjuvant therapy achieved a margin-negative resection after IRE. One had a pathological complete response. A prospective neoadjuvant trial in LAPC incorporating IRE is planned.

Phase Ib/II study of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with CRLX101 and capecitabine for locally advanced rectal cancer.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15144-e15144 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Wang ◽  
Autumn Jackson McRee ◽  
A. William Blackstock ◽  
Bert H. O'Neil ◽  
Dominic T. Moore ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Pathologic Complete Response ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
Phase Ib ◽  
Grade 3

e15144 Background: There is strong interest in the development of novel agents to further improve the therapeutic ratio of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. CRLX101 is an investigational nanoparticle-drug conjugate with a camptothecin payload. The purpose of this Phase Ib/II study is to assess toxicity and to evaluate whether the addition of CRLX101 to chemoradiotherapy can improve pathologic complete response (pCR) for rectal cancer. Methods: This is a single-arm multicenter Phase Ib/II study examining the addition of CRLX101 to a standard capecitabine-based chemoradiotherapy regimen. Phase Ib employs a 3+3 dose escalation design with starting dose of 12 mg/m2 every other week (QOW). Dose level +1 was 15 mg/m2 (MTD for CRLX101 single agent QOW). Upon reaching MTD for QOW dosing, protocol was modified to evaluate QW CRLX101 dosing starting at 12 mg/m2 and 15 mg/m2as +1 level. Secondary endpoints included pCR and clinical outcome. Results: A total of 32 patients were enrolled on the trial. 26/32 had T3-4, 9/32 had N2 and 16/32 had N1 disease. For QOW dosing, 9 patients completed treatment without DLT and MTD was identified as 15 mg/m2 QOW. 14 patients were treated on the Phase II portion of the study at 15 mg/m2 QOW prior to the initiation of weekly dosing Phase Ib cohorts. For QW dosing, 0/3 patients experienced DLT at 12 mg/m2 and 1/6 patients experienced DLT at 15 mg/m2. The DLT was skin desquamation requiring treatment delay. QW MTD was identified as 15 mg/m2. Toxicities (all grade 3 except lymphopenia) that could possibly be attributed to CRLX101 are in Table 1. Full clinical and pathologic staging were available for 29/32 patients. Mean neoadjuvant rectal (NAR) score was 19 with standard deviation of 15. At the weekly MTD, 3/6 patients had pCR. Conclusions: CRLX101 weekly at 15 mg/m2+ standard capecitabine-based chemoradiotherapy appears to be well tolerated, with promising pCR rates that warrants further evaluation. A larger PhII trial should be considered with this regimen. Clinical trial information: NCT02010567. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Avoiding Unnecessary Major Rectal Cancer Surgery by Implementing Structural Restaging and a Watch-and-Wait Strategy After Neoadjuvant Radiochemotherapy

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. F. Huisman ◽  
I. J. H. Schoenaker ◽  
R. M. Brohet ◽  
O. Reerink ◽  
H. van der Sluis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Pathologic Complete Response ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
Response Evaluation ◽  
Watch And Wait ◽  
Time To Event

Abstract Background Pathologic complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) is found in 15–20% of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. A watch-and-wait (W&W) strategy has been introduced as an alternative strategy to avoid surgery for selected patients with a clinical complete response at multidisciplinary response evaluation. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the multidisciplinary response evaluation by comparing the proportion of patients with pCR since the introduction of the structural response evaluation with the period before response evaluation. Methods This retrospective cohort study enrolled patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who underwent nCRT between January 2009 and May 2018, categorizing them into cohort A (period 2009–2015) and cohort B (period 2015–2018). The patients in cohort B underwent structural multidisciplinary response evaluation with the option of the W&W strategy. Proportion of pCR (ypT0N0), time-to-event (pCR) analysis, and stoma-free survival were evaluated in both cohorts. Results Of the 259 patients in the study, 21 (18.4%) in cohort A and in 8 (8.7%) in cohort B had pCR (p = 0.043). Time-to-event analysis demonstrated a significant pCR decline in cohort B (p < 0.001). The stoma-free patient rate was 24% higher in cohort B (p < 0.001). Conclusion Multidisciplinary clinical response evaluation after nCRT for locally advanced rectal cancer led to a significant decrease in unnecessary surgery for the patients with a complete response.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document