Phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter trial of daily everolimus plus weekly trastuzumab and vinorelbine in trastuzumab-resistant, advanced breast cancer (BOLERO-3).

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 505-505 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruth O'Regan ◽  
Mustafa Ozguroglu ◽  
Fabrice Andre ◽  
Masakazu Toi ◽  
Guy Heinrich Maria Jerusalem ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Advanced Breast Cancer ◽  
Group Performance ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Advanced Breast ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Adult Women ◽  
Metastatic Setting

505 Background: Everolimus (EVE) is an inhibitor of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), a protein kinase central to a number of signaling pathways regulating cell growth and proliferation. Data from preclinical and phase 1/2 clinical studies indicated that adding EVE to trastuzumab (TRAS) plus chemotherapy may restore sensitivity to and enhance efficacy of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-targeted therapy. The international BOLERO-3 phase 3 study is being conducted to evaluate the addition of EVE to TRAS plus vinorelbine. Methods: Adult women with HER2+ advanced breast cancer and who received prior taxane therapy and experienced recurrence or progression on TRAS were randomized 1:1 to receive either EVE or placebo (5 mg/day) in combination with weekly TRAS and vinorelbine (25 mg/m2). The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival, response rate, clinical benefit rate, safety, quality of life, and pharmacokinetics. Final analysis will be conducted after approximately 417 PFS events. Results: The trial accrued 569 patients between October 2009 and May 2012. Previous therapy included TRAS (100%), a taxane (100%), and lapatinib (28%). The median age was 54 years, and 76% of patients had visceral metastases, 5% had stable brain metastases, 56% had hormone-receptor–positive disease, 33% had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 1 or 2, and 41% had 3 or more metastatic sites. The median number of prior chemotherapy lines in the metastatic setting was 1. As of February 4, 2013, a total of 396 PFS events were reported. Conclusions: Final PFS analysis will be performed in early May 2013; primary and secondary efficacy endpoints will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT01007942.

Phase III randomized study of fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide v fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide in advanced breast cancer: an Italian multicentre trial. Italian Multicentre Breast Study with Epirubicin.

1988 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. 976-982 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Advanced Breast Cancer ◽  
Combination Chemotherapy ◽  
Chemotherapy Regimen ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Menopausal Status ◽  
Advanced Breast ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Combination Chemotherapy Regimen

From February 1983 to January 1985, 497 patients with advanced breast cancer were randomly allocated to receive either epirubicin or doxorubicin in the following combination chemotherapy regimen: fluorouracil (5-FU) 500 mg/m2 intravenous (IV) on days 1 and 8; epirubicin or doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 IV on day 1; cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2 IV on day 1 (FEC or FAC). Cycles were repeated every 21 days until progression or to cumulative doses of 700 mg/m2 for epirubicin and 550 mg/m2 for doxorubicin. Dose reductions were applied according to the standard criteria. Activity was evaluated in 443 patients (222 in the FEC arm and 221 in the FAC arm). The two experimental groups were comparable in age, performance status, menopausal status, histology, previous treatments, and site of the disease. The overall response rate (complete response and partial response [CR + PR]) was not significantly different: 53.6% for FEC and 56.5% for FAC. The median time to progression was 273 days for FEC and 314 days for FAC; the median survival time was 591 and 613 days, respectively. Leukopenia, anemia, nausea, and vomiting were significantly lower in patients treated with FEC. As for cardiotoxicity, four cases of congestive heart failure (CHF) were recorded among patients treated with FAC while only one was observed in the FEC group. These results indicate that epirubicin in a combination chemotherapy regimen is as active as doxorubicin and is significantly less toxic.

Medroxyprogesterone acetate addition or substitution for tamoxifen in advanced tamoxifen-resistant breast cancer: a phase III randomized trial. Australian-New Zealand Breast Cancer Trials Group.

1997 ◽  
Vol 15 (9) ◽  
pp. 3141-3148 ◽  
Author(s):  
M J Byrne ◽  
V Gebski ◽  
J Forbes ◽  
M H Tattersall ◽  
R J Simes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Advanced Breast Cancer ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Medroxyprogesterone Acetate ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Advanced Breast ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Primary Therapy ◽  
Metastatic Sites

PURPOSE To determine whether a strategy of adding medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) to tamoxifen (TAM) is superior to the substitution of MPA for TAM among women with advanced breast cancer and disease progressing on TAM. To assess the patterns or response and subsequent progression in sites and tissues according to prior involvement and treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS Two-hundred-fifteen postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer progressing on TAM after receiving TAM for at least six months were randomized: 109 to add MPA 500 mg/day orally (TAM + MPA), and 106 to stop TAM and to substitute MPA. RESULTS There were no significant differences between the groups with respect to complete plus partial response rates: TAM + MPA 10%, MPA 9%, median time to progression TAM + MPA 3.0 months, MPA 4.5 months, or median overall survival, TAM + MPA 17.2 months, MPA 18.4 months. In a multivariate model, prognostic factors significant for a shorter time to disease progression were worse for performance status, involvement of more than one tissue, prior radiotherapy, and shorter time from recurrence after primary therapy to randomization. Adjusting for these factors, treatment with TAM + MPA was associated with a higher relative risk for disease progression, with a hazards ratio of 1.31, but this was not significant (95% confidence interval, 0.98 to 1.74; P = .067). However, in an exploratory analysis, the time to disease progression, among patients with progesterone receptor positive (PR+) tumors, was 6.3 months with MPA versus 2.9 months with TAM + MPA, with a hazards ratio of 1.92 (95% confidence interval, 1.12 to 3.32; P = .02). There was a significant interaction, P = .04, between PR status and treatment, indicating an advantage to treatment substitution for those who have PR+ tumors. Tumor response occurred in 14% of assessed metastatic sites. Subsequent progression occurred in a new tissue alone in 13% of patients, in both new and previously involved (old) tissues in 76%, and in old tissues only in 11%. In 23% of patients, progression occurred only at a new site, in 50% at both old and new sites, and in 27% only at old sites. No significant differences in the patterns of response or progression were seen in the different treatment groups. CONCLUSION Among women with breast cancer whose disease is progressing after at least six months of treatment with TAM, there is no advantage to maintaining TAM when MPA is to be given. An overall effect of treatment on the pattern of failure at old sites or at new sites or tissues cannot be discerned.

A phase III study comparing trastuzumab emtansine with trastuzumab, pertuzumab, and docetaxel in elderly patients with advanced stage HER2-positive breast cancer: (JCOG1607 HERB TEA study).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS1100-TPS1100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akihiko Shimomura ◽  
Kenji Tamura ◽  
Tomonori Mizutani ◽  
Taro Shibata ◽  
Fumikata Hara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Advanced Breast Cancer ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Advanced Breast ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Her2 Overexpression ◽  
Trastuzumab Emtansine ◽  
Her2 Positive

TPS1100 Background: Systemic chemotherapy with anti-HER2 therapy is the standard of care for HER2-positive advanced breast cancer. Patient outcomes have improved remarkably with the use of novel anti-HER2 drugs, including trastuzumab (H), pertuzumab (P), and trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1). The combination treatment comprising H, P, and docetaxel (D) (HPD) is highly recommended as the 1st-line treatment for patients with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer. In contrast, for elderly patients over 65 years of age, this regimen seems to be intolerable mentally and physically, and impairs their quality of life. A new standard treatment with less toxicity and non-inferior efficacy for elderly patients is needed. Methods: We have planned a randomized, multicenter, open-label, phase III trial to confirm the non-inferiority of T-DM1 compared to HPD in terms of overall survival (OS) in elderly patients with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer. The eligibility criteria are as follows: 1) histologically proven metastatic breast cancer, 2) age 65-74 years with a performance status (PS) score 0-2, or 75-79 years with a PS score 0-1, 3) HER2 overexpression or amplification confirmed in primary or metastatic tissues, and 4) no anti-HER2 therapy with chemotherapy for breast cancer, excluding (neo) adjuvant therapy. Patients are randomized to receive either HPD (H 6 mg/kg, P 420 mg/body, and D 60 mg/m2) or T-DM1 3.6 mg/kg every 3 weeks. The dose up of D (75 mg/m2) after the second cycle is defined based on the data regarding safety during the first cycle. The primary endpoint is OS. The secondary endpoints are progression-free survival, response rate, adverse events, breast cancer-related death, and deterioration of activities of daily living. The trial is designed to achieve 70% power to confirm non-inferiority of T-DM1 to HPD at a one-sided alpha of 5% with a non-inferiority margin of 1.3 in terms of hazard ratio. With a median OS of 30 months in both arms, 6 years of accrual, and 5 years of follow up, the planned sample size is 330. The trial began in January 2018 and nineteen patients have been enrolled as of January 2019. Clinical trial information: UMIN000030783.

BOLERO-6: Phase II study of everolimus plus exemestane versus everolimus or capecitabine monotherapy in HR+, HER2- advanced breast cancer.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS660-TPS660 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bent Ejlertsen ◽  
Guy Heinrich Maria Jerusalem ◽  
Sara A. Hurvitz ◽  
Richard H. De Boer ◽  
Tanya Taran ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Advanced Breast Cancer ◽  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Advanced Breast ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Objective Evidence

TPS660 Background: Everolimus (EVE), an orally bioavailable inhibitor of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), has shown clinical activity as monotherapy and in combination with endocrine therapy (ET) in hormone-receptor–positive (HR+; estrogen and/or progesterone receptors) advanced breast cancer (ABC). In a pivotal phase 3 trial in patients with HR+ ABC progressing on ET, EVE + exemestane (EXE) significantly prolonged median progression-free survival (PFS) vs EXE alone per local (7.8 vs 3.2 months; log-rank P<.0001) or central (11.0 months for EVE+EXE vs 4.1 months for EXE alone; log-rank P<.0001) assessment. Capecitabine, an orally administered fluoropyrimidine carbamate indicated as monotherapy in paclitaxel and/or anthracycline-refractory ABC, has shown clinical benefit in patients with HR+, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) ABC. The BOLERO-6 study in patients with HR+, HER2- ABC progressing on prior anastrozole or letrozole will compare PFS following EVE+EXE combination therapy vs EVE or capecitabine monotherapy. Methods: In this multicenter, open-label, randomized, 3-arm, phase 2 study, 300 patients will be randomized to receive either EVE (10 mg/d) + EXE (25 mg/d) combination therapy, or EVE (10 mg/d) alone, or capecitabine (1,250 mg/m2twice daily for 14 d/3-wk cycle) alone, until disease progression. Patients will be stratified based on the presence of visceral disease. Key eligibility criteria include age ≥18 years, postmenopausal status; histologic or cytologic confirmation of estrogen-receptor–positive, HER2- ABC; radiologic or objective evidence of recurrence or progression on prior aromatase inhibitors; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≤2. The primary endpoint is PFS with EVE+EXE vs EVE, based on local radiologic assessment (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors [RECIST] 1.1). The key secondary endpoint is PFS with EVE+EXE vs capecitabine. Other secondary endpoints include overall survival, objective response rate, clinical benefit rate, safety, quality of life, and patient satisfaction with treatment. Enrollment will start in Q1 2013. Estimated study completion in Q1 2015. Clinical trial information: NCT01783444.

Assessment of estrogenic recruitment before chemotherapy in advanced breast cancer: a double-blind randomized study. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Breast Cancer Cooperative Group.

1993 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. 1723-1728 ◽  
Author(s):  
R Paridaens ◽  
J C Heuson ◽  
J P Julien ◽  
C Veyret ◽  
J Van Zyl ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Advanced Breast Cancer ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Menopausal Status ◽  
Specific Effect ◽  
Advanced Breast ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Survival Duration ◽  
European Organization

PURPOSE In the present phase III study, the specific effect of estrogenic recruitment was assessed by comparing two groups of patients with advanced breast cancer receiving either ethinylestradiol (EE2) or placebo (PL) before chemotherapy (CT). PATIENTS AND METHODS The therapeutic regimen consisted of (1) estrogen suppression by aminoglutethimide (AGL) 1 g/d plus hydrocortisone (HC) 40 mg/d, with surgical castration performed on premenopausal patients; (2) fluorouracil (5-FU) 500 mg/m2, doxorubicin 50 mg/m2, and cyclophosphamide (CPA) 500 mg/m2 (FAC) intravenously (IV) every 3 weeks; (3) following randomization, patients were double-blinded to receive either PL or EE2 50 micrograms exactly 24 hours before receiving FAC. All patients had advanced breast cancer presumably sensitive to endocrine therapy (estrogen receptor-positive [ER+] and/or progesterone receptor-positive [PgR+] status) with measurable lesions; none had received prior systemic antineoplastic therapy for metastatic disease; prior adjuvant hormonal therapy (HT) or CT (without anthracyclines) was allowed if interval since completion was longer than 1 year. RESULTS Among 154 patients treated according to the protocol, tolerance, response rates, time to progression, and median survival duration were identical in the PL and EE2 groups. Only performance status, dominant metastatic site, and menopausal status seemed to influence response (overall response, 64%), with the highest levels of partial remission (PR) and complete remission (CR) being achieved in premenopausal women (CR plus PR, 26% plus 55%) and in those with dominant soft tissue lesions (CR plus PR, 45% plus 28%). CONCLUSION We conclude that the validity of the hormonal recruitment concept has not yet been established in clinical practice so that this approach remains experimental. The results achieved by combining (near) complete estrogenic suppression and cyclical FAC chemotherapy are not significantly different from those to be expected with the more conventional use of HT followed by CT in presumably hormone-responsive (ER+) patients.

Phase II Multicenter Trial of a Weekly Paclitaxel and Carboplatin Regimen in Patients With Advanced Breast Cancer

2002 ◽  
Vol 20 (18) ◽  
pp. 3857-3864 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Loesch ◽  
Nicholas Robert ◽  
Lina Asmar ◽  
Mary Ann Gregurich ◽  
Mark O’Rourke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Advanced Breast Cancer ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Group Performance ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Advanced Breast ◽  
Weekly Paclitaxel ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Group 1

PURPOSE: To determine the activity of weekly paclitaxel plus carboplatin as first-line therapy in patients with advanced breast cancer (ABC) by assessing response rate, survival, and safety. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred patients with ABC received paclitaxel 135 mg/m2 (group 1, n = 20) and carboplatin area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of 2. Paclitaxel was subsequently reduced to 100 mg/m2 (group 2, n = 80) because of toxicity. The median age was 58.5 years, and most patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of ≤ 2. Estrogen and progesterone receptor status were evenly distributed among both groups. Sixty-one patients received prior chemotherapy, 37 (61%) of whom received prior doxorubicin. Among 47 patients who received prior hormonal therapy, 43 received tamoxifen. RESULTS: The overall response rate (ORR) among 95 assessable patients was 62%, including 8% complete responses and 54% partial responses. The median time to response was 1.8 months, and the median duration of response was 13.3 months. The median time to progression was 4.8 months. The median survival was 16 months. Neutropenia and leukopenia were the most common grade 3 and 4 toxicities. In group 1, neutropenia (50%) and leukopenia (35%) necessitated dose reductions for 50% of patients during the first three cycles, prompting the reduction in paclitaxel dose to 100 mg/m2. Grade 3 and 4 nonhematologic toxicities for all patients included peripheral neuropathy (11%), infection (6%), anemia (5%), weakness (6%), and paresthesia (3%). CONCLUSION: The 62% ORR achieved with weekly paclitaxel plus carboplatin is among the highest achieved with chemotherapy for ABC. This high response rate and the lack of cardiotoxicity suggest that the regimen should be considered as a nonanthracycline regimen for future adjuvant therapy.

Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting survival of advanced breast cancer patients in China.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e13064-e13064
Author(s):  
Shaoyan Lin ◽  
Hongnan Mo ◽  
Yiqun Li ◽  
Xiuwen Guan ◽  
Yimeng Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Advanced Breast Cancer ◽  
Multivariate Analyses ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Local Therapy ◽  
Advanced Breast ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Ecog Performance Status

e13064 Background: The prognosis of patients with advanced breast cancer (ABC) varied according to different prognostic factors. This study aimed to establish a nomogram to predict the overall survival (OS) of ABC patients in China. Methods: Data from the China National Cancer Center database that recorded 4039 patients diagnosed with breast cancer between 1987 and 2019 were extracted and a total of 2263 ABC patients with complete relevant information were included in this study, which were further randomized 3:1 and divided into training ( n = 1706) and validation ( n = 557) cohorts. The nomogram was built based on independent predictors identified by univariate and multivariate analyses. Harrell′s concordance index (C-index) and calibration plots were used to assessed the discriminatory and predictive capacities of the nomogram. Results: With a median OS of 45.4 months, the 2-year and 3-year OS rates of ABC patients were 75.2% and 60.2%, respectively. Univariate and multivariate analyses found that age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, T-stage, N-stage, tumor subtype, the presence of distant lymph node (DLN)/liver/brain metastasis, local therapy, efficacy of first-line therapy and metastatic-free interval (MFI) were significantly associated with OS (all P < 0.05). These variables were incorporated into a nomogram to predict the 2-year and 3-year OS of ABC patients. The C-indexes of the nomogram were 0.700 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.683-0.717) and 0.686 (95% CI: 0.652-0.719) for the training and the validation sets, respectively. The calibration curves revealed satisfactory agreement between actual survival and nomogram prediction in both the internal and external validations. The nomogram was able to stratify patients into different risk groups. Conclusions: We developed and validated a nomogram that might serve as an efficient tool to provide individual prediction for ABC patients and guide the physicians to make personalized treatment decisions for individual ABC patients.

A prospective randomized phase III trial comparing combination chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, fluorouracil, and either doxorubicin or epirubicin. French Epirubicin Study Group.

1988 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 679-688 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Advanced Breast Cancer ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Menopausal Status ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Advanced Breast ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Recurrence Time ◽  
Treatment Regimens

Two hundred sixty-three patients with advanced breast cancer were randomized to two treatment regimens consisting of fluorouracil, 500 mg/m2; cyclophosphamide, 500 mg/m2; and either epirubicin (Farmorubicin, Farmitalia Carlo Erba SpA, Italy), 50 mg/m2 (FEC); or doxorubicin (Adriamycin, Adria Laboratories, Columbus, OH), 50 mg/m2 (FAC), administered intravenously (IV) every 3 weeks. Two hundred thirty patients (FAC, 113; FEC, 117) were evaluable for response, and 244 patients for toxicity (FAC, 120; FEC, 124). The two groups were comparable with respect to age, menopausal status, disease-free interval to first recurrence, time from initial diagnosis to protocol activation, indicator lesions, performance status, and prior adjuvant therapy. Of 117 evaluable patients treated with FEC, 59 (50.4%) had a partial response (PR) or complete response (CR), 40 showed no change (NC), and 18 had progressive disease. Of 113 evaluable patients treated with FAC, 54 (52%) showed a remission, 30 NC, and 18 progression. There was no statistical difference between the two regimens in overall response rate, response rate according to tumor site, time to response, or duration of response. Median survival was 15 months for FEC and 18.2 months for FAC (not significant). In the 120 patients evaluable for toxicity treated with FAC, three episodes of congestive heart failure (CHF) were observed after 225, 350, and 550 mg/m2 of doxorubicin, respectively. Of the 124 evaluable patients treated with FEC, 25 received greater than 600 mg/m2 of epirubicin and no CHF was recorded. FEC induced significantly less neutropenia (P = .01), less nausea and vomiting (P less than .01), and less complete alopecia (P less than 10(-3) than did FAC. The results of this study demonstrate that FEC is as effective a regimen as FAC for the therapy of advanced breast cancer. Moreover, FEC was better tolerated than FAC in this patient population.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document