Evaluating the impact of early versus late inpatient palliative care consultation for cancer patients.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6638-6638
Author(s):  
Brian Cassel ◽  
Patrick J. Coyne ◽  
Nevena Skoro ◽  
Kathleen Kerr ◽  
Egidio Del Fabbro
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Palliative Care Team ◽  
Care Team ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Palliative Care Consultation ◽  
Social Security Death Index ◽  
Hospital Deaths ◽  
Care Consultation ◽  
The Impact

6638 Background: Access to specialist palliative care (hospital-based or hospice) is a recognized measure of quality in cancer care. Most cancer centers do have palliative care consult services, although the availability of a comprehensive program that includes a palliative care unit and outpatient clinic (Hui 2010) is inconsistent. A simultaneous integrated model of palliative care that facilitates earlier access to a specialized palliative care team may improve clinical outcomes. Palliative care programs should measure the access, timing and impact of their clinical service. Methods: Hospital claims data were linked to Social Security Death Index (SSDI) data from the US Department of Commerce. 3,128 adult cancer patients died between January 2009 and July 2011 and had contact with our inpatient palliative care team in their last six months of life. We determined whether IPC earlier than 1 month prior to death had an impact on hospitalizations, in-hospital mortality and referral to hospice. Results: 27.5% of cancer decedents accessed IPC, median of 22 days before death. 13.2% were discharged to hospice, median of 13 days before death. Patients with IPC earlier than 1 month until death were more likely to have hospice and fewer in-hospital deaths but there was no association between early IPC and a 30-day mortality admission. Conclusions: Palliative care services are accessed by a minority of patients and typically in the last 2-3 weeks of life. Although in-hospital deaths were reduced by earlier palliative care consultation, 30 day mortality did not improve. Hospitals may need to implement other strategies including early integration of outpatient palliative care among cancer patients, to achieve an impact on 30-day mortality admissions. [Table: see text]

Palliative Care for Inmates in the Hospital Setting

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 321-325 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie L. Stephens ◽  
J. Brian Cassel ◽  
Danielle Noreika ◽  
Egidio Del Fabbro
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Hospital Setting ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Palliative Care Team ◽  
Care Team ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Palliative Care Consultation ◽  
Large Tertiary Care ◽  
Care Consultation

The US population of inmates continues to increase along with a rapid escalation in the number of elderly prisoners. Previous studies have demonstrated multiple barriers to providing palliative care for seriously ill inmates. The aim of this study was to assess the frequency of palliative care consultation and nature of consultation requests for inmates who died while hospitalized at a large tertiary care hospital. A retrospective chart review of all inmate decedents over a 10-year time period was conducted. The reason and timing of consultation was noted in addition to symptoms identified and interventions recommended by the palliative care team. Characteristics of patients who were transferred to the inpatient palliative care unit were also recorded. Forty-five percent of inmates were seen by palliative care prior to their death. Timing of consultation was close to the day of death. Inmates with cancer were significantly more likely to have a palliative care consultation prior to death. The most frequent intervention recommended was opiates for pain or dyspnea. Delirium was often missed by the primary team but was identified by the palliative care team. Nearly, 5000 prisoners die each year, mostly in community hospitals. These patients exhibit similar symptoms to free-living patients. Given that the inmate population has a higher rate of comorbid conditions, there is a need for more research to identify areas of need for incarcerated patients and where palliative care can best serve these individuals.

Cost Savings Associated With Palliative Care Among Older Adults With Advanced Cancer

2021 ◽  
pp. 104990912098680
Author(s):  
Paige E. Sheridan ◽  
Wendi G. LeBrett ◽  
Daniel P. Triplett ◽  
Eric J. Roeland ◽  
Andrew R. Bruggeman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Healthcare Costs ◽  
Healthcare Expenditure ◽  
Advanced Cancer Patients ◽  
Palliative Care Consultation ◽  
Care Consultation ◽  
The Impact

Background: There is inconsistent evidence that palliative care intervention decreases total healthcare expenditure at end-of-life for oncology patients. This inconsistent evidence may result from small sample sizes at single institution studies and disparate characterization of costs across studies. Comprehensive studies in population-based datasets are needed to fully understand the impact of palliative care on total healthcare costs. This study analyzed the impact of palliative care on total healthcare costs in a nationally representative sample of advanced cancer patients. Methods: We conducted a matched cohort study among Medicare patients with metastatic lung, colorectal, breast and prostate cancers. We matched patients who received a palliative care consultation to similar patients who did not receive a palliative care consultation on factors related to both the receipt of palliative care and end of life costs. We compared direct costs between matched patients to determine the per-patient economic impact of a palliative care consultation. Results: Patients who received a palliative care consultation experienced an average per patient cost of $5,834 compared to $7,784 for usual care patients (25% decrease; p < 0.0001). Palliative care consultation within 7 days of death decreased healthcare costs by $451, while palliative care consultation more than 4 weeks from death decreased costs by $4,643. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that palliative care has the capacity to substantially reduce healthcare expenditure among advanced cancer patients. Earlier palliative care consultation results in greater cost reductions than consultation in the last week of life.

scholarly journals Palliative Care for Patients on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for COVID-19 Infection

2021 ◽  
pp. 104990912110010
Author(s):  
Anirudh Rao ◽  
Akram M. Zaaqoq ◽  
In Guk Kang ◽  
Erin M. Vaughan ◽  
Jose Flores ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Palliative Care Team ◽  
Care Team ◽  
Morbidity And Mortality ◽  
High Morbidity ◽  
Palliative Care Consultation ◽  
Care Consultation

Background: Critically ill patients with COVID-19 infection on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) face high morbidity and mortality. Palliative care consultation may benefit these patients and their families. Prior to the pandemic, our institution implemented a policy of automatic palliative care consultation for all patients on ECMO due to the high mortality, medical complexity, and psychosocial distress associated with these cases. Objectives: The main objective was to describe the role of the palliative care team for patients on ECMO for COVID-19 infection. The secondary objective was to describe the clinical outcomes for this cohort. Design: Case series. Settings/Subjects: All patients age 18 or older infected by the novel coronavirus who required cannulation on ECMO from March through July of 2020, at an urban, academic medical center in the United States. Inter-disciplinary palliative care consultation occurred for all patients. Results: Twenty-three patients (median age 43 years [range 28-64], mean body mass index 34.9 kg/m2 [SD 9.2], 65% Hispanic ethnicity) were cannulated on ECMO. Eleven patients died during the hospitalization (48%). Patients older than 50 years of age demonstrated a trend toward increased odds of death compared to those younger than 50 years of age (OR 9.1, P = 0.07). Patients received an average of 6.8 (SD 3.7) palliative clinical encounters across all disciplines. The actions provided by the palliative care team included psychosocial support and counseling, determination of surrogate decision maker (for 100% of patients), pain management (83%), and non-pain symptom management (83%). Conclusions: Here, we present one of the first studies describing the patient characteristics, outcomes, and palliative care actions for critically ill patients with COVID-19 on ECMO. Almost half of the patients in this cohort died during their hospitalization. Given the high morbidity and mortality of this condition, we recommend involvement of palliative care for patients/families with COVID-19 infection who are on ECMO. The impact of palliative care on patient and family outcomes, such as symptom control, satisfaction with communication, rates of anxiety, and grief experience merits further investigation.

Hospital based palliative care teams improve the insight of cancer patients into their disease

2004 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 46-52
Author(s):  
Barbara Jack ◽  
Valerie Hillier ◽  
Anne Williams ◽  
Jackie Oldham
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Symptom Control ◽  
Palliative Care Team ◽  
Care Team ◽  
Care Assessment ◽  
Palliative Care Teams ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Doctors And Nurses

It is reported that cancer patients want as much information as possible about their diagnosis and prognosis. This input regarding patients' insight into their disease is undoubtedly a major part of providing optimal palliative care. Despite this, there is little information regarding the impact of hospital based palliative care teams. An evaluation study comprising a nonequivalent control group design, using a quota sample, investigated 100 cancer patients who had been admitted to hospital for symptom control. Fifty patients received hospital palliative care team intervention compared with 50 patients receiving traditional care. Outcome was assessed using the Palliative Care Assessment tool (PACA) assessment tool on three occasions that measured the patients self-reported understanding of their illness. A supplementary qualitative approach that included 31 semistructured interviews with doctors and nurses to explore their perception of the impact of the palliative care team was also undertaken. The results indicated that cancer patients admitted to hospital for symptom control demonstrated an improvement in their insight to their diagnosis. Those patients who had the additional input of the palliative care team had a significantly greater improvement in their insight scores (reported by the doctors and nurses as being invaluable for the patients). Potential explanations are made for these results including enhanced communication skills of the palliative care team are explored.

scholarly journals Economic impact of palliative care among elderly cancer patients.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (31_suppl) ◽  
pp. 91-91
Author(s):  
Wendi G. Lebrett ◽  
Eric Roeland ◽  
Andrew Bruggeman ◽  
Heidi Yeung ◽  
James Don Murphy
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Economic Impact ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Healthcare Costs ◽  
Advanced Cancer Patients ◽  
Care Intervention ◽  
Palliative Care Consultation ◽  
Care Consultation ◽  
The Impact

91 Background: Randomized trials among advanced cancer patients demonstrate that early palliative care integration into usual oncology care reduces symptom burden, improves quality of life and caregiver outcomes, and may improve survival. The impact of palliative care on health economics remains poorly defined and reported cost savings are an unintentional consequence of providing care aligned with patient goals. This study determined the impact of palliative care on healthcare costs among elderly patients with advanced cancer. Methods: We conducted a matched case-control study among Medicare beneficiaries with metastatic lung, colorectal, breast and prostate cancers. We matched patients who received a palliative care consultation to similar patients who did not receive a palliative care consultation. To determine the economic impact of a palliative care consultation we compared costs between cases and controls before and after the palliative care intervention. Costs included inpatient, outpatient, home health care, hospice, and medical equipment, and were adjusted to 2011 dollars. Results: Among the 2,576 patients in this study the total healthcare costs per patient in the 30 days before palliative care consultation was balanced between palliative care ($12,881) and non-palliative care control patients ($12,335). Palliative care intervention reduced total healthcare costs after the intervention. The total cost of care per patient in the 120 days after palliative care exposure was $6,880 compared to $9,604 for controls (28% decrease; p < 0.001). The economic effect of palliative care depended on timing of the consult. Palliative care consultation within 7 days of death decreased healthcare costs by $975, whereas palliative care consultation more than 4 weeks from death decreased costs by $5,362. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that palliative care has the capacity to substantially reduce healthcare expenditures among advanced cancer patients. Furthermore, the cost reduction depends on timing of the palliative care consult.

scholarly journals Perceptions of Specialty Palliative Care and Its Role in Pediatric Stem Cell Transplant: A Multi-Disciplinary Qualitative Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Griffin Collins ◽  
Hannah Beaman ◽  
Alvin Ho ◽  
Michelle Hermiston ◽  
Harvey Cohen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Palliative Care Team ◽  
Care Team ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Team Members ◽  
Care Integration ◽  
Palliative Care Consultation ◽  
Care Consultation

Background Consultation of specialty palliative care remains uncommon in pediatric stem cell transplant (SCT) despite growing evidence that early integration of palliative care improves outcomes in patients with advanced cancers or undergoing SCT. Little is known about how multidisciplinary pediatric SCT teams perceive palliative care and its role in SCT. Procedure We conducted semi-structured interviews of members of a multi-disciplinary SCT team to understand their perceptions of palliative care, how specialty palliative care is integrated into SCT, and to identify barriers to increased integration. Eligible participants included physicians, nurses, nurse practitioners, social workers, and child life specialists. Data was analyzed using thematic analysis. Results Four major themes were identified. First, SCT team members held a favorable perception of the palliative care team. Second, participants desired increased palliative care integration in SCT. Third, participants believed that the palliative care team had insufficient resources to care for the large number of SCT patients which led to the SCT team limiting palliative care consultation. And, finally, the lack of a standardized palliative care consultation process prevented greater integration of palliative care in SCT. Conclusions SCT team members held a favorable perception of palliative care and saw a role for greater palliative care integration throughout the SCT course. We identified modifiable barriers to greater palliative care integration. SCT teams who desire greater palliative care integration may adapt and implement an existing model of palliative care integration in order to improve standardization and increase integration of specialty palliative care in SCT.

The Impact of an Outpatient Palliative Care Consultation on Symptom Burden in Advanced Prostate Cancer Patients

2012 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 20-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sriram Yennurajalingam ◽  
Bradley Atkinson ◽  
Jessica Masterson ◽  
David Hui ◽  
Diana Urbauer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Advanced Prostate Cancer ◽  
Symptom Burden ◽  
Palliative Care Consultation ◽  
Care Consultation ◽  
The Impact

Early Palliative Care Consultation in the Burn Unit: A Quality Improvement Initiative to Increase Utilization

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather Carmichael ◽  
Hareklia Brackett ◽  
Maurice C Scott ◽  
Margaret M Dines ◽  
Sarah E Mather ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Small Sample ◽  
Quality Improvement Initiative ◽  
Comfort Care ◽  
Early Palliative Care ◽  
Palliative Care Consultation ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Care Consultation ◽  
Patient Values ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Despite significant morbidity and mortality for major burns, palliative care consultation (PCC) is underutilized in this population. The purpose of this study is to examine the impact of a protocol using recommended “triggers” for PCC at a single academic burn center. This is a retrospective review of patient deaths over a four-year period. Use of life-sustaining treatments, comfort care (de-escalation of one or more life-sustaining treatments) and do not attempt resuscitation (DNAR) orders were determined. Use of PCC was compared during periods before and after a protocol establishing recommended triggers for early (&lt;72 hrs of admission) PCC was instituted in 2019. A total of 33 patient deaths were reviewed. Most patients were male (n=28, 85%) and median age was 62 years [IQR 42-72]. Median revised Baux score was 112 [IQR 81-133]. Many patients had life-sustaining interventions such as intubation, dialysis, or cardiopulmonary resuscitation, often prior to admission. Amongst patients who survived &gt;24 hrs, 67% (n=14/21) had PCC. Frequency of PCC increased after protocol development, with 100% vs. 36% of these patients having PCC before death (p=0.004). However, even during the later period, less than half of patients had early PCC despite meeting criteria at admission. In conclusion, initiation of life-sustaining measures in severely injured burn patients occurs prior to or early during hospitalization. Thus, value-based early goals of care discussions are valuable to prevent interventions that do not align with patient values and assist with de-escalation of life-sustaining treatment. In this small sample, we found that while there was increasing use of PCC overall after developing a protocol of recommended triggers for consultation, many patients who met criteria at admission did not receive early PCC. Further research is needed to elucidate reasons why providers may be resistant to PCC.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document