Screening in the high-risk populations: Stage of breast cancer when detected by combination imaging with MRI and mammogram.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (26_suppl) ◽  
pp. 44-44
Author(s):  
Kendall W. Carpenter ◽  
Mindy L. Merritt ◽  
Matthew Gromet ◽  
Karinn Marie Chambers ◽  
Terry Sarantou ◽  
...  

44 Background: Screening patients at high-risk for the development of breast cancer consists of MRI and mammography. This retrospective review of screening MRIs in patients designated as high-risk for the development of breast cancer--based on family history alone or a calculated lifetime risk of ≥ 20%--seeks to determine the utility of MRI screening in the detection of early-stage breast cancer. The primary outcome evaluated was stage of malignancy detected through screening imaging.  Methods: Results of screening imaging performed between 1/1/08 and 12/31/11 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients who had a personal history of breast cancer were excluded. Remaining screens were categorized based on the following criteria: family history, BRCA mutation or high-risk as calculated by risk assessment tools. Screens with corresponding core biopsies were evaluated for the following: previous imaging obtained, core biopsy pathology and pathologic staging. Results: 118 patients met inclusion criteria and had a subsequent biopsy as a result of screening. Resultant pathology was 75 (64%; 75/118) benign lesions, 19 (16%; 19/118) atypical lesions, and 24 (20%; 24/118) malignant lesions. Of the 24 malignant lesions, 1 (4%; 1/24) were found to be node-positive at the time of surgical staging, and, 23 (96%; 23/24) were node-negative. Conclusions: Four percent (1/24) of patients undergoing high-risk screening had nodal disease at surgical staging, which compares favorably to historical rates of approximately 30% node-positive disease at diagnosis (Krag DN et al., NSABP B-32). Therefore, this study shows that screening high-risk patients can decrease the nodal-positivity rate.

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (9) ◽  
pp. 1388-1393 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather L. McArthur ◽  
Karen A. Gelmon ◽  
Ivo A. Olivotto ◽  
Caroline H. Speers ◽  
Susan L. Ellard ◽  
...  

Purpose After National Cancer Institute of Canada trial MA.17 demonstrated benefits with letrozole after 5 years of tamoxifen, oncologists needed to identify and offer therapy to patients in community follow-up who were eligible for extended adjuvant hormone therapy. In British Columbia (BC), letters about extended letrozole therapy were sent to eligible BC women, their primary care physicians (PCPs), and their oncologists. We evaluated the effectiveness of this communication strategy. Patients and Methods Eight hundred eighty-five women with stage I-III breast cancer who completed 4 to 6 years of tamoxifen in 2004 with no documented recurrence were sent letters describing extended adjuvant letrozole in February 2005. Treatment uptake and characteristics for women who did or did not receive a subsequent letrozole prescription were described. Results Among 838 eligible women, 305 (36%) received a letrozole prescription before April 2006. More women in the letrozole cohort had tumors larger than 2.0 cm (44.2% v 30.8%); node-positive disease (52.5% v 22.5%); prior radiotherapy (71.1% v 58.5%); and prior chemotherapy (51.5% v 20.8%; all P ≤ .001). Among women younger than 70 years with node-positive disease, 65% received letrozole (122 of 188). Most prescribing physicians were oncologists (57.0%) or PCPs (30.8%). A significant increase in letrozole prescriptions was observed after the letter mail-out. Conclusion In this population-based setting, extended adjuvant letrozole was more common among younger women with higher risk disease and more prior therapy but underutilized overall. The reasons for extended therapy underutilization and the role of the letter mail-out strategy in informing breast cancer survivors of new available treatments in other health systems warrant further study.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maroun Bou Zerdan ◽  
Maryam Ibrahim ◽  
Clara El Nakib ◽  
Rayan Hajjar ◽  
Hazem I. Assi

In recent years, developments in breast cancer have allowed yet another realization of individualized medicine in the field of oncology. One of these advances is genomic assays, which are considered elements of standard clinical practice in the management of breast cancer. These assays are widely used today not only to measure recurrence risk in breast cancer patients at an early stage but also to tailor treatment as well and minimize avoidable treatment side effects. At present, genomic tests are applied extensively in node negative disease. In this article, we review the use of these tests in node positive disease, explore their ramifications on neoadjuvant chemotherapy decisions, highlight sufficiently powered recent studies emphasizing their use and review the most recent guidelines.


Author(s):  
Ericson Stoen ◽  
Jodi Kagihara ◽  
Elena Shagisultanova ◽  
Christine M. Fisher ◽  
Andrew Nicklawsky ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose Adjuvant pertuzumab and neratinib are independently FDA-approved for treatment of early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer in combination with or following trastuzumab for one year, respectively. Both agents reduce the risk of recurrence; however, the absolute benefit is modest for many patients with added risk of adverse effects. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical use of adjuvant pertuzumab and neratinib in patients with early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer. Methods Patients diagnosed with stage I–III HER2-positive breast cancer treated with trastuzumab at four University of Colorado Health hospitals between July 2016 and April 2019 were identified. Patient demographics, cancer stage, treatment, and administration of pertuzumab and/or neratinib were obtained. Results We identified a total of 350 patients who received adjuvant trastuzumab for stage I–III HER2-positive breast cancer; 253 (73.1%) had tumors that were ≥ T2 or node-positive disease. The rate of adjuvant pertuzumab use increased following FDA approval; pertuzumab was administered to the majority of patients with node-positive HER2-positive breast cancer. The use of adjuvant pertuzumab was associated with younger age, premenopausal status, and node-positive disease. Rates of administration of adjuvant neratinib were lower, with only 15.2% of patients receiving this therapy within 3 months of completing adjuvant trastuzumab. Conclusion In our cohort of patients treated within a diverse healthcare network, the majority of patients with node-positive HER2-positive breast cancer received adjuvant pertuzumab following FDA approval. The use of adjuvant neratinib was less common, potentially as a result of adverse effects, prolongation of therapy, previous administration of adjuvant pertuzumab, and modest benefit.


Author(s):  
T. Bachelot ◽  
F. Dalenc ◽  
S. Chabaud ◽  
P. Cottu ◽  
D. Allouache ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS596-TPS596
Author(s):  
Sara M. Tolaney ◽  
Lesley Fallowfield ◽  
Peter A. Kaufman ◽  
Eva M. Ciruelos ◽  
Mary Corona Gainford ◽  
...  

TPS596 Background: Hormone receptor positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer (BC) with high-risk characteristics has a high risk of disease recurrence. Novel therapeutic options for this population are urgently needed. Abemaciclib is an oral, selective, and potent CDK4 & 6 inhibitor administered on a continuous schedule which is approved for HR+, HER2- advanced BC (ABC) as monotherapy and in combination with endocrine therapy (ET). Abemaciclib combined with ET demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) in participants (pt) with HR+, HER2-, node-positive, high risk early breast cancer (EBC) and also clinical activity in HR+, HER2+ ABC. The eMonarcHER trial investigates whether abemaciclib plus ET will improve IDFS in pts with HR+, HER2+, node-positive, high risk EBC. Methods: eMonarcHER is a phase 3 global, randomized, double-blinded, placebo (PB)-controlled trial in participants with HR+, HER2+, node-positive, high risk EBC who have completed adjuvant HER2-targeted therapy (tx). Eligible participants are randomized 1:1 to receive either abemaciclib 150 mg twice daily or PB, plus standard ET. Study intervention period will be ≤26 cycles (approximately 2 years) followed by ≤8 years of ET as medically indicated. Participants must have undergone definitive surgery of the primary breast tumor and have high-risk disease. High-risk disease is defined as (i) detection of residual axillary nodal disease at the time of definitive surgery in participants with prior neoadjuvant (neoadj) tx; or (ii) in patients not receiving neoadj tx, must have either ≥4 pathologically positive axillary lymph nodes (pALNs), or 1-3 pathological pALNs and either: histologic Grade 2-3 and/or primary invasive tumor size ≥5 cm. Participants must have received either adjuvant pertuzumab plus trastuzumab with chemotherapy or adjuvant T-DM1. Stratification factors include treatment with neoadj tx, menopausal status, and region. The study is powered at approximately 80% to detect the superiority of abemaciclib plus ET over PB plus ET in terms of IDFS (as defined by the STEEP system) at a 1-sided α =.025 using a log-rank test. Assuming a hazard ratio of 0.73, this requires approximately 324 events at final IDFS analysis. Key secondary objectives include overall survival, distant relapse free survival, safety, pharmacokinetics, and patient-reported outcomes. The study is planned to start in March 2021. Approximately 525 centers in 23 countries plan to enroll ̃2450 participants. Clinical trial information: NCT04752332.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yaqian Xu ◽  
Yanping Lin ◽  
Yifan Wu ◽  
Yaohui Wang ◽  
Liheng Zhou ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Homologous recombination repair gene mutations are associated with increased platinum-based chemosensitivity, whereas few studies have reported the predictive value of family history of cancer for breast cancer in the neoadjuvant setting. This study aimed to construct a brief and effective novel family history scoring system and explore its association with pathological complete response (pCR), survival outcomes, and safety for locally advanced breast cancer receiving platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy.Methods: A total of 262 patients treated with neoadjuvant cisplatin and paclitaxel were included. Neo-Family History Score (NeoFHS) was calculated according to cancer type, age at diagnosis, kinship, and number of affected relatives. Logistic regression was performed to analyze the association between pCR and NeoFHS. Survival rates were compared by Kaplan-Meier curves, examined by log-rank test and Cox proportional hazard regressions.Results: For all patients enrolled in this study, clinical tumor stage (p=0.048), estrogen receptor status (p=0.001), progesterone receptor status (p=0.036), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status (p=0.013), and molecular subtype (p=0.016) were significantly related to NeoFHS. The multivariate logistic regression revealed that NeoFHS is an independent predictive factor of pCR (OR=2.262, 95% CI 1.159-4.414, p=0.017), especially in node-positive (OR=3.088, 95% CI 1.498-6.367, p=0.002), hormone receptor-positive (OR=2.645, 95% CI 1.164-6.010, p=0.020), and HER2-negative subgroups (OR=4.786, 95% CI 1.550-14.775, p=0.006). Kaplan-Meier estimates suggested that NeoFHS could serve as an independent prognostic factor for relapse-free survival in the whole group (adjusted HR=0.305, 95% CI 0.102-0.910, p=0.033) and node-positive subgroup (adjusted HR=0.317, 95% CI 0.103-0.973, p=0.045). Furthermore, alopecia (p=0.001), nausea (p=0.001), peripheral neuropathy (p=0.018), diarrhea (p=0.026), constipation (p=0.037) of any grade and leukopenia of grade 3 or greater (p=0.005) were more common in patients with higher NeoFHS.Conclusions: Our study revealed that NeoFHS is a practical and effective biomarker for predicting not only pCR and survival outcomes but also chemotherapy-induced AEs for neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy for breast cancer. It may help screen candidate responders and guide safety managements in the future.


2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 412-417 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Evron ◽  
A.M. Ben-David ◽  
H. Goldberg ◽  
G. Fried ◽  
B. Kaufman ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document