Corrigendum to ‘VP1-2021: Efficacy of everolimus in patients with HR+/HER2- high risk early stage breast cancer’

594 Background: Breast Cancer Index (BCI) is a continuous risk index based on the combination of HOXB13:IL17BR (H:I) and the Molecular Grade Index (MGI) that estimates the individual risk of recurrence in ER+, LN- breast cancer patients. In the current study, a modified BCI model was developed using untreated breast cancer patients in order to evaluate its pure prognostic value, and to better optimize BCI for both early and late risk assessment. Methods: A model was built by linearly combining H:I and MGI weighted by their corresponding Cox regression coefficients using ER+ LN- patients from the untreated arm of the prospective Stockholm trial (N=283). Validation was performed in 2 independent ER+, LN- cohorts: the TAM arm of the Stockholm trial (N=317), and a multisite cohort of TAM-treated patients (N=358). Correlation of BCI with distant metastasis was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier analysis using the log rank test, and multivariate analysis adjusting for standard prognostic factors was performed using Cox proportional hazards. Results: The BCI linear model was significantly associated with risk of cumulative (0-10y), early (<5y) and late (≥5y) distant metastasis. Based on pre-specified cutpoints, BCI classified 64% and 55% patients as low-, 21% and 22% as intermediate-, and 16% and 23% as high-risk, with 10-y rates of distant recurrence (95% CI) of 4.8% (1.7-7.8%) and 6.6% (2.9–10.0%), 11.7% (3.1–19.5%) and 23.3% (12.3-33.0%), 21.1% (18.5–32.0%) and 35.8% (24.5–45.5%), in the Stockholm TAM and multisite cohort, respectively. Conclusions: BCI demonstrated significant prognostic performance beyond clinicopathological factors to predict cumulative, early and late risk of recurrence in early stage breast cancer patients. Use of BCI at diagnosis should enable clinicians to identify patients who are at high risk of late recurrence and may benefit from an additional 5y of hormonal therapy. [Table: see text]

Download Full-text

A randomised phase III trial comparing two dose-dense, dose-intensified approaches (EPC and PM(Cb)) for neoadjuvant treatment of patients with high-risk early breast cancer (GeparOcto).

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2017.35.15_suppl.518 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. 518-518 ◽

Cited By ~ 7

Author(s):

Andreas Schneeweiss ◽

Volker Moebus ◽

Hans Tesch ◽

Claus Hanusch ◽

Carsten Denkert ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

High Risk ◽

Early Stage ◽

Pathologic Complete Response ◽

Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽

Complete Response ◽

Primary Objective ◽

Early Stage Breast Cancer ◽

Phase Iii ◽

Luminal B

518 Background: The sequential use of intense does-dense (idd) epirubicin, paclitaxel, cyclophosphamide (EPC) and weekly paclitaxel/liposomal doxorubicin (+/- carboplatin (Cb) in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) (PM(Cb)) are considered highly efficient regimens for high-risk early stage breast cancer (BC). Methods: GeparOcto (NCT02125344) patients (pts) received 18 weeks (wks) either EPC (3x E 150mg/m² q2w followed by 3x P225 mg/m² q2w followed by 3x C 2000mg/m² q2) or PM(Cb) (12x P 80mg/m² plus M 20 mg/m² q1w, plus Cb AUC 1.5 q1w in TNBC). For HER2+ BC trastuzumab 6 (8) mg/kg q3w and pertuzumab 420 (840) mg q3w cycles were given concomitantly with P and C. Pts with histologically confirmed, cT1c - cT4a-d BC and central receptor assessment were included. Pts with HER2+ or TNBC were eligible irrespective of nodal status, luminal B-like tumours only if pN+. Primary objective compared pathologic complete response (pCR) rates (ypT0/is ypN0). Sample size calculations assumed a pCR rate of 50% for EPC and 60% for PM(Cb), requiring 950 pts to show superiority of PM(Cb). Secondary objectives compared pCR rates within the stratified subgroups (BC subtype, HER2+ vs HER2- HR+ vs HER2- HR-), amongst others. Results: 961 pts were recruited between 12/2014 and 05/2016, 945 started treatment. Median age was 48 years, 4% T3, 2% T4d, 46% N+, 82% ductal invasive, 66% G3 tumors; 40% were HER2+, 43% TNBC. 347 pts reported SAEs (176 EPC/171 PM(Cb)) and 2 pts died. 35 pneumonias (2 EPC vs 33 PM(Cb)) and 18 pneumonitis (3 EPC vs 15 PM(Cb)) were reported. 16.4% pts with EPC and 33.8% with PM(Cb) discontinued treatment (p<0.001), mainly due to AEs (47 EPC vs 113 PM(Cb)). Mean treatment duration was 17 wks with EPC and 16 wks with PM(Cb). pCR rate was 48.3% with EPC and 47.6% with PM(Cb)(OR 0.97 (95%CI 0.75-1.25), p=0.876). pCR rate in TNBC was 48.5% with EPC and 51.7% with PM(Cb); in HER2+ 62.0% vs 57.4% and in Luminal B 14.1% vs 14.6%. Conclusions: In high-risk early stage breast cancer pts pCR rates of idd EPC compared to weekly PM(Cb) were not significantly different. PM(Cb) appeared to be less feasible. Clinical trial information: NCT02125344.

Download Full-text