Outcomes of pediatric cancer patients enrolled in phase 1 clinical trials designed for adults: Experience from a major cancer center.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e21024-e21024
Author(s):  
Vivek Subbiah ◽  
Fernando F. Corrales-Medina ◽  
Cynthia E. Herzog ◽  
Kenneth R. Hess ◽  
Daniela Elizabeth Egas Bejar ◽  
...  
2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16533-e16533
Author(s):  
Dana Lee ◽  
Ju-Hsien Chao ◽  
Sandy Stevens ◽  
Goetz H. Kloecker

e16533 Background: Accrual to clinical trials among adult cancer patients is persistently low. Patient preference plays an important role in enrollment. To identify the reasons why patients decline study participation, it is important, to evaluate the perceptions of newly diagnosed oncology patients about clinical trials. Methods: Patients were given a ten-question survey reflective of their attitudes regarding clinical trials as a treatment option at their initial visit. The self-directed questionnaire was scored on an ordinate scale from strongly agree (1) to strongly disagree (5). Results: Ninety-two new patients were surveyed in the cancer - specific multispecialty clinics in an academic cancer center. The patients expected information relating to eligible clinical trials and privacy protection by university sponsored studies as they strongly concurred with “I expect my doctor to inform me about clinical trials that I am eligible for” (mean score 2.15, p=0.001) followed by “all possible measures to protect my privacy are likely to be taken in a clinical trial that is sponsored by a university” (2.36, p=0.36). The strongest disagreement was “If enrolled in a clinical trial, I am comfortable being assigned by a method such as ‘flipping a coin’ or ‘throwing a dice’” (3.73, p=0.001) and “I would be willing to participate in a clinical trial as a first line treatment option” (3.50, p=0.001). Industry sponsored trials, phase 1 trials, second line treatment trials, privacy concerns and investigator initiated trials and time commitment and altruistic reasons did not significantly deviate from the mean preference (2.5) by a one sample T-test analysis. Conclusions: Patients consider the option of clinical trials as important in their treatment, and expect to be informed by their oncologist about clinical trials. Newly diagnosed cancer patients perceive randomization and first line trials negatively. Since randomized data provides new standards for care and hope for improved treatment, patients and their families must be educated about their importance.


2014 ◽  
Vol 62 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephan D. Voss ◽  
Julia Glade-Bender ◽  
Sheri L. Spunt ◽  
Steven G. DuBois ◽  
Brigitte C. Widemann ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sungmin Woo ◽  
Abdallah Araji ◽  
Mohammad Ali El Amine ◽  
Natalie Gangai ◽  
Elizabeth Acquafredda ◽  
...  

Abstract Background To assess the spectrum and frequency of modalities used for emergency room (ER) imaging and their findings in pediatric cancer patients and assess their relationship with survival. Methods Consecutive pediatric cancer patients that underwent imaging during an ER visit at our tertiary cancer center over a 5-year period were retrospectively analyzed. Imaging findings were considered positive when they were relevant to the ER presenting complaint. Imaging positivity was correlated with inpatient admission. Overall survival (OS) was assessed with Kaplan-Meier curves and uni- and multi-variate Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify significant factors associated with OS. Results Two hundred sixty-one patients (135 males and 126 females; median age 11 years [interquartile range 5–16 years] with 348 visits and a total of 406 imaging studies were included. Common chief complaints were related to the chest (100 [28.7 %]) and fever (99 [28.4 %]). ER imaging was positive in 207 visits (59.5 %), commonly revealing increased metastases (50 [14.4 %]), pneumonia (47 [13.5 %]), and other lung problems (12 [2.9 %]). Positive ER imaging was associated with inpatient admission (69.3 % [133/192] vs. 40.4 % [63/156], p < 0.01). Multivariate survival analysis showed that positive ER imaging (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.35 [95% CI 1.44–3.83, p < 0.01), admission (HR = 1.86 [95% CI 1.17–3.00], p < 0.01), number of ER visits (HR = 3.08 [95% CI 1.62–5.83], p < 0.01 for ≥ 3 visits) were associated with poorer survival. Conclusions Imaging was able to delineate the cause for ER visits in children with cancer in over half of the cases. Positive ER imaging was associated with admission and worse survival.


Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 24-25
Author(s):  
Fatemah Al-Haddad ◽  
Abdullah Ali ◽  
Danah Al-Sharrah ◽  
Suha Atyani ◽  
Hadeel Saleh ◽  
...  

Introduction: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has been a major challenge worldwide. Data reporting manifestations of COVID-19 in pediatric cancer patients are limited. This report describes the presentation and initial management challenges of a newly diagnosed child with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) with positive (+) SARS-CoV-2 complicated by multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C). Case Description: A previously healthy 9-year-old female had (+)SARS-CoV-2 following a 4-day history of fatigability. This was followed by a day of severe gastroenteritis (GE) necessitating a visit to Jaber Al-Ahamed Hospital (JAH), the designated COVID-19 pandemic center. Examination revealed hypovolemic shock, hepatosplenomegaly (HSM) and cervical lymphadenopathy. Patient also had significant pancytopenia and high inflammatory markers (Table).Bone marrow aspiration (BMA) - done 7 days from diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 - was consistent with B-ALL. Transfer to National Bank of Kuwait Children's Hospital (NBKCH) - the pediatric cancer center - was delayed for 11 days given her (+)SARS-CoV-2, but once tested negative, transfer was complete. Due to logistical issues, lumbar puncture and repeat BM were delayed. She then developed new fever, abdominal pain and vomiting. Her febrile neutropenia (FN) was managed according to local protocol including antifungal therapy for prolonged FN. Five days into her FN, she developed hematemesis and septic shock. In addition to pancytopenia, she also had disseminated intravascular coagulation with further raise in CRP (Table). She also had a new maculopapular rash (Image). Infectious work-up was negative except for (+)SARS-CoV-2 (after 10 days of negativity), fulfilling criteria of MIS-C. Patient was transferred back to JAH according to local pandemic protocol. Induction chemotherapy as perUK-MRC-ALL 2011 regimen Afor standard risk ALL - with modifications given her MIS-C - was started after 22 days (Figure). On day 5 of chemotherapy, patient was clinically stable with negative SARS-CoV-2, therefore transferred back to NBKCH for continuation of leukemia management. Discussion: Although children tend to have a milder course of COVID-19, this case described a fulminant presentation initially with GE, hypovolemic shock and complicated by MIS-C, lacking any respiratory symptoms throughout her course. Until more data reporting manifestations of SARS-CoV-2 in pediatric cancer patients are available, physicians should keep high index of suspicion for leukemia in presence of pancytopenia and HSM in spite of (+)SARS-CoV-2. Prompt diagnosis of ALL is fundamental to avoid delays in treatment and consequent effects on prognosis. Logistical issues such as lack of optimum COVID-19 isolation measures in our cancer center and paucity of blood products have led to delayed initiation of chemotherapy. These cancer-related challenges have been well described. Another interesting aspect of our case is the seroconversion to (+)SARS-CoV-2 after proved negativity. It is possible that protective antibodies were not well developed as she is immunocompromised, making such patients prone to recurrent SARS-CoV-2 infection. The re-emergence of SARS-CoV-2 has led to the diagnosis of MIS-C after fulfilling other criteria. This phenomenon of negative to (+)SARS-CoV-2 seroconversion has been reported in 20-40% of MIS-C cases. Increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) is linked to the hyperinflammatory state of COVID-19. Chemotherapy is also identified as an independent risk factor for VTE in malignancy. To avoid the collateral effects of these factors, modifications of the planned chemotherapy were implemented in our case to minimize the VTE risk. The high steroid dose with chemotherapy was also planned as a treatment for MIS-C, which is consistent with different modalities of MIS-C treatment offered in literature. Conclusion: Children with B-ALL may suffer from fulminant clinical course when diagnosed with COVID-19 and could be prone to recurrent SARS-CoV-2 infection. Our experience highlights the importance of optimizing isolation measures and raising awareness for need of blood products to avoid treatment delay. Further research can aid in forming recommendations to prevent management pitfalls especially with the anticipation of a second wave of this pandemic. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2015 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 602-608 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy P Cripe ◽  
Minhtran C Ngo ◽  
James I Geller ◽  
Chrystal U Louis ◽  
Mark A Currier ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fransisca M. Sidabutar ◽  
Anggie Regia Anandari ◽  
Ingrid Karli ◽  
Yusnita Katagori ◽  
Henny E. Wirawan

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margaret M. Mannix ◽  
Nicole Furnari ◽  
Adam Rudolph ◽  
Karen M. Moody

2001 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara O. Rothbaum ◽  
Larry F. Hodges ◽  
Jonathan Gershon ◽  
Michael Briones ◽  
Melissa Pickering

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document