Clinical activity of enzalutamide against metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in patients who have progressed on abiraterone acetate: The Princess Margaret experience.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 159-159 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francisco Emilio Vera-Badillo ◽  
Raya Leibowitz-Amit ◽  
Arnoud Templeton ◽  
Jo-An Seah ◽  
Srikala S. Sridhar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Response Rate ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Abiraterone Acetate ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Psa Response ◽  
Metastatic Sites

159 Background: In men with mCRPC enzalutamide and abiraterone acetate have been shown individually to prolong survival after progression on chemotherapy with docetaxel. Little is known about the sequential use of enzalutamide and abiraterone. A PSA response rate of 8% and progression free survival (PFS) of 2.7 months has been reported for 38 men who received abiraterone following enzalutamide [Loriot, Ann Onc, 2013]. Here we report our experience with enzalutamide following abiraterone. Methods: We reviewed all patients with mCRPC treated with enzalutamide following abiraterone and docetaxel at our institution. Primary outcomes were PSA response rate (confirmed decline ≥ 50%) and time to treatment failure (TTF, defined as the time from treatment initiation to treatment discontinuation for any reason, including disease progression, treatment toxicity, patient preference, or death.). Data were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Twenty-six patients were treated between August 2012 and July 2013. Median age was 72 years (range 56-88); 85% had ECOG performance status 0 or 1; metastatic sites included bone (N=25, 96%), lymph nodes (N=19, 73%) and visceral (N=1, 3.4%). Median number of prior cycles of docetaxel was 8 (range 1 – 12), 6 patients (29%) had previous exposure to ketoconazole, and median duration of previous abiraterone was 8.7 (range 1.4-22.7) months. Seven pts (27%) had a PSA response ≥ 50% and an additional 7 patients (27%) had a ≥ 30% PSA response. Median TTF on enzalutamide was 4.9 (95% CI 3.8-6.2) months. Reasons for discontinuation of enzalutamide were clinical and/or biochemical progression in 24 patients (92%), and toxicity (fatigue grade 3-4) in 3 patients (11.5%). An update of patient numbers and analysis will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions: Treatment of patients with mCRPC with enzalutamide after progression on docetaxel and abiraterone has modest clinical activity.

A phase Ib/II trial of indomethacin and enzalutamide to treat castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC).

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS394-TPS394 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chong-xian Pan ◽  
Primo Lara ◽  
Christopher P. Evans ◽  
Mamta Parikh ◽  
Ralph de Vere White ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Phase Ib ◽  
Androgen Synthesis ◽  
Psa Response

TPS394 Background: Enzalutamide (Enza) and abiraterone (Abi) are commonly used to treat CRPC. Resistance is the most common cause of treatment failure. We discovered that a critical steroidogenic enzyme AKR1C3 was significantly elevated and contributed to intratumoral androgen synthesis in Enza-resistant prostate cancer cells and tumors. Overexpression of AKR1C3 induced androgen receptor variant 7 (AR-V7) expression, while inhibition of AKR1C3 downregulated AR-V7. We then discovered that indomethacin (Indo) inhibited AKR1C3 activation and sensitized resistant CRPC cells to Enza and Abi. One patient accidentally took Indo and achieved biochemical as well as radiological response of his prostate cancer. These findings prompted us to design a clinical trial to test the combination of Indo with Enza for the treatment of CRPC and to study the underlying mechanisms of action and resistance. Methods: This investigator-initiated single-arm Phase Ib/II trial enrolls patients with progressive CRPC after Abi, adequate vital organ function, ECOG performance status 0-2, and serum testosterone < 50 ng/dl. Major exclusion criteria include prior Enza treatment, brain metastasis and history of seizure. In the Phase Ib cohort, patients receive Enza 160 mg po qd and Indo 50 mg po tid to determine toxicity. The Phase II expansion will enroll 26 patients with 21 evaluable patients. This sample size provides 90% power to detect, at the 0.05 level (1-sided), the difference between a PSA response rate of 50% expected with the study treatment and a historical control of 20% with Enza alone. Co-primary endpoints are safety and PSA response of ≥50% decrease. Secondary endpoints include overall response rate as determined by the Prostate Cancer Working Group 2 criteria (PCWG2), progression-free survival and overall survival. Molecular correlative studies are exploratory endpoints. Serum and intratumoral androgen levels, full-length AR, AR-V7 and AKR1C3 will be measured to assess the effect of the combination therapy. To date, 4 patients have been enrolled to the trial (clinicaltrials.gov Identifier No: NCT02935205; this trial is funded by DoD Prostate Cancer Research Program IMPACT award). Clinical trial information: NCT02935205.

Phase II multicenter study of chemotherapy (chemo)-naive castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) not exposed to ketoconazole (keto), treated with abiraterone acetate (AA) plus prednisone

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5046-5046 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Ryan ◽  
E. Efstathiou ◽  
M. Smith ◽  
M. Taplin ◽  
G. Bubley ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Performance Status ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Abiraterone Acetate ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Androgen Withdrawal ◽  
Psa Response ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Hormonal Therapies ◽  
Ecog Ps

5046 Background: AA is a potent inhibitor of the enzyme CYP17, a major contributor to androgen biosynthesis. Keto is also known to inhibit this enzyme but AA is many-fold stronger in its action. 33 pts with progressive metastatic disease, normal organ function, ECOG performance status (PS) 0–1, and no prior chemo were enrolled. Pts with prior keto treatment were excluded. AA (1000 mg qd) plus prednisone (5mg bid) were administered orally in 28 day cycles. Methods: Results: At baseline median age was 71.0 (range 52–85) yrs and median PSA was 24.7 (range 7.1–1110.0) ng/mL;19/26 pts (73%) had an ECOG PS of 0 and 7/26 (27%) had PS of 1; the median number of prior hormonal therapies was 2; all pts were on LHRHa and 73% of pts had received anti-androgen, all of whom had undergone prior anti-androgen withdrawal. Pts were evaluated at each cycle for PSA response according to PSAWG criteria. 27 pts have available data for PSA response. Total maximal PSA declines of ≥30%, ≥50%, ≥90% were observed in 89% (24/27), 85% (23/27) and 41% (11/27) pts, respectively. Week 12 PSA declines displayed a similar and sustained trend: ≥30%, ≥50% and ≥90% PSA decline in 82%, 78%, and 26% of pts. Post-treatment ECOG PS score was 0 in 24 (92%) pts: 19% experienced improvement in PS (PS 1 to 0 in 5 pts) and 19/19 pts maintained a PS of 0; Median time to PSA progression has not been reached. Majority of adverse events were grades 1–2. Incidence of hypokalemia - 12%; HTN - 6%; edema - 15%. One pt experienced a grade 3 drug-related HTN. Conclusions: Abiraterone acetate plus prednisone has significant anti-cancer activity in patients with metastatic CRPC not previously treated with ketoconazole or chemotherapy, as demonstrated by declines in PSA and improvement in performance status, and is well-tolerated. [Table: see text]

A phase I study of TRC105 (anti-CD105 monoclonal antibody) in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 171-171 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Adelberg ◽  
A. B. Apolo ◽  
R. A. Madan ◽  
J. L. Gulley ◽  
A. Pierpoint ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Monoclonal Antibody ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Igg1 Monoclonal Antibody ◽  
Psa Response ◽  
Ecog Ps

171 Background: TRC105 is a human/murine chimeric IgG1 monoclonal antibody to CD105 (endoglin) that inhibits angiogenesis and tumor growth through inhibition of endothelial cell (EC) proliferation, antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity and induction of apoptosis. CD105 is highly expressed on proliferating vascular ECs. Preclinical and clinical evidence demonstrates an important role for angiogenesis in mCRPC biology. Methods: The primary objective is to evaluate safety and identify the maximum tolerable dose of TRC105. Secondary objectives include the assessment of TRC105 pharmacokinetics, PSA response rate and overall response rate (ORR). Eligibility requires ECOG performance status (PS) ≤ 2 and progressive mCRPC. Three cohorts of 3-6 patients receive TRC105 at doses of 1, 3 or 10 mg/kg IV over 1–4 hours every 2 weeks of a 4 week cycle. Premedications are dexamethasone, acetaminophen, famotidine, and diphenhydramine. PSA is evaluated prior to each treatment and response is assessed every 2 cycles with imaging studies. Results: Eight patients are enrolled in cohorts 1–3. Median age is 65 (range 47–84), ECOG PS 1 (1–2), Gleason score 8 (6–10), on–study PSA 201 (0.10 – 3,373), and number of prior therapies after gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist or anti-androgen therapy 2.5 (0–6). Median time on study is 14 weeks (7–16). Dose-limiting toxicity was not observed. Grade 1 to 2 infusion reactions occurred in 4 patients. PSA declines were seen in both patients in cohort 3 (26% and 51% from baseline); each had progressed on docetaxel and at least one second-line agent. Five of 6 evaluable patients with measurable soft tissue disease achieved stable disease (2 in cohort 1, 2 in cohort 2 and 1 in cohort 3); the latter 3 patients in cohorts 2 and 3 remain on study. Conclusions: TRC105 is tolerated at doses up to 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks with early evidence of clinical activity in patients with mCRPC. Accrual is ongoing to evaluate higher doses and more frequent dosing. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

A phase I study of TRC105 (anti-CD105 [endoglin] antibody) in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (5_suppl) ◽  
pp. 117-117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fatima H Karzai ◽  
Andrea Borghese Apolo ◽  
David E. Adelberg ◽  
Ravi Amrit Madan ◽  
James L. Gulley ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Response Rate ◽  
Vascular Endothelial Cells ◽  
Transmembrane Protein ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Endothelial Cell Proliferation ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Ecog Performance Status

117 Background: Preclinical and clinical evidence demonstrates an important role for angiogenesis in mCRPC biology. CD105 (endoglin) is a transmembrane protein expressed on the surface of proliferating vascular endothelial cells. The expression of CD105 is required for the formation of new blood vessels. TRC105 is a human/murine chimeric IgG1 kappa monoclonal antibody that binds to human CD105 (endoglin). It inhibits angiogenesis and tumor growth through inhibition of endothelial cell proliferation, antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity, and induction of apoptosis. The primary objective is to evaluate safety and identify the maximum tolerable dose (MTD) of TRC105. Secondary objectives include the assessment of TRC105 pharmacokinetics, PSA response rate, evaluation of progression free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR) and overall survival (OS). Methods: Patients with an ECOG performance status (PS) ≤ 2, progressive mCRPC and either chemotherapy-naïve or post-docetaxel treatment were eligible. Five cohorts of patients, on escalating dose levels, receive TRC105 intravenously at doses of 1, 3, 10 or 15 mg/kg IV every 2 weeks (cohorts 1, 2, 3, and 5) or 10 mg/kg IV weekly (cohort 4) on a 4 week cycle. Response is assessed with imaging studies every 2 months for the first four months and then every 3 months thereafter. Results: Seventeen patients are enrolled in cohorts 1-5. Median age is 65 (range 48-87), median ECOG PS is 1 (range 0−2), median Gleason score is 8 (range 6−10), median on−study PSA is 147.5 (range 0.1-3373), and median number of prior (non-hormonal) therapies is 3 (range 0−6). Median time on study is 16 weeks (range 8-28 weeks). One patient experienced a dose limiting toxicity (grade 4 vasovagal episode) in cohort 5. PSA declines were seen in 6 patients ranging from 20% to 57% from baseline. Ten out of 12 patients with measurable soft tissue disease achieved stable disease for at least two cycles. Two patients remain on study (in cohort 5). Conclusions: TRC105 is tolerated up to 15 mg/kg every two weeks with early evidence of clinical activity in mCRPC. Accrual is ongoing to evaluate ORR, PFS, and OS in the phase II portion of this study.

A phase I study of TRC105 (Anti-CD105 [endoglin] antibody) in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3043-3043
Author(s):  
Fatima H Karzai ◽  
Andrea Borghese Apolo ◽  
David Adelberg ◽  
Ravi A. Madan ◽  
James L. Gulley ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Response Rate ◽  
Vascular Endothelial Cells ◽  
Transmembrane Protein ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Endothelial Cell Proliferation ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Ecog Performance Status

3043 Background: Pre−clinical and clinical evidence demonstrates an important role for angiogenesis in mCRPC biology. CD105 (endoglin) is a transmembrane protein expressed on the surface of proliferating vascular endothelial cells. The expression of CD105 is required for the formation of new blood vessels. TRC105 is a human/murine chimeric IgG1 kappa monoclonal antibody that binds to human CD105 (endoglin). It inhibits angiogenesis and tumor growth through inhibition of endothelial cell proliferation, antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity, and induction of apoptosis. The primary objective is to evaluate safety and identify the maximum tolerable dose (MTD) of TRC105. Secondary objectives include the assessment of TRC105 pharmacokinetics, PSA response rate, evaluation of progression free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR) and overall survival (OS). Methods: Patients with an ECOG performance status (PS) ≤ 2, progressive mCRPC and either chemotherapy-naïve or post-docetaxel treatment were eligible. Six cohorts of patients, on escalating dose levels, receive TRC105 intravenously at doses of 1, 3, 10, 15, or 20 mg/kg IV every 2 weeks (cohorts 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6) or 10 mg/kg IV weekly (cohort 4) on a 4 week cycle. Response is assessed with imaging studies every 2 months for the first four months and then every 3 months thereafter. Results: Sixteen patients are enrolled in cohorts 1-5. Median age is 65 (range 48-87), median ECOG PS is 1 (range 0−2), median Gleason score is 8 (range 6−10), median on−study PSA is 147.5 (range 0.1-3373), and median number of prior (non-hormonal) therapies is 3 (range 0−6). Median time on study is 16 weeks (range 8-28 weeks). One patient experienced a dose limiting toxicity (grade 4 vasovagal episode) in cohort 5. PSA declines were seen in 6 patients ranging from 20% to 57% from baseline. Ten out of 12 patients with measurable soft tissue disease achieved stable disease for at least two cycles. Conclusions: TRC105 is tolerated up to 15 mg/kg every two weeks with early evidence of clinical activity in mCRPC. An additional cohort (6), with dosage of 20 mg/kg, is currently under investigation. Accrual is ongoing to evaluate ORR, PFS, and OS in the phase II portion of this study.

A phase II study of S-1 for previously treated small cell lung cancer (SCLC)

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e19074-e19074
Author(s):  
K. Kudo ◽  
F. Ohyanagi ◽  
A. Horiike ◽  
E. Miyauchi ◽  
I. Motokawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Treatment Regimens ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Previously Treated

e19074 Background: S-1 is a novel oral 5-fluorouracil derivative that exhibits obvious activity against various tumor types including NSCLC. However, the effects of S-1 against SCLC have not been reported. The present phase II trial assesses the efficacy and safety of S-1 in previously treated SCLC patients. Methods: Eligible patients had pathologically documented SCLC that relapsed after platinum-based chemotherapy, ECOG performance status (PS) 0–2, and adequate bone marrow, kidney and liver function. Patients with untreated or symptomatic brain metastasis were excluded. Treatment comprised the oral administration of S-1 at 40 mg/m2 twice each day for 28 days every 6 weeks. The primary end point was the objective tumor response rate (RECIST). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival and overall survival. Results: Twenty-six evaluable patients were enrolled (Simon's two-stage optimal design; α = 0.1; β = 0.1; P0 = 0.05; P1 = 0.25) with the following characteristics: male: female, 22/4; median age, 68 (33 - 79) y; PS0–1, n = 21; PS2, n = 5. The median number of prior treatment regimens was 2 (1–3). S-1 was administered for a mean of 1.3 cycles (1 - 5). One patient (3.8%) partially responded, 10 (38.5%) had stable and 15 (57.7%) had progressive disease. The overall response rate was 3.8% and the disease control rate was 42.3%. The median time to progression was 33 days. The median survival time was 8.0 months and the 1-year survival rate was 23%. This regimen was well tolerated. The common grade 3/4 toxicities included neutropenia (7.7%), leukopenia (7.7%), anemia (7.7%), hyponatremia (7.7%), rush (7.7%), infection (7.7%), and diarrhea (3.8%). None of the patients developed febrile neutropenia and no deaths were attributed to treatment. Conclusions: S-1 is well tolerated but has low activity as a single agent in previously treated patients with SCLC. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Interim safety analysis of a compassionate-use program (CUP) and early-access program (EAP) providing cabazitaxel (Cbz) plus prednisone (P) to patients (pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) previously treated with docetaxel.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5055-5055 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zafar I. Malik ◽  
Giuseppe Di Lorenzo ◽  
Mert Basaran ◽  
Alexandros Ardavanis ◽  
Phillip Parente ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Metastatic Sites

5055 Background: Cbz + P provides a significant survival benefit vs mitoxantrone + P in pts with mCRPC (Phase III TROPIC study [NCT00417079]; hazard ratio 0.70; p < 0.0001). These findings supported the initiation of ongoing Sanofi-funded CUP and EAP (NCT01254279) to provide access to Cbz prior to commercialization and to collect real-life safety data. Methods: Expected enrollment is ~1600 pts with mCRPC from 250 centers worldwide. Pts receive Cbz (25 mg/m2 Q3W) + P (10 mg oral QD) until progressive disease (PD), death, unacceptable toxicity, physician/pt decision or Cbz commercial availability. Pts are followed until 30 days after last dose. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) use is recommended as per ASCO guidance. Results: Interim baseline and safety data from the first 1301 pts treated in 37 countries are now available. Mean age was 68 yrs (22% were ≥ 75 yrs). All pts had an ECOG performance status ≤ 2. Median time from initial prostate cancer diagnosis was 57.6 months and 60% of pts had ≥ 2 metastatic sites; the most common were bone (91%) and lymph nodes (regional 30%, distant 27%). In total, 17% had PD whilst on docetaxel. The median number of Cbz cycles was 6 (range 1–22); median relative dose intensity was 99%. Overall, 837 pts (64%) received G-CSF (n = 123 curative [C], n = 765 prophylactic [P] and n = 99 [C + P]). Of 1142 pts (88%) who discontinued Cbz + P, the most common reasons were PD (44%), adverse event (AE; 27%), physician decision (13%) and commercial availability of Cbz (7%). Grade 3–4 AEs possibly related to Cbz + P occurred in 43% of pts; the most frequent were clinical neutropenia (18%), febrile neutropenia (FN; 7%) and diarrhea (4%). Of 80 pts (6%) with AEs leading to death, the AE was related to Cbz + P in 39 pts (3%). Conclusions: These results provide valuable data on Cbz + P treatment in routine clinical practice, confirming the safety results of clinical trials and showing that treatment with Cbz + P is associated with a manageable safety profile. The incidence of FN seems slightly lower than in TROPIC, owing to more frequent use of G-CSF prophylaxis in the CUP and EAP. Clinical trial information: NCT01254279.

Pharmacokinetic food-effect study of abiraterone acetate (AA) in patients with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC): The ABIFOOD trial (EudraCt number: 2012-003226-25).

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. 227-227 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Espinosa ◽  
A Falcon ◽  
A Gutierrez-Valencia ◽  
A Cervera ◽  
CM Rosso-Fernandez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Food Effect ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Effect Study ◽  
Abiraterone Acetate ◽  
Fat Content ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Time Curve

227 Background: A.A has been approved for the treatment of mCRPC before and after docetaxel. The standard regime consists on daily A.A. 1.000 mg in a fasting state along with prednisone 10mg q.d. However, data from pharmacokinetic (PK) studies in patients (pts) and healthy volunteers has revealed a significant food-effect with up to 7-10 folder increase in area under plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) when A.A is given with food, specially with fat content, [Chi KN, J Clin Pharmacol 2015]. Methods: ABIFOOD is a phase I, randomized trial to evaluate the short and long-term effect of diet on the PKs of A.A. in pts with mCRPC who have progressed to docetaxel. Eligible pts include men ≥ 18 years old with mCRPC, ECOG performance status (PS) < 2 and an adequate organ function. Pts are randomly assigned to receive 4-weekly cycles of 250 mg A.A with standard meal (Arm A), 250 mg A.A with high-fat meal (Arm B) or 1000 mg A.A in fasting conditions (Arm C). PK analyses are conducted at week 1 (W1) and cycle 5. Results: Fifteen pts (5, 3 and 7 in arms A, B and C respectively) have been included and 6 are still on treatment. Median age is 72, 97% have ECOG-PS 1. Gleason Score is > 8 in 6 (40%) pts.Geometric mean abiraterone [AUC (ng.h/ml) (IQR)] at W1 did not significantly differ between treatment arms [arm A: 404.68 (368.4 - 488.2), arm B: 372 (334.6 - 440.5) arm C: 656.51 (387.8 – 1144.5) p 0.15]. PK data did not influence activity or toxicity. Progression free survival was 8.50, 6.33 and 4.86 months in Arms A, B and C respectively (p 0.53). One patient in arm A is still on treatment after 17 cycles. Conclusions: The administration of lower doses of A.A with food [regardless the fat content], might achieve comparable plasma levels to standard dosing with no detriment in efficacy or toxicity parameters. The study is actively recruiting and data on additional pts and long term PK parameters will be presented. Clinical trial information: EudraCt number: 2012-003226-25.

Correlation of a novel whole blood RT-PCR assay measuring AR-V7 expression with outcomes in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients treated with abiraterone acetate (ABI).

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. 223-223
Author(s):  
Tilman Todenhöfer ◽  
Arun Azad ◽  
Craig Stewart ◽  
Jian Gao ◽  
Bernhard J. Eigl ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Whole Blood ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Predictive Biomarker ◽  
Abiraterone Acetate ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Pcr Assay ◽  
Ecog Performance Status

223 Background: Expression of androgen receptor splice variant 7 (AR-V7) in circulating tumor cells (CTCs) has been associated with resistance to ABI and enzalutamide (ENZ) (Antonarakis et al. N Engl J Med 2014). We have developed a RT-PCR assay that is neither time sensitive nor requires CTC enrichment for detection of prostate cancer (PCa)-associated transcripts in whole blood. Using this assay, our aim was to correlate AR-V7 expression with outcomes on ABI. Methods: 2.5 ml whole blood was collected into PAXgene RNA tubes from mCRPC patients (pts) commencing ABI. RT-PCR was performed for the following genes: AR-V7, FOXA1, GRHL2, HOXB13, KLK2, KLK3 and TMPRSS2:ERG. For each gene, the highest CT value among 20 normal controls was set as the threshold for a positive (+) test. Clinical endpoints were PSA50 response rate (RR) (PSA decline ≥ 50% confirmed ≥ 3 weeks later), PSA30 RR, time to PSA (PCWG2 criteria) or clinical progression (change in anti-cancer therapy or decline in ECOG performance status (PS) ≥ 2 levels due to PCa), and overall survival (OS). Results: Whole blood samples were obtained from 37 pts. Median age was 70. 59% received prior docetaxel. All pts were ABI and ENZ naïve. PSA50 RR was 37% and PSA30 RR was 48%. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.8 months (mos) and median OS was 21.0 mos. 11% (4/37) of pts were AR-V7+. AR-V7+ pts were more likely to have high ALP (P= 0.04; Χ2), high LDH (P= 0.07) and ECOG PS ≥ 2 (P= 0.052). Pts with an AR-V7+ test had lower PSA50 RR (0% vs. 42%, P= 0.10; Χ2) and PSA30 RR (0% vs. 52%, P= 0.051) together with shorter median PFS (0.7 mos vs. 4.0 mos, P< 0.001; log-rank) and median OS (5.5 mos vs. 22.1 mos, P< 0.001). Other factors linked with worse OS were high ALP (P= 0.02), liver metastases (P= 0.03), ≤ 36 mos on primary hormone therapy (P= 0.04), HOXB13+ (P= 0.03) and KLK2+ (P< 0.001). Conclusions: RT-PCR detection of AR-V7 transcripts in whole blood was associated with a 0% PSA RR and significantly inferior PFS and OS in pts treated with ABI. These results reinforce the potential utility of AR-V7 as a prognostic and predictive biomarker for mCRPC. Validation of the assay in larger datasets is ongoing.

Clinical versus radiographic progression and overall survival for patients (pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) from COU-AA-302.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 193-193 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles J. Ryan ◽  
Thian Kheoh ◽  
Howard I. Scher ◽  
Peter De Porre ◽  
Margaret K. Yu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Radiographic Progression ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Abiraterone Acetate ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
End Points ◽  
Ecog Ps

193 Background: COU-AA-302 evaluated abiraterone acetate plus prednisone (AA) vs prednisone (P) in chemotherapy-naïve mCRPC pts, with overall survival (OS) and radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) as co-primary end points. Per study criteria, pts with radiographic progression (RAD) only were allowed to continue treatment, while those with unequivocal clinical progression (UCP) only were not, and were censored for rPFS. We evaluated the clinical significance of survival outcomes for pts with UCP only vs RAD only from the prospective COU-AA-302 trial. Methods: UCP was defined per protocol as ≥ 1 of the following: initiation of chronic opiates, ECOG performance status (PS) decline to ≥ 3, or initiation of chemotherapy, palliative radiation therapy, or surgery. OS was evaluated for each type of progression using Cox proportional hazard models. Results: 500 (92%) pts in the AA arm and 540 (100%) in the P arm discontinued study treatment. Of the 736 pts who discontinued treatment for a protocol-defined reason, 280 (38%) discontinued for UCP only, 332 (45%) for RAD only, and 124 (17%) for both UCP and RAD. Clinical events cited as the reason for discontinuation for UCP (AA vs P arm) included pain requiring opiates (22% vs 25%), ECOG PS ≥ 3 (4% vs 5%), and initiation of chemotherapy (50% vs 53%), radiation therapy (36% vs 27%) and surgery (3% vs 5%). UCP only pts had shorter median OS compared with RAD only pts (Table). Conclusions: UCP is a criterion used as an indicator for a censored event, yet appears to confer inferior survival relative to RAD. The high frequency of UCP implies that it may be an important determinant of clinical outcome. The events that drive UCP should be defined as part of the development of more informative interim trial end points, in line with the PCWG3-proposed “no longer clinically benefitting” outcome measure, which captures pts with UCP. Clinical trial information: NCT00887198. [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document