scholarly journals SWOG S0221: A Phase III Trial Comparing Chemotherapy Schedules in High-Risk Early-Stage Breast Cancer

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 58-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
George T. Budd ◽  
William E. Barlow ◽  
Halle C.F. Moore ◽  
Timothy J. Hobday ◽  
James A. Stewart ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Hormone Receptor ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Early Stage Breast Cancer ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Original Design ◽  
Significant Difference

Purpose To determine the optimal dose and schedule of anthracycline and taxane administration as adjuvant therapy for early-stage breast cancer. Patients and Methods A 2 × 2 factorial design was used to test two hypotheses: (1) that a novel continuous schedule of doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide was superior to six cycles of doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide once every 2 weeks and (2) that paclitaxel once per week was superior to six cycles of paclitaxel once every 2 weeks in patients with node-positive or high-risk node-negative early-stage breast cancer. With 3,250 patients, a disease-free survival (DFS) hazard ratio of 0.82 for each randomization could be detected with 90% power with two-sided α = .05. Overall survival (OS) was a secondary outcome. Results Interim analyses crossed the futility boundaries for demonstrating superiority of both once-per-week regimens and once-every-2-weeks regimens. After a median follow-up of 6 years, a significant interaction developed between the two randomization factors (DFS P = .024; OS P = .010) in the 2,716 patients randomly assigned in the original design, which precluded interpretation of the two factors separately. Comparing all four arms showed a significant difference in OS (P = .040) but not in DFS (P = .11), with all treatments given once every 2 weeks associated with the highest OS. This difference in OS seemed confined to patients with hormone receptor–negative/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) –negative tumors (P = .067), with no differences seen with hormone receptor–positive/HER2-negative (P = .90) or HER2-positive tumors (P = .40). Conclusion Patients achieved a similar DFS with any of these regimens. Subset analysis suggests the hypothesis that once-every-2-weeks dosing may be best for patients with hormone receptor–negative/HER2-negative tumors.

Denosumab versus placebo as adjuvant treatment for women with early-stage breast cancer who are at high risk of disease recurrence (D-CARE): An international, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III clinical trial.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS670-TPS670
Author(s):  
Paul Edward Goss ◽  
Carlos H. Barrios ◽  
Richard Bell ◽  
Dianne M Finkelstein ◽  
Hiroji Iwata ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Human Monoclonal Antibody ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Early Stage Breast Cancer ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Oral Bisphosphonate ◽  
Her 2

TPS670 Background: Bone is a common site of distant recurrence in women with early-stage breast cancer, and represents approximately 40% of all first recurrences. Tumor cells in bone release growth factors and cytokines that stimulate osteoclast-mediated bone resorption through the RANK ligand (RANKL) pathway. In preclinical studies, RANKL inhibition significantly delays skeletal tumor formation, reduces skeletal tumor burden, and prolongs survival of tumor-bearing mice. Denosumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody that binds to RANKL with high affinity and specificity. It is approved for the prevention of skeletal-related events in patients with established bone metastases from a variety of solid tumors. The purpose of the D-CARE trial is to evaluate the ability of denosumab to prolong bone metastasis-free survival (BMFS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in the adjuvant breast cancer setting. Methods: Approximately 4,500 women with stage II or III breast cancer, at high risk for recurrence and with known hormone and HER-2 receptor status, are eligible. Standard-of-care adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemo-, endocrine, or HER-2 targeted therapy, alone or in combination must be planned. Exclusion criteria include: a prior history of breast cancer (except DCIS or LCIS) or distant metastasis, oral bisphosphonate (BP) use within 1 year of randomization or any intravenous BP use. Patients are randomized 1:1 to receive denosumab 120 mg or placebo subcutaneously monthly for 6 months, then every 3 months for a total of 5 years of treatment. All patients receive vitamin D (≥ 400 IU) and calcium (≥ 500 mg) supplements. Primary endpoint of this event-driven trial is BMFS. Secondary endpoints include DFS and overall survival. Safety, quality of life assessments, breast density, and biomarkers are additional endpoints. The trial, sponsored by Amgen Inc. and registered with the ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01077154, began enrolling patients in June 2010 and is expected to complete in October 2016. Paul Goss and Dianne Finkelstein supported in part by the Avon Foundation New York.

Subgroup efficacy evaluation of the AE37 HER2 vaccine in breast cancer patients in the adjuvant setting.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3088-3088 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kaitlin M. Peace ◽  
Elizabeth Ann Mittendorf ◽  
Sonia A. Perez ◽  
Panagiotis Tzonis ◽  
Nikolaos Fragkiskos Pistamaltzian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Her2 Expression ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Adjuvant Setting ◽  
Gm Csf ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Disease Free

3088 Background: AE37 is a Ii-Key hybrid of the HER2 peptide AE36 (HER2776-790), which stimulates peptide-specific T cells. We have completed the active phase of a prospective, randomized, multi-center, phase II trial of the AE37 vaccine in the adjuvant setting. The primary analysis, performed after a median follow up (f/u) of 25 months (mo), did not show a significant difference in disease free survival (DFS) between vaccinated and control patients (pts). However, demonstrating the efficacy of cancer vaccines may require more time than other therapies, especially in malignancies with relatively late recurrences like breast cancer. Here, we present updated efficacy data after extended f/u in subgroups of pts stratified by clinicopathologic characteristics. Methods: Clinically disease-free, node positive or high-risk node negative pts with any level of HER2 expression were randomized to receive AE37 + GM-CSF (VG) or GM-CSF alone (CG) following standard of care therapy. Pts received 6 monthly intradermal inoculations during the primary vaccine series (PVS) followed by 4 boosters administered every 6 mo. Kaplan Meier and log rank analyses were performed from the time of the first inoculation in pts who completed at least the PVS, according to stage, node status, tumor size, HER2 expression and ER/PR status. Results: There were no clinicopathologic differences between groups in the 298 enrolled pts (VG = 153, CG = 145). The vaccine is safe and well tolerated. After a median f/u of 55 mo, there was a trend toward improved DFS in the VG among stage IIB/III pts (VG, n = 73, DFS 82% vs CG, n = 61, 67%, HR = 0.48, p = 0.06) and those with low HER2 expression (HER2 LE, VG, n = 68, 89% vs CG, n = 66, 51%, HR = 0.47, p = 0.1). Improved DFS in the VG was documented in patients with both stage IIB/III disease and HER2 LE (VG, n = 39, 90% vs CG, n = 38, 32%, HR 0.3, p = 0.02) and triple negative (TNBC) pts (VG, n = 21, 89% vs CG, n = 21, 0%, HR 0.26, p = 0.05). Conclusions: The AE37 vaccine is safe and well tolerated and has statistically significant efficacy in stage IIB/III pts with HER2 LE and in TNBC pts. This justifies further evaluation in a phase III study enrolling stage IIb/III pts not eligible for trastuzumab treatment and the very high risk TNBC group. Clinical trial information: NCT00524277.

Phase III Trial of Concurrent or Sequential Adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy After Conservative Surgery for Early-Stage Breast Cancer: Final Results of the ARCOSEIN Trial

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 405-410 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alain Toledano ◽  
David Azria ◽  
Pascal Garaud ◽  
Alain Fourquet ◽  
Daniel Serin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Locoregional Recurrence ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Treatment Protocol ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
New Drugs ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Significant Difference

Purpose In 1996, we initiated the French multicenter phase III randomized trial to compare the effect on disease-free survival (DFS) of concurrent versus sequential chemotherapy (CT) and radiotherapy (RT) after breast-conserving surgery for stages I and II breast cancer. This report presents the clinical results with a median follow-up of 60 months. Patients and Methods Between February 1996 and April 2000, 716 patients were entered onto this trial. Adjuvant treatment began within 6 weeks after surgery. Sequential treatment of CT administered first followed by RT was compared with concurrent treatment of CT administered with RT. The CT regimen consisted of mitoxantrone (12 mg/m2), fluorouracil (500 mg/m2), and cyclophosphamide (500 mg/m2) on day 1, and it was repeated every 21 days for six courses. RT was delivered to the breast and, when indicated, to the regional lymphatics. Results There was no statistically significant difference in treatment in the 5-year DFS (80% in both groups; P = .83), locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS; 92% in sequential v 95% in concurrent; P = .76), metastasis-free survival (87% in sequential v 84% in concurrent; P = .55), or overall survival (90% in sequential v 91% in concurrent; P = .76). Nevertheless, in the node-positive subgroup, the 5-year LRFS was statistically better in the concurrent arm (97% in concurrent v 91% in sequential; P = .02), corresponding to a risk of locoregional recurrence decreased by 39% (hazard ratio, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.38 to 0.93). Conclusion This treatment protocol remains an appealing clinical option for many women with operable breast cancer at a high risk of recurrence. Combination treatments with new drugs for breast cancer are warranted.

Inflammatory markers in early-stage breast cancer.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e11537-e11537
Author(s):  
Hilbrahim Petekkaya ◽  
Sercan Aksoy ◽  
Gizem Gecmez ◽  
Emre Kulahcioglu ◽  
Alexis K. Okoh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Inflammatory Markers ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Serum Markers ◽  
Early Stage Breast Cancer ◽  
Chemotherapy Response ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Stage Ia

e11537 Background: In a few number of studies a possible relationship between inflammatory markers and the prognosis, chemotherapy response and survival in breast cancer has been reported. The aim of this study is to point out the place of serum markers as a prognostic factor in early stage breast cancer. Methods: This study was conducted in Hacettepe University Cancer Institute. Patients operated and stage IA to III C for breast cancer between December 2009 and June 2012 were included the study. Before the any adjuvant therapy inflammation markers were studied. Results: A total of 704 patients were included in the study. The median age of the patients was 50 (25-92). 42,8% of the patients were premenopausal and 48,2% postmenopausal. The median follow up period for the whole study group was 22 months (3-287). We studied the CRP, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, B2 microglobulin, LDH, albumin, and ferritin studied and values for each marker were grouped as high and normal. There was no statistically significant difference in disease free survival and overall survival for each marker who had high and normal levels. Conclusions: We did not found any inflammatory markers as a prognostic value. However our follow up time is short and we should be wait for more mature data.

A randomised phase III trial comparing two dose-dense, dose-intensified approaches (EPC and PM(Cb)) for neoadjuvant treatment of patients with high-risk early breast cancer (GeparOcto).

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 518-518 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Schneeweiss ◽  
Volker Moebus ◽  
Hans Tesch ◽  
Claus Hanusch ◽  
Carsten Denkert ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Pathologic Complete Response ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Early Stage Breast Cancer ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Luminal B

518 Background: The sequential use of intense does-dense (idd) epirubicin, paclitaxel, cyclophosphamide (EPC) and weekly paclitaxel/liposomal doxorubicin (+/- carboplatin (Cb) in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) (PM(Cb)) are considered highly efficient regimens for high-risk early stage breast cancer (BC). Methods: GeparOcto (NCT02125344) patients (pts) received 18 weeks (wks) either EPC (3x E 150mg/m² q2w followed by 3x P225 mg/m² q2w followed by 3x C 2000mg/m² q2) or PM(Cb) (12x P 80mg/m² plus M 20 mg/m² q1w, plus Cb AUC 1.5 q1w in TNBC). For HER2+ BC trastuzumab 6 (8) mg/kg q3w and pertuzumab 420 (840) mg q3w cycles were given concomitantly with P and C. Pts with histologically confirmed, cT1c - cT4a-d BC and central receptor assessment were included. Pts with HER2+ or TNBC were eligible irrespective of nodal status, luminal B-like tumours only if pN+. Primary objective compared pathologic complete response (pCR) rates (ypT0/is ypN0). Sample size calculations assumed a pCR rate of 50% for EPC and 60% for PM(Cb), requiring 950 pts to show superiority of PM(Cb). Secondary objectives compared pCR rates within the stratified subgroups (BC subtype, HER2+ vs HER2- HR+ vs HER2- HR-), amongst others. Results: 961 pts were recruited between 12/2014 and 05/2016, 945 started treatment. Median age was 48 years, 4% T3, 2% T4d, 46% N+, 82% ductal invasive, 66% G3 tumors; 40% were HER2+, 43% TNBC. 347 pts reported SAEs (176 EPC/171 PM(Cb)) and 2 pts died. 35 pneumonias (2 EPC vs 33 PM(Cb)) and 18 pneumonitis (3 EPC vs 15 PM(Cb)) were reported. 16.4% pts with EPC and 33.8% with PM(Cb) discontinued treatment (p<0.001), mainly due to AEs (47 EPC vs 113 PM(Cb)). Mean treatment duration was 17 wks with EPC and 16 wks with PM(Cb). pCR rate was 48.3% with EPC and 47.6% with PM(Cb)(OR 0.97 (95%CI 0.75-1.25), p=0.876). pCR rate in TNBC was 48.5% with EPC and 51.7% with PM(Cb); in HER2+ 62.0% vs 57.4% and in Luminal B 14.1% vs 14.6%. Conclusions: In high-risk early stage breast cancer pts pCR rates of idd EPC compared to weekly PM(Cb) were not significantly different. PM(Cb) appeared to be less feasible. Clinical trial information: NCT02125344.

scholarly journals Definitive Results of a Phase III Adjuvant Trial Comparing Three Chemotherapy Regimens in Women With Operable, Node-Positive Breast Cancer: The NSABP B-38 Trial

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (26) ◽  
pp. 3197-3204 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandra M. Swain ◽  
Gong Tang ◽  
Charles E. Geyer ◽  
Priya Rastogi ◽  
James N. Atkins ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Sensory Neuropathy ◽  
Early Stage Breast Cancer ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Node Positive ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Dense ◽  
Positive Breast Cancer

Purpose Anthracycline- and taxane-based three-drug chemotherapy regimens have proven benefit as adjuvant therapy for early-stage breast cancer. This trial (NSABP B-38; Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Women Who Have Undergone Surgery for Node-Positive Breast Cancer) asked whether the incorporation of a fourth drug could improve outcomes relative to two standard regimens and provided a direct comparison of those two regimens. Patients and Methods We randomly assigned 4,894 women with node-positive early-stage breast cancer to six cycles of docetaxel, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (TAC), four cycles of dose-dense (DD) doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by four cycles of DD paclitaxel (P; DD AC→P), or DD AC→P with four cycles of gemcitabine (G) added to the DD paclitaxel (DD AC→PG). Primary granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support was required; erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) were used at the investigator's discretion. Results There were no significant differences in 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) between DD AC→PG and DD AC→P (80.6% v 82.2%; HR, 1.07; P = .41), between DD AC→PG and TAC (80.6% v 80.1%; HR, 0.93; P = .39), in 5-year overall survival (OS) between DD AC→PG and DD AC→P (90.8% v 89.1%; HR, 0.85; P = .13), between DD AC→PG and TAC (90.8% v 89.6%; HR, 0.86; P = .17), or between DD AC→P versus TAC for DFS (HR, 0.87; P = .07) and OS (HR, 1.01; P = .96). Grade 3 to 4 toxicities for TAC, DD AC→P, and DD AC→PG, respectively, were febrile neutropenia (9%, 3%, 3%; P < .001), sensory neuropathy (< 1%, 7%, 6%; P < .001), and diarrhea (7%, 2%, 2%; P < .001). Exploratory analyses for ESAs showed no association with DFS events (HR, 1.02; P = .95). Conclusion Adding G to DD AC→P did not improve outcomes. No significant differences in efficacy were identified between DD AC→P and TAC, although toxicity profiles differed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document