Final analysis of the phase 2 APEC study: Overall survival (OS) data and biomarker subanalyses for first-line FOLFOX or FOLFIRI with cetuximab (cet) once every 2 weeks in patients (pts) with KRAS or RAS (KRAS and NRAS, exons 2-4) wild-type (wt) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 566-566
Author(s):  
Ann-Lii Cheng ◽  
Gerardo H. Cornelio ◽  
Lin Shen ◽  
Timothy Jay Price ◽  
Tsai-Sheng Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
Asia Pacific ◽  
First Line ◽  
Ras Mutation ◽  
Mutation Status ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
The Status

566 Background: The Asia-Pacific, multicenter, nonrandomized, phase II APEC study previously reported that first-line therapy for pts with KRAS ex 2 wt mCRC consisting of C once every 2 weeks combined with FOLFOX or FOLFIRI achieved efficacy and safety profiles comparable to those reported in analogous pivotal studies involving weekly C. This final analysis presents OS data from the KRAS wt intent-to-treat (ITT) population, as well as subgroup efficacy analyses stratified by BRAF, PIKC3A, and all RAS mutation status. Methods: Eligible pts received C once every 2 weeks (day 1 of each cycle, 500 mg/m2) with FOLFOX or FOLFIRI (investigator’s choice). Study treatment continued until disease progression, dose-limiting toxicity or consent withdrawal. The primary endpoint was best confirmed overall response as assessed by RECIST 1.0; progression-free survival (PFS) and OS were secondary endpoints. In the evaluable populations, the status of BRAF, PIK3CA, and all RAS mutations was assessed retrospectively by pyrosequencing. Results: 42 months after the last patient was enrolled, median OS in the KRAS wt population was 26.8 months (Table). There were no unexpected safety findings. Additional biomarker results—including objective response rate (ORR), PFS, and OS subgroup analyses stratified on BRAF, PIKC3A, and all RAS mutation status—will be presented. Conclusions: The observed median OS of 26.8 months in the KRAS wt population is comparable to that reported in prior pivotal studies involving weekly C plus FOLFOX or FOLFIRI in the first line. These results suggest that C plus FOLFOX or FOLFIRI in a once-every-2-weeks regimen is active and tolerable as first-line therapy in this Asia-Pacific study population and a convenient alternative to weekly administration. Clinical trial information: NCT00778830. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals The Impact of Tumor Mutation Burden on the Effect of Frontline Trastuzumab Plus Chemotherapy in Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Positive Advanced Gastric Cancers

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hye Ryeon Kim ◽  
Soomin Ahn ◽  
Hyunji Jo ◽  
Hongsik Kim ◽  
Joohyun Hong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Objective Response ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
First Line ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
The Status ◽  
Tumor Mutational Burden ◽  
The Impact

BackgroundTrastuzumab is a HER2-trargeted humanized monoclonal antibody that has been studied as a first-line treatment for patients with HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer (AGC). The effect of anti-HER2 therapy according to tumor mutational burden (TMB) in HER2-positive AGC remains unclear.MethodsWe performed next-generation sequencing (NGS), including TMB analysis, in 31 HER2-positive AGC patients with trastuzumab plus chemotherapy as first-line therapy for recurrent (n=8) or metastatic (n=23) tumors. The TruSight Oncology 500 Assay from Illumina (San Diego, CA, USA) was used to evaluate TMB.ResultsAmong 31 patients, 30 had tumors with immunohistochemistry (IHC) 3+, and one was IHC 2+ and silver in situ hybridization (SISH) positive. The median age was 57.0 years old (range, 35-76), and the majority had tumors with low TMB (87.1%, n=27/31). Only four (12.9%) had tumors with high TMB. Of these four, three achieved complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) to treatment, and the remaining patient was not evaluable for tumor response. Objective response rate (ORR) to trastuzumab plus chemotherapy showed a favorable trend in patients with high TMB (75.0%, n=3/4) compared to patients with low TMB (59.3%, n=16/27) (P=0.546). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was not reached in the TMB-high group but was 8.0 months (95% CI, 7.6-8.5) in the TMB-low group (P=0.019)ConclusionThe status of TMB could be a novel biomarker in predicting the efficacy of trastuzumab plus chemotherapy in HER2-positive AGCs.

Objective response rate and progression-free survival as surrogate endpoints for overall survival and the impact of crossover and unbalanced post-progression treatments: A systematic review and meta-analysis in first-line therapy of advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9049-9049
Author(s):  
Boris Pfeiffer ◽  
Mahmoud Hashim ◽  
Monica Duran ◽  
Maarten Postma ◽  
Bart Heeg
Keyword(s):  
Response Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Absolute Difference ◽  
Surrogate Endpoints ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
The Impact

9049 Background: Correlations between overall survival (OS) and objective response rate (ORR) or progression-free survival (PFS) are poor. We aimed to evaluate the impact of crossover and unbalanced subsequent treatments on ORR and PFS as surrogate endpoints for OS in patients with advanced NSCLC receiving first-line therapy. Methods: A systematic literature review of randomized clinical trials of systemic treatment for patients with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC receiving first-line therapy was performed. Weighted (by trial size) linear regression models were fitted with the absolute difference in ORR or median PFS as an independent variable and the absolute difference in median OS as a dependent variable. The analysis was repeated in predefined subsets based on crossover and balance of post-progression therapies. Surrogate threshold effect (STE) was estimated using prediction intervals. Results: 317 trials (78,644 patients) fulfilled the eligibility criteria. In all treatment arms, the mean ORR, median PFS, and median OS were 28.2% (standard deviation (SD) = 12.4%), 5.1 months (SD = 2.1), and 10.4 months (SD = 2.5), respectively. ORR and PFS had weak (R = 0.351; 95% CI: 0.251-0.443) and (R = 0.397; 95% CI: 0.267-0.512) associations with OS, respectively. However, within phase III trials that did not allow crossover and reported balanced post-progression treatments, both ORR and PFS had stronger associations with OS (ORR and OS: R = 0.601, 95% CI: 0.399-0.747; PFS and OS: R = 0.695, 95% CI: 0.446-0.844). STE estimation indicated that trials that show statistically significant treatment effect size of ≥43% ORR or ≥3.2 median PFS months can be expected to show significant OS benefit with sufficient certainty. Conclusions: Surrogacy of ORR and PFS for OS might be better estimated in trials that do not allow crossover and report balanced post-progression treatments. Presented STE calculation can be used to estimate the expected effect on OS when either ORR or PFS are used as primary endpoints.

Camrelizumab combined with capecitabine and oxaliplatin followed by camrelizumab and apatinib as first-line therapy for advanced or metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer: Updated results from a multicenter, open label phase II trial.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4031-4031 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lin Shen ◽  
Zhi Peng ◽  
Yan-Qiao Zhang ◽  
Jia Wei ◽  
Feng Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Sequential Therapy ◽  
Metastatic Gastric Cancer ◽  
First Line ◽  
Open Label ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Open Label Phase

4031 Background: Capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (CAPOX) is one of the standard first-line treatments for advanced or metastatic gastric cancer. Camrelizumab (SHR-1210, an anti–PD-1 antibody) shows promising anti-tumor activity in patients (pts) with advanced or metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) cancer. Camrelizumab combined with CAPOX for untreated G/GEJ cancer was assessed as a part of an ongoing multicenter, open-label phase 2 trial (cohort 1), and encouraging preliminary results were reported. Here, we present the updated safety and efficacy data. Methods: In this cohort, systemic treatment naïve pts with HER2– advanced or metastatic G/GEJ adenocarcinoma were given camrelizumab 200 mg on Day 1, capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 bid on Days 1–14 and oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 on Day 1 of each 21-day-cycle for 4 to 6 cycles followed by camrelizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks plus apatinib 375 mg qd until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. The primary endpoint was objective response rate. Results: At data cutoff (Jan 20, 2019), 43 of the 48 enrolled pts were evaluable. Partial response was observed in 28 pts (65%), and 19 (44%) were confirmed. Stable disease in 14 pts and progressive disease in 10 pts were reported. Median estimates for duration of response and progression-free survival were not reached. Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 9 pts (21%), included neutropenia, diarrhea, rash and elevated ALT, whereas none of the TRAEs was fatal. Ten pts without progression after 4–6 cycles of camrelizumab and CAPOX combination therapy all received camrelizumab plus apatinib as sequential therapy, and no new safety signals were observed. Conclusions: The updated results confirmed that camrelizumab plus CAPOX followed by camrelizumab plus apatinib was well tolerated with noteworthy responses as first-line therapy in advanced or metastatic G/GEJ cancer pts. Expansion of this cohort in a phase 3 study are under way. Clinical trial information: NCT03472365.

scholarly journals Efficacy and Safety of Apatinib in Patients with Recurrent or Refractory Melanoma

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shumin Yuan ◽  
Qiang Fu ◽  
Yingkun Ren ◽  
Zhimeng Li ◽  
Huijuan Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Malignant Melanoma ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Angiogenesis Inhibitor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Metastatic Malignant Melanoma ◽  
Advanced Melanoma ◽  
First Line ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy

Abstract Background: Prognosis of patients with metastatic malignant melanoma is very poor and partly due to high resistance to conventional chemotherapies. The study’s objectives were to assess the activity and tolerability of apatinib, an oral small molecule anti-angiogenesis inhibitor, in patients with recurrent advanced melanoma.Methods: This was a single-arm, single-center phase II trial. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) and the secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and overall survival (OS). Eligible patients received at least one first-line therapy for advanced melanoma and experienced recurrence. Apatinib (500 mg) was orally administered daily. Trail registration: Clinical Trials, ID: NCT03383237. Registered on 24 December 2017. URL of trail registry record: https://register.clinicaltrials.gov. Results: Fifteen patients were included in the analysis. The median PFS was 4.0 months. There were two major objective responses, for a 13.33% response rate. Eleven patients had stable disease, with a DCR of 86.67%.The median OS was 12.0 months. The most common clinically significant grade 3 or 4 toxicities included hypertension and canker sore. No treatment-related deaths occurred.Conclusions: Apatinib showed antitumor activity as a second or first-line therapy in patients with malignant melanoma. The toxicity was manageable.

scholarly journals Efficacy and safety of apatinib in patients with recurrent or refractory melanoma

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shumin Yuan ◽  
Qiang Fu ◽  
Yingkun Ren ◽  
Zhimeng Li ◽  
Huijuan Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Malignant Melanoma ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Angiogenesis Inhibitor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Metastatic Malignant Melanoma ◽  
Advanced Melanoma ◽  
First Line ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy

Abstract Background Prognosis of patients with metastatic malignant melanoma is very poor and partly due to high resistance to conventional chemotherapies. The study’s objectives were to assess the activity and tolerability of apatinib, an oral small molecule anti-angiogenesis inhibitor, in patients with recurrent advanced melanoma. Methods This was a single-arm, single-center phase II trial. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) and the secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and overall survival (OS). Eligible patients received at least one first-line therapy for advanced melanoma and experienced recurrence. Apatinib (500 mg) was orally administered daily. Trail registration: Clinical Trials, ID: NCT03383237. Registered on 24 December 2017. URL of trail registry record: https://register.clinicaltrials.gov. Results Fifteen patients were included in the analysis. The median PFS was 4.0 months. There were two major objective responses, for a 13.33% response rate. Eleven patients had stable disease, with a DCR of 86.67%.The median OS was 12.0 months. The most common clinically significant grade 3 or 4 toxicities included hypertension and canker sore. No treatment-related deaths occurred. Conclusions Apatinib showed antitumor activity as a second or first-line therapy in patients with malignant melanoma. The toxicity was manageable.

Pharmacoeconomic analysis for K-Ras status–based decisions for first-line therapy of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in Spain.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 438-438
Author(s):  
Cristobal Belda
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Ras Status

438 Background: Personalized medicine is a challenge for current oncology practice. Nowadays there are no pharmacoeconomic analyses in Spain dealing with the clinical and financial impact secondary to K-Ras based decisions for first-line therapy in mCRC patients. So, this study was aimed to assess the cost- effectiveness of K-Ras status based decisions in first- line therapy of mCRC patients in comparison with non- K-Ras based selection of available therapies. Methods: K-Ras mutation prevalence and efficacy of available therapies (measured as response rate and progression free survival) were extracted from randomized clinical trials (RCT) that allowed on-label use of accessible drugs in Spain. Then, we have simulated all possibilities of combination therapies for first-line mCRC based on K-Ras status (wild- type vs mutated) and confronted with all therapies that could be chosen in absence of K-Ras analysis. Prices for all drugs in Spain were used to assume the best- value for each drug including all possibilities to reduce pharmacy costs. For first line, median duration of therapy reported by RCT was used to calculate the final budget. 70 kg and 1.7 m were used as reference for patients dose calculations. Results: First-line therapy that includes a biological drug in absence of K-Ras status based decisions implies an incremental cost per 1% of increased response rate of 1,237 euros for irinotecan based doublets and 3,193 euros for oxaliplatin based doublets. On the opposite, K-Ras based decisions reduce costs per objective response by 69% and 35% for irinotecan and oxaliplatin- based schedules in K-Ras wild-type population incorporating cetuximab as biological agent. These data mimic all calculi based on incremental costs secondary to improved progression free survival measured as HR when all scenarios without prior determination of K-Ras status were confronted with K-Ras based decisions. Conclusions: K-Ras based decisions reduces costs per objective response as well as per improved progression free survival. The most cost- effective scenario among all simulated was cetuximab in combination with chemotherapy for patients that harbor wt K-Ras mCRC.

Efficacy and toxicities of gemcitabine and cisplatin combination chemotherapy in advanced thymoma and thymic carcinoma.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e20007-e20007
Author(s):  
Jian Fang ◽  
Yang Wang
Keyword(s):  
Partial Response ◽  
Combination Chemotherapy ◽  
Thymic Carcinoma ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
First Line ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Gemcitabine And Cisplatin

e20007 Background: Thymoma and thymic carcinoma are rare thymic epithelial tumours. This study investigated the efficacy of first-line gemcitabine and cisplatin combination chemotherapy in advanced thymoma and thymic carcinoma Methods: Retrospective review of patients with histologically-confirmed invasive, metastatic thymoma or thymic carcinoma treated with gemcitabine plus cisplatin as a first-line therapy between August 2008 and February 2016 at the Department of Respiratory Medicine II Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute. The objective response rate was the primary end point. Results: Forty patients, 13 with thymoma and 27 with thymic carcinoma, were identified. Nine received gemcitabine and cisplatin combined with Endostar (injectable recombinant human Endostatin); 31 received gemcitabine and cisplatin only. Of the 13 patients with thymoma, four (30.8%) achieved a partial response (PR) and nine (69.2%) had stable disease (SD); no patients had a complete response (CR) or progressive disease (PD). Among the 27 patients with thymic carcinoma, 13 (48.1%) achieved a PR, 12 (44.4%) had SD and two (7.4%) had PD; no patients had a CR. In thymic carcinoma, progression free survival (PFS) was 25 months and median survival (OS) was 41 months; in thymoma, median PFS was 29 months and median OS was 77 months. As no patients achieved a complete response, objective response was defined as partial response in this study. Conclusions: This retrospective analysis indicates gemcitabine plus cisplatin has moderate efficacy and could represent a suitable first-line therapy for thymic carcinoma and thymoma, especially for patents who cannot tolerate anthracyclines. [Table: see text]

Endostar plus gemcitabine/cisplatin (GP) with maintenance endostar as first-line therapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Preliminary results of a phase II study.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18033-e18033
Author(s):  
You Lu ◽  
Meijuan Huang ◽  
Qingxia Fan ◽  
Qi Wu ◽  
Jin Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Survival Rate ◽  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
First Line ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Grade 3

e18033 Background: Endostar is a recombinant human endostatin. We conducted a multi-centre trial to investigate the efficacy and safety of Endostar plus GP with maintenance Endostar as first- line therapy for advanced NSCLC Methods: Chemotherapy-naïve patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed, measurable, stage ‡W NSCLC were enrolled from 11 centers in China. All patients received gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 (days 1 and 8) plus cisplatin 25 mg/m2 (days 1-3) every 21 days. Patients achieving objective response or disease stabilization following initial 2 cycles of GP were given Endostar (15 mg) on days 1–14 every 21 days in combination with another 2 cycles of GP. Then, patients who did not progress received maintenance endostar (15 mg) on days 1–14 every 21 days until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints were treatment-related toxicity and median overall survival (OS). Results: Between Oct.2008 and Sep. 2010, we enrolled 85 patients (median age: 52.2 years; median KPS score: 80; stage IV with M1b: 94.1%; adenocarcinoma: 64.6%). 48 (56.5%) patients complete 4 cycles of GP plus 2 cycles of Endostar and 33(38.8%) patients were treated with maintenance Endostar. For 38 patients receiving maintenance therapy, median PFS throughout the study period by independent review was 5.97 month and 1-year survival rate was 75.8%. Median PFS were 3.97 months for all 85 patients, while 1-year survival rate was 64.7%. No treatment related death occurred. 28(32.9%) patients had at least one grade 3/4 adverse events; the grade 3/4 hematologic toxicity included anemia in 32.9%, thrombocytopenia in 25.9%, neutropenia in 4.7% of patients. The grade 3/4 non-hematologic toxicities included nausea/vomiting in 18.8%, rash in 5.9%, hepatic impairment in 3.5%, diarrhea in 1.2%, hemorrhage in 1.2% of patients. Conclusions: This regimen, involving maintenance Endostar, didn’t significantly improve PFS in advanced NSCLC patients as compared to historic control although associated acceptable toxicity has been demonstrated

Randomized phase II study of carboplatin and paclitaxel with either linifanib or placebo for advanced nonsquamous NSCLC.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7512-7512
Author(s):  
Suresh S. Ramalingam ◽  
Mikhail Shtivelband ◽  
Ross A. Soo ◽  
Carlos H. Barrios ◽  
Anatoly Makhson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Predictive Biomarkers ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
First Line ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
And Gender ◽  
Ecog Ps

7512 Background: Linifanib is a potent and selective inhibitor of VEGF and PDGF receptors with modest single-agent activity in NSCLC. We evaluated the combination of linifanib with carboplatin (C) and paclitaxel (P) for first-line therapy of advanced non-squamous NSCLC. Methods: Patients (pts) with stage IIIB/IV, non-squamous NSCLC, stratified by ECOG PS and gender, were randomized to receive up to six 3-wk cycles of C (AUC 6 mg/ml/min) and P (200 mg/m2) with daily placebo (Arm A), linifanib 7.5 mg (Arm B), or linifanib 12.5 mg (Arm C). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), 12 m survival rate, and objective response rate (ORR). Safety was assessed by NCI-CTCAE v3.0. Results: 138 pts were randomized at 37 sites in 6 countries. Baseline characteristics were: median age, 61 y; men, 57%; smoker, 84%. Efficacy results are shown in the table. Thrombocytopenia was the only Grade 3/4 AE significantly higher on linifanib (Arm B: 16.7%; Arm C: 29.8%) vs. placebo (2.1%). Other adverse events (AEs) related to the dose of linifanib were diarrhea, thrombocytopenia, hypertension, weight loss, palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia syndrome, and hypothyroidism. Analysis of samples for predictive biomarkers including serum VEGF and placental growth factor are underway. Conclusions: The addition of linifanib to chemotherapy was tolerable at the doses tested and resulted in a significant improvement in PFS, with a modest survival improvement for Arm C in first-line therapy of advanced non-squamous NSCLC. [Table: see text]

Pan-cancer evaluation of homologous repair deficiency somatic mutations and response to first-line anti-neoplastic therapy.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10535-10535
Author(s):  
Jessica A Lavery ◽  
Samantha Brown ◽  
Gregory J. Riely ◽  
Philippe L. Bedard ◽  
Ben Ho Park ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Somatic Mutations ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
First Line ◽  
Major Mechanism ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Oncogenic Mutation ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Response To Chemotherapy

10535 Background: Homologous recombination is a major mechanism of defective DNA repair, but it remains uncertain whether homologous repair deficient (HRD) tumors have favorable prognosis or are more/less likely to respond to treatment than tumors lacking such mutations. Objective: To determine whether lung (NSCLC) and colorectal (CRC) HRD+ tumors have better survival or response to chemotherapy than HRD- tumors. Methods: Patients with de novo stage IV NSCLC or CRC who had next generation sequencing (NGS) between 2015-2018 from one of four cancer centers were identified. Records were curated using the PRISSMM framework to ascertain treatment, overall survival (OS) and progression free survival based on imaging (PFS-I) and oncologists’ notes (PFS-M). Each NSCLC or CRC tumor was categorized as HRD+ if NGS revealed an oncogenic/likely oncogenic mutation in: ATM, BAP1, BARD1, BLM, BRCA1, BRCA2, BRIP1, CHEK2, FAM175A, FANCA, FANCC, NBN, PALB2, RAD50, RAD51, RAD51C, RTEL1, or MRE11A based on the OncoKB database. The tumor was categorized as HRD- if no oncogenic mutation in any of these genes was evident and HRD indeterminate (HRD?) if no mutation was identified but the panel did not include all genes. OS, PFS-I and PFS-M from start of first line therapy were reported by HRD status. The percentage with a good response to first line therapy (≥2x the median) and exceptional response (≥3x the median) was estimated for each endpoint. Results: For NSCLC 4% were HRD+, 59% HRD- and 37% HRD?. For CRC there were 5% HRD+, 60% HRD- and 35% HRD?. There were no significant differences for any survival endpoint between patients who were HRD+ vs HRD- in univariable analyses. The proportion of good and exceptional responders to first line systemic chemotherapy also did not vary by HRD status, though patients with HRD+ CRC were potentially more likely to be exceptional responders. Similarly, no differences between HRD+ and HRD- tumors were apparent for the subgroup receiving platinum containing therapy. Conclusions: NSCLC and CRC patients with somatic mutations in HRD oncogenic genes did not differ from patients lacking such a mutation with respect to OS or PFS. CRC patients with HRD+ tumors may be more likely to be exceptional responders, but sample sizes are limited. By May, the analysis will include breast and pancreatic cancer cases.[Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document