Multicenter phase III trial of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy in stomach tumors 2 (ARTIST 2).

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS228-TPS228 ◽  
Author(s):  
Se Hoon Park ◽  
Su Jin Lee ◽  
Seung Tae Kim ◽  
Jeeyun Lee ◽  
Joon Oh Park ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Statistical Power ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Intestinal Type ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy ◽  
Phase Iii Trial ◽  
Node Positive ◽  
Node Positive Disease

TPS228 Background: Treatment of gastric cancer (GC) has some notable differences between Asia and Western countries including the extent of surgery and the type of adjuvant therapy. In ARTIST trial comparing adjuvant chemotherapy involving capecitabine plus cisplatin with chemoradiotherapy, we reported comparable disease-free survival (DFS) in Korean patients with D2-resected GC. In subset analyses, patients with node-positive disease and intestinal type GC may have benefit with the addition of radiotherapy to adjuvant chemotherapy. Methods: ARTIST 2 (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT0176146) is a 3-arm, multi-center, open-label phase III trial comparing adjuvant chemotherapy involving S-1 (40 mg/m2 bid 4-weeks-on/2-weeks-off) for one year (arm A) with S-1 plus oxaliplatin (SOX, S-1 40 mg/m2 bid 2-weeks-on/1-week-off plus oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 iv on day 1) for 8 cycles (arm B) and chemoradiotherapy (arm C). Arm C patients receive SOX for 2 cycles, then concurrent chemoradiotherapy 45 Gy with S-1 40 mg bid daily, followed by additional SOX for 4 more cycles. Patients are randomized 1:1:1 with 3 strata: stage (II or III), type of surgery (subtotal or total gastrectomy) and Lauren classification (diffuse or intestinal type). Eligibility criteria include gastric or gastro-esophageal junction adenocarcinoma, D2 or higher surgery with no residual disease, pathologic stages 2 or 3, lymph node positive disease. Primary endpoint is DFS, and secondary endpoints include overall survival, safety, QOL and molecular biomarkers. To test if experimental arms (arm B or C) lower the hazard of recurrence by 50% (i.e., HR 1.5) compared to arm A, we need 900 patients (300 per arm) with 90% of overall statistical power. First patient entered onto the study in Feb 2013. As of Aug 2014, a total of 118 (13% of target) patients were recruited by 8 Korean tertiary centers. Clinical trial information: NCT0176146.

Phase III Trial to Compare Adjuvant Chemotherapy With Capecitabine and Cisplatin Versus Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Gastric Cancer: Final Report of the Adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Stomach Tumors Trial, Including Survival and Subset Analyses

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (28) ◽  
pp. 3130-3136 ◽  
Author(s):  
Se Hoon Park ◽  
Tae Sung Sohn ◽  
Jeeyun Lee ◽  
Do Hoon Lim ◽  
Min Eui Hong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy ◽  
Final Report ◽  
D2 Lymph Node Dissection ◽  
Node Positive ◽  
Stomach Tumors

Purpose The Adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Stomach Tumors (ARTIST) trial tested whether the addition of radiotherapy to adjuvant chemotherapy improved disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with D2-resected gastric cancer (GC). Patients and Methods Between November 2004 and April 2008, 458 patients with GC who received gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection were randomly assigned to either six cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy with capecitabine and cisplatin (XP) or to two cycles of XP followed by chemoradiotherapy and then two additional cycles of XP (XPRT). This final update contains the first publication of overall survival (OS), together with updated DFS and subset analyses. Results With 7 years of follow-up, DFS remained similar between treatment arms (hazard ratio [HR], 0.740; 95% CI, 0.520 to 1.050; P = .0922). OS also was similar (HR, 1.130; 95% CI, 0.775 to 1.647; P = .5272). The effect of the addition of radiotherapy on DFS and OS differed by Lauren classification (interaction P = .04 for DFS; interaction P = .03 for OS) and lymph node ratio (interaction P < .01 for DFS; interaction P < .01 for OS). Subgroup analyses also showed that chemoradiotherapy significantly improved DFS in patients with node-positive disease and with intestinal-type GC. There was a similar trend for DFS and OS by stage of disease. Conclusion In D2-resected GC, both adjuvant chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy are tolerated and equally beneficial in preventing relapse. Because results suggest a significant DFS effect of chemoradiotherapy in subsets of patients, the ARTIST 2 trial evaluating adjuvant chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy in patients with node-positive, D2-resected GC is under way.

Six months versus twelve months of capecitabine as adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III (Dukes' C) colon cancer: Initial safety report for the open-label randomized phase III study (JFMC37-0801).

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3607-3607 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katsuyuki Kunieda ◽  
Sotaro Sadahiro ◽  
Hideyuki Mishima ◽  
Chikuma Hamada ◽  
Shigetoyo Saji ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Treatment Duration ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Chemotherapeutic Agents ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Phase Iii Trial ◽  
Stage Iii Colon Cancer

3607 Background: The standard treatment duration of adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) in patients (pts) with stage III colon cancer is 6 months. On the other hand, no clinical trial showed the optimal treatment duration of oral chemotherapeutic agents in adjuvant setting for colon cancer. Sargent et al have reported that 83% of recurrences in stage II and III pts have occurred within the first 3 years after surgery and peak was observed around one year after surgery. Therefore, to clarify the benefit of 12 months administration of Capecitabine, we designed randomized phase III trial for a comparison of 6 months treatment and 12 months treatment of capecitabine as adjuvant CT for stage III colon cancer. Methods: JFMC37 is a multicenter, randomized Phase III trial. Patients with fully resected Stage III colon or recto sigmoid cancer were eligible. Capecitabine was administered orally as tablets, 2,500 mg/m²/day for 14 days followed by a 7-days rest. Treatment is continued to 8 cycles (6 months) in arm A (A) or 16 cycles (12 months) in arm B (B). Patients were randomized 1:1 to A or B. Data size was estimated by disease free survival as primary endpoint. The statistical design is based on superiority hypothesis; 5-yrs DFS is 60% in arm A, 67% in arm B ;unilateral α=0.05, 1-β=0.8;and planed accrual is 1200 pts. Results: Between September 2008 to December 2009, 1304 patients were enrolled and then randomized. Both arms were well balanced for mean age: (A) 64.1, (B) 63.8; ECOG PS (%0/1): (A) 95.0/5.0, (B) 97.1/2.9; involvement of lymph nodes (%N0/N1/N2): (A) 77.1/19.9/3.1, (B) 76.6/19.7/3.7. Treatment completion rate for A and B were 68.2% and 43.4%. Incidences of serious adverse events (SAEs) over 1% were neutropenia: (A) 2.6%, (B) 3.8%, diarrhea: (A) 2.9%, (B) 2.1%, loss of appetite: (A) 1.3%, (B) 1.0%, fatigue: (A) 1.8%, (B) 1.2%, hand-hoot syndrome: (A) 16.4%, (B) 22.1%. Conclusions: There were no obvious differences in SAEs between arm A and arm B. Although twelve months of capecitabine showed a tendency to increase G3/4 hand-foot syndrome, we concluded that incidence of SAEs were acceptable and comparable to previously report.

NSABP B-47: A randomized phase III trial of adjuvant therapy comparing chemotherapy alone to chemotherapy plus trastuzumab in women with node-positive or high-risk node-negative HER2-low invasive breast cancer.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS1139-TPS1139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louis Fehrenbacher ◽  
Jong-Hyeon Jeong ◽  
Priya Rastogi ◽  
Charles E. Geyer ◽  
Soonmyung Paik ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Statistical Power ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Adjuvant Radiation ◽  
Weight Changes ◽  
Node Negative ◽  
Node Positive ◽  
Her2 Breast Cancer

TPS1139 Background: Adjuvant trastuzumab trials in HER2+ breast cancer (BC) demonstrated a large reduction in recurrence and death. Central testing showed HER2 non-amplified participants derived similar benefit. Among HER2-amplified patients (pts), multiple studies showed no effect on benefit by degree of amplification. Blinded internal and external review confirmed the non-amplified nature of the HER2 normal group. Based on these findings, NSABP B-47, sponsored by the NCI, was activated January 2011 and is actively accruing. The study is NCI central IRB approved, open via the CTSU, and endorsed by SWOG, ECOG, and RTOG. Methods: Study: Chemotherapy treatment is by physician choice: The non-anthracycline regimen is TC (docetaxel 75 mg/m2, cyclophosphamide (C) 600 mg/m2) IV q 3 wks for 6 cycles; the anthracycline regimen is AC → WP (doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 and C 600 mg/m2 IV either q 3 wks or q 2 wks [investigator discretion] for 4 cycles → paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 IV wkly for 12 doses). Pts are randomly assigned to chemotherapy with or without trastuzumab for 1 year. Pts receive adjuvant radiation therapy and endocrine therapy, as clinically indicated. Detailed menstrual history, concurrent medications, weight changes, and biomarkers (estrogen, stress, inflammation), are being collected. Eligibility: Eligibility includes: node positive or high risk node negative BC pts; HER2 IHC 1+ or 2+ scores, but non amplified by FISH; normal cardiac, renal, and liver function. Detailed eligibility will be provided. Statistical Design: The primary aim is to determine whether the addition of trastuzumab to chemotherapy improves invasive disease-free survival (IDFS). 3,260 pts will be enrolled to provide statistical power of 0.9 to detect a 33% reduction in the hazard rate of IDFS using a one-sided alpha level of 0.025. Progress: Protocol was activated in January 2011. First pt was entered in February 2011. As of January 23, 2013, 1,416 of 3,260 (43.4 %) pts have been enrolled. Updated information on enrollment and study background will be provided. Support: NCI U10-12027, -37377, 69651, 69974, and Genentech, Inc. Clinical trial information: NCT01275677.

Capecitabine (Cape) versus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based (neo-)adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC): Safety results of a randomized, phase III trial

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4014-4014 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Hofheinz ◽  
F. Wenz ◽  
S. Post ◽  
A. Matzdorff ◽  
S. Laechelt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy ◽  
Tumour Resection ◽  
Duration Of Treatment ◽  
Phase Iii Trial ◽  
Perioperative Treatment

4014 Background: 5-FU based CRT is regarded standard perioperative treatment in LARC. Here we report safety data of a non-inferiority phase III trial investigating (neo-)adjuvant CRT with Cape in comparison with 5-FU. Methods: Patients (pts) aged ≥18 years with LARC UICC stages II or III were recruited in this two-arm, two-strata randomized phase-III trial (arm A: Cape, arm B: 5-FU; stratum [S] I: adjuvant, S II: neoadjuvant). Regimens: Arm A: CRT: 50.4 Gy + Cape 1,650 mg/m2 days 1–38 plus five cycles of Cape 2,500 mg/m2 d 1–14, rep. d 22 (S I: 2 x Cape, CRT, 3 x Cape; S II: CRT, TME surgery followed by Cape x 5). Arm B: CRT: 50.4 Gy + 5-FU 225 mg/m2 c.i. daily [S I] or 5-FU 1,000 mg/m2 c.i. d 1–5 and 29–33 [S II] plus 4 cycles of bolus 5-FU 500mg/m2 d 1–5, rep. d 29 (S I: 2 x 5-FU, CRT, 2 x 5-FU; S II: CRT, TME surgery followed by 5-FU x 4). Primary endpoint was survival, secondary endpoints comprised safety and disease-free survival. Results: Of 401 randomized pts a total of 392 are evaluable (Arm A n=197, arm B n=195; S I n=231, S II n=161). Both arms were well balanced with respect to age, sex, WHO status, T- and N- stages. Regarding duration of treatment, 78% (Cape) and 80% (5-FU) completed all scheduled treatment cycles in S I, and 46% (Cape) and 40% (5-FU) in neoadjuvant stratum S II. In S II a total of 38% (Cape) and 43% (5-FU) did not continue chemotherapy after tumour resection. Concerning early efficacy endpoints in S II, pts treated with Cape (evaluable thus far n=121) exhibited a higher rate of T-downstaging (defined as ypT0–2; 52 vs 39%; p=0.16) and N0 (71 vs 56%; p=0.09). Regarding overall safety (NCI-CTC), pts receiving Cape experienced significantly less leukopenia (25 vs 35%; p=0.04), but more hand-foot syndrome (31 vs. 2%; p<0.001). Stomatitis/mucositis, diarrhea, nausea/vomiting, and radiodermatitis were not significantly different between both arms. Conclusions: Given the observed safety profile and the trend in improved downstaging in neoadjuvant stratum, Cape exhibits a potential to replace 5-FU as perioperative treatment of LARC. Efficacy results on the primary endpoint are expected for 2010. [Table: see text]

Randomized, Phase III Trial of Sequential Epirubicin and Docetaxel Versus Epirubicin Alone in Postmenopausal Patients With Node-Positive Breast Cancer

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (24) ◽  
pp. 3247-3254 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Charles Coombes ◽  
Judith M. Bliss ◽  
Marc Espie ◽  
Frans Erdkamp ◽  
Jacob Wals ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Postmenopausal Women ◽  
Early Breast Cancer ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Phase Iii Trial ◽  
Node Positive

Purpose The Docetaxel Epirubicin Adjuvant (DEVA) trial evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of incorporating docetaxel after epirubicin to create a sequential anthracycline-taxane regimen in early breast cancer. Patients and Methods After complete tumor excision, postmenopausal women with node-positive early breast cancer were randomly assigned to either epirubicin 50 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 every 4 weeks for six cycles (EPI × 6) or three cycles of epirubicin 50 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 every 4 weeks followed by three cycles of docetaxel 100 mg/m2 on day 1 every 3 weeks (EPI-DOC). A subset of patients also participated in a quality of life (QOL) study. The primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS). Results From 1997 to 2005, 803 patients entered DEVA (EPI × 6, n = 397; EPI-DOC, n = 406). At a median follow-up of 64.7 months (interquartile range, 45.2 to 84.4 months), 198 DFS events had been reported (EPI × 6, n = 114; EPI-DOC, n = 84). The 5-year DFS rates were 72.7% (95% CI, 68.0% to 77.3%) for epirubicin alone and 79.5% (95% CI, 75.2% to 83.8%) for epirubicin followed by docetaxel; evidence of improvement in DFS was observed with EPI-DOC (hazard ratio [HR], 0.68; 95% CI, 0.52 to 0.91; P = .008). One hundred twenty-seven patients have died (EPI × 6, n = 75; EPI-DOC, n = 52); a reduction in deaths was observed with EPI-DOC (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.46 to 0.94; P = .02). The 5-year overall survival rates were 81.8% (95% CI, 77.7% to 85.9%) for epirubicin and 88.9% (95% CI, 85.5% to 92.2%) for epirubicin followed by docetaxel. Assessment of toxicity and QOL showed that EPI-DOC was associated with greater toxicity but with no difference in QOL between arms during follow-up. Conclusion These results suggest, within a relatively small trial, that substitution of docetaxel for epirubicin for the last three cycles of chemotherapy results in improved outcome in postmenopausal women with node-positive, early breast cancer compared with six cycles of epirubicin monotherapy.

A randomized phase III trial comparing dose-dense epirubicin and cyclophosphamide (ECdd) followed by paclitaxel (T) with paclitaxel plus carboplatin (PCdd) as adjuvant chemotherapy for early triple-negative breast cancer patients with high-recurrence risk.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 528-528
Author(s):  
Jiani Wang ◽  
Qing Li ◽  
Yuxin Mu ◽  
Tongtong Zhang ◽  
Ying Han ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Recurrence Risk ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Phase Iii Trial ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Dose Dense

528 Background: There are no well-established adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) regimens for early triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). Our randomized phase III trial was designed to compare dose dense paclitaxel plus carboplatin (PCdd) with commonly used dose dense epirubicin and cyclophosphamide, followed by paclitaxel (ECdd-T) regimen as AC for TNBC with high recurrence risk. Methods: Between May 2011 and November 2015, TNBC patients were randomized in 1:1 ratio to receive PCdd or ECdd-T regimen as AC every two weeks for 8 cycles with administration of granulocyte stimulating factor (G-CSF) support. The primary endpoint was 3-year disease free survival (DFS).The secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and safety. Survival analyses were also performed for different subgroups stratified by age status (≤40 years vs >40 years), Ki 67(<50 vs ≥50), tumor size (<2cm vs ≥2cm), nodal status (N- vs N+) and treatment free survival (TFS) (<30 days vs ≥30 days). Results: In total, 132 patients with a median age of 49 years (PCdd 64 patients, ECdd-T 68 patients) were enrolled. After a median follow-up of 57.3 months, 23 events were observed (18 in ECdd-T, 5 in PCdd). Patients in the PCdd arm had significantly higher DFS rate than that in the ECdd-T arm (log-rank p = 0.0046, hazard ratio (HR) 0.305, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.134-0.693). The 3-year DFS rate was 93.7% with PCdd versus 77.9% with ECdd-T,respectively. Difference in 3-year OS rate was observed between the two arms (98.4% vs 92.6%), significantly higher in the PCdd arm ( p = 0.0268). Both regimens were well tolerated with manageable adverse events(AEs). Worse neutropenia (Grade 3/4: 48.5% in ECdd-T vs. 21.9% in PCdd, p=0.002) was found in ECdd-T arm. 3-year DFS rate for PCdd was superior in the following subgroups, age>40 years, clinically evaluated lymph nodes, TFS <30 days, with statistical significance ( p <0.05). Conclusions: Our data suggested that PCdd was superior to ECdd-T as AC for early TNBC in terms of improving 3-year DFS and OS. PCdd with lower hematological toxicity might be an appropriate regimen for early TNBC patients with high recurrence risk. Clinical trial information: NCT01378533.

ARTIST 2: Interim results of a phase III trial involving adjuvant chemotherapy and/or chemoradiotherapy after D2-gastrectomy in stage II/III gastric cancer (GC).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4001-4001 ◽  
Author(s):  
Se Hoon Park ◽  
Dae Young Zang ◽  
Boram Han ◽  
Jun Ho Ji ◽  
Tae Gyu Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Subtotal Gastrectomy ◽  
Data Monitoring Committee ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
Node Positive ◽  
Resected Stage

4001 Background: Adjuvant chemotherapy and/or chemoradiotherapy have been the standard of care in GC for years, supported by randomized trials. We compared the efficacy of different chemotherapy regimens and chemoradiotherapy in patients with D2-resected, stage II/III, node-positive GC. Methods: From Feb 2013 through Nov 2018, we randomly assigned, in a 1:1:1 ratio, patients with pathologically-staged II or III, node-positive, D2-resected GC, to receive adjuvant S-1 (40-60 mg twice daily 4-weeks-on/2-weeks-off) for one year, S-1 (2-weeks-on/1-week-off) plus oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 (SOX) for six months, or SOX plus chemoradiotherapy 45 Gy (SOXRT). Randomization was stratified according to the type of surgery (total or subtotal gastrectomy), stage (II or III), and Lauren histologic classification (diffuse or intestinal). The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS). A total of 900 patients had to be enrolled to demonstrate superiority of SOX or SOXRT to S-1 (hazard ratio [HR] 0.667), with 90% power at a two-sided significance level of 5%. Results: A total of 538 patients were included for this interim efficacy analysis. Median age was 58 years, men constituted 65%, and stage II and III were 31% and 69%, respectively. Baseline tumor and patient characteristics were balanced between treatment arms. Adverse events were as anticipated in each arm, generally well-tolerated and manageable. DFS in the control arm (S-1) were significantly shorter than in SOX and SOXRT arms (stratified HR for recurrence): S-1 vs. SOX, 0.617 (P = 0.016) and S-1 vs. SOXRT, 0.686 (P = 0.057). The DFS at 3-years was found to be 65%, 78% and 73% in S-1, SOX and SOXRT arms, respectively. No difference in DFS between SOX and SOXRT was found (HR 0.910, P = 0.667). Based on the results after the observation of 145 recurrence events at the cutoff date of Dec 27, 2018, the independent data monitoring committee considered the results sufficient to meet the endpoint of the trial and recommended early stopping of the trial. Conclusions: In patients with curatively D2-resected, stage II/III, node-positive GC, adjuvant SOX or SOXRT was effective in prolonging DFS, when compared to S-1 monotherapy. Clinical trial information: NCT0176146.

German Adjuvant Intergroup Node-Positive Study: A Phase III Trial to Compare Oral Ibandronate Versus Observation in Patients With High-Risk Early Breast Cancer

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (28) ◽  
pp. 3531-3539 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gunter von Minckwitz ◽  
Volker Möbus ◽  
Andreas Schneeweiss ◽  
Jens Huober ◽  
Christoph Thomssen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Early Breast Cancer ◽  
Data Monitoring Committee ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Phase Iii Trial ◽  
Positive Study ◽  
Node Positive ◽  
Dose Dense

Purpose Bisphosphonates prevent skeletal-related events in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Their effect in early breast cancer is controversial. Ibandronate is an orally and intravenously available amino-bisphosphonate with a favorable toxicity profile. It therefore qualifies as potential agent for adjuvant use. Patients and Methods The GAIN (German Adjuvant Intergroup Node-Positive) study was an open-label, randomized, controlled phase III trial with a 2 × 2 factorial design. Patients with node-positive early breast cancer were randomly assigned 1:1 to two different dose-dense chemotherapy regimens and 2:1 to ibandronate 50 mg per day orally for 2 years or observation. In all, 2,640 patients and 728 events were estimated to be required to demonstrate an increase in disease-free survival (DFS) by ibandronate from 75% to 79.5% by using a two-sided α = .05 and 1-β of 80%. We report here the efficacy analysis for ibandronate, which was released by the independent data monitoring committee because the futility boundary was not crossed after 50% of the required DFS events were observed. Results Between June 2004 and August 2008, 2,015 patients were randomly assigned to ibandronate and 1,008 to observation. Patients randomly assigned to ibandronate showed no superior DFS or overall survival (OS) compared with patients randomly assigned to observation (DFS: hazard ratio, 0.945; 95% CI, 0.768 to 1.161; P = .589; OS: HR, 1.040; 95% CI, 0.763 to 1.419; P = .803). DFS was numerically longer if ibandronate was used in patients younger than 40 years or older than 60 years compared with patients age 40 to 59 years (test for interaction P = .093). Conclusion Adjuvant treatment with oral ibandronate did not improve outcome of patients with high-risk early breast cancer who received dose-dense chemotherapy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document