scholarly journals Comparing Intelligence Quotient Change After Treatment With Proton Versus Photon Radiation Therapy for Pediatric Brain Tumors

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (10) ◽  
pp. 1043-1049 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa S. Kahalley ◽  
M. Douglas Ris ◽  
David R. Grosshans ◽  
M. Fatih Okcu ◽  
Arnold C. Paulino ◽  
...  

Purpose Compared with photon radiation (XRT), proton beam radiation therapy (PBRT) reduces dose to normal tissues, which may lead to better neurocognitive outcomes. We compared change in intelligence quotient (IQ) over time in pediatric patients with brain tumors treated with PBRT versus XRT. Patients and Methods IQ scores were available for 150 patients (60 had received XRT, 90 had received PBRT). Linear mixed models examined change in IQ over time since radiation therapy (RT) by RT group, controlling for demographic/clinical characteristics. Craniospinal and focal RT subgroups were also examined. Results In the PBRT group, no change in IQ over time was identified (P = .130), whereas in the XRT group, IQ declined by 1.1 points per year (P = .004). IQ slopes did not differ between groups (P = .509). IQ was lower in the XRT group (by 8.7 points) versus the PBRT group (P = .011). In the craniospinal subgroup, IQ remained stable in both the PBRT (P = .203) and XRT groups (P = .060), and IQ slopes did not differ (P = .890). IQ was lower in the XRT group (by 12.5 points) versus the PBRT group (P = .004). In the focal subgroup, IQ scores remained stable in the PBRT group (P = .401) but declined significantly in the XRT group by 1.57 points per year (P = .026). IQ slopes did not differ between groups (P = .342). Conclusion PBRT was not associated with IQ decline or impairment, yet IQ slopes did not differ between the PBRT and XRT groups. It remains unclear if PBRT results in clinically meaningful cognitive sparing that significantly exceeds that of modern XRT protocols. Additional long-term data are needed to fully understand the neurocognitive impact of PBRT in survivors of pediatric brain tumors.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10009-10009
Author(s):  
Lisa Kahalley ◽  
M. Fatih Okcu ◽  
M. Douglas Ris ◽  
David Grosshans ◽  
Arnold Paulino ◽  
...  

10009 Background: Radiation therapy (RT), an essential treatment for pediatric brain tumors, increases the risk of cognitive impairment. Advanced RT techniques reduce the volume of normal tissues receiving radiation dose. Proton beam radiation therapy (PBRT) minimizes irradiation to surrounding healthy brain tissue, with the potential to preserve cognitive function better than photon radiotherapy (XRT). We examined change in IQ over time between patients treated for pediatric brain tumors with PBRT versus XRT. Methods: IQ scores obtained in the first 3 years post-RT were abstracted for pediatric brain tumor patients treated with PBRT or XRT. Results: Baseline and follow-up IQ scores were available for 53 survivors (31 PBRT, 22 CRT). A linear regression model predicted follow-up IQ scores controlling for baseline IQ, age-at-RT, time-since-RT, and craniospinal irradiation (CSI), F(7,45)=23.4, p<.001. Follow-up IQ scores were significantly lower in the XRT group compared to the PBRT group (p<.05). The XRT group lost 10.3 IQ points on average with each additional year post-RT (p<.01), while the PBRT group remained stable, losing only 0.1 points per year on average (p<.05). CSI was associated with IQ decline in both groups (p<.05), while age-at-RT was not in either group (p=.154). Total RT dose was not associated with IQ with the above variables in the model. Conclusions: Findings suggest significant cognitive risk is associated with XRT, with IQ scores declining by more than half a standard deviation with each additional year post-RT. In contrast, IQ remained stable in the PBRT group. Preliminary findings suggest that PBRT may spare cognitive functioning in the first 3 years post-RT. Future research should replicate these findings with a larger sample and should study longer-term cognitive outcomes in patients treated with PBRT versus XRT. [Table: see text]


2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. iii459-iii459
Author(s):  
Takashi Mori ◽  
Shigeru Yamaguchi ◽  
Rikiya Onimaru ◽  
Takayuki Hashimoto ◽  
Hidefumi Aoyama

Abstract BACKGROUND As the outcome of pediatric brain tumors improves, late recurrence and radiation-induced tumor cases are more likely to occur, and the number of cases requiring re-irradiation is expected to increase. Here we report two cases performed intracranial re-irradiation after radiotherapy for pediatric brain tumors. CASE 1: 21-year-old male. He was diagnosed with craniopharyngioma at eight years old and underwent a tumor resection. At 10 years old, the local recurrence of suprasellar region was treated with 50.4 Gy/28 fr of stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT). After that, other recurrent lesions appeared in the left cerebellopontine angle, and he received surgery three times. The tumor was gross totally resected and re-irradiation with 40 Gy/20 fr of SRT was performed. We have found no recurrence or late effects during the one year follow-up. CASE 2: 15-year-old female. At three years old, she received 18 Gy/10 fr of craniospinal irradiation and 36 Gy/20 fr of boost to the posterior fossa as postoperative irradiation for anaplastic ependymoma and cured. However, a anaplastic meningioma appeared on the left side of the skull base at the age of 15, and 50 Gy/25 fr of postoperative intensity-modulated radiation therapy was performed. Two years later, another meningioma developed in the right cerebellar tent, and 54 Gy/27 fr of SRT was performed. Thirty-three months after re-irradiation, MRI showed a slight increase of the lesion, but no late toxicities are observed. CONCLUSION The follow-up periods are short, however intracranial re-irradiation after radiotherapy for pediatric brain tumors were feasible and effective.


Author(s):  
May Albee ◽  
Santiago Allende ◽  
Victoria Cosgrove ◽  
Matthew Hocking

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Survivors of pediatric brain tumors (BT) are at increased risk for difficulties with social competence, including poor social information processing (SIP) and peer relationships. Due to improved survival rates among BT, there is a need to better understand these challenges and if they are specific to BT versus other survivors of childhood cancer. METHODS: 51 BT and 34 survivors of pediatric solid tumors (ST) completed evaluations of SIP and peer relationship quality within 6 months of completing treatment and at one year follow-up. Caregivers also completed a measure of social skills. Linear mixed models evaluated (1) differences between BT and ST on SIP and social skills and (2) how indices of SIP were associated with peer relationships over time for ST and BT. RESULTS: BT did not differ from ST on indices of SIP or social skills over time. There was a three-way interaction between measures of SIP, group, and time to predict peer relationships. ST showed a positive association between baseline social skills and theory of mind and peer relationships over time, whereas BT showed an inverse association between baseline social skills and theory of mind and peer relationships over time. CONCLUSION: Baseline SIP and social skills affected the trajectory of BT peer relationships. BT social functioning should be monitored regularly after the completion of treatment to determine if and when intervention services would be beneficial.


2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (06) ◽  
pp. 307-312
Author(s):  
Fred Chiu-Lai Lam ◽  
Ekkehard M Kasper ◽  
Anand Mahadevan

AbstractRadiation therapy (RT) is a mainstay for the treatment of pediatric brain tumors. As improvements in and sophistication of this modality continue to increase the survival of patients, the long-term sequelae of RT pose significant challenges in the clinical management of this patient population as they transition into adulthood. In this special edition, we review the short- and long-term effects of RT for the treatment of pediatric brain tumors and the necessary surveillance required for follow-up.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document