Randomized phase I/II trial of two schedules of bortezomib and bevacizumab (BBmibmab) in metastatic renal cell cancer: USC trial 4K-05-1.

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. 574-574
Author(s):  
David I. Quinn ◽  
Denice Wei ◽  
Kristy Massopust ◽  
Charlean Ketchens ◽  
James Hu ◽  
...  

574 Background: VEGF agents are a mainstay of therapy in advanced RCC. Bev has activity in RCC but was licensed with interferon-α, which can produce side effects and reduced QoL. Based on non-overlapping side effect profiles, we studied bortezomib (Bmib), a proteasome inhibitor, with the VEGF ligand monoclonal antibody, bevacizumab (Bmab). Primary objective was to examine safety/toxicity of 2 dose schedules of Bmib with Bmab with secondary aims of efficacy (benchmarked to NCI data) and correlatives. Methods: From 2005 and 2014, 62 RCC patients with clear cell or papillary predominant histology treated with 0-4 prior therapies were screened: 10 screen failed, 4 were ineligible (2 treated, 2 not) leaving 48 eligible patients, of whom 46 were evaluable for safety and efficacy endpoints with 20 in each of the phase II dose schedules. Regimens were randomly allocated, stratified by MSKCC group. Results: Best tolerated doses of Bmib with Bmab 10mg/kg IV q3wks on each regimen were A: 1.3 mg/m2 on D 1, 4, 8 and 11 q3wks & B: 1.8 mg/m2on days 1 and 8 q3wks. MSKCC strata: low, intermediate, high risk in 43, 42%; 48, 49%; 9, 9% for schedules A and B, respectively; other baseline factors were not significantly different between A & B. Overall: nephrectomy 90%; ECOG 0 73%; male 71%; median age 57 years; Caucasian 48%, Hispanic 33%, Black 8%, Asian 10%;. Median cycles both arms: 5. Best RECIST 1.0 response PR: 13%, 13%; SD 52%, 48%; PD 26%, 35%; Reason off therapy: PD 58, 67%; toxicity 25, 17% in arms A, B. Median OS: 33.4, 14.7 months (p=0.69), TTP 11.2, 9.4 months, PFS 7.3, 6.6 months (p=0.61) in arms A, B. Grade 3+ tox: A 14/24 vs. B 13/24, p=1.0. Arm A had numerically more skin toxicities and grade 2/3 hematological tox (Plats and WBCs) compared to arm B but this was not statistically significant. Conclusions: Randomized comparisons of novel agents are feasible in renal cell cancer using risk factor algorithms. This VEGFrTKI contemporaneous series of Bmab based therapy with 2 schedules of Bmib suggests potential better outcomes for schedule A with more frequent dosing of Bmib – further sensitivity analysis is ongoing to determine whether this is explained by histology or therapeutic sequencing or likely to suggest proteasome as a target in RCC. Clinical trial information: NCT00184015.

2013 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. e1115, C07
Author(s):  
M. Chocholatý ◽  
K. Havlová ◽  
M. Schmidt ◽  
M. Kalousová ◽  
M. Jáchymová ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 275-275
Author(s):  
Grant D. Stewart ◽  
Sarah J. Welsh ◽  
Stephan Ursprung ◽  
Ferdia Gallagher ◽  
Iosif Mendichovszky ◽  
...  

275 Background: Venous tumor thrombus (VTT) extension occurs in 4-15% cases of renal cell cancer (RCC). The Mayo classification distinguishes 4 levels of VTT extension between the renal vein and supradiaphragmatic inferior vena cava (IVC). Although surgery is performed with curative intent, mortality is high (5-15%) with complications increasing with the level of the VTT. 5-year survival rates are poor; ~40-65% in non-metastatic RCC. It is hypothesised that neoadjuvant targeted therapy could downstage the VTT reducing the extent of surgery, leading to reduced surgical morbidity and mortality, and increased survival. However, level I or II evidence is lacking. NAXIVA provides the first level II evidence in this patient group, assessing the response of VTT to axitinib. Extensive translational sampling will provide in depth interrogation of VTT (using genomics, proteomics, immunophenotyping and metabolomics) to examine the role of the tumor microenvironment of VTT and response to axitinib. Methods: NAXIVA was a single arm, single agent, multi-center phase 2 feasibility study of axitinib in patients with both metastatic and non-metastatic clear cell RCC prior to nephrectomy and thrombectomy. A Simon two stage minimax design was adopted and the trial designed for adequate power to distinguish a <5% from a >25% improvement in the Mayo VTT level. 21 patients were recruited over a 24 month period between 15/Dec/2017 and 06/Jan/2020 at 5 sites across the UK. Patients were treated with 8 weeks of axitinib (starting dose 5mg bd, increasing to 10mg bd as tolerated) prior to planned surgery. The primary endpoint was the percentage of evaluable patients with an improvement in VTT according to the Mayo classification (assessed using MRI abdomen scans at screening and week 9, prior to surgery. Secondary endpoints were percentage change in surgical approach, percentage change in VTT height, response rate (by RECIST) and evaluation of surgical morbidity assessed by Clavien-Dindo classification. Results: The percentage of evaluable patients with an improvement in VTT according to the Mayo classification was 26.58% [80% CI: 15.76%, 39.74%] (6 of 21 evaluable patients). 35.29% (6 of 17 patients who progressed to surgery) had a change in surgical approach to a less invasive option. There was a median percentage reduction in VTT height of 21.49% (SD=27.60%). The response rate (by RECIST) in the evaluable population was 61.90% SD, 14.29% PR, 9.52% PD. In terms of surgical morbidity 11.76% (2 of 17 patients who progressed to surgery) experienced a Clavien-Dindo 3 or greater complication (0 CD3, 1 CD4, 1 CD5). Conclusions: NAXIVA provides unique prospective data on the feasibility of neoadjuvant axitinib administration to down stage IVC VTT and reduce the extent of surgery. Work is ongoing to establish predictors of response. Clinical trial information: NCT03494816 .


2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (8) ◽  
pp. 2006-2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Iris J.H. van Vlodrop ◽  
Sophie C. Joosten ◽  
Tim De Meyer ◽  
Kim M. Smits ◽  
Leander Van Neste ◽  
...  

1990 ◽  
Vol 1 (5) ◽  
pp. 377-378 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Atzpodien ◽  
A. Körfer ◽  
P.A. Palmer ◽  
C.R. Franks ◽  
H. Poliwoda ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 25 ◽  
pp. iv292 ◽  
Author(s):  
G.A. Bjarnason ◽  
B. Naveen ◽  
E. Winquist ◽  
C.K. Kollmannsberger ◽  
C. Canil ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (5_suppl) ◽  
pp. 443-443
Author(s):  
Robert J. Amato ◽  
Amber Flaherty ◽  
Somyata Saxena ◽  
Mika Stepankiw

443 Background: Everolimus, an oral mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor, has demonstrated efficacy affects tumor growth by blocking growth factor stimulation, arresting cell cycle progression, and inhibiting angiogenesis. mTOR inhibitors and agents with primarily antiangiogenic activity have been shown to have efficacy in renal cell cancer (RCC). This study expanded the original everolimus study of 41 patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell cancer to 66 patients to examine outcome and clinical prognostic factors associated with outcome Methods: Patients had confirmed predominantly clear cell RCC. Everolimus was given at a dose of 10 mg daily orally without interruption (28-day cycle), with dose modifications for toxicity (graded according to National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria, version 3.0). Patients were evaluated every 2 cycles (8 weeks) using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). Results: Of 66 evaluable and treated patients, 73% were male, and 45% were >60. Forty-five percent had right kidney involvement, 49% left kidney involvement, and 6% had dual kidney involvement. Eighty-six percent had prior systemic therapy, and 76% of patients had at least two metastatic sites including lung (72%), liver (26%), bone (48%), lymph nodes (50%), adrenal (21%), and other (39%). Twenty-four (36%) of patients had a progression-free survival (PFS) of ≥12 months, and 40 patients (61%) had an overall survival (OS) ≥12 months. Factors most likely to have an influence on OS benefit was high LDH, alkaline phosphatase, and calcium; low hemoglobin; and prior treatment with tyrokinase inhibitors. Conclusions: Everolimus was found to have clinical benefit in patients with clear cell RCC. Clinical prognostic factors may help determine patients most likely to receive benefit from everolimus. Information regarding curves and correlation between prognostic factors and OS and PFS will be presented.


2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15615-e15615
Author(s):  
Ugo De Giorgi ◽  
Karim Rihawi ◽  
Michele Aieta ◽  
Giovanni Lo Re ◽  
Teodoro Sava ◽  
...  

e15615 Background: Lymphopenia is associated with toxicity and outcome in several cancer types. We assessed the association of pre-treatment lymphopenia with toxicity and clinical outcome of elderly patients with metastatic renal cell cancer treated with first-line sunitinib. We evaluated the prognostic factors in these patients. Methods: We reviewed the clinical files of 181 patients aged >70 years with mRCC treated with first-line sunitinib in seventeen Italian Oncology Units from February 2006 to September 2011. Baseline lymphopenia was defined as lymphocyte counts <1,000/µL. Results: Twenty–nine patients (16.0%) had a baseline lymphocyte counts <1,000/µL, and 152 (84%) ≥1,000/µL. No difference between the two groups was reported in overall response rate (p = 0.207), dose reductions (p = 0.740); discontinuations due to adverse events (p = 0.175), overall incidence of grade 3-4 toxicities (p = 0.112) even if more patients in the group with lymphopenia had grade 3-4 neutropenia (p = 0.017), grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia (p = 0.017) and grade 3-4 diarrhea (p = 0.006). In multivariate analysis, performance status and Heng score were predictors of progression-free survival (p = 0.015 and p = 0.0006, respectively), while performance status, Heng score, and lymphopenia were found to be significantly associated with overall survival (p = 0.007, p < 0.0001 and p = 0.023, respectively). Conclusions: Sunitinib appeared safe and active in elderly patients with lymphopenia. Lymphocyte counts is an independent prognostic factor for OS in elderly patients with mRCC treated with first-line sunitinib.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document