Publication of quality improvement in medical oncology: A descriptive numerical summary from a scoping review.

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 251-251
Author(s):  
Laavanya Dharmakulaseelan ◽  
Bryan B. Franco ◽  
Matthew C. Cheung ◽  
Adam E. Haynes ◽  
Brian M. Wong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Quality Of Care ◽  
Scoping Review ◽  
Medical Oncology ◽  
Knowledge Dissemination ◽  
Advanced Degree ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Academic Settings ◽  
Oncology Practice

251 Background: Quality improvement (QI) is becoming a professional expectation and essential to medical oncology practice. A study of medical oncologists found that most QI interventions are not published, suggesting barriers to knowledge dissemination. We aim to describe the authors, settings of QI interventions, and publishing journals of scholarly QI literature. Methods: We conducted a scoping review using Arksey and O'Malley's framework. A search of MEDLINE and EMBASE databases found 48,186 unique English citations from January 2001 to August 2014. Two independent reviewers were responsible for screening the search results and 270 studies were included. Characteristics of first authors, settings of QI interventions, and publishing journals were charted. We used online search engines to find institutional profiles to obtain author and institutional information. A descriptive numerical summary analysis was used to summarize and report the results. Results: The number of QI publications has increased over time, with 60 between 2001 and 2006 and 199 from 2007 to 2013. The majority of first authors are clinicians (65%), of which 59% are physicians, 31% are nurses, and 5% are pharmacists. Furthermore, 27% of first authors are primarily researchers whereas 5% are solely administrators. In addition to professional degrees, having an advanced degree was common amongst clinicians (48% of physicians, 85% of nurses, 44% of pharmacists). Forty-four percent of interventions were conducted in settings affiliated with an academic institution, as opposed to community-based settings. Only 9% of articles were published in a quality of care focused journal. Conclusions: Our scoping review found that most first authors of QI interventions are clinicians, many with an advanced degree in academic settings (rather than community-based settings where most patients receive care). The lack of studies published in quality of care focused journals may result in lost opportunities for knowledge transfer. These findings suggest that more effective knowledge dissemination and increased support for QI studies are needed to further the science of quality and ultimately improve quality of care.

Utilizing QOPI in the quality improvement efforts of the NCI Community Cancer Centers Program (NCCCP).

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (34_suppl) ◽  
pp. 208-208
Author(s):  
Robert D. Siegel ◽  
Holley Stallings ◽  
Donna M. Bryant ◽  
Pamela Kadlubek ◽  
Laurel Borowski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Quality Of Care ◽  
Best Practices ◽  
New England ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Quality Initiatives ◽  
Cancer Centers ◽  
High Performing ◽  
Oncology Practice

208 Background: The NCCCP is a network of community based institutions from New England to Hawaii funded by the NCI. Quality of care is a priority of the NCCCP with participation in ASCO’s Quality Oncology Practice Initiative (QOPI) playing a fundamental role. QOPI provides a process for quality assessment but we have also used it as a measure of quality improvement (QI) network-wide. Using QOPI methodology, we have analyzed our performance twice a year in an effort to enhance our implementation of quality indicators relevant to program aims. Methods: A data sharing agreement allows individual practice QOPI data to be electronically sent to the NCI where it is aggregated with the other NCCCP QOPI participants. Data are presented via webinar within the network using a variety of QI strategies. For example, blinded site performance distributions are benchmarked against NCCCP national averages on specific indicators. High performing practices voluntarily present their QI initiatives and best practices to the network. The NCCCP Quality of Care Subcommittee then selects QI projects and areas to focus quality improvement efforts. Results: In Spring 2012, 44 practices affiliated with 25 NCCCP sites participated in QOPI, a consistent pattern since Fall 2010. The table below describes the percent compliance with certain QOPI measures for the NCCCP aggregate over time. Selected measures were perceived as having had suboptimal compliance in Fall 2010. Conclusions: QOPI is an effective tool for assessing quality within a network and for measuring quality improvement efforts. Best practices from within the network can be leveraged and disseminated to enhance the quality of cancer care. This methodology facilitates quality initiatives despite the logistical challenges of working with practices across the country. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Improving nursing documentation for surgical patients in a referral hospital in Freetown, Sierra Leone: protocol for assessing feasibility of a pilot multifaceted quality improvement hybrid type project

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nataliya Brima ◽  
Nick Sevdalis ◽  
K. Daoh ◽  
B. Deen ◽  
T. B. Kamara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Quality Of Care ◽  
Sierra Leone ◽  
Referral Hospital ◽  
Audit And Feedback ◽  
Health System Strengthening ◽  
Theory Of Change ◽  
Improve Quality ◽  
Nursing Documentation

Abstract Background There is an urgent need to improve quality of care to reduce avoidable mortality and morbidity from surgical diseases in low- and middle-income countries. Currently, there is a lack of knowledge about how evidence-based health system strengthening interventions can be implemented effectively to improve quality of care in these settings. To address this gap, we have developed a multifaceted quality improvement intervention to improve nursing documentation in a low-income country hospital setting. The aim of this pilot project is to test the intervention within the surgical department of a national referral hospital in Freetown, Sierra Leone. Methods This project was co-developed and co-designed by in-country stakeholders and UK-based researchers, after a multiple-methodology assessment of needs (qualitative, quantitative), guided by a participatory ‘Theory of Change’ process. It has a mixed-method, quasi-experimental evaluation design underpinned by implementation and improvement science theoretical approaches. It consists of three distinct phases—(1) pre-implementation(project set up and review of hospital relevant policies and forms), (2) intervention implementation (awareness drive, training package, audit and feedback), and (3) evaluation of (a) the feasibility of delivering the intervention and capturing implementation and process outcomes, (b) the impact of implementation strategies on the adoption, integration, and uptake of the intervention using implementation outcomes, (c) the intervention’s effectiveness For improving nursing in this pilot setting. Discussion We seek to test whether it is possible to deliver and assess a set of theory-driven interventions to improve the quality of nursing documentation using quality improvement and implementation science methods and frameworks in a single facility in Sierra Leone. The results of this study will inform the design of a large-scale effectiveness-implementation study for improving nursing documentation practices for patients throughout hospitals in Sierra Leone. Trial registration Protocol version number 6, date: 24.12.2020, recruitment is planned to begin: January 2021, recruitment will be completed: December 2021.

CQI: Meeting the Mandate for Quality

1995 ◽  
Vol 112 (5) ◽  
pp. P111-P111
Author(s):  
Carl A. Patow
Keyword(s):  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Quality Of Care ◽  
Continuous Quality Improvement ◽  
Educational Objectives ◽  
Continuous Quality

Educational objectives: To understand the principles of continuous quality improvement and to use these principles to enhance patient satisfaction through increased efficiency and improved quality of care.

Value-based dentistry: Putting the patient first

2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 126-129 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sreenivas Koka ◽  
Galya Raz
Keyword(s):  
Risk Management ◽  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Quality Of Care ◽  
Dental Care ◽  
Time Cost ◽  
Safety Risk ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Over Time

What does ‘value’ mean? In the context of dental care, it can be defined as the quality of care received by a patient divided by the cost to the patient of receiving that care. In other words: V =Q/C, where Q equals the quality improvement over time, which most patients view in the context of the outcome, the service provided and safety/risk management, and C equals the financial, biological and time cost to the patient. Here, the need for, and implications of, value-based density for clinicians and patients alike are explored.

scholarly journals Baseline Quality-of-Care Data From a Quality-Improvement Program Implemented by a Network of Diabetes Outpatient Clinics

Diabetes Care ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 31 (11) ◽  
pp. 2166-2168 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. C.E. Rossi ◽  
A. Nicolucci ◽  
A. Arcangeli ◽  
A. Cimino ◽  
G. De Bigontina ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Quality Of Care ◽  
Quality Improvement Program ◽  
Outpatient Clinics ◽  
Improvement Program

scholarly journals Morbidity and Mortality Revisited: Applying a New Quality Improvement Paradigm in Oncology

2015 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. e428-e433 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel G. Stover ◽  
Jessica A. Zerillo
Keyword(s):  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Morbidity And Mortality ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Cancer Centers ◽  
Oncology Practice

Using a quality improvement (QI) paradigm, the authors conducted 11 multidisciplinary conferences throughout 2013-2014 at two tertiary academic cancer centers and a satellite community-based oncology practice. They present their approach including key components and an example case.

scholarly journals PSS58 A SCORING SYSTEM FOR QUALITY OF CARE EVALUATION. A COMMUNITY-BASED STUDY OF CHRONIC LEG ULCERS IN NORTH GERMANY

2008 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. A627
Author(s):  
M Augustin ◽  
L Grams ◽  
K Herberger ◽  
N Franzke ◽  
S Debus ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Care ◽  
Scoring System ◽  
Leg Ulcers ◽  
Community Based ◽  
North Germany ◽  
Care Evaluation ◽  
Chronic Leg Ulcers

Effect of a health system payment and quality improvement programme for tonsillectomy in Ontario, Canada: an interrupted time series analysis

2021 ◽  
pp. bmjqs-2021-013110
Author(s):  
Sanjay Mahant ◽  
Jun Guan ◽  
Jessie Zhang ◽  
Sima Gandhi ◽  
Evan Jon Propst ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Time Series ◽  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Quality Of Care ◽  
Health System ◽  
Interrupted Time Series ◽  
Improve Quality ◽  
Interrupted Time Series Analysis ◽  
Quality Improvement Programme ◽  
Improvement Programme

BackgroundTonsillectomy is among the most common and cumulatively expensive surgical procedures in children, with known variations in quality of care. However, evidence on health system interventions to improve quality of care is limited. The Quality-Based Procedures (QBP) programme in Ontario, Canada, introduced fixed episode hospital payment per tonsillectomy and disseminated a perioperative care pathway. We determined the association of this payment and quality improvement programme with tonsillectomy quality of care.MethodsInterrupted time series analysis of children undergoing elective tonsillectomy at community and children’s hospitals in Ontario in the QBP period (1 April 2014 to 31 December 2018) and the pre-QBP period (1 January 2009 to 31 January 2014) using health administrative data. We compared the age-standardised and sex-standardised rates for all-cause tonsillectomy-related revisits within 30 days, opioid prescription fills within 30 days and index tonsillectomy inpatient admission.Results111 411 children underwent tonsillectomy: 51 967 in the QBP period and 59 444 in the pre-QBP period (annual median number of hospitals, 86 (range 77–93)). Following QBP programme implementation, revisit rates decreased for all-cause tonsillectomy-related revisits (0.48 to −0.18 revisits per 1000 tonsillectomies per month; difference −0.66 revisits per 1000 tonsillectomies per month (95% CI −0.97 to −0.34); p<0.0001). Codeine prescription fill rate continued to decrease but at a slower rate (−4.81 to −0.11 prescriptions per 1000 tonsillectomies per month; difference 4.69 (95% CI 3.60 to 5.79) prescriptions per 1000 tonsillectomies per month; p<0.0001). The index tonsillectomy inpatient admission rate decreased (1.12 to 0.23 admissions per 1000 tonsillectomies per month; difference −0.89 (95% CI −1.33 to −0.44) admissions per 1000 tonsillectomies per month; p<0.0001).ConclusionsThe payment and quality improvement programme was associated with several improvements in quality of care. These findings may inform jurisdictions planning health system interventions to improve quality of care for tonsillectomy and other paediatric procedures.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document