Comprehensively assessing the clinical trial landscape in oncology over the last 10 years.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18023-e18023
Author(s):  
Jonathan Crowther ◽  
David john Cocker
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Adaptive Design ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Research Field ◽  
Multiple Drug ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Real World Data ◽  
Drug Databases ◽  
Cancer Trials ◽  
Semantic Ontology

e18023 Background: Since the establishment of clinical trial registries such as ClinicalTrials.gov the number of such registries and the volume of data within the registries has quadrupled. Many studies have assessed the clinical trial landscape within their research field and have been hindered by inadequate search queries. Several approaches within these studies have implemented descriptive statistical analysis by examining specific indications or by searching for trials often using vague search terms such as “neoplasms”. This type of analysis permits the integration of potentially non-relevant noisy data which, impairs the overall analysis quality, Methods: In this study, we developed a semantic ontology linking algorithm to comprehensively merge 16 trial registries, 198,000 clinical trials, 10,000 molecules from multiple drug databases and PubMed, thus rendering and identifying indications, treatment, sites and investigators into one resource. The method allowed for a semantically cleaned and collapsed database to be queried more effectively with higher reliability in results. Results: The second proponent of our study was to assess the international oncology trial landscape over the last 10 years. The last major analysis in 2009 identified a significant preference for United States clinical sites in large cancer trials. Since this study, oncology has evolved toward a precision therapy approach and adaptive design model. This 2017 analysis shows an increasing concentration of US based clinical activity. For lung cancer trials with a US component, the top 100 US clinical research sites in the US are involved in 86% of the phase 1 trials, representing 55% of the total enrolment. When analyzing site usage for phase 3, this share drops to 67% of trials, representing just 8,5% of the total patient enrolment targets. Conclusions: The semantic ontology and algorithms and exploiting real-world data to mapped out and re-evaluate the status of cancer trials globally and gave insights into how cancer trials are progressing in the future. Understanding this evolution is of high importance for clinical trial planning and global trial country and site optimization.

Safety and clinical activity of adenosine A2a receptor (A2aR) antagonist, CPI-444, in anti-PD1/PDL1 treatment-refractory renal cell (RCC) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3004-3004 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lawrence Fong ◽  
Patrick M. Forde ◽  
John D. Powderly ◽  
Jonathan Wade Goldman ◽  
John J. Nemunaitis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Adaptive Design ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Optimal Dose ◽  
Dose Schedule ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Specific Expansion ◽  
Anti Tumor Activity

3004 Background: Adenosine production in the tumor leads to immunosuppression through A2aR on infiltrating immune cells. CPI-444 is an oral A2aR antagonist with single agent(SA) anti-tumor activity in pre-clinical models. This phase 1/1b clinical trial uses a 2-step adaptive design to evaluate CPI-444 as a SA and in combination (combo) with the anti-PDL1 antibody, atezolizumab (atezo). We report results of RCC and NSCLC cohorts. Methods: Primary objectives: safety, efficacy and to identify optimal dose/schedule. Step 1 utilized 3 SA and 1 combo cohort to select dose/schedule. Step 2 included disease-specific expansion cohorts including RCC and NSCLC. Eligible pts had selected advanced cancers and failed standard therapies including checkpoint inhibitors. Results: 34 pts have enrolled and 25 pts were evaluable for response (Table 1). Median prior regimens: 3 (range,1-5) and most pts were resistant/refractory to anti PD1/PDL1 therapy (R/R). Most common AEs were Gr 1 nausea (n = 3) and pyrexia (n = 3); Gr 3 tachycardia was the only possibly related SAE. The selected Step 2 doses were CPI-444 100mg BID as a SA and in combo with atezo 840mg IV q2 weeks. The disease control rate (DCR, CR+PR+SD; duration 2 mo to > 8 mo) for pts with RCC and NSCLC cohorts were 86% and 50%, (100% and 43% for R/R pts), respectively. DCRs were similar in the SA and combo cohorts. Of 7 evaluable RCC pts, 1 pt has an ongoing PR (SA cohort, > 4 mo) and 5 have ongoing SD, duration 3 mo to > 8 mo (2 SA, 3 combo). Biopsy of the PR pt showed no detectable tumor and infiltration with CD8+ lymphocytes. In 18 evaluable NSCLC pts, 1 PR (PDL1 negative pt) and 8 SD were seen. PRs and SDs were seen in R/R pts and in PDL1 negative pts in both diseases. Conclusions: CPI-444 is well tolerated and shows anti-tumor activity in RCC and NSCLC pts as a SA and in combo. Pts who are R/R to anti PD1/PDL1 therapy and who are PDL1 negative can also benefit. Clinical trial information: NCT02655822. [Table: see text]

Effect of olutasidenib (FT-2102) on complete remissions in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) mIDH1 acute myeloid leukemia (AML): Results from a planned interim analysis of a phase 2 clinical trial.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7006-7006
Author(s):  
Stéphane De Botton ◽  
Karen W. L. Yee ◽  
Christian Recher ◽  
Andrew Wei ◽  
Pau Montesinos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Median Duration ◽  
Interim Analysis ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Duration Of Treatment ◽  
Transfusion Independence

7006 Background: Olutasidenib, a potent, selective, oral, small molecule inhibitor of mutant IDH1 (m IDH1), has exhibited favorable tolerability and clinical activity in high-risk AML patients (pts) in a phase 1 trial (Watts, Blood 2019). Here, we present interim analysis results of a phase 2 trial (NCT02719574) in R/R m IDH1 AML pts receiving olutasidenib monotherapy 150 mg twice daily. Methods: The efficacy evaluable (EE) set comprised m IDH1R132X pts whose first dose was ≥180 days before the data cut-off (18-JUN-20). The primary endpoint was CR+CRh (complete remission [CR] or CR with partial hematologic recovery [CRh] according to modified IWG 2003 criteria) rate. CRh was defined as bone marrow blasts <5%, absolute neutrophil count >0.5×109/L, and platelet count >50×109/L. Overall response rate (ORR) comprised CR+CRh+CR with incomplete recovery (CRi) + morphologic leukemia-free state (MLFS) + partial response (PR). Duration of treatment (DOT), duration of response (DOR), and overall survival (OS) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methodology. Results: This clinical trial met its pre-specified early enrollment-stopping criteria for efficacy. A total of 153 pts with R/R AML received olutasidenib; median DOT, 5.5 mo (95% CI: 4.4, 8.7). 43 pts (28%) remain on treatment and 110 (72%) discontinued, most commonly due to: disease progression, 31%; AEs, 14%; death, 10%; and transplant, 8%. For the EE set (123 pts), the median age was 71 y (range: 32‒87) with a median number of prior therapies of 2 (1‒7). The CR+CRh rate was 33% including 30% of pts in CR (Table). Median duration of CR+CRh was not reached (NR) and 13.8 mo in a sensitivity analysis when HSCT or relapse was deemed end of response. ORR was 46% and median duration of ORR was 11.7 mo. Of responders who were transfusion-dependent at baseline, 56-day platelet transfusion independence (TI) and RBC TI were gained by 100% and 83%, respectively, of pts who achieved CR+CRh, and by 56% and 50% who did not. Median OS was 10.5 mo (EE set). In CR+CRh responders, median OS was NR and the estimated 18-mo OS was 87%. TEAEs in ≥25% of pts were nausea, 38%; constipation, 25%; leukocytosis, 25%. Grade 3/4 all-causality TEAEs in >10% of pts were febrile neutropenia, 20%; anemia, 19%; thrombocytopenia, 16%; neutropenia, 13%. Investigator-assessed IDH1 differentiation syndrome (any grade) was observed in 21 pts (14%); most cases resolved with treatment management; one case was fatal; 19 pts had concomitant leukocytosis. Conclusions: Olutasidenib was well tolerated and induced durable CR in a subset of high-risk R/R m IDH1 AML pts. TI was achieved in all response groups. Clinical benefit, per DOR and OS, extended beyond CR+CRh responders. Clinical trial information: NCT02719574. [Table: see text]

Preliminary Results from a Phase 1/2, Open-Label, Dose-Escalation Clinical Trial of IMO-8400 in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 1540-1540 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sheeba K. Thomas ◽  
Wael A. Harb ◽  
Joseph Thaddeus Beck ◽  
Gabrail Nashat ◽  
M. Lia Palomba ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Preliminary Evidence ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Label Dose ◽  
Myd88 L265p Mutation ◽  
Myd88 L265p

Abstract Introduction: Waldenström's macroglobulinemia (WM) is a rare, indolent B-cell lymphoma characterized by lymphoplasmacytic cell infiltration of bone marrow and elevated serum levels of immunoglobulin M (IgM) protein. Despite recent advances in treatment the disease relapses in most patients. About 90% of WM patients harbor the MYD88 L265P oncogenic mutation. MYD88 is an adapter protein in the Toll-like receptor (TLR) pathway. The MYD88 L265P oncoprotein has been shown to amplify TLR 7 and 9 signaling, leading to downstream activation of NF-κB and cytokine signaling pathways that promote tumor cell survival and proliferation (Lim, AACR 2013). IMO-8400 is an investigational oligonucleotide antagonist of endosomal TLRs 7, 8 and 9. In preclinical studies in a human cell line and animal models of WM, IMO-8400 inhibited key cell signaling pathways, including NF-κB, BTK, STAT-3 and IRAK-4, and inhibited tumor growth and tumor IgM production. In Phase 1 and 2 clinical trials in healthy subjects (N=30) and in patients with autoimmune disease (N=35), IMO-8400 was generally well tolerated and demonstrated evidence of clinical activity. Based on these data, we initiated a Phase 1/2 clinical trial of IMO-8400 in WM, the first study of a drug candidate specifically targeting the MYD88 L265P mutation. Methods: This Phase 1/2 multicenter, open-label, dose-escalation clinical trial continues to recruit adult patients with relapsed or refractory WM (NCT Identifier: NCT02092909). In a classic 3x3 dose escalation scheme, patients are enrolled in one of three sequential escalating dose cohorts and receive subcutaneous IMO-8400 at dosages of 0.6, 1.2 or 2.4 mg/kg per week, respectively, for 24 weeks. The presence of the MYD88 L265P mutation is assessed by PCR-based genetic screening following enrollment. Patients who complete the 24-week treatment period are eligible to enroll in an extension trial. The primary study objective is to evaluate the safety and tolerability of escalating IMO-8400 dosages. Secondary objectives include preliminary evaluation of clinical response based on international guidelines and identification of an optimal dose for further evaluation (Kimby, Clin Lymphoma Myeloma 2006). Results: Overall, 17 patients (6 female, 11 male) have been enrolled in three dose cohorts to date. Median baseline characteristics include: age 66 years, prior therapies 4 (range 1-13), serum IgM 2,225 mg/dL, serum M protein 0.96 g/dL, and B2-microglobulin 3.42 mg/L. IMO-8400 has been generally well tolerated across all dose cohorts to date, with patient exposure ranging from 2-46 weeks in the Phase 1/2 and extension trials. The most common adverse events reported to date include transient flu-like symptoms and injection site reactions. One serious adverse event of worsening grade 3 arthritis, deemed possibly related to study drug, was reported in a patient with a pre-existing history of arthritis in the 2.4 mg/kg dose cohort. This patient discontinued study treatment. To date, no other patients have discontinued treatment due to treatment-related adverse events. Preliminary evidence of clinical activity for IMO-8400 has been observed in all dose cohorts. In June 2015, an independent Data Review Committee reviewed 4-week safety data from the highest dose cohort and agreed that 2.4 mg/kg was safe for further evaluation. Safety, pharmacokinetics and preliminary activity for all three dose cohorts will be presented. Conclusions: IMO-8400 is a mutation-targeted therapy in development for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory WM. In an ongoing Phase 1/2 clinical trial in WM, IMO-8400 has been generally well tolerated and has demonstrated preliminary evidence of clinical activity. Safety results support continued evaluation of IMO-8400 at 2.4 mg/kg/week in this patient population. Disclosures Thomas: Novartis, Celgene, Acerta Pharmaceuticals, Idera Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Harb:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding; Idera Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Beck:Idera Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Nashat:Idera Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Ansell:Idera Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Eradat:Idera Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Libby:Idera Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Hajdenberg:Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Speakers Bureau; Idera Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Heffner:Idera Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Hoffman:Idera Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Vesole:Celgene Corporation: Speakers Bureau; Idera Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Simov:Idera Pharmaceuticals: Employment. Wyant:Idera Pharmaceuticals: Employment. Brevard:Idera Pharmaceuticals: Employment. O'Leary:Idera Pharmaceuticals: Employment. Agrawal:Idera Pharmaceuticals: Employment.

KEYNOTE-046 (Part B): Effects of ADXS-PSA in combination with pembrolizumab on survival in metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer patients with or without prior exposure to docetaxel.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 126-126 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark N. Stein ◽  
Lawrence Fong ◽  
Anthony E. Mega ◽  
Elaine Tat Lam ◽  
John W. Heyburn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Prior Exposure ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Clinical Trial Information

126 Background: ADXS-PSA, an attenuated Listeria monocytogenes-based immunotherapy targeting prostate-specific antigen (PSA), is currently being evaluated in combination with pembrolizumab as a treatment for progressive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in the phase 1/2 KEYNOTE-046 trial (Part B). Methods: A total of 37 patients received 1x109 CFU + 200 mg pembro IV every 3 wks, for up to 2 yrs or until progression/toxicity. Results: At entry, patients were ~70 yrs with median a Gleason score of 9, and bone predominant disease (70%). MSI-High was negative in 36 pts who were able to be tested. Eighteen (48.6%) patients had received prior docetaxel, 15 pts of whom (83.3%) had also received 1-2 next generation hormonal agents (NGHAs). Nineteen (51.3%) had not received prior docetaxel and 16 of these pts (84.2%) had received 1-2 NGHAs. Overall, 16 out of 37 pts (43%) had a decreased PSA post-BL with 6/37 (16%) pts achieving a confirmed PSA reduction ≥50% from baseline. The median OS (months) for the whole group (37 pts) was 33.6 m (95% CI, range 15.4-33.6 months). The mOS for pts with and without prior exposure to docetaxel was 16 m (5.9 -33.6) and NR at 30 months of follow-up (15.4-NR), respectively. Prolonged survival was observed in pts regardless of prior therapies, microsatellite stable (MSS) status or PSA delta <50% or ≥50%. Conclusions: Results with ADXS-PSA in combination with pembrolizumab in mCRPC, with or without prior docetaxel, show promising clinical activity to be further assessed in randomized studies. Clinical trial information: NCT02325557.

Phase 2 multicenter study of the EZH2 inhibitor tazemetostat in adults with INI1 negative epithelioid sarcoma (NCT02601950).

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 11058-11058 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mrinal M. Gounder ◽  
Silvia Stacchiotti ◽  
Patrick Schöffski ◽  
Steven Attia ◽  
Antoine Italiano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Epithelioid Sarcoma ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Molecular Feature ◽  
Rhabdoid Tumors ◽  
Tumor Expression

11058 Background: Epithelioid sarcoma (ES) is a rare soft tissue sarcoma (STS) typically seen in young adults accounting for < 1% of all STS. While local disease may be indolent, ES can rapidly spread and patients (pts) with distant metastasis are often resistant to systemic treatment with 1 year survival of < 50%. The defining molecular feature of ES is the absence of tumor expression of INI1, a SWI/SNF subunit member involved in chromatin remodeling. Tazemetostat, a potent and selective EZH2 inhibitor, has demonstrated tumor regressions in INI1 negative preclinical malignant rhabdoid tumors (MRT) models and phase 1 clinical activity in MRT and ES pts. The proposed mechanism of tazemetostat sensitivity is INI1 loss inducing compromised SWI/SNF activity and tumor dependence on PRC2 activity (of which EZH2 is the catalytic subunit). Preliminary phase 2 safety and efficacy of tazemetostat in ES pts is reported here. Methods: This is a phase 2 multicenter open-label single arm study of tazemetostat (800 mg po BID) in adult pts with ES whose tumors harbor evidence of INI1 loss. Pts enroll into 1 of 5 cohorts of different tumor types with INI1 loss/reduction, up to 30 pts each, using a 2-stage Green-Dahlberg design. For the ES cohort, primary endpoint is disease control rate (DCR) defined as objective response of any duration or stable disease (SD) lasting ≥32 wks. Success at stage 2 required DCR in ≥5/30 treated pts. Key secondary endpoints include safety/tolerability, ORR, PFS, OS, PK and response biomarkers e.g. H3K27me3. Results: In 31 ES pts with a median of 1 prior systemic therapy, stage 2 DCR criteria was surpassed with a RECIST confirmed PR (4 pts) and SD ≥32 wks (2 pts) observed to date. 13 pts are still on treatment therefore DCR and ORR will be updated. Tazemetostat was well tolerated with grade 1/2 fatigue (39%), nausea (26%) and vomiting (19%) as the most frequently reported AEs regardless of attribution. Conclusions: In the largest prospective clinical trial of ES to date, tazemetostat monotherapy shows promising antitumor activity, including confirmed responses and long-term SD, with favorable safety/tolerability in ES. Enrollment has been expanded to 60 ES pts given the clinical activity described here. Clinical trial information: NCT02601950.

Phase 1/2a study of double immune suppression blockade by combining a CSF1R inhibitor (pexidartinib/PLX3397) with an anti PD-1 antibody (pembrolizumab) to treat advanced melanoma and other solid tumors.

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS465-TPS465 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zev A. Wainberg ◽  
Peter D. Eisenberg ◽  
Jasgit C. Sachdev ◽  
Amy M. Weise ◽  
David Ross Kaufman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Normal Function ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Ratio Test ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Tumor Resistance ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Activated T Cells

TPS465 Background: Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) support tumor growth and cause tumor resistance to chemotherapy and radiation therapy; myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) suppress anti-tumor immunity and cause resistance to PD-1 inhibition. TAMs and MDSCs are both regulated by colony stimulating factor 1 (CSF1). Pexidartinib is a small molecule inhibitor of CSF1 receptor, CSF1R. The normal function of PD-1, expressed on the cell surface of activated T-cells, is to suppress excessive immune responses, eg, autoimmune reactions. Tumors utilize PD-1 signaling to downregulate immune-mediated elimination. Pembrolizumab is a potent, highly selective humanized monoclonal antibody that blocks interactions between PD-1 and its ligands, PD-L1 and PD-L2. We present the study design for a Phase 1/2a clinical trial assessing safety, efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of the combination of pexidartinib and pembrolizumab in advanced solid tumors (NCT02452424). Methods: In Part 1 of this open-label, uncontrolled trial, patients with advanced solid tumors will receive pembrolizumab (200 mg IV q 3 weeks) and escalating daily oral doses of pexidartinib to establish the safety and tolerability of the combination and a recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). In Part 2, the combination RP2D will be studied in an expanded panel of solid tumor cohorts in up to 475 patients, to assess safety and preliminary efficacy. The panel will include GI malignancies for which preclinical data support this combination, including gastric and gastro-esophageal adenocarcinoma, pancreatic cancer, cholangiocarcinoma, and GI stromal tumors. Overall response rate (RECISTv1.1) and progression free survival will be evaluated. Exploratory endpoints include novel biomarkers of clinical activity and drug mechanisms of action. A truncated sequential probability ratio test will be employed in each tumor cohort to allow early decision-making for futility or success. The results will support further development of the pexidartinib/pembrolizumab combination in the solid tumors that respond to treatment in this study. Clinical trial information: NCT02452424.

Clinical activity and safety of ASN001, a selective CYP17 lyase inhibitor, administered without prednisone in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC): A phase 1/2 clinical trial.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5041-5041
Author(s):  
Jorge A. Garcia ◽  
Robert Dreicer ◽  
Allan J. Pantuck ◽  
Naomi B. Haas ◽  
Ulka N. Vaishampayan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Systemic Exposure ◽  
Preliminary Evidence ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Imaging Results ◽  
Disease Stabilization ◽  
Pretreated Patients

5041 Background: ASN001 is a novel, non-steroidal, potent inhibitor of CYP17 lyase that selectively inhibits synthesis of testosterone over cortisol in the adrenals to avoid the need for co-administration of prednisone. ASN001 also exhibits high oral bioavailability and low potential for drug-drug interaction. Methods: This Phase (Ph) 1/2 clinical trial in men with progressive mCRPC evaluates once-daily, oral ASN001 at escalating doses of 50, 100, 200, 300 and 400 mg (NCT02349139). While Ph 1 also allowed enrollment of pretreated patients, no prior enzalutamide (ENZA) or abiraterone (ABI) is permitted in Ph 2. Endpoints include maximum dose (MTD) and dose limiting toxicities, recommended Ph 2 dose, PK, effect on steroid hormone biosynthesis and clinical efficacy (PSA and imaging). Results: To date, 26 mCRPC pts have been enrolled. No prednisone was administered and no mineralocorticoid excess has been reported. Overall, ASN001 was well tolerated. Most drug-related adverse events were Gr 1/2 and included fatigue, constipation and nausea. At 400mg, two pts experienced asymptomatic, reversible Gr 3 ALT/AST elevation, but no recurrence when retreated at 300mg. Enrollment of ABI/ENZA naïve patients continues at lower doses to further evaluate safety and efficacy. Testosterone decrease to below quantifiable limits and DHEA decrease of up to 80% was observed. Systemic exposure was high (Cmax, AUC and T1/2 at 300 mg QD were 6.7 µM, 80 µM.h and 21.5 h, respectively). Stable disease up to 18+ months has been observed despite prior ABI and ENZA exposure. PSA decline of > 50% (up to 93% decline) and up to 37+ wks duration was observed in 3 of 4 ABI/ENZA naïve patients at starting doses of 300/400mg. Conclusions: Overall, ASN001 was safe and well tolerated. Prednisone co-administration was not needed. Encouraging preliminary evidence of efficacy is reflected by PSA declines in evaluable mCRPC pts not pretreated with ABI or ENZA and by durable disease stabilization in refractory disease. Enrollment is ongoing at doses below 400mg QD in ABI/ENZA naïve mCRPC pts. Updated and detailed results will be presented at the meeting. Clinical trial information: NCT02349139.

Phase 1-2 study of progesterone receptor (PR) inhibition with extended-release (ER) onapristone (ONA) alone or in combination with abiraterone (AA) in patients (pts) with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) incorporating plasma DNA analysis to define androgen receptor (AR) status.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5071-5071
Author(s):  
Anuradha Jayaram ◽  
Karolina Nowakowska ◽  
Joaquin Mateo ◽  
Sanjeev Kumar ◽  
Tatiana Hernandez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Dna Analysis ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Plasma Concentrations ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Type I ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Plasma Dna ◽  
Open Label

5071 Background: An urgent need exists for new therapies after progression (PD) onAA and enzalutamide (ENZ). Increased PR expression or progesterone-activating AR mutations have been associated with resistance to AR targeting. We aimed to test ONA, a type I PR antagonist with clinical activity in PRpos cancers, in AA/enz-resistant CRPC. In a prospectively defined exploratory analysis, we aimed to report outcome by plasma AR status ( pAR). Methods: This was a multi-institution, open label phase I/II clinical trial in pts progressing after ENZ/AA. Pts were first treated with single agent (SA) ONA using a randomised dose escalation design. ONA at 2 doses was then combined with AA (1000mg od with pred 5mg bid) in pts progressing on AA. The primary end-points were safety, pharmacokinetics (PK) and anti-tumor activity split by p AR. Archival and metastatic biopsies were collected when possible and tested for PR status. p AR was studied using previous methods (Romanel STM 2015). Results: 21 pts received SA ONA (5 = 10mg/ 5 = 20mg/ 4 = 30mg/ 4 = 40mg /3 = 50mg BID) and 15 pts received ONA-AA combination (5 = 30mg ONA BID, 10 = 50mg ONA BID). There were not DLTs or significant LFT abnormalities and no G3/4 adverse events (AE), no treatment discontinuations due to AEs and no SAEs considered related to ONA. PK in SA ONA observed active plasma concentrations and no interaction with AA. Of 32 evaluated pts 15 had a 2105T > A (p.L702H) or 2632A > G (p.T878A) AR mutation detected in plasma pre-treatment and 1 had AR copy number gain. PSA declines were not observed with SA ONA but in 2 pts with combination (-30%, -7%) who were AR normal. The rPFS on SA ONA was 2.8 months for AR normal and 2.6 for AR aberrant (Hazard ratio (HR) 1.41; 95% CI, 0.62-3.72; P 0.48) and on combination was 4.4 months for AR normal (8/15) and 2.2 for AR aberrant (7/15) (HR 6.08; 95%CI, 6.32-221.9; P < 0.001). Conclusions: ONA is safe in CRPC as SA and in combination with AA. There was no difference in rPFS by p AR status for SA ONA but on the combination with AA, pts who were plasma AR normal had a significantly longer rPFS. Clinical trial information: NCT02049190.

scholarly journals First-in-Human, Multicenter Phase I Study of IPH4102, First-in-Class Humanized Anti-KIR3DL2 Monoclonal Antibody, in Relapsed/Refractory Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphomas: Preliminary Safety, Exploratory and Clinical Activity Results

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 1826-1826 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martine Bagot ◽  
Pierluigi Porcu ◽  
Caroline Ram-Wolff ◽  
Michael Khodadoust ◽  
Maxime Battistella ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Ex Vivo ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Autologous Tumor ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
T Cell Lymphomas ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract KIR3DL2 is expressed in all subtypes of cutaneous T-cell lymphomas (CTCL), irrespective of clinical stage, with the highest prevalence of expression in Sézary syndrome (SS) and transformed mycosis fungoides (MF), two subgroups of patients with a high unmet need for clinically impactful therapies. KIR3DL2 belongs to the killer immunoglobulin-like receptor (KIRs) family and is expressed on minor subpopulations of normal NK, CD8 and CD4 T cells. IPH4102 is a first-in-class anti-KIR3DL2 monoclonal antibody (mAb). It selectively depletes KIR3DL2-expressing cells by recruiting immune effectors. Its main modes of action include antibody-dependent cell-cytotoxicity (ADCC) and -phagocytosis (ADCP). IPH4102 has shown potent efficacy in preclinical models, in particular ex vivo autologous assays using primary CTCL cells. IPH4102 is currently being investigated in a first-in-human dose-finding phase 1 study (NCT02593045) evaluating repeated administrations of single-agent IPH4102 in relapsed/refractory CTCL patients. The primary objective is to assess the safety and tolerability of increasing doses of IPH4102. Secondary objectives include PK, immunogenicity and signals of anti-tumor clinical activity. Exploratory biomarkers aim to characterize KIR3DL2-expressing and non-expressing cells in involved tissue/disease compartments and to monitor changes during IPH4102 treatment. Minimal residual disease (MRD) is measured in the skin, blood and/or lymph nodes. Assessment of ex vivo NK cell-mediated ADCC against autologous tumor cells is also performed pre-dose on SS patient samples. The study has two sequential portions, a dose-escalation followed by a cohort expansion. The dose-escalation portion has a 3+3 design with accelerated titration and aims to determine the maximal tolerated dose (MTD) or recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). In the cohort expansion portion, two CTCL subtype-specific cohorts will be studied, each to include 10 additional patients to further explore MTD or RP2D. Eligible CTCL patients must have received at least 2 lines of anti-neoplastic systemic therapy. Centrally assessed KIR3DL2 expression on malignant cells in skin or blood is required for inclusion. Patients receive IPH4102 administrations until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Intra-patient dose-escalation is allowed, only past the first complete clinical assessment at week 5 and provided the upper next dose-level is declared safe by the safety committee. Enrollment into study IPH4102-101 started in November 2015 and is currently ongoing. At time of abstract submission, dose-levels #1 to #6 have been completed. A total of 13 patients have been treated at these 6 dose-levels and are evaluable for safety and clinical activity. These patients comprise 10 SS (including 1 with evidence of large-cell transformation), 2 MF and 1 "not-otherwise-specified" CD4+ CTCL. Median age is 71 years (range 50 - 90). For these 13 patients, only grade 1 or 2 related adverse events (AEs) have been reported with IPH4102 treatment. No patient experienced a DLT or a related AE of grade ≥3. No IPH4102-related skin rashes or infections have been observed so far. Results of immuno-phenotyping of patients' blood lymphocytes show consistency of local and central assessments. In addition, ex vivo functional assay results confirm that SS patients' NK cells are functional and able to kill autologous tumor cells through ADCC with IPH4102. Our preliminary data from the phase 1 study of a novel targeted immune therapy show excellent tolerability in advanced CTCL patients. Updated results including exploratory biomarker assessment results will be presented and discussed at the meeting. Disclosures Bagot: Millenium: Other: Investigator in a clinical trial; Kiowa Hakko Kirin: Other: Investigator in a clinical trial; Innate Pharma: Equity Ownership, Other: Investigator in a clinical trial, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. Porcu:celgene: Other: Investigator in a clinical trial; miRagen: Other: Investigator in a clinical trial; Innate Pharma: Other: Investigator in a clinical trial; Millenium: Other: investigator in a clinical trial. Ram-Wolff:Innate Pharma: Other: Investigator in a clinical trial. Battistella:Innate Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding. Marie-Cardine:Innate Pharma: Research Funding. Mathieu:Innate Pharma: Other: Investigator in a clinical trial. Vermeer:Innate Pharma: Other: Investigator in a clinical trial. Whittaker:Seattle Genetics: Other: Investigator in a clinical trial; Innate Pharma: Other: Investigator in a clinical trial; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Galderma: Research Funding. Duvic:Kiowa Hakko Kirin: Other: investigator in a clinical trial, Research Funding; Rhizen Pharmaceuticals: Other: Investigator in a clinical trial; Innate Pharma: Consultancy, Other: Investigator in a clinical trial; Millenium: Other: Investigator in a clinical trial; Angimmune LLC: Other: Investigator in a clinical trial; miRagen: Other: Investigator in a clinical trial. Bensussan:Innate Pharma: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. Paturel:Innate Pharma: Employment, Equity Ownership. Bonnafous:Innate Pharma: Employment, Equity Ownership. Widemann:Innate Pharma: Employment. Bonin:Innate Pharma: Employment. Sicard:Innate Pharma: Employment, Equity Ownership. Paiva:Innate Pharma: Employment. Pilz:Innate Pharma: Consultancy. Kim:Kyowa Hakko Kirin: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other, Research Funding; Innate Pharma: Other: Investigator in a clinical trial; Millenium: Consultancy, Other: Investigator in a clinical trial; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Other: Investigator in a clinical trial; Merck: Other: Investigator in a clinical trial; Genentech: Other: Investigator in a clinical trial; MiRagen: Consultancy; Neumedicine: Consultancy; Soligenix: Consultancy; Eisai: Consultancy, Other: Investigator in a clinical trial; Actelion: Consultancy, Other: Investigator in a clinical trial; Celgene: Consultancy; Galderma: Consultancy; Horizon: Consultancy.

Clinical activity and safety of ASN001, a selective CYP17 lyase inhibitor, administered without prednisone in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 240-240
Author(s):  
Jorge A. Garcia ◽  
Robert Dreicer ◽  
Allan J. Pantuck ◽  
Naomi B. Haas ◽  
Ulka N. Vaishampayan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Systemic Exposure ◽  
Preliminary Evidence ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Imaging Results ◽  
Disease Stabilization ◽  
Pretreated Patients

240 Background: ASN001 is a novel, non-steroidal, potent inhibitor of CYP17 lyase. It selectively inhibits synthesis of testosterone over cortisol in the adrenals to avoid the need for co-administration of prednisone. ASN001 also exhibits high oral bioavailability and low potential for drug-drug interaction supporting its use in future combination trials. Methods: This Phase 1/2 clinical trial in men with progressive mCRPC evaluates once-daily, oral ASN001 at escalating doses of 50, 100, 200, 300 and 400 mg (NCT02349139). While the Phase 1 also allowed enrollment of pretreated patients, no prior enzalutamide (ENZA) or abiraterone (ABI) is permitted in Phase 2. Endpoints included maximum dose (MTD) and dose limiting toxicities, recommended Phase 2 dose, pharmacokinetics, effect on steroid hormone biosynthesis and clinical efficacy (PSA and imaging). Results: To date, 23 mCRPC pts have been enrolled. No prednisone was administered and no mineralocorticoid excess has been reported. Overall, ASN001 was well tolerated. Most drug-related adverse events were Gr 1/2 and included fatigue, nausea and dizziness. At 400mg, two pts experienced asymptomatic, reversible Gr 3 elevation of ALT/AST, but no recurrence when retreated at a lower dose (300mg). Testosterone decreased to below quantifiable limits and DHEA decrease of up to 80% was observed in ABI/ENZA naïve patients. Systemic exposure was high (Cmax, AUC and T1/2 at 300 mg QD was 6.7 µm, 80 µm.h and 21.5h, respectively). RECIST defined Stable Disease up to 15+ months has been observed at the 100mg cohort despite prior ABI and ENZA exposure. PSA decline of > 50% (51%-70%) was observed in 3 of 3 ABI/ENZA naïve patients at doses of 300/400mg. Conclusions: Overall, ASN001 was safe and well tolerated without need for prednisone co-administration. Encouraging preliminary evidence of efficacy is based on the PSA decline observed in evaluable mCRPC pts not pretreated with ABI or ENZA and based on durable disease stabilization after progression on ABI and ENZA. Enrollment is ongoing at doses below 400mg QD in ABI/ENZA naïve mCRPC pts. Updated and detailed results will be presented at the meeting. Clinical trial information: NCT02349139.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document