Objective assessment of physical activity during chemotherapy for breast cancer.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS6626-TPS6626 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle E. Melisko ◽  
Edward Kenji Hadeler ◽  
Sandahl H Nelson ◽  
Audrey Lunde ◽  
Irene Acerbi ◽  
...  

TPS6626 Background: Exercise can alleviate side effects of chemotherapy, improve quality of life (QOL), and positively impact disease specific and overall survival. Despite the benefits of physical activity (PA), many patients’ activity levels decrease during chemotherapy. Wearable devices, such as the Fitbit, can provide insight into patterns of activity, and help encourage behavior change. The aims of this study are: 1) determine the feasibility/acceptability of using a Fitbit to measure PA and sleep throughout chemotherapy for breast cancer; 2) describe patterns of PA, sedentary time, and sleep during chemotherapy; 3) explore associations of activity and sleep with QOL. Methods: Non-metastatic breast cancer patients from UCSF and UCSD will be enrolled prior to starting chemotherapy. Eligibility criteria include ability to speak/read English, walk unassisted, and access to internet or Fitbit compatible smart phone. Patients sign informed consent, receive a Fitbit Charge HR and guidance on how to use the device. Patients are instructed to wear the Fitbit throughout their adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy and 6 months post therapy and to sync the Fitbit at least weekly. Patients complete surveys at start, midpoint, end, and 6 months post chemotherapy. Questionnaires include PROMIS anxiety, depression, physical function, fatigue, cognitive function, social roles, comfort with technology and usefulness of the Fitbit. Fitabase database collects minute level activity, sleep, and heart rate. To assess feasibility, we will evaluate if a participant wears FitBit for at least 10 hour per day for ≥ 80% of the days during chemotherapy. We will use mixed effects regression models to assess patterns of PA and associations between activity and QOL. All models will include activity time and Fitbit wear time and will control for the potential confounding effects of age and other demographic or clinical variables. As of February 6 2017, 48 out of a planned 80 patients are enrolled. Acknowledgment: Athena Breast Health Network investigators and patients; support at UCSD by NCI (U54 CA155435-01) and by gift from Carol Vassiliadis and family; NCI grant K07CA181323 to SH; UCSF M Zion Health Fund Award, GBCTB unrestricted funding and TriValley SOCKS to MM. Clinical trial information: NCT03041545.

2016 ◽  
Vol 62 (1) ◽  
pp. 38-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Carla Gomes Canário ◽  
Patricia Uchoa Leitão Cabral ◽  
Lucila Corsino de Paiva ◽  
Gilzandra Lira Dantas Florencio ◽  
Maria Helena Spyrides ◽  
...  

SUMMARY Objective: to evaluate the relationship between levels of physical activity, fatigue and quality of life (QOL) in women diagnosed with breast cancer. Methods: 215 women between the ages of 40 and 65 years were recruited at a cancer clinic. Physical activity levels were assessed by using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ), fatigue levels by using the revised Piper scale, and QOL by means of EORTC QLQ-C30 and WHOQOL-Bref. Statistical analysis was performed using Minitab statistical software, version 16. Results: the mean age of subjects was 52.66 years (SD=8.6); patients were mostly white (58.14%) and overweight (55.81%). Most women were fatigued (72.09%) while physically active women showed lower symptoms of fatigue (p<0.001). Mean scores for QOL were significantly lower among fatigued women (p<0.001). More active women scored higher on all scales of QOL (EORTC), especially for functional capacity (p<0.001), compared with the sedentary patients. A significant association was found between level of physical activity and overall QOL (WHOQOL-Bref) for all domains (p<0.001). Climacteric symptoms ranged from mild to strong and did not show any statistically significant results; however, the most active women had the fewest symptoms. Conclusion: physical activity appears to positively influence fatigue and QOL in women diagnosed with breast cancer.


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e13075-e13075
Author(s):  
Sofía Ruíz ◽  
Bella Pajares ◽  
Maria-Jose Bermejo-Perez ◽  
Cristina Roldán Jiménez ◽  
Antonio Cuesta Vargas ◽  
...  

e13075 Background: The safety, feasibility and benefit of physical activity is robust in adjuvant breast cancer, but as far as we know, there is little information on the feasibility and benefit of exercise in women with advanced breast cancer. The objective of our study is to analyze the feasibility and impact on fatigue, quality of life and functionality of an individualized, prospective and supervised exercise program in a group of patients with metastatic breast cancer. Methods: A prospective study on 30 metastatic breast cancer patients who were recruited as volunteers between February 2018 and April 2019 by Medical Oncologists from the Medical Oncology Unit at University Clinical Hospital Virgen de la Victoria (Malaga, Spain). Participants included in this study were patients aged between 34 and 71 years old and all had metastatic breast cancer, not amenable to curative treatment. The intervention was a twelve-week Therapeutic Exercise and Education Programme delivered by a physiotherapist. The intervention was preceded by a physical assessment of the musculoskeletal system. The outcomes were cancer-related fatigue, quality of life and functional outcomes (patient- reported and other measured by investigators). Results: Of the 30 patients initially recruited, only 11 of them completed the program with an attendance greater or equal to 17 sessions (75% of assistance). Most of patients who dropped (19), did it because of personal matters, not related to disease progression. Regarding patients who completed the completion of physical activity program (n = 11), the majority were treated on first line of treatment with hormonal receptors positive tumors and bone metastasis. After the intervention, no major changes were observed in cancer-related fatigue, quality of life and several patients-reported outcomes, although an improvement in functionality was observed, in investigator-measured parameters (30-STS and adapted burpees). Conclusions: Our study shows that a supervised and individualized tailored physical activity program in metastatic breast cancer patients is safe and feasible, although more studies are needed to analyse its impact on improving functional parameters, fatigue and quality of life.


Author(s):  
H. Helbrich ◽  
M. Braun ◽  
C. Hanusch ◽  
G. Mueller ◽  
H. Falk ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose This study examines congruence between self-reported and device-measured physical activity data in women with early breast cancer and compares trajectories under different treatments. Methods Women with non-metastatic breast cancer were recruited before primary therapy. In four weeks distributed over six months after treatment start, patients reported time spent on work, transport, chores and sports via diary and wore Garmin® vivofit 3 accelerometers to assess steps taken. Associations between these measures and agreement regarding guideline adherence were tested with Spearman’s Correlation Coefficient and Weighted Kappa statistic. Effects of time and treatment were evaluated using mixed analyses of variance. Results Ninety-nine participants (median age = 50) were treated with adjuvant (N= 23), neoadjuvant (N= 21) or without chemotherapy (N= 55). Coherence between self-report and device data was strong (r = 0.566). Agreement about reaching recommendations was only “fair” (kappa coefficient = 0.321 and 0.249, resp.). Neither treatment or week nor their interaction had effects on step counts (all p > 0.05). Self-reported activity time was lower for patients with chemotherapy than for those without (adjuvant: ∆ = 69min, p= 0.006, neoadjuvant: ∆ = 45min, p= 0.038) and lower in week 18 than in week 3 (∆ = 43min, p= 0.010). Conclusion Results show that consumer-grade activity monitors and self-reports correlate but show different perspectives on physical activity in breast cancer patients. In general, patients perceive some decline regardless of primary treatment regimen. Those affected should be offered assistance to gain the benefits of activity. Accelerometers may help professionals to identify these individuals and patients to verify appraisal of their activity levels.


In Vivo ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 819-824
Author(s):  
MAXIMILIAN ALEXANDER STRUNK ◽  
EVA M. ZOPF ◽  
JULE STECK ◽  
STEFANIE HAMACHER ◽  
MICHAEL HALLEK ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. 337-347 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyrillus S. Shohdy ◽  
Shaimaa Lasheen ◽  
Loay Kassem ◽  
Omar Abdel-Rahman

Background: Cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors show promising results in metastatic breast cancer. However, an increased incidence of adverse events is remarkable. Among others, gastrointestinal (GI) involvement is of momentous impact on patients and their quality of life. Methods: Our search included PubMed, ASCO, ESMO and SABCS databases. Randomized phase II/III trials in metastatic breast cancer receiving CDK4/6 inhibitors were identified and considered relevant based on providing a sufficient safety profile on the incidence of adverse GI effects. Results: Of the 999 records initially screened for relevance, 33 articles were found relevant and 4 studies were finally eligible for meta-analysis with a total of 2007 patients. The relative risk (RR) for all-grade nausea was 1.48 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.12–1.93, p = 0.005], vomiting was 1.74 (95% CI: 1.09–2.76, p = 0.02), decreased appetite was 1.42 (95% CI: 1.07–1.88, p = 0.02), and for diarrhea it was 1.44 (95% CI: 1.19–1.74, p = 0.0002). Meanwhile, the RR for high-grade nausea was 1.10 (95% CI: 0.29–4.13, p = 0.89), vomiting was 1.38 (95% CI: 0.25–7.75, p = 0.72), decreased appetite was 4.00 (95% CI: 0.87–18.37, p = 0.07), and high-grade diarrhea was 1.19 (95% CI: 0.44–3.21, p = 0.73). Conclusion: Selective CDK4/6 inhibitors were not associated with higher-grade GI toxicities reflecting a well-tolerated safety profile. Regarding the increase in all-grade GI toxicities, it needs further caution with addition of cytotoxic chemotherapy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document