Phase I study of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with xeloda and oxaliplatin (G-XELOX) for locally advanced gastric cancer.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 149-149
Author(s):  
Hironaga Satake ◽  
Masato Kondo ◽  
Takeshi Kotake ◽  
Yoshihiro Okita ◽  
Takatsugu Ogata ◽  
...  

149 Background: Prognosis for locally advanced gastric cancer, such as clinical T4 disease, bulky nodal involvement, type 4 and large type 3 gastric cancer, remains unsatisfactory, even with D2 gastrectomy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is a promising approach, and combination chemotherapy with Xeloda and oxaliplatin (G-XELOX) is recognized as a potentially promising regimen for gastric cancer. However, the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy consisting of G-XELOX for locally advanced gastric cancer has not been reported. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence of dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) during the neoadjuvant chemotherapy and to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose of preoperative chemotherapy combined with oxaliplatin with a fixed Xeloda dose for locally advanced gastric cancer. Methods: Patients received two cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with oxaliplatin on day 1, as well as Xeloda (2000 mg/m2/day, b.i.d.) for 14 days, repeatedly every 3 weeks. They then underwent gastrectomy with curative D2/3 lymph-node dissection followed by adjuvant S-1 (80 mg/m2/day, b.i.d.) for one year. A decrease of oxaliplatin dose was planned (starting at level 1, 130 mg/m2). Results: Six patients (5 male, 1 female) with a median age of 72 (range 68-79) were enrolled. MTD was not reached at level 1. Oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 in combination with Xeloda 2000 mg/m2/day, b.i.d. could be administered with acceptable toxicity. No treatment-related death was observed. Most frequent drug-related AEs during the neoadjuvant chemotherapy period were G1 anemia, G1/2 thrombocytopenia and G1 peripheral neuropathy. One patient refused surgical resection, therefore five received resection with curative intent. Of the five patients, all achieved a pathological downstaging after neoadjuvant G-XELOX therapy. The incidence of operative morbidity was tolerable. Conclusions: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with G-XELOX regimen was feasible by patients with locally advanced gastric cancer. Clinical trial information: UMIN000015950.

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS180-TPS180
Author(s):  
Yoshihiro Okita ◽  
Hironaga Satake ◽  
Hiroyuki Okuyama ◽  
Masato Kondo ◽  
Akira Miki ◽  
...  

TPS180 Background: Prognosis for locally advanced gastric cancer, such as clinical T4 disease, bulky nodal involvement, type 4 and large type 3 gastric cancer, was not satisfactory even by D2 gastrectomy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is another promising approach. In our phase I study, neoadjuvant chemotherapy of S-1 and oxaliplatin (SOX) had manageable toxicities and good pathological complete response rate (33%) in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer. Based on the results of this phase I study, we initiate a multi-institutional, single-arm, open label, phase II study (Neo G-SOX PII study). The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the neoadjuvant chemotherapy of S-1 and oxaliplatin (SOX) followed by gastrectomy with D2/3 lymph node dissection; clinical T4; clinically resectable gastric cancer of type 4 or large type 3 (over 8 cm); bulky nodal involvement around major branched arteries to the stomach Methods: Eligibility criteria include histologically proven adenocarcinoma of the stomach; clinical T4; clinically resectable gastric cancer of type 4 or large type 3 (over 8 cm); bulky nodal involvement around major branched arteries to the stomach; resectable peritoneal dissemination (pathological CY1 or P1, except for clinical CY1 or P1). Patients receive two cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 (80 mg/m2, p.o., days 1-14 followed by 1 week rest) and oxaliplatin (130 mg/m2 at day 1), followed by D2 or higher surgery with no residual disease. Patients with pathological R0/1 resection received S-1 (80 mg/m2, p.o., days 1-28 followed by 2 week rest) for 1 year as adjuvant chemotherapy. Primary endpoint is curative resection rate. Key secondary endpoints include pathological response, R0/1 resection rate, dose-intensity, overall survival, relapse free survival and safety. We set the threshold curative resection rate at 65% and the expected curative resection rate at 80%. Given a one-sided α of 0.1 and statistical power of 80%, 40 patients was required. Clinical trial information: UMIN000018661 Clinical trial information: UMIN000018661.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document