Optimal indications for chemotherapy in elderly patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 450-450
Author(s):  
Shoichi Nakazuru ◽  
Shoji Nakamori ◽  
Seiya Kato ◽  
Ayaka Shoji ◽  
Ryosuke Kiyota ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Ct Scans ◽  
Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis ◽  
Ecog Ps

450 Background: Pancreatic cancer is seen predominantly in elderly patients. Since many patients with pancreatic cancer have locally advanced unresectable tumors or distant metastases at diagnosis, they require chemotherapy. However, it is difficult to appropriately select elderly patients who are likely to benefit from chemotherapy. This study aimed to identify prognostic factors for elderly patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer treated with chemotherapy. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the data of 191 patients with pancreatic cancer, aged ≥ 70 years, who had been diagnosed at our hospital between January 2006 and August 2016. Their overall survival (OS) was calculated using Kaplan-Meyer analysis. Prognostic factors were evaluated using Cox regression analysis. Results: Of the 191 patients, 52 patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer were treated with chemotherapy. Their median age was 76.5 years (range, 70–85 years). Twenty-two patients (42%) were men, and 44 (85%) had metastatic disease. Forty-one (79%) and 11 (21%) patients had ECOG performance status (PS) 0–1 and 2–3, respectively. Thirty-eight (73%), 10 (19%), and 4 (8%) patients received gemcitabine, gemcitabine-based combination regimens, and S-1, respectively, as first-line chemotherapy. The median OS was 219 days (range, 7–920 days). On univariate analysis, ECOG PS ≥ 2 (hazard ratio [HR], 4.37; P = 0.0005), carcinoembryonic antigen ≥ 10 ng/mL (HR, 2.32; P = 0.0162), serum AST ≥ 30 U/L (HR, 2.02; P = 0.0263), serum albumin < 3.0 g/dL (HR, 2.38; P = 0.0247), serum C-reactive protein ≥ 0.5 mg/dL (HR, 2.21; P = 0.0140), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio ≥ 5.0 (HR, 3.25; P = 0.0066), and presence of ascites on computed tomography (CT) scans (HR, 3.02; P = 0.0016) were significantly associated with shorter survival times. On multivariate analysis, ECOG PS ≥ 2 (HR, 5.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.18–13.32; P = 0.0005) and presence of ascites on CT scans (HR, 2.53; 95% CI, 1.20–5.24; P = 0.0148) were associated with poor OS. Conclusions: Elderly patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer who have a good performance status and do not show ascites on CT scans are likely to benefit from chemotherapy.

The prognostic value of polymorphisms in the insulin-like growth factor receptor (IGFR) pathway in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC)

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4500-4500
Author(s):  
R. T. Shroff ◽  
M. M. Javle ◽  
X. Dong ◽  
V. S. Kumar ◽  
S. Krishnan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Induction Chemotherapy ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Status ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis

4500 Background: The IGFR pathway is activated in pancreatic cancer and may result in aggressive disease course. The study of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) involved in this pathway may provide prognostic information and predict response to IGFR directed agents. We investigated IGFR pathway SNPs in patients with LAPC. Methods: We evaluated 39 SNPs from 7 candidate genes in the IGFR pathway (IGF1R, IGF2R, IGF1, IGF2, IRS1, IRS2, IGFBP3) in 105 LAPC patients. DNA extraction from whole blood was performed using the Qiagen Flexigene DNA and Promega Maxwell 16 kits. Genotyping was performed using the Sequenom method. Overall survival was measured from date of diagnosis to date of death or last follow-up. Kaplan-Meier plot, log-rank test, and Cox regression were used to compare survival of patients according to genotype corrected for previously identified prognostic factors, including induction chemotherapy, CA 19–9, albumin, LDH, hemoglobin and Karnofsky performance status (KPS). Results: Median survival time (MST) was 15 months (95% CI 13.3–16.7). Induction chemotherapy, LDH, CA 19–9 level, hemoglobin, and KPS were not significantly associated with survival. Serum albumin and three SNPs of the IGF pathway (IGF1R IVS20–3431A>G, IRS1 G971R, and IGF2 *4352A>G) were significantly associated with prognosis ( Table ). Two of the three genotypes remained as significant predictors for survival in Cox regression analysis when adjusted for clinical factors. A significant combined genotype effect was observed wherein patients with all three deleterious alleles had significantly worse survival than those with only two or one (10 vs. 16.3 vs. 21.3 months, p< 0.0001). Conclusions: These data suggest that SNPs in the IGFR pathway genes may have prognostic value for LAPC patients. This information may identify population subgroups that could benefit from IGFR-targeted agents. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Phase II clinical trial of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine in elderly patients with previously untreated locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma: BIBABRAX study.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4615-4615 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaime Feliu Batlle ◽  
Monica Jorge Fernandez ◽  
Teresa Macarulla ◽  
Bartomeu Massuti ◽  
Ana Albero ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Standards Of Care ◽  
Ecog Ps

4615 Background: FOLFIRINOX and nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (nab-P+G) are the standard of care in the first-line treatment of mPC patients (pt) with good performance status. However, no standards of care exist for elderly ( > 70 years) pt as they are usually excluded in clinical trials. This study aimed to evaluate whether the clinical benefit of nab-P+G could be extended to elderly pt with mPC. Methods: This was an open-label, single-arm, multicenter, phase II trial, to assess the efficacy and safety of Nab-P+G in elderly pt (≥ 70 years) with ECOG PS 0–1 and untreated unresectable locally advanced or metastatic PC. Pt received four-week cycles of intravenous (i.v.) nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2, followed by i.v. gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2, on days 1, 8 and 15, until disease progression. Efficacy was evaluated according RECIST v 1.1 criteria and safety according NCI-CTCAE v 4.0 criteria. Results: Eighty pt were enrolled in the study. Median age was 74.6 years (range 70-87.9), 57.5% were men, 71% had ECOG PS 1 and 86% metastatic disease. 16.3% of patients had a history of prior tumor surgical resection, 12.5% received chemotherapy and 3.8% radiotherapy. Primary tumor was located in head (32.5%), tail (25.0%) and body (22.5%). Nab-P and G was reduced in 49% and 41% of pt respectively. 15 pt definitely interrupt study treatment due to toxicity: neurotoxicity (7), asthenia (5), neutropenia (1), leukocytosis (1) and hepatotoxicity (1). Time until definite deterioration (reduction ≥10 points as compared to baseline in EORTC-QLQ C30) was 1.6 months and deterioration-free rate at 3 months was 54.3%. Overall response rate was 13.8%, clinical benefit rate 67.5%, median PFS 7.2 months and median OS 9.2 months. The most common treatment-related adverse events were asthenia (60.0%), diarrhea (40.0%), neutropenia (33.8%), hair loss (28.8%), thrombocytopenia (26.3%), and nausea (23.8%). Only asthenia and neutropenia presented a relatively high incidence of grade 3 and 4 toxicities (21.3%). At least 1 SAE was reported in 55% of pt. Conclusions: BIBABRAX study confirms the clinical benefit of nab-P+G in an elderly population with mPC, in terms of survival, clinical response and tolerance, therefore it could be considered a treatment option for elderly patients. However, it was unable to demonstrate the preplanned benefit on the quality of life. Further research is needed on treatment strategies that could reduce deterioration of the quality of life in these pt. Clinical trial information: NCT02391662 .

Locally Advanced, Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (22) ◽  
pp. 2654-2668 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward P. Balaban ◽  
Pamela B. Mangu ◽  
Alok A. Khorana ◽  
Manish A. Shah ◽  
Somnath Mukherjee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Group Performance ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
American Society ◽  
Comorbidity Profile

Purpose To provide evidence-based recommendations to oncologists and others for treatment of patients with locally advanced, unresectable pancreatic cancer. Methods American Society of Clinical Oncology convened an Expert Panel of medical oncology, radiation oncology, surgical oncology, gastroenterology, palliative care, and advocacy experts and conducted a systematic review of the literature from January 2002 to June 2015. Outcomes included overall survival, disease-free survival, progression-free survival, and adverse events. Results Twenty-six randomized controlled trials met the systematic review criteria. Recommendations A multiphase computed tomography scan of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis should be performed. Baseline performance status and comorbidity profile should be evaluated. The goals of care, patient preferences, psychological status, support systems, and symptoms should guide decisions for treatments. A palliative care referral should occur at first visit. Initial systemic chemotherapy (6 months) with a combination regimen is recommended for most patients (for some patients radiation therapy may be offered up front) with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 or 1 and a favorable comorbidity profile. There is no clear evidence to support one regimen over another. The gemcitabine-based combinations and treatments recommended in the metastatic setting (eg, fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin and gemcitabine plus nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel) have not been evaluated in randomized controlled trials involving locally advanced, unresectable pancreatic cancer. If there is local disease progression after induction chemotherapy, without metastasis, then radiation therapy or stereotactic body radiotherapy may be offered also with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤ 2 and an adequate comorbidity profile. If there is stable disease after 6 months of induction chemotherapy but unacceptable toxicities, radiation therapy may be offered as an alternative. Patients with disease progression should be offered treatment per the ASCO Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer Treatment Guideline. Follow-up visits every 3 to 4 months are recommended. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/guidelines/LAPC and www.asco.org/guidelines/MetPC and www.asco.org/guidelineswiki .

scholarly journals Digital Detection of Sarcopenia in Pancreatic Cancer: Additional Utilization to Plan Patient Management

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mustafa Jalal ◽  
Jennifer A Campbell ◽  
Jonathan Wadsley ◽  
Andrew D Hopper
Keyword(s):  
Skeletal Muscle ◽  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Group Performance ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Skeletal Muscle Index ◽  
Ecog Ps ◽  
Cancer Network

Abstract Purpose: The presence of a sarcopenia adversely affects the prognosis of patients with pancreatic cancer. There is an emerging role for using computed tomography (CT) to calculate skeletal muscle index (SMI) and the presence of sarcopenia. The aim of this study was to assess if detecting ‘digital sarcopenia’ is feasible and can contribute to the management of patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC).Methods: Patients diagnosed with LAPC referred for endoscopic ultrasound guided biopsy (EUS-B) by our regional cancer network were identified. Age, body mass index (BMI), and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG-PS) was noted. CT images were analysed for SMI and the presence of sarcopenia. Decision outcomes on receiving chemotherapy or not were collected from the regional oncology database. Results: In total 51/204 (25%) patients with LAPC who underwent EUS-B were not given chemotherapy and received BSC only. The prevalence of sarcopenia (p=0.0003), age ≥ 75 years old (p=0.03) and ECOG-PS 2-3 (p=0.01) were significantly higher in the patents receiving BSC only. Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that SMI was the only independent associated factor identifying patients with LAPC who were treated with BSC only and not chemotherapy after adjusting for age and ECOG-PS. Conclusion: Our study has shown that digital skeletal muscle analysis at the time of a diagnostic CT for patients with pancreatic cancer is feasible and can detect sarcopenia and malnourished patients who are much less likely to take up chemotherapy. These patients could be triaged to oncology assessment prior to EUS-B to avoid unnecessary investigations.

A phase III trial of virulizin plus gemcitabine vs. gemcitabine alone in advanced pancreatic cancer: Results of subgroup analysis

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4116-4116 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. A. Wright ◽  
J. Osterlee ◽  
S. Fekete ◽  
Y. Lee ◽  
A. H. Young
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Cancer ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Ecog Ps ◽  
To Receive

4116 Background: Virulizin (V) is a novel antitumor immune modulator that improves survival in pancreatic cancer patients (pts) as monotherapy. A double-blind, multicenter, randomized, phase III study was conducted to evaluate the survival benefits and safety of V in combination with gemcitabine (G) in pts with advanced pancreatic cancer. Methods: Chemo-naive pts with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer with ECOG Performance Status (PS) of 0, 1 or 2 were enrolled. Pts were randomized to receive intramuscular injections of either V or placebo (P) 3 times weekly + G (1,000 mg/m2 weekly ×7 with 1 week rest, then weekly ×3 q4w). Randomization was stratified according to ECOG PS (0 or 1, and 2) and extent of disease (locally advanced and metastatic). Pts who showed no clinical benefit or were intolerant to G entered 2nd-line therapy (stage 3), in which pts continued to receive either V or P alone or with 5-FU, or best supportive care. The primary endpoint was survival, defined as time from baseline/treatment day 1 to time of death from any cause. Results: The intent to treat (ITT) population comprised 434 pts, of which 377 were efficacy evaluable (EE). Median overall survival for V + G was 6.3 months for the ITT population (6.8 months for EE pts) and 6 months for P + G for both ITT and EE pts. While differences in survival times were not statistically significant, exploratory analysis showed encouraging results in specific subgroups treated with V + G ( table ). Importantly, a significant difference was found in stage 3 pts who received V in a salvage setting compared to pts who received P. Conclusions: Pancreatic cancer pts with either low ECOG PS or metastatic cancer showed a survival benefit when treated with V + G, which was significant in pts who continued to receive V as a salvage therapy. Further studies in these targeted patient populations are being considered. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

scholarly journals Computed Tomographic Sarcopenia in Pancreatic Cancer: Further Utilization to Plan Patient Management

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mustafa Jalal ◽  
Jennifer A. Campbell ◽  
Jonathan Wadsley ◽  
Andrew D. Hopper
Keyword(s):  
Skeletal Muscle ◽  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Group Performance ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Skeletal Muscle Index ◽  
Computed Tomographic ◽  
Ecog Ps

Abstract Purpose The presence of a sarcopenia adversely affects the prognosis of patients with pancreatic cancer. There is an emerging role for using computed tomography (CT) to calculate skeletal muscle index (SMI) and the presence of sarcopenia. The aim of this study was to assess if detecting ‘computed tomographic sarcopenia’ is feasible and can contribute to the management of patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). Methods Patients diagnosed with LAPC referred for endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsy (EUS-B) by our regional cancer network were identified. Age, body mass index (BMI), and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG-PS) were noted. CT images were analysed for SMI and the presence of sarcopenia. Decision outcomes on receiving chemotherapy or not were collected from the regional oncology database. Results In total, 51/204 (25%) patients with LAPC who underwent EUS-B were not given chemotherapy and received best supportive care (BSC) only. The prevalence of sarcopenia (p = 0.0003), age ≥ 75 years old (p = 0.03), and ECOG-PS 2–3 (p = 0.01) were significantly higher in the patients receiving BSC only. Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that SMI was the only independent associated factor identifying patients with LAPC who were treated with BSC only and not chemotherapy after adjusting for age and ECOG-PS. Conclusion Our study has shown that computed tomographic skeletal muscle analysis at the time of a diagnostic CT for patients with pancreatic cancer is feasible and can detect sarcopenia and malnourished patients who are much less likely to take up chemotherapy. These patients could be triaged to oncology assessment prior to EUS-B to avoid unnecessary investigations.

Chemotherapy at the end of life in colorectal and pancreatic cancer: Real-world data and trends over time.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18723-e18723
Author(s):  
Catherine Dunn ◽  
Belinda Lee ◽  
Jeremy David Shapiro ◽  
Rachel Wong ◽  
Grace Gard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Real World ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Chemotherapeutic Regimen ◽  
Trends Over Time ◽  
Line Of Therapy ◽  
Over Time

e18723 Background: Chemotherapy at the end of life (CEOL) is widely accepted as an indicator of aggressive care. However, the evidence is limited primarily to single-centre experiences, with no consensus regarding acceptable benchmarks for CEOL, nor how this may be changing over time and with novel treatment options. We describe ‘real world’ CEOL in two large, multisite Australian registries of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and both locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer (PC). Methods: Data was analysed from the TRACC and PURPLE registries, two large prospective multisite Australian cancer registries collecting prospective demographic, tumour, treatment and outcome data for mCRC and PC respectively. We identified all decedents between May 2009 and November 2020, determined the proportion who died within 14 or 30 days of chemotherapy (14D / 30D), or within 30D after a new line of therapy, defined as the first cycle of a new treatment regimen. Using univariate analysis, we compared baseline demographic and clinicopathological variables and trends over time. Results: 1505 mCRC and 602 PC decedents were identified. 20.9% of decedents (21.6% mCRC and 19.3% PC) received chemotherapy within 30D, and 11.5% within 14D (12.3% mCRC and 9.6% PC). There were lower rates of 30D CEOL after the first cycle of a new line of therapy (4.3% mCRC and 5.7% PC). Rates of CEOL decreased over the study period for mCRC (median rate of initial 3-year period 28% versus 15% in last 3-year period), but remained largely static for PC (18.9% versus 17.9%). 30D CEOL was more likely with palliative than curative intent treatment (mCRC OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.14-2.25, p = 0.007, PC OR 5.3, 95% CI 1.6-17.8), and advanced rather than local disease in PC (PC OR 2.59, 95%CI 1.6-4.1, p < 0.001). There was a trend towards CEOL and poorer performance status (ECOG) across all groups, only significant for 30D CEOL mCRC (OR 1.51, 95% CI 1.04-2.2). There was no association between CEOL and patient age, gender, Charlson comorbidity score or lines of therapy. Conclusions: Real-world rates of CEOL are higher in our cohorts of mCRC and PC patients than historical benchmarks but comparable to contemporary reports, which may be due to a wider array of available active treatments. Overall rates are decreasing over time for mCRC but static for PC, which may reflect the poorer overall survival for PC and lack of new effective therapies. The lower rates of death after new lines of therapy may signify that CEOL is more likely with existing treatment regimens and that clinicians are less likely to initiate a new chemotherapeutic regimen at EOL.

scholarly journals Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio predicts prognosis in unresectable pancreatic cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Naoto Iwai ◽  
Takashi Okuda ◽  
Junichi Sakagami ◽  
Taishi Harada ◽  
Tomoya Ohara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Group Performance ◽  
Prognostic Score ◽  
Neutrophil To Lymphocyte Ratio ◽  
Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Characteristic Analysis ◽  
Lymphocyte Ratio ◽  
Ecog Ps

Abstract Inflammation-based prognostic indicators have been developed to predict the prognosis in patients with pancreatic cancer. However, prognostic indices have not been established in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer, including those without indication for chemotherapy at diagnosis. This study aimed to identify the predictors in all patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer. We retrospectively analyzed data of 119 patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer from June 2006 to September 2018. The following laboratory parameters were evaluated: the Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS), modified GPS, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), C-reactive protein albumin (CRP/Alb) ratio, and prognostic nutritional index (PNI). We performed time-dependent receiver operating characteristic analysis, overall survival (OS) analysis, and univariate and multivariate analyses to determine the prognostic factors in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer. The cut-off value for NLR was determined to be 3.74. The 6-month OS rates in low and high NLR groups were 75.5% and 18.8% (P < 0.001). In the univariate analysis, advanced age (P = 0.003), metastatic pancreatic cancer (P = 0.037), no treatment (P < 0.001), worse Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG-PS) (P < 0.001), high GPS (P < 0.001), high modified GPS (P < 0.001), high NLR (P < 0.001), high PLR (P = 0.002), high CRP/Alb ratio (P < 0.001), and low PNI (P < 0.001) were identified as the prognostic factors. The multivariate analysis revealed that metastatic pancreatic cancer (P = 0.046), no treatment (P < 0.001), worse ECOG-PS (P = 0.002), and high NLR (P < 0.001) were independently associated with OS. We revealed that the high NLR could be an independent indicator of poor prognosis in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document