Change in tumor lysis syndrome risk after lead-in treatment in a phase 1b/2 study of obinutuzumab, ibrutinib, and venetoclax for chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7528-7528
Author(s):  
Kerry Anne Rogers ◽  
Ying Huang ◽  
Amy S. Ruppert ◽  
Todd Civils ◽  
Subhashish Das ◽  
...  
Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (15) ◽  
pp. 1568-1572 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kerry A. Rogers ◽  
Ying Huang ◽  
Amy S. Ruppert ◽  
Farrukh T. Awan ◽  
Nyla A. Heerema ◽  
...  

Key Points Cytoreduction with obinutuzumab and ibrutinib followed by the addition of venetoclax has acceptable safety with no tumor lysis syndrome. This combination has preliminary activity including complete remissions with undetectable residual disease in relapsed or refractory CLL.


2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (31) ◽  
pp. 5047-5047 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laure A. Moutouh-de Parseval ◽  
Lilia Weiss ◽  
Robert J. DeLap ◽  
Robert D. Knight ◽  
Jerome B. Zeldis

1998 ◽  
Vol 16 (7) ◽  
pp. 2313-2320 ◽  
Author(s):  
B D Cheson ◽  
J N Frame ◽  
D Vena ◽  
N Quashu ◽  
J M Sorensen

PURPOSE To quantify the incidence and severity of tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) as a consequence of fludarabine therapy in patients with advanced chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). PATIENTS AND METHODS A retrospective review and questionnaire follow-up of clinical and laboratory data were performed on patients with intermediate or high-risk CLL on the National Cancer Institute Group C protocol or special exception mechanisms, or phase II trials of fludarabine, for whom adverse drug reports of TLS were available. Fludarabine was administered at a dose of 20 to 40 mg/m2 per day for 5 days at monthly intervals. RESULTS Among the 6,137 patients, TLS was suspected in 26 (0.42%), with clinical and laboratory features consistent with TLS present in 20 (0.33%). Prophylaxis against TLS had been administered to 60% of these patients. Clinical or laboratory features were similar to patients who did not develop TLS. Of the patients with TLS, 90% had high-risk CLL, 60 months of prior disease duration, with a median pretreatment WBC of 109 x 10(9)/L, two prior regimens, lymphadenopathy in 89%, splenomegaly and/or hepatomegaly in 90%. TLS developed on approximately day 7 and lasted a median of 9.5 days. Dialysis was required in 30% during the TLS episode; 20% of patients died during cycle one of fludarabine therapy with renal failure, and another 20% died of infection or congestive heart failure. Six patients were retreated with fludarabine without recurrent TLS. CONCLUSION TLS after fludarabine therapy is extremely uncommon, but may be associated with significant morbidity and mortality.


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 133 (26) ◽  
pp. 2765-2775 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian W. Flinn ◽  
John G. Gribben ◽  
Martin J. S. Dyer ◽  
William Wierda ◽  
Michael B. Maris ◽  
...  

Abstract This single-arm, open-label, phase 1b study evaluated the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of venetoclax when given with obinutuzumab and its safety and tolerability in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) or previously untreated (first line [1L]) chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Venetoclax dose initially was escalated (100-400 mg) in a 3 + 3 design to define MTD combined with standard-dose obinutuzumab. Patients received venetoclax (schedule A) or obinutuzumab (schedule B) first to compare safety and determine dose/schedule for expansion. Venetoclax-obinutuzumab was administered for 6 cycles, followed by venetoclax monotherapy until disease progression (R/R) or fixed duration 1-year treatment (1L). Fifty R/R and 32 1L patients were enrolled. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed. Safety, including incidence of tumor lysis syndrome (TLS), did not differ between schedules (2 laboratory TLSs per schedule). Schedule B and a 400-mg dose of venetoclax were chosen for expansion. The most common grade 3-4 adverse event was neutropenia (R/R, 58% of patients; 1L, 53%). Rates of grade 3-4 infections were 29% (R/R) and 13% (1L); no fatal infections occurred in 1L. All infusion-related reactions were grade 1-2, except for 2 grade 3 events. No clinical TLS was observed. Overall best response rate was 95% in R/R (complete response [CR]/CR with incomplete marrow recovery [CRi], 37%) and 100% in 1L (CR/CRi, 78%) patients. Rate of undetectable (<10−4) minimal residual disease (uMRD) in peripheral blood for R/R and 1L patients, respectively, was 64% and 91% ≥3 months after last obinutuzumab dose. Venetoclax and obinutuzumab therapy had an acceptable safety profile and elicited durable responses and high rates of uMRD. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01685892.


Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 1395-1395 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandra Ferrajoli ◽  
Xavier Badoux ◽  
Susan O'Brien ◽  
William G. Wierda ◽  
Stefan Faderl ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 1395 Lenalidomide is an immunomodulatory drug with single-agent activity in untreated and relapsed patients (pts) with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Lenalidomide may potentiate the activity of rituximab through enhancement of NK and cytotoxic T-cell activity and antibody-dependent cytotoxicity. As lenalidomide is active as single-agent in relapsed/refractory CLL, we designed a trial to evaluate the combination of lenalidomide and rituximab in pts with previously treated CLL. Between 09/2008 and 10/2009, 59 pts with relapsed or treatment-refractory CLL were enrolled in this Phase II trial. Pts were eligible if they had relapsed disease requiring treatment and had received prior fludarabine-based therapy. Pts were required to have adequate performance status (WHO <3) and adequate renal and liver function (serum Cr or bilirubin <2mg/dl). Pts with an unrelated malignancy or with HIV, hepatitis B or C infection were excluded. Rituximab 375 mg/m2 was given intravenously weekly × 4 from Day 1 in Cycle 1 then every 4 weeks during cycles 3 – 12. Oral lenalidomide 10 mg/day was started on Day 9 of cycle 1 on a continuous dosing schedule. Cycles were 28 days with intention to continue therapy for 12 cycles or longer if the patient experienced a clinical response. Dose reductions were made following grade 3 or 4 lenalidomide-related toxicity. Allopurinol 300mg daily was prescribed during the first 2 weeks as tumor lysis prophylaxis. Response evaluation was performed with after cycles 3, 6 and every 6 cycles thereafter using 2008 IWCLL response assessment guidelines. Toxicity was graded according to CTC-v3.0 criteria. All 59 pts are evaluable for response and clinical outcome. Patient pre-treatment characteristics are shown in Table 1. All pts had prior rituximab therapy and 52 (88%) pts had prior chemoimmunotherapy with fludarabine, cyclophosphamide and rituximab (FCR). The overall response rate was 64% with 5 complete responses (CR, 8%), 3 CR with incomplete hematological recovery (CRi, 5%), 7 nodular partial remissions (nPR, 12%) and 23 PR (39%). Most response (32/38, 84%) occurred by 3 cycles of therapy, but the majority of CR/CRi (7 of 8, 88%) occurred after 6 cycles of therapy. At a median follow-up of 14 months, the estimated treatment failure rate was 42% and estimated overall survival (OS) was 90%. There was no significant difference in responses or TTF for pts with deletion 17p when compared to other FISH subgroups. Two deaths occurred while on study therapy, one due to ischemic stroke and one to infectious exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Six deaths occurred after progression of disease during subsequent therapies. Grade 3/4 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia and anemia occurred in 40 (68%), 13 (22%) and 6 (10%) pts, respectively. Grade 3/4 infections occurred in 18 pts (31%), mostly lower respiratory tract. Seventy-three % of pts required a dose reduction of lenalidomide with a median tolerated daily dose of 5mg (2.5mg – 10mg). One patient experienced a grade 3 tumor lysis syndrome and 22 pts had grade 1–2 tumor flare reactions. In conclusion, combination therapy with lenalidomide and rituximab induces both complete and partial responses as salvage therapy in CLL. The addition of rituximab to lenalidomide appears to improve responses relative to single agent lenalidomide (Ferrajoli 2008, Chanan-Khan 2006) despite all pts having received prior rituximab-based therapies. This treatment was well tolerated with the most common toxicity being myelosuppression. Disclosures: Ferrajoli: Celgene: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding. Off Label Use: The use of lenalidomide in the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia. O'Brien:Celgene: Consultancy; Genentech BioOncology: Consultancy. Wierda:Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech BioOncology: Advisory Board, Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Estrov:Celgene: Consultancy. Keating:Celgene: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy.


2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (7) ◽  
pp. 544-549 ◽  
Author(s):  
Krystal S Titus-Rains ◽  
Jamie N Brown ◽  
Julia M Hammond

Background Tumor lysis syndrome results when intracellular contents are released during cell lysis. Ibrutinib, a Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is used for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia, small lymphocytic lymphoma, Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia, mantle cell lymphoma, and marginal zone lymphoma. Tumor lysis syndrome caused by ibrutinib therapy is potentially life threatening, but is rare and not often reported in clinical trials. Objective The purpose of this case series is to describe the occurrence of tumor lysis syndrome in two patients initiated on ibrutinib, and to highlight the importance of close monitoring during therapy. Discussion One patient with chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma and one patient with mantle cell lymphoma developed laboratory and clinical tumor lysis syndrome following initiation of ibrutinib therapy. Assessment with the Naranjo Adverse Drug Reaction Probability Scale indicated one probable relationship and one possible relationship between ibrutinib therapy and tumor lysis syndrome. There were additional factors that may have confounded the laboratory and clinical factors observed, including baseline laboratory values and concurrent medications. Both patients were managed with supportive therapies. A literature review identified five additional reported cases of tumor lysis syndrome following ibrutinib therapy. Conclusion This case series identifies one patient with a probable relationship and one patient with a possible relationship between the development of tumor lysis syndrome and treatment with ibrutinib. Although uncommon, proper attention should be given to monitoring for this adverse drug reaction and appropriate follow-up should occur despite ibrutinib’s ease of administration.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document