Primary tumor location as a prognostic implication in patients undergoing resection for colorectal liver metastasis: A propensity score-matched analysis.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15504-e15504 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuichi Goto ◽  
Carlos Castro Benitez ◽  
Oriana Ciacio ◽  
Gabriella Pittau ◽  
Eric Vibert ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
pp. v79
Author(s):  
V. Pacheco-Barcia ◽  
O. Donnay ◽  
R. Mondéjar Solís ◽  
R. Serrano ◽  
E. Martin ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuanping Zhang ◽  
Yongjin Wang ◽  
Yichuan Yuan ◽  
Jiliang Qiu ◽  
Yuxiong Qiu ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Whether primary tumor location of colorectal cancer (CRC) affects survival of patients after resection of liver metastases remains controversial. This study was conducted to investigate the differences in clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis between right-sided CRC and left-sided CRC patients with liver metastases after hepatectomy. Methods: From 2002 to 2018, 611 patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) who underwent hepatectomy at our center were reviewed. Primary tumors located from cecum to transverse colon were defined as right-sided group (n = 141); tumors located from splenic flexure to rectum were defined as left-sided group (n = 470). Patients were compared between two groups before and after a 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) analysis. Results: Before PSM, median survival time and 5-year overall survival (OS) rate in right-sided group were 77 months and 56.3%, and those in left-sided group were 64 months and 51.1%, respectively. After PSM, median survival time and 5-year OS rate in right-sided group were 77 months and 55.9%, and those in left-sided group were 58.8 months and 47.3%, respectively. The OS rates did not differ between two groups before and after PSM (P = 0.575; P = 0.453). However, significant different recurrence-free survival (RFS) rate was found before and after PSM between right-sided and left-sided group (P = 0.028, P = 0.003). Conclusions: Compared to patients with left-sided primary tumors, patients with right-sided primary tumors had a worse RFS but similar OS. Careful preoperative evaluation, intensive preoperative chemotherapy and frequent follow-up to detect early recurrence might be justified for CRLM patients with right-sided primary tumors.


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 636-636
Author(s):  
Ben Boursi ◽  
Einat shacham-Shmueli ◽  
Yaacov Richard Lawrence ◽  
Yu-Xiao Yang ◽  
Kim Anna Reiss ◽  
...  

636 Background: Previous studies have shown that prognosis in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) may vary according to sites of metastasis. We evaluated prognosis in individuals with single site metastasis, according to several clinical and genetic variables. Methods: Using the National Cancer Database we identified 58,044 mCRC patients with a synchronous single site of metastasis. We first examined the effect of metastasis site on prognosis. In a secondary analysis, among individuals who had not undergone surgery or received radiotherapy, we examined the prognostic value of chemotherapy intensity, KRAS status, primary tumor location and CEA levels. Results: Individuals with lung metastasis had the best prognosis (HR = 0.80, 0.77-0.83), followed by those with liver metastasis (HR = 1.11, 1.07-1.15), while those with bone or brain metastasis had the worse prognosis. In a subgroup analysis, we assessed prognosis among individuals who received multi-agent chemotherapy and had not undergone surgery or received radiotherapy. Individuals with lung metastasis and mutant KRAS had better prognosis compared with those with liver metastasis, (HR = 0.69, 0.54-0.88), regardless of primary tumor location or CEA levels. Conclusions: Single site metastasis to the lungs is associated with better prognosis in mCRC, specifically among KRAS mutant tumors. This survival advantage should be taken into consideration in clinical decision-making.


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 105-105
Author(s):  
Hiromichi Nakajima ◽  
Shota Fukuoka ◽  
Toshikazu Moriwaki ◽  
Toshiki Masuishi ◽  
Atsuo Takashima ◽  
...  

105 Background: In the recent years, primary tumor location (PTL) is considered as an important prognostic and predictive factor in first-line treatment of mCRC. Although regorafenib (REG) and trifluridine/tipiracil (TFTD) have been available recently, the prognostic value of PTL in later-line with these agents is not well understood. TFTD improved survival regardless of PTL in the RECOURSE trial, while REG did not show survival benefit in the patients (pts) with rectal cancer in the CORRECT trial. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated pts with mCRC who were registered in a multicenter observational study (the REGOTAS study). The main inclusion criteria were ECOG PS of 0–2, refractory or intolerant to fluoropyrimidines, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and anti-VEGF and anti-EGFR therapy (if KRAS wild type), and no prior use of REG and TFTD. The impact of PTL on overall survival (OS) were evaluated using Cox proportional hazards models based on baseline characteristics and propensity score matching. Results: A total of 550 pts (223 pts in the REG group, 327 pts in the TFTD group; 122 pts in the right-sided, 428 pts in the left-sided) were included in this study. Although the right-sided pts was significantly shorter OS compared with the left-sided pts by univariate analysis (hazard ratio [HR] 0.79, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.63-0.99, P = 0.04), multivariate analysis revealed that PTL was not an independent prognostic factor (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.69-1.1, P = 0.26). The similar results were obtained in each treatment group. In subgroup analysis according to PTL, OS were comparable between REG and TFTD groups regardless of PTL (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.62-1.39 in the right-sided; HR 1.08, 95% CI 0.83-1.39 in the left-sided [excluding rectum]; and HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.62-1.62 in the rectal cancer pts). These results were similar in sensitivity analysis using propensity score-matching. Conclusions: In the present study, PTL is not a prognostic factor in patient with mCRC treated with either REG or TFTD as later-line. No difference in OS was observed between REG and TFTD groups irrespective of PTL.


Breast Cancer ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 100-107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiqiao Yang ◽  
Shenli Tang ◽  
Yuting Zhou ◽  
Juanjuan Qiu ◽  
Juying Zhang ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document