Long-term outcomes after induction chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-FU (TPF) followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced nasopharyngeal cancer.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18008-e18008
Author(s):  
Sang-Hee Cho ◽  
Hyun-Jeong Shim ◽  
Jun-Eul Hwang ◽  
Woo Kyun Bae ◽  
Ik-Joo Chung
2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (29_suppl) ◽  
pp. 67-67
Author(s):  
Teng Hwee Tan ◽  
Yu Yang Soon ◽  
Timothy Cheo ◽  
Lea Choung Wong ◽  
Yiat Horng Leong ◽  
...  

67 Background: To determine and compare the incremental clinical benefit (ICB) and costs of induction chemotherapy (IC) when added to concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT), concurrent chemotherapy (CC) added to RT and CC + adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) when added to RT for locally advanced nasopharyngeal cancer (LA-NPC). Methods: We searched phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which reported overall survival (OS) benefit with the use of IC, CC and CC+AC in LA-NPC. We quantified the ICB using the ASCO and ESMO value framework. We calculated the incremental drug costs in US dollars using the lowest average wholesale price reported in the Lexicomp drug database. Results: We identified three RCTs on IC, three RCTs on CC and four RCTs on CC + AC. The ICB was judged to be Grade A based on the ESMO framework. The ASCO Net Health Benefit Score (NHBS) ranged from 17.43 to 57.39. The incremental drug costs ranged from 133.46 to 626.14. There were no statistically significant differences in the means of NHBS [39.37 (IC) vs 37.61 (CC) vs 33.98 (CC+AC), P = 0.89] and costs [383 (IC) vs 253 (CC) vs 460 (CC+AC), P = 0.27] between these three approaches. There was no statistically significant correlation between ICB and costs. Conclusions: The magnitudes of ICB and incremental drug costs of adding of IC to CCRT, CC to RT and CC + AC to RT for LA NPC are not significantly different.


2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (11) ◽  
pp. e1386-e1396
Author(s):  
Teng Hwee Tan ◽  
Yu Yang Soon ◽  
Timothy Cheo ◽  
Lea Choung Wong ◽  
Yiat Horng Leong ◽  
...  

PURPOSE: To determine and compare the incremental clinical benefit (ICB) and costs of induction chemotherapy (IC) when added to concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT), concurrent chemotherapy (CC) when added to radiotherapy (RT), and CC plus adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) when added to RT for locally advanced nasopharyngeal cancer (LA-NPC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that reported overall survival benefit with the use of IC, CC, and CC + AC in LA-NPC. We quantified the ICB using the ASCO and European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) value frameworks. We calculated the incremental drug costs in US dollars using the lowest average wholesale price reported in the Lexicomp drug database. RESULTS: We identified three RCTs on IC, three RCTs on CC, and four RCTs on CC + AC. The ICB was judged to be grade A based on the ESMO framework. The ASCO Net Health Benefit score ranged from 17.43 to 57.39. The incremental drug costs ranged from $133.46 to $626.14. There were no statistically significant differences in the mean Net Health Benefit scores (39.37 for IC v 37.61 for CC v 33.98 for CC + AC; P = .89) and costs ($383 for IC v $253 for CC v $460 for CC + AC; P = .27) between the three approaches. There was no statistically significant correlation between ICB and costs. CONCLUSION: The magnitudes of ICB and incremental drug costs of adding of IC to CCRT, CC to RT, and CC + AC to RT for LA-NPC are not significantly different.


2018 ◽  
Vol 56 (1) ◽  
pp. 213-214 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shin Tanaka ◽  
Seiichiro Sugimoto ◽  
Junichi Soh ◽  
Takahiro Oto

Abstract The technique of pneumonectomy, back-table lung preservation, double-sleeve resection and reimplantation of basal segments (the Oto procedure) has been proposed as a useful technique for the management of locally advanced central lung cancer with short-term follow-up. We report the long-term outcomes of 5 consecutive patients who underwent the Oto procedure.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document