The prognostic role of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio trends during therapy in esophageal cancer.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 17-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yaseen Al Lawati ◽  
Jose Luis Ramirez-Garcialuna ◽  
Juan Carlos Molina Franjola ◽  
Donavan Pham ◽  
Elena Skothos ◽  
...  

17 Background: Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has been identified as a biomarker for a number of malignancies, with higher ratios being associated with poorer oncologic outcomes. Rather than purely an indicator of advanced disease there is emerging evidence that neutrophils are directly implicated in facilitating cancer progression, and thus alterations and trends of neutrophil counts and NLR during different phases of treatment may reflect a change in oncologic outcome that is as important, or more so, as the absolute count or NLR at baseline. The aim of this study is to investigate the prognostic role of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio trends during the treatment trajectory of patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma. Methods: This is a retrospective study of patients who underwent esophagectomy for esophageal adenocarcinoma between 2005-2016. NLR was measured at three time points: baseline, during neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), and in the late postoperative period. Primary outcomes were overall (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Results: 333 patients met our inclusion criteria. Mean age was 65.6 years and 82% of patients were males. The majority of patients had locally advanced disease; 75% had clinical T3 disease and 59% had clinical N-positive disease. NAC was administered in 65.6% of patients. Increasing NLR trends between baseline and late postoperative periods was associated with worse OS (3-year OS 56.1% vs. 71.9%, p=0.045). Patients in the high NLR group before and after treatment did worse than those who moved from high to low groups (3-year OS 42.8% vs. 69.2%, p=<0.0001, 3-year DFS 32.3% vs. 61.8%, p=0.0001). High NLR at baseline and in the postoperative stage is associated with worse OS (3-year OS: 57% vs. 75.7% for baseline and 44.1% vs. 74.9% for postoperative NLR; p=0.0038 and <0.0001, respectively) and DFS (3-year DFS: 52.4% vs. 60.9% for baseline and 34.9% vs. 59.9% for postoperative NLR; p=0.03 and <0.0001, respectively). Patients with complete pathological response to NAC had lower mean baseline NLR (3.2 vs. 4.9 p=0.009). Conclusions: Changes in NLR during treatment may provide a clearer picture about survival outcomes and the role of neutrophils in cancer progression.

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jingxu Sun ◽  
Xiaowan Chen ◽  
Peng Gao ◽  
Yongxi Song ◽  
Xuanzhang Huang ◽  
...  

The prognostic role of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in gastric cancer remains controversial. We aimed to quantify the prognostic role of peripheral blood NLR in gastric cancer. A literature search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases. The results for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS)/disease-free survival (DFS) are expressed as hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 19 studies with 5431 patients were eligible for final analysis. Elevated NLRs were associated with a significantly poor outcome for OS (HR = 1.98; 95% CI: 1.75–2.24,p<0.001) and PFS (HR = 1.58; 95% CI: 1.32–1.88,p<0.001) compared with patients who had normal NLRs. The NLR was higher for patients with late-stage compared with early-stage gastric cancer (OR = 2.76; 95% CI: 1.36–5.61,p=0.005). NLR lost its predictive role for patients with stage IV gastric cancer who received palliative surgery (HR = 1.73; 95% CI: 0.85–3.54,p=0.13). Our results also indicated that prognoses might be influenced by the NLR cutoff values. In conclusion, elevated pretreatment NLRs are associated with poor outcome for patients with gastric cancer. The ability to use the NLR to evaluate the status of patients may be used in the future for personalized cancer care.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document