PanCO: An open-label, single-arm pilot study of phosphorus-32 (P-32; Oncosil) microparticles in patients with unresectable locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (LAPC) in combination with FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel (GNP) chemotherapies.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4125-4125 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul J. Ross ◽  
Daniel Croagh ◽  
Morteza Aghmesheh ◽  
Adnan Nagrial ◽  
Nam Nguyen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pilot Study ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Tumour Volume ◽  
Current Standard ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Local Progression ◽  
Grade 3

4125 Background: LAPC is associated with a poor prognosis. Current standard treatment is limited to chemotherapy or chemo-radiotherapy. P-32 Microparticles is a brachytherapy device that implants a predetermined dose of P-32 into pancreatic tumours via endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guidance. This reports the initial results of a pilot study in combination with chemotherapy. Methods: Eligible patients were permitted to receive either GNP or FOLFIRINOX. P-32 was implanted at week 4 or 5. The dose of P-32 was calculated from tumour volume to deliver an absorbed dose of 100 Gy. Diffusion pattern of the P-32 suspension was assessed by EUS and bremsstrahlung SPECT/CT imaging. Safety data was graded using CTCAE v4.0 criteria. Response was assessed according to RECIST 1.1 with CT scans every 8 weeks and FDG-PET scans at baseline and week 12. Results: 50 patients were enrolled (Intent-to-Treat population (ITT)) of which 42 were implanted with the device (Per Protocol population (PP)). 10 received FOLFIRINOX and 40 GNP. Median age was 65, 28 were male and all had a PS 0/1. 1070 adverse events (ITT) were reported; 153 (80% of patients) were ≥ Grade 3. The most common AEs of ≥ Grade 3 were haematological (39, 46%) and gastrointestinal disorders (30, 34%). No serious device- or radiation-related toxicities have been reported. PP Local Disease Control Rate at Week 16 was 90%; 95% CI: 77-97% and at Week 24 was 71%; 95% CI: 55-84%. Overall Response Rate (ORR) was 31%; 95% CI: 18-47%. Median change in tumour volume from Baseline to Week 16 and to Week 24 was -38% (range +89% to -90%) and -27.5% (range +139% to -79%). Ten (24%) patients underwent surgical resection following repeat staging. Eight patients had R0 margin. Conclusions: The use of EUS-guided implantation of P-32 is feasible, with an acceptable safety profile in combination with first-line chemotherapy for LAPC patients. Encouraging OR and DCR are observed. Further follow-up to inform results of local progression free survival and progression free survival is warranted. Acknowledgement: Nab-paclitaxel was supported by Specialised Therapeutics Australia Pty Ltd. Clinical trial information: NCT03003078.

scholarly journals Pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy in recurrent, advanced urothelial cancer in Japanese patients: a subgroup analysis of the phase 3 KEYNOTE-045 trial

2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 165-174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroyuki Nishiyama ◽  
Yoshiaki Yamamoto ◽  
Naoto Sassa ◽  
Kazuo Nishimura ◽  
Kiyohide Fujimoto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Urothelial Cancer ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Japanese Patients ◽  
Open Label ◽  
End Points ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Metastatic Urothelial Cancer ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background The open-label, randomized, active-controlled KEYNOTE-045 study (NCT02256436) showed that second-line pembrolizumab significantly improved overall survival (OS) of patients with advanced/metastatic urothelial cancer (UC) that progressed after first-line platinum-containing chemotherapy, compared with standard chemotherapy (paclitaxel, docetaxel, or vinflunine). Pembrolizumab is approved for patients with bladder cancer in Japan. Patients and methods Analysis was performed in the subgroup of Japanese patients enrolled in the KEYNOTE-045 study. Coprimary end points were OS and progression-free survival (PFS). Objective response rate (ORR) and safety were secondary end points. Results Fifty-two Japanese patients (pembrolizumab, n = 30; chemotherapy, n = 22) were followed up for a median of 26.1 months. Patients who received pembrolizumab compared with chemotherapy had a 19% lower risk for death (hazard ratio [HR] 0.81, 95% CI 0.44–1.50); after adjusting for baseline covariates, the HR for OS was 0.61 (95% CI 0.32–1.15). The 24-month OS rate was higher with pembrolizumab (26.9% vs 14.3%). PFS was 2.0 and 4.9 months for pembrolizumab and chemotherapy, respectively (HR 1.71, 95% CI 0.95–3.08). ORR was similar for pembrolizumab and chemotherapy (20.0% vs 18.2%); durability of response was higher with pembrolizumab: 67% and 33% of patients, respectively, maintained a response for > 12 months. Treatment-related adverse events, including grade 3–5 events, occurred less frequently with pembrolizumab. Conclusions Pembrolizumab provided durable antitumor activity in patients with locally advanced/metastatic UC that progressed after platinum-containing chemotherapy in the overall population and in the Japanese subgroup; safety profile was consistent with that previously observed for pembrolizumab.

Phase III, Open-Label, Randomized Study Comparing Concurrent Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin and Radiation Followed by Adjuvant Gemcitabine and Cisplatin Versus Concurrent Cisplatin and Radiation in Patients With Stage IIB to IVA Carcinoma of the Cervix

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (13) ◽  
pp. 1678-1685 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alfonso Dueñas-González ◽  
Juan J. Zarbá ◽  
Firuza Patel ◽  
Juan C. Alcedo ◽  
Semir Beslija ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
External Beam Radiotherapy ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Score ◽  
Current Standard ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Grade 3

Purpose To determine whether addition of gemcitabine to concurrent cisplatin chemoradiotherapy and as adjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin improves progression-free survival (PFS) at 3 years compared with current standard of care in locally advanced cervical cancer. Patients and Methods Eligible chemotherapy- and radiotherapy-naive patients with stage IIB to IVA disease and Karnofsky performance score ≥ 70 were randomly assigned to arm A (cisplatin 40 mg/m2 and gemcitabine 125 mg/m2 weekly for 6 weeks with concurrent external-beam radiotherapy [XRT] 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions, followed by brachytherapy [BCT] 30 to 35 Gy in 96 hours, and then two adjuvant 21-day cycles of cisplatin, 50 mg/m2 on day 1, plus gemcitabine, 1,000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8) or to arm B (cisplatin and concurrent XRT followed by BCT only; dosing same as for arm A). Results Between May 2002 and March 2004, 515 patients were enrolled (arm A, n = 259; arm B, n = 256). PFS at 3 years was significantly improved in arm A versus arm B (74.4% v 65.0%, respectively; P = .029), as were overall PFS (log-rank P = .0227; hazard ratio [HR], 0.68; 95% CI, 0.49 to 0.95), overall survival (log-rank P = .0224; HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.49 to 0.95), and time to progressive disease (log-rank P = .0012; HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.37 to 0.79). Grade 3 and 4 toxicities were more frequent in arm A than in arm B (86.5% v 46.3%, respectively; P < .001), including two deaths possibly related to treatment toxicity in arm A. Conclusion Gemcitabine plus cisplatin chemoradiotherapy followed by BCT and adjuvant gemcitabine/cisplatin chemotherapy improved survival outcomes with increased but clinically manageable toxicity when compared with standard treatment.

Biweekly Raltitrexed in Combination with Irinotecan (RIR) as Second-Line Therapy for Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Non-Randomized, Open-Label Phase II Trial.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ke Cheng ◽  
Yu-Wen Zhou ◽  
Ye Chen ◽  
Zhi-Ping Li ◽  
Meng Qiu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Second Line Therapy ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Common Grade ◽  
Open Label Phase ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background Irinotecan-based doublet chemotherapy strategy was standard second-line backbone treatment for patients with oxaliplatin‑refractory metastatic colorectal cancer(mCRC). The aim of this study was to evaluate tolerability and efficacy of raltitrexed combined with irinotecan biweekly administered as the second-line therapy for mCRC patients.Methods The study was a single-center, non-randomized, open-label phase II trial. Patients with mCRC after failure with first-line treatment of oxaliplatin and fluoropyrimidine or its derivatives were enrolled. Irinotecan (180 mg/m2) and raltitrexed (2.5 mg/m2) were given intravenously on day 1. Cycles were repeated every 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival, and the secondary endpoints included overall response rate, disease control rate, overall survival and treatment related adverse events. Results Between December 2012 and October 2016, 35 patients were enrolled. 33 and 35 patients were assessed for response and safety, respectively. The overall response rate (ORR) was 8.6 %, and the disease control rate (DCR) was 71.4%. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.5 months (95% CI 3.8–5.2). The median overall survival was 12.0 months (95% CI 8.5–15.5). Four patients received conversion therapy to no evidence of disease (NED), and 2 patients were still alive with beyond 24 months survival. The most common grade 3/4 hematological adverse events were leukopenia (8.6%), neutropenia (5.7%). The most common grade 3/4 nonhematological adverse events were anorexia (14.3%), vomiting (14.3%), nausea (11.4%) and fatigue (8.6%). Two patients discontinued the protocol treatment because of treatment-related gastrointestinal adverse events. No one died from treatment-related events. The incidence and severity of toxicity was irrelevant to UGT1A1 status.Conclusions The combination of irinotecan with raltitrexed is an active, convenient and acceptable toxic regimen for second-line treatment for mCRC patients, which needs further study as a chemotherapy backbone to be combined with targeted agents in mCRC.Trial registration No. ChiCTR-ONC-12002767. The study was registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry at 29 Octorber 2012, http://www.chictr.org.cn/index.aspx.

Results of a phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of pegfilgrastim (PEG) in patients (pts) receiving first-line FOLFOX or FOLFIRI and bevacizumab (B) for colorectal cancer (CRC).

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3575-3575
Author(s):  
Tamas Pinter ◽  
Esteban Abella ◽  
Alvydas Cesas ◽  
Adina Croitoru ◽  
Jochen Decaestecker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
First Line ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Clinically Significant ◽  
Grade 3

3575 Background: The literature reports that adding biologics to chemotherapy (ctx) may increase the incidence of clinically significant neutropenia. his trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of PEG in reducing the incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN) in pts with locally-advanced (LA) or metastatic (m)CRC receiving first-line treatment with either FOLFOX/B or FOLFIRI/B. Methods: Key eligibility: ≥ 18 years old; measurable, nonresectable CRC per RECIST 1.1. Pts were randomly assigned 1:1 to either placebo or 6 mg PEG ~24 h after ctx/B. The study treatment period included four Q2W cycles, but pts could continue their assigned regimen until progression. Pts were stratified by region (North America vs rest of world), stage (LA vs mCRC), and ctx (FOLFOX vs FOLFIRI). Estimated sample size (N = 800) was based on the expected incidence of grade 3/4 FN (primary endpoint) across the first 4 cycles of ctx/B, powered for PEG superiority over placebo. Other endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: 845 pts were randomized (Nov 2009 to Jan 2012) and received study treatment; 783 pts completed 4 cycles of ctx/B. Median age was 61 years; 512 (61%) pts were male; 819 (97%) had mCRC; 414 (49%) received FOLFOX, and 431 (51%) received FOLFIRI. Grade 3/4 FN (first 4 cycles) for placebo vs PEG was 5.7% vs 2.4%; OR 0.41; p = 0.014. A similar incidence of other ≥ grade 3 adverse events was seen in both arms (28% placebo; 27% PEG). See table for additional results. Conclusions: PEG significantly reduced the incidence of grade 3/4 FN in this pt population receiving standard ctx/B for CRC. Follow-up is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT00911170. [Table: see text]

Phase II study of biweekly administration of CPT-11 and gemcitabine in chemotherapy-naive patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer in Japan.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15150-e15150
Author(s):  
Ryoji Takada ◽  
Tatsuya Ioka ◽  
Nobuko Ishida ◽  
Takuo Yamai ◽  
Nobuyasu Fukutake ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Combination Chemotherapy ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Current Standard ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Grade 3

e15150 Background: The current standard therapies for metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma in Japan are the single-agent Gemcitabine (Gem) or S-1 and Gem plus erlotinib. Irinotecan (CPT-11) is one of the promising drugs for Gem-refractory PC pts. Both Irinotecan and Gem have shown activity against these diseases with different mechanisms and are non-cross-resistant with each other. Japanese pts have the different metabolism with Irinotecan rather than pts in western countries. Methods: The aim of this phase II study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CPT-11 and Gem in Japanese pancreatic cancer pts. Patients with MPC and PS 0-2 were enrolled in this phase II trial. CPT-11, 100mg/m (2), was administered in 90 min. and Gem, 1000mg/m (2), was administered in 30 min. soon after CPT-11 on day1. Chemotherapy was repeated biweekly. Results: From May 2002 to May 2006 40 pts, with median age of 62 (40-74) years, were enrolled in this study. The overall response rate (RR) was 15% with disease control rate of 50%. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.0 months (range: 1.0-15.0 months), and median overall survival (OS) was 7.5 months (range: 3.0-24.0 months). Grade 3/4 anemia, leucopenia occurred in 26.3, 5.2% of pts. The most common non-hematologic toxities were fatigue, diarrhea, nausea/vomiting and anorexia. Grade 3 diarrhea and nausea occurred in 10.5% of pts. Conclusions: The combination chemotherapy with Gem and CPT-11 showed favorable RR as expected and the treatment was manageable in Japanese pts with MPC. We plan to evaluate this combination chemotherapy for MPC pts after progression of FOLFIRINOX in near the future. Clinical trial information: UMIN000009963.

Updated efficacy and tolerability of durvalumab in locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC).

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4525-4525 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noah M. Hahn ◽  
Thomas Powles ◽  
Christophe Massard ◽  
Hendrik-Tobias Arkenau ◽  
Terence W. Friedlander ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase 1 ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Anticancer Therapy ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Grade 3

4525 Background: Anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy shows promising clinical activity in UC. We report a planned update of the safety and efficacy of durvalumab in patients (pts) with locally advanced/metastatic UC from a multicenter, phase 1/2 open-label study. Methods: Pts received durvalumab 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks (Q2W) up to 12 months (mo) or until unacceptable toxicity, progression, or starting another anticancer therapy. Primary endpoints were safety and confirmed objective response rate (ORR) by blinded independent central review (RECIST v1.1). Duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were key secondary endpoints. Tumor PD-L1 expression was assessed by Ventana SP263 assay (PD-L1 high = ≥25% PD-L1 expression on tumor or immune cells). Results: As of Oct 24, 2016 (data cutoff [DCO]), 191 pts had received treatment. Median follow-up was 5.78 mo (range, 0.4–25.9). All pts had Stage 4 disease and 99.5% had prior anticancer therapy (95.3% post-platinum). As of DCO, ORR was 17.8% (34/191), including 7 CRs, with responses observed regardless of PD-L1 status (Table). Responses occurred early (median time to response, 1.41 mo) and were durable (median DoR not reached [NR]). Median PFS and OS were 1.5 mo (95% CI, 1.4, 1.9) and 18.2 mo (95% CI, 8.1, not estimable [NE]), respectively; the 1-year OS rate was 55.0% (95% CI, 43.9%, 64.7%). Grade 3/4 treatment-related AEs occurred in 6.8% of pts; grade 3/4 immune-mediated (im)AEs occurred in 4 pts; 2 pts discontinued due to imAEs (acute kidney injury and autoimmune hepatitis). Conclusions: Durvalumab 10 mg/kg Q2W shows favorable clinical activity and an excellent safety profile in locally advanced/metastatic UC pts. Table. Antitumor activity in UC pts, including second-line or greater (≥2L) post-platinum pts Clinical trial information: NCT01693562. [Table: see text]

FORT-1: Phase II/III study of rogaratinib versus chemotherapy (CT) in patients (pts) with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC) selected based on FGFR1/3 mRNA expression.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 489-489 ◽  
Author(s):  
David I. Quinn ◽  
Daniel Peter Petrylak ◽  
Joaquim Bellmunt ◽  
Andrea Necchi ◽  
Howard Gurney ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Activating Mutations ◽  
Stage Iv Disease ◽  
Dna Alterations ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Muscle Invasive

489 Background: Aberrant activation of fibroblast growth receptor (FGFR) signaling plays a role in UC. Rogaratinib, a pan-FGFR1-4 inhibitor, has promising efficacy and safety in pts with advanced muscle-invasive UC, selected based on FGFR1-3 mRNA overexpression and/or FGFR3-activating mutations/translocations. This Phase II/III, randomized, open-label study evaluated the efficacy of rogaratinib vs CT in pts with FGFR-positive advanced or metastatic UC who received prior platinum CT. We present an ORR analysis for rogaratinib vs CT. Methods: FGFR1/3 mRNA was tested by in situ hybridization of archival tissue. Pts were randomized 1:1 to 800 mg rogaratinib p.o. BID continuously or CT Q3W (i.v., docetaxel 75 mg/m2, paclitaxel 175 mg/m2, or vinflunine 320 mg/m2), and stratified by PIK3CA/ RAS-activating mutations, prior immunotherapy, and modified 4-factor Bellmunt risk score. Results: 87 pts were assigned to rogaratinib and 88 to CT. Overall, 82.9% were male, median age was 69.0 yrs (range: 36-89), 96.6% had stage IV disease, and 2.3% were stage IIIB. PIK3CA/ RAS-activating mutations were present in 11.4% of pts. ORRs of 19.5% and 19.3% (1-sided p=0.56) and disease control rates of 49.4% and 55.7% (p=0.84) were observed for rogaratinib and CT, respectively; median progression-free survival was 2.7 months (95% CI 1.6, 4.2) and 2.9 months (95% CI 2.6, 4.2). Grade 3-4 treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 40/86 pts (47%) treated with rogaratinib and 46/82 pts (56%) with CT, most commonly anemia (3% vs 15%), neutropenia (1% vs 17%), asthenia (9% vs 1%), lipase increase (8% vs 2%), fatigue (2% vs 6%), and urinary tract infection (2% vs 6%). Exploratory analysis of pts with FGFR3 DNA alterations (4 spot mutations and fusions) showed ORRs of 52.4% with rogaratinib and 26.7% with CT. Conclusions: In pts with FGFR1/3 tumor mRNA-positive UC, rogaratinib had efficacy comparable with standard CT and an acceptable safety profile. Subgroup analysis suggests rogaratinib may be more active in pts with an FGFR3 DNA alteration. Sensitivity analysis of biomarker subgroups is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT03410693.

scholarly journals Rationale and design of a phase II trial of durvalumab treatment in patients with NSCLC ineligible for stage III chemoradiotherapy following radiation monotherapy (SPIRAL-RT study)

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 175883592092784 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tadaaki Yamada ◽  
Junji Uchino ◽  
Yusuke Chihara ◽  
Takayuki Shimamoto ◽  
Masahiro Iwasaku ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Antitumor Agents ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
The Pacific ◽  
Secondary Endpoints

Background: In the PACIFIC study, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients with unresectable, locally advanced, stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were prolonged by durvalumab as maintenance therapy after radical concurrent chemoradiotherapy using platinum-based antitumor agents. However, no data were obtained to reveal the efficacy of durvalumab after radiation monotherapy in patients unsuitable for chemoradiotherapy. Here, we describe an ongoing single-arm, prospective, open-label, multicenter phase II trial of durvalumab in patients with NSCLC ineligible for stage III chemoradiotherapy following radiation monotherapy (SPIRAL-RT study). Methods: Durvalumab at 10 mg/kg body weight is administered every 2 weeks after radiation therapy until individual patients meet the discontinuation criteria. The treatment duration is up to 12 months. The primary endpoint is the 1-year PFS rate. Secondary endpoints are response rate, PFS, OS, and safety. Durvalumab treatment after radiation monotherapy is expected to prolong 1-year PFS rate and have acceptable adverse events. Discussion: We are conducting an intervention study to investigate the safety and efficacy of durvalumab treatment in patients with NSCLC ineligible for stage III chemoradiotherapy following radiation monotherapy.

Olaparib plus paclitaxel plus carboplatin (P/C) followed by olaparib maintenance treatment in patients (pts) with platinum-sensitive recurrent serous ovarian cancer (PSR SOC): A randomized, open-label phase II study.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5001-5001 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amit M. Oza ◽  
David Cibula ◽  
Ana Oaknin ◽  
Christopher John Poole ◽  
Ron H.J. Mathijssen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Maintenance Treatment ◽  
Parp Inhibitor ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Platinum Sensitive ◽  
Open Label Phase ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
Grade 3

5001 Background: The oral PARP inhibitor olaparib has shown antitumor activity in pts with SOC. Our multicenter study compared the efficacy of (Arm A) olaparib capsules plus P/C for 6 cycles then maintenance olaparib monotherapy vs (Arm B) P/C alone for 6 cycles and no further therapy in pts with PSR SOC (NCT01081951). Methods: Pts received 6 x 21-day(d) cycles of olaparib (200 mg bid, d1–10/21) + P (175 mg/m2 iv, d1) + C (AUC4 iv, d1), then olaparib monotherapy as maintenance (400 mg bid, continuous) (Arm A), or 6 x 21d cycles of P (175 mg/m2 iv, d1) + C (AUC6 iv, d1) then no further therapy (Arm B), until progression. Randomization (1:1) was stratified by number of platinum treatments and platinum-free interval. Primary endpoint: progression-free survival (PFS) by central review (RECIST 1.1). Secondary endpoints: overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), safety. Archival tissue was collected where available for analysis of biomarker correlation. Results: Of 162 pts randomized (n=81 per arm), 156 received treatment (Arm A, n=81; Arm B, n=75) and 121 began the maintenance/no further therapy phase (Arm A, n=66; Arm B, n=55). Olaparib + P/C (AUC4) followed by maintenance olaparib showed a significant improvement in PFS vs P/C (AUC6) alone (HR = 0.51, 95% CI 0.34, 0.77; P=0.0012; median = 12.2 vs 9.6 months). OS data are immature (total events: 14%). ORR was similar for Arm A and Arm B (64 vs 58%). Most common AEs during the combination phase were alopecia (74 vs 59%), nausea (69 vs 57%) and fatigue (64 vs 57%) for Arm A vs Arm B, respectively. Pts with grade ≥3 AEs (65 vs 57%), serious AEs (SAEs: 15 vs 21%) and AEs leading to treatment discontinuation (19 vs 16%) were similar for Arm A vs Arm B. Most common AEs during maintenance/no further therapy were nausea (50 vs 6%) and vomiting (29 vs 7%). 29 vs 16% of pts had grade ≥3 AEs, 9 vs 7% had SAEs and 8% vs N/A discontinued due to AEs in the olaparib vs no treatment arms, respectively. There were no fatal AEs. Conclusions: In pts with PSR SOC, olaparib plus P/C (AUC4) followed by olaparib 400 mg bid monotherapy maintenance treatment resulted in a significant improvement in PFS vs P/C (AUC6) alone.

DeCIDE: A phase III randomized trial of docetaxel (D), cisplatin (P), 5-fluorouracil (F) (TPF) induction chemotherapy (IC) in patients with N2/N3 locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN).

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5500-5500 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ezra E. W. Cohen ◽  
Theodore Karrison ◽  
Masha Kocherginsky ◽  
Chao H Huang ◽  
Mark Agulnik ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
High Survival ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Prior Therapy ◽  
Distant Failure ◽  
Grade 3

5500 Background: IC is associated with lower distant failure (DF) rates in SCCHN but an improvement in overall survival (OS) has not been validated. The goal of this trial was to determine whether IC prior to chemoradiotherapy (CRT) improves survival compared to CRT alone. Methods: In this phase 3, open-label trial, subjects with pathologically confirmed SCCHN; N2/N3 disease without metastases; no prior therapy; KPS ³ 70%; and intact organ function were randomized to CRT alone (CRT arm) [5 days of D (25 mg/m2), F (600 mg/m2), hydroxyurea (500 mg BID), and RT (150 cGy BID) followed by a 9 day break] or to 2 cycles of IC [D (75 mg/m2), P (75 mg/m2), F (750 mg/m2 day 1-5)] followed by the same CRT (IC arm). Primary endpoint was OS. Secondary endpoints included DF free survival, failure pattern, and recurrence-free survival (RFS). 280 subjects provided 80% power to detect a hazard ratio HR=0.5 for OS (a=0.05). Results: 280 subjects were accrued from 2004-09 with minimum follow-up 24 months. Of 142 patients randomized to IC, 91% received 2 cycles and 87% continued to CRT. Treatment adherence during CRT was high for docetaxel and hydroxyurea, but fewer than 75% of the patients received target dose of 5FU in both arms. RT was delivered without major deviations in 94% and 95% of patients on IC and CRT arms, respectively. The most common grade 3-4 toxicities during IC were febrile neutropenia (9%) and mucositis (8%), and during CRT (both arms combined) they were mucositis (45%), dermatitis (19%), and leukopenia (17%). Only grade 3-4 leukopenia and neutropenia rates were significantly higher in IC (p=0.002 and p=0.02, respectively). Table shows efficacy. Conclusions: High survival rates were observed in both arms. Further analysis and follow-up may provide insight into why the significant decrease in DF did not translate into improved OS. [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document