Results of randomized phase II trial of neoadjuvant carboplatin plus docetaxel or carboplatin plus paclitaxel followed by AC in stage I-III triple-negative breast cancer (NCT02413320).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 516-516
Author(s):  
Priyanka Sharma ◽  
Bruce F. Kimler ◽  
Anne O'Dea ◽  
Lauren Elizabeth Nye ◽  
Yen Y. Wang ◽  
...  

516 Background: Addition of neoadjuvant carboplatin (Cb) to paclitaxel (T) followed by doxorubicin + cyclophosphamide (AC) improves pathologic complete response (pCR) rate compared to T/AC in TNBC. An anthracycline-free regimen of Cb plus docetaxel (D) also yields high pCR rates in TNBC, and patients achieving pCR with this regimen demonstrate excellent 3-year outcomes without adjuvant anthracycline. This study was designed to compare the efficacy of neoadjuvant regimens CbT→AC and CbD in TNBC. Methods: In this multicenter study, eligible patients with stage I–III TNBC were randomized (1:1) to either paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 every week X 12 + carboplatin (AUC 6) every 3 weeks X 4, followed by doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 + cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 every 2 weeks X 4 (CbT→AC, Arm A), or to carboplatin (AUC 6) + docetaxel (75 mg/m2) every 21 days X 6 cycles (CbD, Arm B). The primary endpoint was pCR (no evidence of invasive tumor in the breast and axilla). The two regimens were compared for differences in pCR, residual cancer burden (RCB), treatment delivery, and toxicity. Results: Between 2015 and 2018, 100 patients were randomized; 48 to Arm A and 52 to Arm B. Median age was 52 years, median tumor size was 2.7 cm, 30% were lymph node-positive and 17% carried a BRCA1/2 mutation. Baseline demographic and tumor characteristics were balanced between two arms. pCR was 55% (95%CI: 41%-59%) in Arm A and 52% (95%CI: 39%-65%) in Arm B, p =0.84. RCB 0+1 rate was 67% in both arms. Grade 3/4 adverse events were more common in Arm A compared to Arm B (73% vs 21%, p < 0.0001), with most notable differences in rates of G3/4 neutropenia (Arm A = 60%, Arm B = 8%, p = 0.0001), febrile neutropenia (Arm A = 18%, Arm B = 0%, p = 0.0001), and G3/4 anemia (Arm A = 46%, Arm B = 4%, p = 0.0001). 81% of Arm A patients completed all 4 doses of AC and 4 doses of Cb, and 71% completed > 9 doses of T. 90% of Arm B patients completed all 6 doses of CbD (p = 0.034). Conclusions: The non-anthracycline platinum regimen of CbD yields pCR and RCB 0+1 rates similar to 4-drug regimen of CbTàAC, but with a more favorable toxicity profile and higher treatment completion rate. The CbD regimen should be further explored as a way to de-escalate therapy in TNBC. Clinical trial information: NCT02413320.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1045-1045 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natalie Faye Sinclair ◽  
Maysa M. Abu-Khalaf ◽  
Tina Rizack ◽  
Kayla Rosati ◽  
Gina Chung ◽  
...  

1045 Background: High risk BrCa patients (pts) often receive weekly paclitaxel (wP) as well as ddAC. Switching to wA(Abraxane) or adding B or Cb may enhance its efficacy, especially in TN pts. Methods: Pts with clinical stage IIA-IIIC BrCa received wA 100 mg/m2, Cb AUC 6 + B 15 mg/kg q3wks x 12 wks only (cohort 1/Yale) or followed by ddAC + B x 4 (cohort 2/Brown). Endpoints: pathologic complete response (pCR) - absence of invasive BrCa in breast + axillary nodes, residual cancer burden (RCB), clinical CR/partial response (cCR/cPR), and toxicity. Correlative studies are being performed on biopsies obtained at baseline and after run-in doses of wA or B only. Post-op pts resume B for 34 wks; other systemic therapy, including ddAC in cohort 1, is at MD discretion. Results: 55 of 60 pts (median age 47, range 25-68; 31 HR+/29 TN) are evaluable for response (see table below). Median # doses wA 11,Cb 4, ddAC 4. Dose reductions: wA 25% for neutropenia (ANC), Cb 15% for thrombocytopenia (tcp). B 7% held for hypertension. Grade 3-4 toxicities (>5%): ANC 85%, tcp 35%, anemia 25%. Serious adverse events during wA: 3 nausea/dehydration (N/D), 3 infection w/o neutropenic fever (FN), 2 GI bleed; during ddAC: 6 (21%) FN despite G-CSF, 3 N/D. Conclusions: The combination of wA, q3wk Cb + B was well tolerated, with cCR+cPR 84%. However, overall pCR was only 11% (27% in TN) after 12 wks of this regimen (cohort 1). Subsequent preop ddAC raised overall pCR to 54%, and 81% in TN, demonstrating that longer treatment duration or inclusion of anthracycline-based therapy improves responses. Results for cohort 2 compare favorably with those from I-SPY, GeparQuinto and NSABP B-40; the addition of Cb and/or B in TN is being evaluated in CALGB 40603. [Table: see text]


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 577-577
Author(s):  
Julia Foldi ◽  
Sarah Schellhorn Mougalian ◽  
Andrea Silber ◽  
Donald R. Lannin ◽  
Brigid K. Killelea ◽  
...  

577 Background: Inclusion of H with chemotherapy has increased pathologic complete response (pCR) rates in HER2 positive breast cancer, and dual HER2 blockade involving H + P further increased efficacy. With dual HER2 blockade and taxane-based (+/-carboplatin followed by anthracycline) chemotherapies, pCR rates reach, 75% in estrogen receptor (ER) negative and 45% in ER+ patients. HER2 targeted therapies also increase the efficacy of anthracyclines but are not routinely combined due to potential cardiotoxicity. The goal of this phase II study was to assess pCR rate when H+P is administered during the entire treatment duration, including the anthracycline phase, of weekly T (80 mg/m2) x 12 followed by FE(75 mg/m2)C x 4 neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Methods: pCR (ypT0/is and ypN0) rate was assessed separately in ER+ and ER- cancers following Simon’s two-stage design to detect improvement in pCR rates to 90% and 70% in the ER- and ER+ cohorts, respectively. Eligibility included age <65, stage I-III, HER2+ disease, and normal cardiac function. Results: The ER- cohort completed full accrual of 25 patients: 23 completed therapy and surgery, 2 patients are still receiving treatment. The pCR rate is 78% (n=18, 95% CI:58-90%). The ER+ cohort was closed after 23 patients were accrued to the first stage due to lower than expected pCR of 26% (n=6, 95% CI:13-46%) at interim analysis. The incidence of grade 3/4 adverse events was 48% (n=24/50), the most common being neutropenia (n=12) and diarrhea (n=7). No patient experienced symptomatic congestive heart failure, one patient had a drop in LVEF to < 50% following completion of chemotherapy. Thirteen patients (27%) had a >10% asymptomatic drop in their LVEF but remained above 50%, LVEF returned to baseline by the next assessment in half of these cases. Conclusions: Neoadjuvant P and H administered concomitantly with weekly T followed by FEC resulted in 78% pCR rate in ER-/HER2+ cancers. This pCR rate is among the highest reported in the literature. The pCR rate was substantially lower in ER+ cancers. Clinical trial information: NCT01855828.


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (14) ◽  
pp. 1539-1548 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadine Tung ◽  
Banu Arun ◽  
Michele R. Hacker ◽  
Erin Hofstatter ◽  
Deborah L. Toppmeyer ◽  
...  

PURPOSE Platinum compounds have activity in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) in germline BRCA mutation carriers ( BRCA carriers). Limited data exist for estrogen receptor (ER)–positive (+) breast cancer among BRCA carriers. INFORM is a randomized, multicenter, phase II trial comparing pathologic complete response (pCR) rates (ypT0/is, N0) after neoadjuvant single-agent cisplatin (CDDP) versus doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide (AC) in BRCA carriers with stage I-III human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)–negative breast cancer. Secondary objectives included residual cancer burden scores (RCB) of 0 or 1 (combined) and toxicity. The goal was to determine whether pCR was ≥ 20% higher with CDDP than AC. PATIENTS AND METHODS BRCA carriers with cT1-3 (≥ 1.5 cm), cN0-3 HER2-negative breast cancer were randomly assigned to preoperative CDDP (75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks × 4 doses) or AC (doxorubicin 60 mg/m2; cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 every 2-3 weeks × 4 doses) followed by surgery. Pathologic responses were confirmed by central review. RESULTS A total of 118 patients were randomly assigned; 117 were included in outcome analyses. Mean age was 42 years (range, 24-73 years); 69% were BRCA1+, 30% were BRCA2+, and 2% had both mutations. Clinical stage was I for 19%, II for 63%, and III for 18%; 45% had nodal involvement at baseline. Seventy percent had TNBC. Clinical and tumor characteristics were well matched between treatment arms. The pCR rate was 18% with CDDP and 26% with AC, yielding a risk ratio (RR) of 0.70 (90% CI, 0.39 to 1.2). The risk of RCB 0 or 1 (RCB 0/1) was 33% with CDDP and 46% with AC (RR, 0.73; 90% CI, 0.50 to 1.1). Both regimens were generally well tolerated without unexpected toxicities. CONCLUSION pCR or RCB 0/1 is not significantly higher with CDDP than with AC in BRCA carriers with stage I-III HER2-negative breast cancer for both TNBC and ER+/HER2-negative disease.


2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4533-4533 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Kleinberg ◽  
M. E. Powell ◽  
A. Forastiere ◽  
S. Keller ◽  
P. Anne ◽  
...  

4533 Background: E1201 included operable esophageal adenocarcinoma, staged II-IVa by EUS. Endpoints were pathologic complete response (pCR), toxicity, and tolerability of these two experimental regimens. pCR was used as a surrogate endpoint. As previously reported, the pCr rates indicated that these regimens did not meet criteria for further study based on a target of 45% against the null hypothesis of 25% for standard therapy. This report contains details of toxicity, tolerability of adjuvant chemotherapy, and prognostic value of EUS staging. Materials/Methods: 90 eligible pts enrolled. Arm A was Cisplatin (C) 30mg/m2 and Irinotecan (I) 50 mg/m2 on days (d) 1,8,22,29 of 45 Gy RT/5 weeks. Post-op therapy was C 30 mg/m2 and I 65 mg/m2 d 1, 8 q21 days x 3. Arm B therapy was C 30 mg/m2 and Paclitaxel (P) 50 mg/m2 1 hour infusion d 1,8,15, 22, 29 with RT. Postoperative therapy was C 75 mg/m2 and P 175 mg/m2 day 1 q21 days x 3. Results: Of all eligible patients, 83% (38/46) and 70% (31/44) had a complete resection with negative margins and 6/46 (15%) (95% CI = 5%, 26%) and 7/44 (16%) (95% CI = 7%, 30%) had pCR on arm A and B respectively. Confirmed EUS staging was available for 71 pts, Path CR rate was 3/19(16%) for stage T2- 3N0M0 and 7/52(14%) for stages T1–3N1M0 or T1–3N0- 1M1a. The incidence of ≥ grade 3 hematology toxicity, dysphagia, and diarrhea during neoadjuvant therapy were 20 (43%), 6 (13%), 4 (9%) for arm A (nTOX=47) and 18 (39%), 9 (20%), and 1 (23%) for arm B (nTOX=46). Zero, one, two and three cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy were received by 26%, 20 %, 5% and 49% of operated patients in arm A (n=41) and 36%, 14%, 3%, and 47% in arm B (n=36). Two of 77 (3%) operated patients died within 30 days of surgery. Conclusions: The low pCR rates suggest that neither regimen is likely to advance treatment of esophageal/GEJ adenoca over preoperative cisplatin/5-FU/RT and therefore do not warrent pursuing. EUS stage did not appear to influence response rate with these regimens. Moreover, these regimens are associated with significant toxicity and, as with other regimens, only a minority of patients were able to receive the planned adjuvant therapy. Survival follow-up continues. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3062-3062 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sibylle Loibl ◽  
Michael Untch ◽  
Nicole Burchardi ◽  
Jens Bodo Huober ◽  
Jens Uwe Blohmer ◽  
...  

3062 Background: Adding an anti-PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitor durvalumab to standard chemotherapy (CT) may increase pathological complete response (pCR) in patients (pts) with TNBC. Methods: GeparNuevo randomizes pts to durvalumab (D) 1.5 g i.v. or placebo (pl) every 4 weeks (wks). D/pl monotherapy (0.75 g i.v.) is given for the first 2 wks (window phase), followed by a biopsy and D/pl plus nab-paclitaxel (nP) 125 mg/m² weekly for 12 wks, followed by D/pl plus epirubicin/cyclophosphamide (EC) q2 wks for 4 cycles. Randomization is stratified by stromal TILs (sTILs) (low (≤10%), intermediate (11-59%), high (≥60%)). Pts with primary cT1b-cT4a-d disease, centrally confirmed TNBC, and sTILs status can be included. Primary objective compares pCR (ypT0 ypN0) rates. Secondary objectives are pCR rates in stratified subpopulations and according to other pCR definitions; response rates; breast conservation rate; toxicity; compliance and survival. Change in sTILs, Ki67 and other immune biomarkers before CT, after the window phase and after CT will be correlated with outcome. The first 10, 20 and 30 pts will be included in safety interim analyses (SIA). Sample size was planned assuming a pCR rate of 48% for pl (nP treated TNBC cohort in GeparSepto) and of 66% for D (as clinically meaningful benefit), requiring 158 pts to show superiority of D (2-sided α = 0.2, 80% power). Assuming a 10% drop-out rate 174 pts will be randomized. Results: Since 6/2016, 50 pts were recruited within 16 sites; data are presented as available until 01/2017. Median age is 49 years; 86% NST and G3 tumors; sTILs categories 40% low, 40% intermediate and 20% high. Blinded SIA was performed. No pt interrupted D/pl, one nP and one EC. Treatment delay was observed in 9 pts (20.0%) in D/pl, 18 (41.9%) in nP and 2 (13.3%) in EC; dose was reduced in 10 pts (23.3%) in nP and in 4 (26.7%) in EC. 10 pts (20%) had at least one grade 3-4 AE: 4 haematological and 6 non-haematological AEs. 4 SAEs and 5 immune related AEs were reported. 2 pts discontinued study treatment prematurely in the EC phase. Conclusions: The addition of D to standard nP-EC is feasible and does not result in an increased toxicity. Clinical trial information: NCT02685059.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 226-226
Author(s):  
Geoffrey Yuyat Ku ◽  
Abraham Jing-Ching Wu ◽  
Smita Sihag ◽  
Bernard J. Park ◽  
David Randolph Jones ◽  
...  

226 Background: Based on the positive results of the CALGB 80803 study (J Clin Oncol 2017;35:1 [abstr]), we have added D to induction FOLFOX and pre-op CRT. Methods: Patients (Pts) had TanyN+ or T3-4NanyM0 esophageal and Siewert Type I-III GEJ adenocarcinoma staged by EUS, PET/CT and CT. Pts received mFOLFOX6 ×2 prior to repeat PET/CT. PET responders (PETr) received 5-FU or capecitabine and oxaliplatin with RT to 50.4Gy, while induction PET non-responders (PETnr) received carboplatin/paclitaxel with RT. All Pts received D 1,500 mg q4W ×2 starting 2 wks prior to and during CRT. Esophagectomy was planned 6-8 weeks after CRT. Pts who had R0 resections received adjuvant D 1,500mg q4W ×6. Results: 36 Pts have been enrolled: 25 GEJ, 11 esophageal; 23 N+ and 32 T3/4. 26 of 36 Pts (72%) are PETr. 2 Pts developed metastatic disease after CRT and 9 Pts remain on preop treatment. 25 Pts have had surgery (Table). Pathologic complete response (pCR) was seen in 6 (24%); 5 Pts (20%) had ypT1N0 tumors with 99% response and 2 Pts (8%) had ypT0N1 with 99% response. 20 Pts (80%) had >90% response. 3 Pts had MSI tumors (2 PETr; 1 pCR, 1 T1aN0 99% response, 1 ypT2N0 90% response). Notable grade (gd) 3/4 adverse events (AEs) observed were neutropenia in 8 Pts (22%), diarrhea and vomiting in 2 Pts each (6%). Notable gd 1/2 AEs in ≥20%: anemia (31 Pts), thrombocytopenia (29 Pts), nausea (21 Pts), fatigue (25 Pts), increased AST (20 Pts), constipation and diarrhea (9 Pts), diarrhea (8 Pts). Immune-related AEs noted were gd 2 dermatitis (2 Pts), gd 3 hepatitis and gd 1 hypothyroidism in 1 Pt each. Median length of post-op stay was 8 days, with 12% anastomotic complication rate, including 1 Pt who died of hematemesis 16 days after discharge from 55-day hospitalization. Conclusions: The addition of D to induction FOLFOX and PET-directed CRT is safe and feasible. pCR and near-pCR in ½ of operated Pts is encouraging and compares favorably to the pCR rate of 31% in CALGB 80803 Pts who received induction FOLFOX. The final pCR rate and correlatives for the fully accrued study will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT02962063. [Table: see text]


2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
William M. Sikov ◽  
Donald A. Berry ◽  
Charles M. Perou ◽  
Baljit Singh ◽  
Constance T. Cirrincione ◽  
...  

Purpose One third of patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) achieve pathologic complete response (pCR) with standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). CALGB 40603 (Alliance), a 2 × 2 factorial, open-label, randomized phase II trial, evaluated the impact of adding carboplatin and/or bevacizumab. Patients and Methods Patients (N = 443) with stage II to III TNBC received paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 once per week (wP) for 12 weeks, followed by doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide once every 2 weeks (ddAC) for four cycles, and were randomly assigned to concurrent carboplatin (area under curve 6) once every 3 weeks for four cycles and/or bevacizumab 10 mg/kg once every 2 weeks for nine cycles. Effects of adding these agents on pCR breast (ypT0/is), pCR breast/axilla (ypT0/isN0), treatment delivery, and toxicities were analyzed. Results Patients assigned to either carboplatin or bevacizumab were less likely to complete wP and ddAC without skipped doses, dose modification, or early discontinuation resulting from toxicity. Grade ≥ 3 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were more common with carboplatin, as were hypertension, infection, thromboembolic events, bleeding, and postoperative complications with bevacizumab. Employing one-sided P values, addition of either carboplatin (60% v 44%; P = .0018) or bevacizumab (59% v 48%; P = .0089) significantly increased pCR breast, whereas only carboplatin (54% v 41%; P = .0029) significantly raised pCR breast/axilla. More-than-additive interactions between the two agents could not be demonstrated. Conclusion In stage II to III TNBC, addition of either carboplatin or bevacizumab to NACT increased pCR rates, but whether this will improve relapse-free or overall survival is unknown. Given results from recently reported adjuvant trials, further investigation of bevacizumab in this setting is unlikely, but the role of carboplatin could be evaluated in definitive studies, ideally limited to biologically defined patient subsets most likely to benefit from this agent.


2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10622-10622
Author(s):  
S. A. McDaniel ◽  
H. Krontiras ◽  
J. T. Carpenter ◽  
L. M. Nabell ◽  
K. I. Bland ◽  
...  

10622 Background: NSABP B-18 randomized women with operable breast cancer to receive chemotherapy either pre- or postoperatively; OS and DSF rates at 9 years were identical. Importantly, pathologic complete response (pCR) was directly proportional to DFS and OS. Recently, dose dense adjuvant chemotherapy has shown a statistically significant improvement in DFS and OS. However, no data is available for the use of dose dense preoperative chemotherapy at this time. Methods: Women enrolled in the I-SPY correlative trial with newly diagnosed breast cancer, T ≥ 3cm, any N, M0 were evaluated to assess response rates and safety to dose dense neoadjuvant chemotherapy (doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 IV Q2 wks × 4, paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 IV Q2 wks × 4, and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 IV Q2 wks × 4). Results: Since 02/2003, 43 pts have been treated with dose dense neoadjuvant chemotherapy on the I-SPY trial at UAB (mean age 47.9). 47% of the pts were ER+, 37% were PR+ and 5% were Her2+ by FISH. 2 pts dropped out for personal reasons and 9 pts are actively undergoing treatment. Overall, 32 pts received dose dense chemotherapy and proceeded to surgery. Of those, 31 received dose dense sequential ATC and 1 received dose dense concurrent AC followed by T. 34% had a pCR (breast & nodes) while an additional 10% had a pCR in the breast but residual disease in lymph nodes; 41% had a PR; 9% had SD; and 6% had PD. Hematologic toxicity consisted of grade 3 anemia in 2 pts, febrile neutropenia in 2 pts and no grade 4 thrombocytopenia. Non-hematologic grade 3–4 toxicity consisted of mediport-associated thrombosis in 2 pts, hyperglycemia in 2 pts, syncope in 1 pt, neuropathy in 1 pt, and disseminated varicella in 1 pt. Conclusion: Our results show that dose dense neoadjuvant chemotherapy achieves a pCR (breast & nodes) in about 1/3 of patients (34%) with tolerable toxicity. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document