Lazertinib, a 3rd generation EGFR-TKI, in patients with EGFR-TKI resistant NSCLC: Updated results of phase I/II Study.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9037-9037 ◽  
Author(s):  
Myung-Ju Ahn ◽  
Ji-Youn Han ◽  
Sang-We Kim ◽  
Ki Hyeong Lee ◽  
Dong-Wan Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Egfr Mutations ◽  
Duration Of Treatment ◽  
Open Label ◽  
T790m Mutation ◽  
Dose Levels ◽  
Egfr Tki

9037 Background: Lazertinib (YH25448) is a highly mutant-selective, irreversible 3rd-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that targets the activating EGFR mutations (Del19 and L858R), as well as the T790M mutation, while sparing wild type. We report the updated results from a Phase I/II study of lazertinib (NCT03046992). Methods: Patients with advanced and metastatic NSCLC who had progressed after treatment with standard EGFR-TKIs with/without asymptomatic brain metastases (BM) were enrolled in an open-label, multicenter, phase I/II study with dose-escalation and expansion cohorts. Lazertinib was administered once daily at doses between 20 to 320 mg in a 21-day cycle. Patients were assessed for safety, tolerability and efficacy. T790M mutation was required in the dose-expansion cohorts. Results: As of 26 Nov 2018, a total of 127 patients were enrolled. The dose-escalation cohort included 38 patients administered with 20 to 320 mg across 7 dose levels, and 89 patients in the dose-expansion cohort were administered with 40 to 240 mg across 5 dose levels. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed. The median duration of treatment was 9.7 months and 58 patients are still ongoing. The objective response rate (ORR) was 60% in all patients, 64% in T790M+ patients, and 37% in T790M- patients by investigators assessment. In BM patients with measurable lesion (n = 14), the intracranial ORR was 50%. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 8.1 months in all patients, 9.5 months in T790M+ patients, and 5.4 months in T790M- patients. Subgroup analysis showed that ORR was 65% and PFS was 12.2 months in T790M+ patients with ≥ 120 mg (n = 62). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were pruritus (27%), rash (24%), constipation (20%), decreased appetite (19%) and diarrhea (14%). TEAEs leading to dose discontinuation were observed in 3% of patients. Drug related TEAEs of grade ≥ 3 was observed in 3% of the patients. Conclusions: Lazertinib was safe, well-tolerated and exhibits promising systemic and intracranial antitumor activity in EGFR T790M+ NSCLC patients. Dose extension cohorts in the 1st and 2nd line settings are underway at 240 mg dose. Clinical trial information: NCT03046992.

Efficacy and safety of lazertinib 240 mg as the clinical dose in patients with EGFR T790M mutant NSCLC: Data from a phase I/II study.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9572-9572
Author(s):  
Ki Hyeong Lee ◽  
Myung-Ju Ahn ◽  
Ji-Youn Han ◽  
Sang-We Kim ◽  
Eun Kyung Cho ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Median Duration ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Egfr Mutations ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Open Label ◽  
T790m Mutation ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Egfr T790m

9572 Background: Lazertinib (YH25448) is a highly mutant-selective, irreversible 3rd-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that targets the activating EGFR mutations (Del19 and L858R), as well as the T790M mutation, while sparing wild type. We report the efficacy and safety results of lazertinib 240 mg as recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) from a phase I/II study of lazertinib (NCT03046992). Methods: Patients (pts) with advanced NSCLC, who had progressed after prior EGFR-TKI therapy were enrolled in an open-label, multicenter, phase I/II study with dose-escalation (20-320 mg), dose-expansion (40-240 mg) and dose-extension phases. Pts were assessed for safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and efficacy. For dose-expansion and extension phases, tumors had to be T790M mutation-positive (T790M+). Of all 78 pts assigned to lazertinib 240 mg dose level across all phases, 76 pts with centrally confirmed T790M+ were included for efficacy analysis. Results: As of 30 Sep 2019, a total of 78 pts (49% female, median age 62) received at least one dose of lazertinib 240 mg. The median duration of follow-up was 9.6 months and 44 pts were ongoing at data cut-off. Of 78 pts, 76 pts with centrally confirmed T790M+ showed the objective response rate (ORR) 57.9% (95% CI 46.8, 69.0), the disease control rate (DCR) 89.5% (95% CI 82.6, 96.4), the median progression-free survival (PFS) 11.0 months (95% CI 5.6, 16.4) and the median duration of response (DoR) 13.8 months (95% CI 9.6, NR) by independent central review (ICR), respectively. Two pts (3%) experienced a confirmed complete response. The investigator-assessed ORR, DCR, median PFS and median DoR were 72.4% (95% CI 62.3, 82.4), 94.7% (95% CI 89.7, 99.8), 13.2 months (95% CI 9.6, not reached) and 11.8 months (95% CI 8.4, not reached), respectively. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) at the 240 mg dose regardless of its causality were rash (35%), pruritus (33%) and paraesthesia (32%), which were mostly mild (Grade ≥3 rash: 1%; no Grade ≥3 pruritus or paraesthesia). TEAEs leading to dose reduction and dose discontinuation were observed in 13% (10/78) and 8% (4/78), respectively. Drug related TEAEs of grade ≥3 were observed in 6% (5/78). Conclusions: Lazertinib 240 mg has a favorable safety profile, and exhibits promising anti-tumor activity in pts with EGFR T790M+ NSCLC. Clinical trial information: NCT03046992 .

A phase I study to evaluate safety and antitumor activity of biweekly BMS-936558 (Anti-PD-1, MDX-1106/ONO-4538) in patients with RCC and other advanced refractory malignancies.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 331-331 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. F. McDermott ◽  
C. G. Drake ◽  
M. Sznol ◽  
J. A. Sosman ◽  
D. C. Smith ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Median Duration ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Tumor Type ◽  
Duration Of Treatment ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Dose Escalation Study ◽  
Grade 3

331 Background: Programmed death-1 (PD-1), a T-cell inhibitory receptor, may suppress antitumor immunity. BMS-936558, a fully human PD-1 blocking antibody, has shown antitumor activity and manageable toxicity after biweekly dosing (Sznol, ASCO 2010, #2506). This report provides an update on safety and antitumor activity with special emphasis on RCC. Methods: An open-label phase I dose escalation study of BMS-936558 was conducted in patients (pts) with treatment refractory metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC), castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), melanoma (MEL), non-small cell lung cancer, or colorectal cancer (CRC). Dose escalation continued to 10 mg/kg when an expansion cohort for pts (16) with each tumor type was opened for additional safety and efficacy information. Tumor response (RECIST) was evaluated every 8 weeks. Clinically stable pts with early PD could continue until further PD or clinical deterioration. Results: 126 pts (18 RCC) were treated with 1, 3, or 10 mg/kg. MTD was not reached. Across all doses, the most common AEs (Any/grade 3-4) were fatigue (45.2%/6.3%) and diarrhea (30.2%/0.8%) while the most common drug-related AEs (Any/grade 3-4) were fatigue (20.6%/0.8%), rash (11.9%/0%), pruritus (11.3%/0%), and diarrhea (10.3%/0.8%). There was no apparent relationship between dose and frequency of AEs. One pt died with sepsis while being treated for drug-related grade 4 pneumonitis. The median number of prior treatment regimens in the RCC cohort was 2 (range 1-6). Of the 18 RCC pts, 16 were treated with 10 mg/kg. The median duration of treatment was 7.6+mo. ORR was 5/16 (31.2%) and SD>4mo was 6/16 (37.5%). The median duration of response was 4.0+ mo (3.7-7.4+ mo). Of the 2 RCC pts treated with 1 mg/kg, 1 obtained a CR (12+ mo) and 1 had SD (21+ mo). For evaluable CRPC pts, 1/15 pts (6.7%) obtained a PR (2+ mo) and 3/15 (20%) had SD>4mo. Conclusions: BMS-936558 administered biweekly is tolerable and has encouraging antitumor activity in a previously treated patients with RCC. Data on baseline characteristics, long-term toxicity and response duration will be updated at the meeting. [Table: see text]

Phase I dose escalation study of TG02 in patients with advanced hematologic malignancies.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6577-6577 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gail J. Roboz ◽  
Hanna Jean Khoury ◽  
Jamile M. Shammo ◽  
Mary Syto ◽  
Francis Burrows ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Intensive Therapy ◽  
Study Drug ◽  
Underlying Disease ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Dose Escalation Study ◽  
Multikinase Inhibitor ◽  
Dose Levels

6577 Background: TG02 is a novel multikinase inhibitor with a unique spectrum of activity, targeting both the cell cycle regulatory cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) 1 and 2 and the transcriptional regulators CDKs 7 and 9. TG02 also inhibits the emerging oncogenic MAPK ERK5 and the DNA damage response mediator CDK5. TG02 kills primary blasts from a variety of hematologic cancers and is curative in the MV4-11 model of FLT3-mutant AML. Methods: This is a first-in-man,single arm, open label, phase I dose escalation trial. The primary endpoints are dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), maximally tolerated dose (MTD ) and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). Patients (pts) ≥ 18 years with advanced hematological malignancies or newly diagnosed AML pts ≥ 65 years unfit for intensive therapy were enrolled onto daily (A) and intermittent (B, 5 days on 2 days off X 2 weeks) schedules. Pts had acceptable organ function and ECOG PS 1-2. Definition of DLT was G3-4 AST or ALT ≥7 days, G4 AST or ALT, G4 hyperbilirubinemia, any other NCI CTC G3-4 events not due to underlying disease. Dose levels on arm A were 10mg to 70mg and 15mg-150 mg on arm B. Results: Forty-five pts have received at least one dose of study drug. Median age was 66 years (range, 37-87) and 80% were ECOG 0-1. Disease types enrolled included: AML (80%), high-risk MDS (22%), and CML-BC (3%). The median number of previous regimens was 3 (range, 1-12). The MTD on arm A was defined at 50 mg daily based on 2 DLTs at the 70mg dose level (G4 hyperbilirubinemia, G4 fatigue). Enrollment to arm B has competed dose levels 15 (N=3), 30 (N=3), 50 (N=3), 70 (N=3), 100mg (N=3), and enrollment at 150mg is ongoing without DLT to date. Common drug related adverse events were nausea (42%), vomiting (23%), fatigue (18%), decreased appetite (15%), constipation and diarrhea (13% each). Preliminary PK demonstrated dose proportional increases in exposure and a T1/2 , supporting once daily dosing. Conclusions: The MTD for TG02 has been determined for the daily schedule at 50mg. Enrollment continues on the intermittent schedule. Schedules of every other day and week on/week off dosing will also be evaluated.

A phase I dose-escalation and expansion study of intratumoral CV8102 as single-agent or in combination with anti-PD-1 antibodies in patients with advanced solid tumors.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3096-3096
Author(s):  
Thomas Eigentler ◽  
Franz G Bauernfeind ◽  
Jürgen C. Becker ◽  
Peter Brossart ◽  
Michael Fluck ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Study Drug ◽  
Tumor Growth Inhibition ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Dose Levels

3096 Background: CV8102 is a non-coding, non-capped RNA that activates the innate (via TLR7/8, RIG-I) and adaptive immunity dose-dependently. CV8102 injected intratumorally (i.t.), as a single agent or combined with systemic anti-PD-1 antibody (Ab) led to tumor growth inhibition in animal models and showed synergism with PD-1 blockade. Methods: An open-label, cohort-based, dose escalation and expansion study in patients with advanced cutaneous melanoma (cMEL), cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC), head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (hnSCC) or adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) is ongoing investigating i.t. CV8102 as single agent and in combination with anti-PD-1 antibodies. [NCT03291002]. Results: As of December 2019, 23 patients in the cohort A (single agent) and 13 patients in cohort C (combination with anti-PD-1 Ab) were exposed to at least one dose of CV8102 at dose levels of 25-600 µg (single agent) and 25-450 µg (combination). No dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed within the first two weeks of study drug treatment. Most frequent TEAEs were G1/2 fatigue, fever, chills and headache. 4 (17%) patients (pts) in cohort A and 3 (23%) pts in cohort C experienced related G3 TEAEs that were manageable with supportive treatment (liver enzyme increases (3), abscess at injection site (1), hypertension (1), asymptomatic elevation of pancreatic enzymes (2)). In cohort A, 2 cMEL patients experienced an objective response according to RECIST 1.1 (1 CR in a PD-1 naïve pt and 1 PR in a PD-1 refractory pt) and 2 further pts (cMEL, hnSCC) showed SD with shrinkage of tumor lesions. Conclusions: CV8102 i.t. was well tolerated without dose limiting toxicities to date and showed evidence of single agent activity. Updated results on safety, efficacy and serum biomarkers will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT03291002 .

Phase II trial of surufatinib plus toripalimab for disease progression after first-line chemotherapy with platinum and fluoropyrimidine in advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16040-e16040
Author(s):  
Lin Shen ◽  
Ming Lu ◽  
Zhendong Chen ◽  
Feng Ye ◽  
Yanqiao Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
First Line ◽  
Duration Of Treatment ◽  
Efficacy Evaluation ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Grade 3

e16040 Background: Surufatinib is a novel small-molecule kinase inhibitor targeting VEGFRs, FGFR and CSF-1R, simultaneous targeting of angiogenesis through VEGFRs/FGFR1 and modulating tumor immune microenvironment through CSF-1R may be a uniquely potent strategy to enhance antitumor activity. Toripalimab is a monoclonal humanized IgG4 PD-1 antibody. Encouraging efficacy of surufatinib plus toripalimab treating patients with advanced solid tumors was reported at 2020 AACR. This is an ongoing, multicenter, open-label, single-arm, phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of surufatinib in combination with toripalimab in various solid tumors. Here we report the results of patients with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma. Methods: Patients with histologically confirmed gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma who have failed first-line of systemic chemotherapy were enrolled. Surufatinib 250 mg once a day (QD) will be orally administrated and toripalimab 240 mg will be intravenously administered every 3 weeks. Primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST v1.1. Results: As of Dec 31, 2020, a total of 21 gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma patients were enrolled. The median age was 58 years old, and 81% of the patients were male. Median duration of treatment was 3 months (surufatinib, 3 months; toripalimab, 3 months). Among 15 patients with at least one post-baseline efficacy evaluation, 2 patients achieved confirmed partial response (PR), with 3 additional unconfirmed PR. And there were 6 in stable disease (SD), 3 in progressive disease (PD) and one not evaluable per RECIST v1.1. There were 5 in PR, 7 in SD and 2 in PD per irRECIST, respectively. The confirmed and unconfirmed ORR were 13.3% (95% CI: 1.7%-40.5%) and 33.3% (95% CI: 11.8%-61.6%), respectively. The disease control rate (DCR) was 73.3% (95% CI: 44.9%-92.2%) per RECIST v1.1. Median PFS was 3.71 months (95% CI: 1.41-unknown). 14.3% (3/21) of patients had treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of ≥ Grade 3. The most common TRAEs of ≥ Grade 3 were herpes zoster (4.8%), lymphopenia (4.8%), lymphocyte count decreased (4.8%), white blood cell count decreased (4.8%), liver injury (4.8%) and anaemia (4.8%). 4.8% (1/21) of patients had serious TRAEs. One patient died due to unknown reasons. Conclusions: Surufatinib plus toripalimab appeared to show encouraging activity in advanced gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma with manageable safety profile. Such combination could be a promising strategy for advanced gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma in the future. Clinical trial information: NCT04169672.

Phase I study of TT-00420, a multiple kinase inhibitor, as a single agent in advanced solid tumors.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3090-3090
Author(s):  
Sarina Anne Anne Piha-Paul ◽  
Binghe Xu ◽  
Filip Janku ◽  
Ecaterina Elena Dumbrava ◽  
Siqing Fu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Disease Control ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Cytokine Signaling ◽  
Concomitant Treatment ◽  
Dose Levels

3090 Background: TT-00420 is a spectrum-selective multi-kinase inhibitor that targets cell proliferation, angiogenesis, and immune-oncology pathways by inhibiting Aurora kinases A/B and Janus kinases (JAK) involved in cytokine signaling and receptor tyrosine kinases (FGFRs and VEGFRs) involved in the tumor microenvironment. TT-00420 has demonstrated anti-tumor activity in both in vitro and in vivo preclinical models of solid tumors, including triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). Methods: The phase I, first-in-human dose escalation and expansion study of TT-00420 is enrolling adult patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors. TT-00420 capsules in 1 mg or 5 mg formulation are administered orally once daily in 28-day cycles. Dose escalation is guided by Bayesian modeling with overdose control. The primary safety endpoints are to determine dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) and a dose recommended for dose expansion (DRDE). Secondary endpoints include pharmacokinetics (PK) and preliminary efficacy evaluated per RECIST v1.1 criteria. Results: As of February 17, 2021, 40 advanced solid tumor patients were enrolled in dose escalation cohorts and received at least one dose of TT-00420 in 7 dose levels: 1 mg q.d. (N=1), 3 mg q.d. (N=1), 5 mg q.d. (N=4), 8 mg q.d. (N=10), 10 mg q.d. (N=6), 12 mg q.d. (N=12), and 15 mg q.d. (N=6). DLTs were observed in 3 out of 32 DLT-evaluable patients, including 1 patient at 8 mg q.d. who had grade (Gr) 3 palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia syndrome and 2 patients at 15 mg q.d. who both had Gr 3 hypertension. Suspected adverse events (AEs) reported in ≥ 20% of patients across all tested dose levels include hypertension (any grade: n=17, 42.5%; Gr 3: n=8, 20.0%), diarrhea (n=10, 25.0%; Gr 3: n=1, 2.5%), vomiting (n=9, 22.5%; Gr 3: n=0), palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia syndrome (n=9, 22.5%; Gr 3: n=1, 2.5%), and nausea (n=8, 20.0%; Gr 3: n=1, 2.5%). No Gr 4 AEs, regardless of causality, were reported. Out of 26 patients who had at least one post-baseline scan, 4 (15.4%) had a best overall objective response of partial response (PR) and 13 (50.0%) had stable disease (SD). Of the patients who achieved PRs are 2 CCA patients (8 mg q.d., n=1; 10 mg q.d., n=1), 1 HER2-negative breast cancer patient (12 mg q.d.), and 1 TNBC (10 mg q.d.). Both CCA patients with PRs had disease control for ≥ 8 months. Of the patients who achieved SD, 1 salivary gland patient (5 mg q.d.) and 1 CCA patient (10 mg q.d.) had disease control for 8 months, and 2 TNBC patients (5 mg q.d., n=1; 8 mg q.d., n=1) had disease control for 6 months prior to disease progression. Conclusions: Toxicities observed in dose escalation cohorts were manageable with concomitant treatment and/or dose interruptions of TT-00420. 12 mg p.o. q.d. was recommended as the dose for dose expansion cohort for further safety and efficacy evaluation of TT-00420 capsules with focus on enrollment of TNBC and CCA patients. Clinical trial information: NCT03654547.

Evaluation of statistical designs of phase I/II clinical trials for cancer patients published in 2005

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 14077-14077
Author(s):  
N. Houede ◽  
A. Kramar ◽  
X. Paoletti
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Biological Marker ◽  
Statistical Design ◽  
Phase Ii Trials ◽  
Dose Levels

14077 Background: Phase I trials determine the maximal safe dose that could be used in phase II trials. Designs are based on the assumption that efficacy and toxicity increase with dose. Phase I/II trials determine the safety, dosage levels, and response rate. This review addresses statistical issues of phase I/II studies designs. Methods: We reviewed phase I/II clinical trials for cancer patients published in 2005. The main criteria were: type of treatment, statistical design, endpoints, expected efficacy and toxicity, one- or two-steps designs, dose levels, definition of Dose Limiting Toxicity and recommended dose, objective response, survival, patient selection and follow-up. Results: 41 phase I/II trials were found. All but one, targeted a specific type of tumor. 14 studies included combined cytotoxic therapies. 21 studies included a cytotoxic agent combined with a targeted therapy (12) or with radiations (9). Others used monochemotherapy, immunotherapy, vaccine or gene therapy. 23 studies were a two steps design, i.e. a phase I followed by a phase II trial, and used a classical Fibonacci escalation dose model. All others used a one-step design evaluating efficacy and toxicity concomitantly. Among them, 3 had a Fibonacci-like design with a desescalation model and 4 had a randomization to different dose levels. In 1 trial, dose escalation was performed in the same patient. In the 10 remaining studies, 1 evaluated only one dose level and was improperly presented as a phase I/II study, and 9 did not describe any statistical design. DLT was described in only 27 trials. Also, recommended doses for further trials were only provided in 30 studies. Efficacy was evaluated with clinical or radiological response for 34 studies, biological marker was evaluated in 5 cases and time to progression in 2 cases. Conclusion: Most of the phase I/II trials published in 2005 used a classical two steps design with an adapted Fibonacci dose escalation. None of them used new designs such as continual reassessment method (CRM), which have the advantage to incorporate data during the course of the trial, leading to optimization of the study in terms of cost and speed. Methodological progresses are necessary to address issues related to multiple endpoints and to help clinicians to feel comfortable with the CRM. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Phase I study (BLOOM) of AZD3759, a BBB penetrable EGFR inhibitor, in patients with TKI-naïve, EGFRm NSCLC with CNS metastases.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2006-2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Myung-Ju Ahn ◽  
Dong-Wan Kim ◽  
Byoung Chul Cho ◽  
Sang-We Kim ◽  
Jong-Seok Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dose Escalation ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Egfr Inhibitor ◽  
Cns Metastases ◽  
T790m Mutation ◽  
Dose Levels

2006 Background: The dose escalation phase is complete forAZD3759, the first EGFR inhibitor primarily designed to cross the blood brain barrier (BBB) to treat patients with EGFRm NSCLC with CNS metastases. AZD3759 is being further evaluated in patients with brain (BM) and leptomeningeal metastases (LM) in TKI-naïve and TKI pre-treated cohorts (data presented separately) (NCT02228369). Methods: The primary objective is safety and tolerability, and secondary objectives include anti-tumor efficacy. Dose levels of 200 and 300 mg BID AZD3759 were assessed based on safety and efficacy data in dose escalation cohorts. Results: As of24 September, 2016,38 patients with EGFRm NSCLC were recruited into the expansion cohorts of this study: 16 patients with TKI naïve BM and 4 patients with TKI naïve LM. 15 and 5 patients were treated with 200 and 300 mg BID of AZD3759, respectively. No DLTs were observed at either dose, while 200 mg BID AZD3759 was better tolerated than 300 mg BID during > 2 month treatment. The longest duration on treatment was > 9 months. Drug-related adverse events (AEs) seen are typically observed for EGFR TKIs. In BM cohort, 56% and 13% of patients had dose interruptions and reductions respectively due to drug-related AEs. The Ctrough free plasma and CSF exposure at both doses were above pEGFR IC90. By investigators’ assessment, the intracranial objective response rate (ORR) was 63% (12 out of 19 evaluable patients) and achieved confirmed/unconfirmed partial/complete response [PR/CR]), extracranial ORR was 50% (10 out of 20 evaluable patients), and the overall ORR was 60% (12 out of 20 evaluable patients). 4 patients have not reached the 6-week RECIST assessment at the data cut-off. 18 of 20 patients are still ongoing (median 4-month follow up). 2 patients have withdrawn, one due to disease progression (de novo T790M mutation in both plasma and CSF), and another due to a non-drug related SAE. Conclusions: AZD3759 was well tolerated at the selected doses, achieved sufficient CNS exposure for target inhibition and demonstrated promising anti-tumor efficacy in both intracranial and extracranial tumors in TKI-naïve patients with CNS metastases. Updated clinical data will be shared at the meeting. Clinical trial information: NCT02228369.

A phase I dose escalation and dose expansion study of the anti-programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) antibody AK105.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14006-e14006
Author(s):  
Dusan Kotasek ◽  
Jermaine Coward ◽  
Paul L. de Souza ◽  
Craig Underhill ◽  
Xiaoping Jin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Receptor Occupancy ◽  
Treatment Interruption ◽  
Antibody Engineering ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Heavily Pretreated ◽  
Label Dose

e14006 Background: AK105 is a humanized IgG1 mAb that blocks PD-1 binding to PD-L1 allowing T-cells to recognize and kill tumor cells. Key attributes of AK105 include antibody engineering to eliminate Fc mediated effector function, and a slower off-rate on antigen binding resulting in improved receptor occupancy (RO). These features offer more robust biological effect and enhance anti-tumor activity of AK105. Methods: A multicenter, Phase I, open-label dose escalation and expansion study in solid tumors (NCT03352531) began in Dec 2017, evaluating the safety and efficacy of AK105 administered IV q2w till confirmed progression (RECIST v1.1). For dose escalation, pts were enrolled at dose cohorts of 1, 3, and 10 mg/kg. Expansion of AK105 at the RP2D of 200 mg q2w is ongoing in pts with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma; esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma; hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) colorectal cancer. Results: As of 1 Feb, 2019, 34 pts (median age 66.5 years [30–79], female 44%, ECOG 0/1 ([68%/32%]) in cohorts of 1 mg/kg (n = 3), 3 mg/kg (n = 6), 10 mg/kg (n = 7), and 200 mg q2w (n = 18), received a median of 5 (1–29) doses of AK105. No DLTs were reported. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 41% of pts (G3 in 12% [4/34], no G4, treatment interruption in 9% [3/34]). Most frequent TRAEs ( > 5%) were hyperthyroidism (9%), hypothyroidism (6%), fatigue (6%), and rash (6%). PD-1 RO analysis showed that pts maintained full occupancy ( > 80%) for all dose levels. Of 25 evaluable heavily pretreated pts, ORR was 24% (6/25; 29% [4/14] in dose escalation and 18% [2/11] in expansion phase) and disease control rate (DCR) was 56% (14/25). Five responses are confirmed and ongoing (HCC, pancreatic carcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma, GBM, gastric adenocarcinoma), one is pending confirmatory scan (GEJ). Conclusions: The RP2D obtained from the dose escalation phase, reported safety profile and encouraging antitumor activity of AK105 supports continued clinical development, which include: pivotal studies in classic Hodgkin lymphoma and nasopharyngeal carcinoma, phase 2/3 combination studies with chemotherapy in NSCLC and combination study with anlotinib, a multi-targeting tyrosine kinase inhibitor in HCC. PD analysis is ongoing and expansion is ongoing at the RP2D. Clinical trial information: NCT03352531.

A phase I, first-in-human, dose-escalation and dose-expansion study of the multitarget kinase inhibitor TT-00420 in patients with advanced solid tumors.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS3168-TPS3168
Author(s):  
Sarina Anne Piha-Paul ◽  
Qunfang Wan ◽  
Wendy Xiong ◽  
Peng Peng ◽  
Xiaoju Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Immune Escape ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Advanced Tumor ◽  
Human Dose

TPS3168 Background: Multi-target kinase inhibitors have gained increasing attention in the past few years due to their capabilities of simultaneously targeting several hallmarks of cancer. Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), the most aggressive type of breast cancer, is a highly heterogeneous disease composed of several subtypes with distinct genomic profiles and activating pathways. TT-00420 is a multi-target kinase inhibitor that targets Aurora A/B, receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) involved in angiogenesis, and other kinases involved in tumor-associated inflammation and immune escape. Preclinical studies have established signs of efficacy for TT-00420 in TNBC. Targets inhibited by TT-00420 are among the key dysregulated pathways directly involved in the tumorigenesis of TNBC. TT-00420 is efficacious against most subtypes of TNBC cell lines. This anti-TNBC activity is confirmed in both cell line derived xenograft (CDX) and patient derived xenograft (PDX) TNBC model in vivo, in which TT-00420 is active both as first-line and second-line treatment. TT-00420 demonstrated good oral bioavailability and pharmacokinetic properties in mice, rats and dogs, and revealed mechanism-related but manageable toxicities. The IND approval of TT-00420 was granted by the FDA on Sept. 27, 2018. Methods: TT420X2101 is an open-label, first-in-human, multicenter, phase I study including a dose escalation portion in adult patients with advanced solid tumors, followed by dose expansion in two parallel cohorts, TNBC cohort (N=22) and selected advanced tumor (SAT) cohort (N=22). Adverse events will be evaluated per CTCAE v5.0 criteria, and tumor responses will be evaluated per RECIST v1.1 criteria. Patients aged 18-75 with measurable target lesion(s) at baseline and ECOG status of 0 or 1 will be enrolled. Patients are treated with a single daily oral administration of TT-00420 continuously for a 28-day cycle. Dose escalation is driven by Bayesian modeling with over-dose control. Approximately 66 patients are expected to be enrolled and treated in this study. Primary endpoint is to evaluate dose limiting toxicity (DLT) and identify maximum tolerate dose (MTD), if feasible, or establish recommended dose for Dose Expansion. Preliminary efficacy and PK profile will be evaluated as well. Enrollment is currently ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT03654547.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document