The targetable mutation landscape of Chinese patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e13018-e13018
Author(s):  
Jun Li ◽  
Cuiyun Zhang ◽  
Jiuzhou Zhao ◽  
Zhizhong Wang ◽  
Bing Wei ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Chinese Patients ◽  
Molecular Testing ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Essential Information ◽  
Nsclc Patients

e13018 Background: In recent years, the prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients has been substantially improved by targeted therapies against specific molecular aberrations, i.e. tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor ( EGFR) etc. Several genes have been suggested by NCCN guideline (v7.2017) to test for NSCLC patients, including EGFR, ALK, ROS1, BRAF, MET, RET, HER2 and KRAS. The aim of this study is to profile the landscape of actionable mutations in Chinese NSCLC patients. Methods: From 2015 to 2017 621 treatment naïve NSCLC patients enrolled in the affiliated cancer hospital of Zhengzhou University were included in this analysis. DNA was extracted from the FFPE biopsies of these patients and processed for target capture sequencing covering the exons and flanking splicing regions of the 8 genes suggested by NCCN guideline, as well as introns of ROS, ALK and RET. Results: In total, 593 out of the 621 NSCLC patients harbor one or more mutations in these 8 genes, accounting for 95.5% of all the cases. EGFR, ALK and HER2 are the top 3 mutants, with a frequency of 52%, 32% and 26% respectively. Genetic aberrations in BRAF, MET, ROS1, KRAS and RET occur in 22%, 18%, 16% and 14% of the patients. The most common variation is missense; T > G, C > T and C > A changes are more often observed than T > C, T > A and C > G; the median number of variants per sample is 2, ranging from 1 to 13. There are 418 mutations detected on EGFR, of which 206 (49.28%) are clinically relevant. EGFR L858R, Exon19 deletion, Exon20 insertion, G719, A750P were observed in 123 (29.43%), 43 (10.29%), 8 (1.91%), 6 (1.44%) and 6 (1.44%) cases respectively. Gene fusions were identified in 78 cases, and the EML4- ALK is the most common one occurred in 54 patients, other fusion genes include KIF5B- ALK (11) ， CCDC6- RET (4), CD74- ROS1 (4), EZR- ROS1 (2), ERC1- RET (1), , SDC4- ROS1 (1) and TCOF1- ROS1 (1). Conclusions: Target sequencing of the 8 genes suggested by NCCN guideline for NSCLC patients reveals essential information for designing personalized therapeutic regimen. Chinese patients, maybe other Asian countries also, may benefit more from this molecular testing, because of the high occurrence of actionable mutations.

scholarly journals Clinical Characteristics of Osimertinib Responder in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients with EGFR-T790M Mutation

Cancers ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 365 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akihiro Yoshimura ◽  
Tadaaki Yamada ◽  
Naoko Okura ◽  
Takayuki Takeda ◽  
Kazuki Hirose ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
T790m Mutation ◽  
Nsclc Patients ◽  
Egfr T790m ◽  
Egfr Tkis

Osimertinib is a mutant-selective EGFR inhibitor that is effective against non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in patients with the EGFR-T790M mutation, who are resistant to EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs). However, the factors affecting response to osimertinib treatment are unknown. In this retrospective study, 27 NSCLC patients with the EGFR-T790M mutation were enrolled at five institutions in Japan. Among several parameters tested, the progression-free survival (PFS) associated with the initial EGFR-TKIs was positively correlated with the PFS after osimertinib treatment (p = 0.021). The median PFS following osimertinib treatment and the overall survival (OS) were longer in patients who responded to osimertinib than in those who did not (17.7 months versus 3.5 months, p = 0.009 and 24.2 months versus 13.5 months, p = 0.021, respectively). A multivariate analysis demonstrated that the PFS with initial EGFR-TKIs was significantly related to the PFS with osimertinib treatment (p = 0.035), whereas osimertinib response was significantly related to the PFS and OS with osimertinib treatment (p = 0.016 and p = 0.006, respectively). Our retrospective observations indicate that PFS following the initial EGFR-TKI treatment and the response rate to osimertinib might be promising predictors for effective osimertinib treatment in NSCLC patients with the EGFR-T790M mutation.

scholarly journals STK3-ALK, a Novel ALK Rearrangement in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer With Sensitivity to Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors: A Case Report

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chunlai Feng ◽  
Rong Zhou ◽  
Feng Liu ◽  
Tingting Wang ◽  
Sisi Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Tyrosine Kinase ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Alk Rearrangement ◽  
Nsclc Patients

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangement occurs in 5% to 8% of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). More than 90 different ALK fusion partners have been discovered in NSCLC patients, and ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) such as crizotinib and alectinib have achieved tumor responses in patients with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC. Here, we report the case of a patient with an advanced NSCLC carrying a novel serine/threonine kinase 3 (STK3)-ALK rearrangement, which was identified by targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) and was confirmed by RNA sequencing. Anti-ALK immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining also revealed the high expression of ALK. The patient benefitted from alectinib treatment after experiencing crizotinib resistance and achieved an overall response to TKI of over 14 months. At the timepoint of submission of this manuscript, this patient is still receiving alectinib treatment with a good tolerance. This study provides meaningful insights into the potential treatment option for NSCLC patients with brain metastases harboring STK3-ALK fusions and highlights the advantages of NGS in rapidly identifying novel molecular targets.

Biomarker utilization in non-small cell lung cancer, are we treating after testing?

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9609-9609
Author(s):  
Elias Makhoul ◽  
Jong Taek Kim ◽  
Wenjuan Zhang ◽  
Jean Raphael Lopategui ◽  
Ani Sarkis Balmanoukian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Targeted Therapy ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Targeted Therapies ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Molecular Testing ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Nsclc Patients

9609 Background: Targeted therapy in EGFR and ALK mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been the standard of care for nearly a decade with subsequent FDA approvals for ROS1 and BRAF V600 mutated NSCLC occurring in 2016 and 2017. However, recent studies have shown suboptimal utilization of genomic profiling results in these patients. In 1 recent study of community oncologists, ~70% of EGFR/ALK+ patients received appropriate targeted therapy, while patients with other gene mutations (including BRAF and ROS1) only received targeted therapy ~30% of the time. Left unanswered was what patients were receiving instead and why. Additionally, it is unknown if this finding is generalizable to the academic setting. We aimed to investigate whether in our patient population, NSCLC patients with actionable mutations received associated FDA approved therapies and if not why. Methods: The pathology database was queried for all NSCLC with molecular testing (including qPCR, FISH and NGS) from 2009 to 2019. Patients with sensitizing EGFR, ALK, ROS1 or BRAF mutations that were detected after the first FDA approval for their respective targeted therapies were included for analysis with those lost to follow up subsequently excluded. Basic demographic and clinical variables were collected as well as treatment records. Results: 2160 NSCLC patients were evaluated (2160 EGFR, 1417 ALK, 810 ROS1, 589 BRAF). 468 patients were identified with targetable mutations (411 EGFR, 46 ALK, 5 ROS1, 6 BRAF). No patient had more than 1 targetable mutation. Of those patients, 248 were at an advanced stage and had clinical follow up (202 EGFR, 37 ALK, 4 ROS1, 5 BRAF). Of those patients 197/202 (97.5%), 33/37 (89.2%), 3/4 (75%) and 1/5 (20%) received EGFR, ALK, ROS1 or BRAF targeted therapy respectively. Across biomarkers 14/248 patients (5.6%) did not receive subsequent targeted therapy. 10 patients (5 EGFR, 3 ALK, 1 ROS1 and 1 BRAF) passed away before targeted therapy could be initiated. Physician choice and missed findings accounted for the remaining four cases. Conclusions: The vast majority of advanced NSCLC patients analyzed in this study received appropriate targeted therapy matched to genomic findings. The main reason (~4% of total cases) that patients did not receive therapy was due to rapidly progressive disease and death before it could be initiated. These findings are at odds with those published from the community setting. This may be due to multiple factors, including clinician education, ease of access to targeted therapies across patient populations and incomplete data in the previous study populations.

scholarly journals Predictive molecular markers for EGFR-TKI in non-small cell lung cancer patients: new insights and critical aspects

2010 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paola Ulivi ◽  
Daniele Calistri ◽  
Wainer Zoli ◽  
Dino Amadori
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Correct Selection ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Nsclc Patients ◽  
Egfr Tkis

In recent years, a number of novel agents have been investigated that target specific molecular pathways in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A great deal of effort has been focused on identifying specific markers that predict treatment response, given that a tailored approach would maximize both the therapeutic index and the cost-effectiveness. The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) pathway has emerged as a key regulator of cancer cell proliferation and invasion, and several specific EGFR inhibitors have been examined. Gefitinib and erlotinib are selective EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs), demonstrating good results in selected cases both in terms of objective response rate and of overall survival. At present, EGFR gene mutations are the best positive predictive factors for TKI therapy, and a number of other potential biomarkers are being investigated as additional positive or negative predictors of response. The correct selection of patients that could benefit from these innovative therapies, based on an accurate molecular characterization, is mandatory to provide the best clinical management. Currently, the main factor limiting the characterization of metastatic NSCLC patients is the small quantity of tumor cells available for molecular analysis. In this paper we provide an overview of the most important molecular predictive markers for EGFR-TKIs therapy in NSCLC patients, and focus attention on biological samples suitable for analysis and alternative sampling approaches such as plasma- or serum-derived DNA.

Association of MUC16 mutations with immunotherapy biomarkers in Chinese non-small cell lung cancer patients.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e21061-e21061
Author(s):  
Tao Han ◽  
Taiyan Guo ◽  
Xia You ◽  
Qianru He ◽  
Qin Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Chinese Patients ◽  
Next Generation Sequencing Data ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Chinese Cohort ◽  
Nsclc Patients

e21061 Background: MUC16 is frequently mutated in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Previous studies showed MUC16 mutation were associated with TMB and prognostic outcome in gastric cancer patients and may benefits for patients with immunotherapy. Herein, we aimed to characterize the association of MUC16 with immunotherapy biomarkers in Chinese and Western NSCLC patients. Methods: Next-generation sequencing data and clinical data were collected from 1053 TCGA NSCLC patients (Western cohort). A 539-gene panel targeted sequencing assay was performed on FFPE tumor samples from 1056 Chinese pan-cancer patients (Chinese cohort). Both MUC16 mutation ratio and TMB were calculated on the two cohorts following the same criteria. Results: In total, 269 (25%) of the 1056 Chinese patients and 494 (47%) of the 1053 Western patients had at least one mutation of MUC16 genes ( MUC16 mutant group). The Chinese cohort had a higher mutation frequency of MUC16 gene than the Western cohort (25% vs. 47%, p＜0.001). In both cohorts, TMB was higher in the MUC16 mutant group compared to non- MUC16 mutant group. In Chinese cohort, PD-L1 positive was not associated with MUC16 mutation. However, patients with MUC16 mutation were not associated with prolonged survival in Western immunotherapy cohort. Conclusions: Our study provided a landscape of MUC16 mutations in a much larger Chinese NSCLC group, which could be a valuable complement to TCGA dataset. Both in Chinese and Western cohorts, the higher TMB in MUC16 mutant patients suggested potential efficacy from immunotherapy of MUC16 mutant group. A larger validation cohort of MUC16 mutant is required to confirm these findings in the further.

scholarly journals Clinical characteristics of advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients with EGFR exon 20 insertions

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chie Morita ◽  
Tatsuya Yoshida ◽  
Masayuki Shirasawa ◽  
Ken Masuda ◽  
Yuji Matsumoto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Clinical Characteristics ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Exon 20 ◽  
Nsclc Patients

AbstractEpidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion mutations (Exon20ins) account for 4–12% of all EGFR mutations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Data on the differences in clinical characteristics between patients with Exon20ins and major mutations (M-mut) such as exon 19 deletion and L858R are limited. We retrospectively reviewed advanced NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations, who were treated with systemic therapy between January 2011 and December 2019. We identified 23 patients with Exon20ins and 534 patients with M-mut. In Exon20ins patients, the median age was 60 (range 27–88) years, and females and never-smokers were predominant. Clinical characteristics were similar in the two groups. In Exon20ins patients, 17 patients received platinum doublet as first-line therapy, and the overall response rate (ORR) and median progression-free survival (mPFS) were 11.8% and 8.9 months. Additionally, seven patients received conventional EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), and eight patients anti-PD-1 antibodies in any-line therapy. ORR and mPFS of EGFR-TKIs and anti-PD-1 antibodies were 0%, 2.2 months and 25%, 3.1 months, respectively. Overall survival was significantly shorter in Exon20ins patients than in M-mut patients (29.3 vs. 43.4 months, p = 0.04). The clinical outcomes in Exon20ins patients were not satisfactory compared to M-mut patients.

Immunotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with EGFR mutations

Immunotherapy ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (16) ◽  
pp. 1195-1207
Author(s):  
Fangfang Liu ◽  
Xun Yuan ◽  
Jizong Jiang ◽  
Qian Chu
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Egfr Mutations ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Nsclc Patients ◽  
Egfr Tkis

EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) had been regarded as the front-line treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with EGFR mutations. However, resistance to EGFR-TKIs is inevitable, it remains a major challenge. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) had shown superior clinical efficacy in many types of solid tumors, while it exhibited impaired overall efficacy in NSCLC with  EGFR mutations. In this review, we will perform a meta-analysis to assess the relationship between the programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression and clinical benefit of EGFR-TKIs. We also overview the immunotherapy in advanced NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations to investigate the potential biomarkers predicting the ICIs efficiency, and the subgroups that could benefit from ICIs treatment.

scholarly journals Co-Occurring Potentially Actionable Oncogenic Drivers in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yiming Zhao ◽  
Shuyuan Wang ◽  
Zhengyu Yang ◽  
Yu Dong ◽  
Yanan Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
First Generation ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Nsclc Patients

BackgroundSeveral oncogenic drivers in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are considered actionable with available or promising targeted therapies. Although targetable drivers rarely overlap with each other, there were a minority of patients harboring co-occurring actionable oncogenic targets, whose clinical characteristics and prognosis are not yet clear.MethodsA total of 3,077 patients with NSCLC who underwent molecular analysis by NGS were included, and their demographic and clinical data were retrospectively collected.ResultsOur study found that the frequency of NSCLC patients harboring co-occurring potentially actionable alterations was approximately 1.5% (46/3077); after excluding patients with EGFR-undetermined mutations, the incidence was 1.3% (40/3077); 80% (37/46) harbored both EGFR mutations and other potentially actionable drivers such as MET amplification (21.6%; 8/37) and alterations in ERBB2 including mutations (27%; 10/37) and amplification (21.6%; 8/37); other combinations of potentially actionable drivers including alterations in ERBB2, KRAS, MET, ALK, and RET were also identified. Additionally, de novo MET/ERBB2 amplification in patients harboring EGFR-mutant NSCLC treated with first-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) was associated with shorter PFS (p < 0.05). The efficacy of TKIs in NSCLC patients harboring other co-occurring potentially actionable drivers varied across different molecular subtypes.ConclusionsApproximately 1.5% of NSCLCs harbored co-occurring potentially actionable oncogenic drivers, commonly involving EGFR mutations. Co-occurring actionable targets may impact the efficacy of TKIs; therefore, future clinical trials in these patients should be anticipated to tailor the combination or sequential treatment strategies.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document