Immune-related adverse events for different age groups using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System.

e14256 Background: Understanding immune-related adverse events (irAEs) for different age groups is crucial in the era of immunotherapy. The aim of our study is to assess the irAE profiles in different age groups (≤65 and > 65 years) for drugs that target PD1/PDL1, CTLA4, and their combination. Methods: Data were obtained from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System database from Jan 2014 to Sep 2018. We extracted the data based on reported irAEs and reviewed 30 different irAEs including, but not limited to colitis, pneumonitis, interstitial lung disease (ILD), myocarditis and pneumonitis. Cases with missing data, another drug reported with the PD1/PDL1 or CTLA4 combinations, and duplicate cases were excluded. We calculated the reporting odds ratio (ROR) for irAE associated with the use of PD1/PDL1, CTLA4 and combination, respectively. Results: A total of 6197 reported irAEs cases were included: 3140 cases from patients ≤65 years and 3057 from > 65 years old. Colitis was the most common irAEs in both groups. The RORs (95% CI) in patients using CTLA4 alone, PD1/PDL1 alone or the combination were 4.17 (3.47-5.02), 0.6 (0.5-0.72), 1.98 (1.64-2.39) for colitis; 0.21 (0.09-0.52), 2.94 (1.97-4.38), 2.2 (1.46-3.3) for diabetic ketoacidosis; 0.29 (0.09-0.92), 16.5 (6.54-41.9), 0.18 (0.04-0.73) for rheumatoid arthritis in ≤65 age group. In > 65 age group, the RORs (95% CI) in patients using CTLA4 alone, PD1/PDL1 alone or the combination were 4.79 (3.49-6.58), 0.56 (0.4-0.78), 2.84 (2.06-4) for hypophysitis; 0.12 (0.06-0.24), 28.53 (18.5-44), 0.17 (0.1-0.29) for interstitial lung disease (ILD); 0.38 (0.19-0.78), 2.87 (2.01-4.1), 2.41 (1.64-3.54) for myocarditis. When we compared all the studied irAEs between age groups (≤65 and > 65) by ROR, the only statistically significant irAE was ILD. The RORs (95%CI) for ILD associated with PD1/PDL1 in age≤65 and > 65 were 11.3 (7.65-16.8) & 28.53 (18.49-44.02). Conclusions: There was no significant difference between irAEs in different age groups except with ILD, which is more commonly seen in the > 65 age group. The ROR combination irAE profiles provide hypothesis generating information regarding association between irAEs and the use of various immune therapies.

Download Full-text

Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors and interstitial lung disease in the FDA adverse event reporting system: a pharmacovigilance assessment

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment ◽

10.1007/s10549-020-06001-w ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Emanuel Raschi ◽

Michele Fusaroli ◽

Andrea Ardizzoni ◽

Elisabetta Poluzzi ◽

Fabrizio De Ponti

Keyword(s):

Adverse Event ◽

Interstitial Lung Disease ◽

Lung Disease ◽

Anticancer Agents ◽

Reporting System ◽

Adverse Event Reporting System ◽

Adverse Event Reporting ◽

Sensitivity Analyses ◽

Cyclin Dependent Kinase ◽

Event Reporting

Abstract Purpose We assessed pulmonary toxicity of cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK)4/6 inhibitors by analyzing the publicly available FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). Methods Reports of interstitial lung disease (ILD) were characterized in terms of demographic information, including daily dose, latency, concomitant drugs known to be associated with ILD, and causality assessment (adapted WHO system). Disproportionality analyses were carried out by calculating reporting odds ratios (RORs) with 95% confidence interval (CI), accounting for major confounders, including notoriety and competition biases. Results ILD reports (N = 161) represented 2.1% and 0.3% of all reports for abemaciclib and palbocilcib/ribociclib, respectively, with negligible proportion of concomitant pneumotoxic drugs. Increased reporting was found for CDK4/6 inhibitors when compared to other drugs (ROR = 1.50; 95%CI = 1.28–1.74), and abemaciclib vs other anticancer agents (4.70; 3.62–5.98). Sensitivity analyses confirmed a strong and consistent disproportionality for abemaciclib. Higher-than-expected reporting emerged for palbociclib (1.38; 1.07–1.77) and ribociclib (2.39; 1.34–3.92) only when removing Japan reports. ILD occurred at recommended daily doses, with median latency ranging from 50 (abemaciclib) to 253 (ribociclib) days. Causality was highly probable in 55% of abemaciclib cases, probable in 68% of palbociclib cases. Conclusions Increased reporting of ILD with CDK4/6 inhibitors calls for further comparative population-based studies to characterize and quantify the actual risk, taking into account drug- and patient-related risk factors. These findings strengthen the role of (a) timely pharmacovigilance to detect post-marketing signals through FAERS and other real-world data, (b) clinicians to assess early, on a case-by-case basis, the potential responsibility of CDK4/6 inhibitors when diagnosing a lung injury.

Download Full-text