Safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 and oxaliplatin plus apatinib for locally advanced gastric cancer.

e15503 Background: Locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) has a poor prognosis. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy can reduce tumor loading, degrade staging and increase possibility of complete resection, thus prolonging the survival of LAGC patients (pts). We conducted a phase II trial to assess the feasibility of SOX regimen in combination with apatinib (an anti-angiogenic agent) as neoadjuvant therapy in LAGC. Methods: This study recruited untreated LAGC pts with pathologically and/or cytologically confirmed adenocarcinoma. Treatment included three 21-day cycles of apatinib (oral, 500 mg qd; discontinued in the last cycle), S-1 (oral, 40-60 mg, bid, day 1-day 14) and oxaliplatin (iv, 130 mg/m2, day 1), followed by radical surgery after 4 weeks. The primary outcome was neoadjuvant therapy related toxicity, and the secondary outcomes included tumor response, R0 resection rate, postoperative pathological evaluation and surgical morbidity. Results: Between December 2, 2016 and August 1, 2018, 31 patients were enrolled. Total 29 patients were eligible for safety and efficacy analyses of SOXA as NAC. During NAC treatment, the incidence of adverse events (AEs, any grade) was 100%, and the incidence of grade 3/4 AEs was 34.48%. No treatment-related death. The ORR of 79.31% (95%CI, 60.28-92.01%) and DCR of 96.55% (95%CI, 82.24-99.91%) were achieved. One patient was evaluated as PD with hepatic metastasis after 3 cycles of preoperative chemotherapy, and this case was inoperable. Resection with curative intent was undertaken in 28 patients with R0 resection rate of 100%. Operative morbidity was observed in 12 of 28 patients including fever (9, 32.14%), anastomotic leakage (1, 3.57%), fat liquefaction of post-surgical incision (1, 3.57%), and gastroparesis (1, 3.57%). Additionally, after surgery 1 patient had pulmonary infection and 1 patient had pleural effusion. The median tumor regression was 90% on pathological findings after surgery. Conclusions: Neoadjuvant therapy with apatinib plus SOX for LAGC showed acceptable toxicity and promising efficacy.

Download Full-text

Apatinib combined with SOX neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced gastric cancer: A multicenter, single-armed, prospective study.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2020.38.4_suppl.367 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 38 (4_suppl) ◽

pp. 367-367

Author(s):

Jian-Xian Lin ◽

Changming Huang

Keyword(s):

Gastric Cancer ◽

Prospective Study ◽

Neoadjuvant Therapy ◽

Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽

Locally Advanced ◽

Gastric Surgery ◽

R0 Resection ◽

Resection Rate ◽

Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽

Tumor Response Evaluation

367 Background: Molecular targeted therapy has made great progress in the treatment of gastric cancer. In some previous studies, apatinib, an oral small molecular of VEGFR-2 TKI, had been confirmed can improve OS and PFS with an acceptable safety profile in patients with advanced gastric cancer refractory to two or more lines of prior chemotherapy. However, there is limited evidence about the safety and feasibility of apatinib combined with SOX regimen as neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced gastric cancer (AGC). Methods: This is a multicenter, single-armed, prospective study. Patients with AGC (cT2-4N+M0) without prior anti-cancer strategies were included. Patients were received 2 to 5 cycles (21 days a cycle) of neoadjuvant therapy using S-1 (po, 40-60 mg bid, day1-day14), oxaliplatin (iv, 130 mg/m2, day1), and apatinib (po, 500 mg qd). Apatinib was prohibited in the last cycle. The operation should be performed 2 to 4 weeks later of the neoadjuvant therapy. The primary endpoint was R0 resection rate. The secondary endpoint included safety, ORR, and DCR. Results: A total of 56 patients from 10 centers in China were recruited. There were 43 males and 13 females. The median age was 63.04 years (range 41-75 years). There were 43 patients with tumor response evaluation, 29 patients (67.4%) had partial response (PR), 12 patients (27.9%) had stable disease (SD), and 2 patient (4.6%) had progressive disease (PD). The ORR and DCR were 67.4% (29/43) and 95.3% (41/43), respectively. 36 patients received gastric surgery, the R0 resection rate was 97.2%, 3 patients had postoperative complication: one had intestinal obstruction and 2 had pneumonia (all Clavien-Dindo classification less than grade II). 46 patients were included for safety analysis. The incidence of adverse events (AEs) and grade 3/4 AEs were 84.8% (39/46) and 17.4% (8/46), respectively. The most common AEs were neutropenia (40%), low platelet count (40%), leucopenia (32.6%), vomit (13%). Conclusions: This prospective study shows that neoadjuvant therapy using apatinib plus SOX brings clinical benefit to AGC with a high disease control rate and tolerable adverse reactions. Clinical trial information: NCT 03192735.

Download Full-text

The Safety and Efficacy of Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Patients with Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

10.21203/rs.3.rs-47635/v1 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Lihang Liu ◽

Feng Li ◽

Shengtao Lin ◽

Yi Liu ◽

Changshun Yang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Gastric Cancer ◽

Postoperative Complications ◽

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽

Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽

Laparoscopic Gastrectomy ◽

Locally Advanced ◽

R0 Resection ◽

Resection Rate ◽

Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽

Significant Difference

Abstract Background: Limited researches focused on the application of laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) in locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) patients following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). In this study, we aimed at illustrating the surgical and survival outcome of LG in LAGC patients following NACT.Methods: We performed a retrospective study of patients with LAGC who received either LG following NACT or upfront LG at Fujian Provincial Hospital between March 2013 and October 2018. Perioperative parameters, short-term and long-term outcomes were compared. The Kaplan-Meier estimator was used to describe the survival curves, and the differences were examined by the log-rank test.Results: In total, 76 consecutive patients were enrolled into the NACT-LG (41 patients) and LG (35 patients) group, respectively. There was no significant difference between the two groups for baseline characteristics, including age, sex, BMI, Eastern Clinical Oncology Group performance status, tumor size, location, Borrmann type, Lauren type, differentiation, cT stage, and surgical type (all P>0.05). The surgical trauma in terms of incision length and blood loss, and postoperative recovery in terms of first aerofluxus time, first time on liquid diets, drainage duration, and hospital stays were similar between the two groups (all P>0.05). The operation time was significantly longer for NACT-LG than for LG (286.5 vs. 248.9 min, P=0.008). There was no significant difference in surgical morbidity (19.5% vs. 22.9%, P=0.721) between the two groups. No patient died of postoperative complications in the NACT-LG group, and one patient (1/35, 2.9%) died of postoperative complications in the LG group (P=0.461). After NACT, the R0 resection rate was significantly higher (95.1% vs. 77.1%, P=0.049), and metastatic lymph nodes were less for NACT-LG than for LG (1 vs. 8, P=0.001). Compared with the LG group, the NACT-LG group had a significantly better DFS (59.4% vs. 14.4%, P=0.034) and better OS (69.0% vs. 37.4%, P=0.009) at 3 years.Conclusions: NACT does not decrease safety of LG for patients with LAGC and offer higher R0 resection rate and better disease-free and overall survival. For patients with LAGC, LG following NACT should be the priority treatment.

Download Full-text

A multicenter, single-armed, prospective phase II study of apatinib combined with chemotherapy neoadjuvant for locally advanced gastric cancer.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2019.37.15_suppl.e15508 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. e15508-e15508

Author(s):

JianXian Lin ◽

Changming Huang

Keyword(s):

Gastric Cancer ◽

Prospective Study ◽

Disease Control ◽

Neoadjuvant Therapy ◽

Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽

Locally Advanced ◽

Disease Control Rate ◽

R0 Resection ◽

Resection Rate ◽

Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer

e15508 Background: Molecular targeted therapy has made great progress in the treatment of gastric cancer. In some previous studies, apatinib, an oral small molecular of VEGFR-2 tyrosine kinase inhibitor, had been confirmed can improve OS and PFS with an acceptable safety profile in patients with advanced gastric cancer refractory to two or more lines of prior chemotherapy. However, there is limited evidence about the safety and feasibility of apatinib combined with SOX regimen as neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced gastric cancer (LADG). Methods: This is a multicenter, single-armed, prospective study. Patients with LAGC (cT2-4N+M0) without prior anti-cancer strategies were included. Patients were received 3 to 5 cycles (21 days a cycle) of neoadjuvant therapy using S-1 (po, 40-60 mg bid, day1-day14), oxaliplatin (iv, 130 mg/m2, day1), and apatinib (po, 500 mg qd). Apatinib was prohibited in the last cycle. The operation should be performed 2 to 4 weeks later of the neoadjuvant therapy. The primary outcome was safety of the neoadjuvant therapy. The secondary outcomes included R0 resection rate, objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR). Results: A total of 30 patients from 7 centers in China were recruited between Sep. 1, 2017 and Aug. 31, 2018. There were 21 males and 9 females. The median age was 66 years (range 41-75 years). There were 25 patients with tumor response evaluation, 18 patients had partial response (PR), 6 patients had stable disease (SD), and 1 patient had progressive disease (PD). The ORR and DCR were 72.0% (18/25) and 96.0% (24/25), respectively. 10 patients discontinued the study (withdrew consent 8 patients, physical deterioration in performance status 1 patient, and Disease progression 1 patient). 20 patients received gastric surgery, the R0 resection rate was 100%, 3 patients had postoperative complication: one had intestinal obstruction and two had pneumonia (all Clavien-Dindo classification less than grade II). All patients were included for safety analysis. The incidence of adverse events (AEs) and grade 3/4 AEs were 56.7% (17/30) and 6.7% (2/30), respectively. The most common AEs were leucopenia (33.3%), liver function damage (6.7%), up-GI hemorrhage (6.7%), and hypertension (6.7%). Conclusions: This prospective study shows that neoadjuvant therapy using apatinib plus SOX brings clinical benefit to LAGC with a high disease control rate and tolerable adverse reactions. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov and carries the following ID number: NCT 03192735. Clinical trial information: NCT 03192735.

Download Full-text

A single-arm, phase II feasibility study of neoadjuvant docetaxel, oxaliplatin, and S-1 (DOS) chemotherapy in potentially resectable gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2011.29.4_suppl.96 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽

pp. 96-96

Author(s):

M. Ryu ◽

Y. Choi ◽

B. Kim ◽

Y. Park ◽

H. Kim ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Gastric Cancer ◽

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽

Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽

Residual Disease ◽

Gastroesophageal Junction ◽

Locally Advanced ◽

Phase Iii ◽

R0 Resection ◽

Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽

Grade 3

96 Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate feasibility and safety of neoadjuvant docetaxel, oxaliplatin, and S-1 (DOS) chemotherapy in patients with potentially resectable adenocarcinoma of stomach or gastroesophageal junction. Methods: Forty-one patients with clinical stage T3-4N0M0 or T2-4N+M0 determined by CT, endoscopic ultrasonography, and laparoscopy were enrolled between DEC 2008 and MAR 2010. Gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection was conducted after 3 cycles of DOS chemotherapy. DOS chemotherapy consists of docetaxel 50 mg/m2 iv (day1), oxaliplatin 100 mg/m2 iv (day1), and S-1 40 mg/m2 po bid (days1-14) at 3 weeks interval. After curative gastrectomy, the patients were given 1 year of adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 (40 mg/m2 D1-28, every 6 weeks). Results: All patients finished the planned neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Twenty-three (56%) patients achieved a partial response, and the remaining 18 patients had stable disease by CT scan after 3 cycles of DOS chemotherapy. No disease progression was observed during the neoadjuvant chemotherapy. A median 4.7 weeks (range, 4.0-7.6) after the start of the 3rd cycle of DOS chemotherapy, 39 (95%) patients underwent R0 resection with no pathologic residual disease in 4 (10%) patients. Hematologic toxicities were common including grade 4 neutropenia (32%), grade 3 thrombocytopenia (17%), and febrile neutropenia (10%). However, hematologic toxicities were generally transient and manageable. There were no grade 3 or 4 non-hematologic toxicities with frequency > 5% of patients. With all toxicities taken together, 21 (51%) patients experienced grade 3 or 4 toxicities (except grade 3 neutropenia). There was no treatment-related death, and surgical complications included only mild wound problem in 4 (10%) patients. Conclusions: In this study, neoadjuvant DOS chemotherapy could induce a sufficient down-staging and R0 resection of locally advanced gastric cancer with mild and manageable toxicities. A phase III randomized trial is planned for evaluating the benefit of neoadjuvant DOS chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer. [Table: see text]

Download Full-text

Multicenter phase II study of neoadjuvant chemotherapy consisted with S-1 and oxaliplatin followed by gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2016.34.4_suppl.tps180 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 34 (4_suppl) ◽

pp. TPS180-TPS180

Author(s):

Yoshihiro Okita ◽

Hironaga Satake ◽

Hiroyuki Okuyama ◽

Masato Kondo ◽

Akira Miki ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Gastric Cancer ◽

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽

Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽

Curative Resection ◽

Locally Advanced ◽

Nodal Involvement ◽

Resection Rate ◽

Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽

Large Type ◽

Type 3

TPS180 Background: Prognosis for locally advanced gastric cancer, such as clinical T4 disease, bulky nodal involvement, type 4 and large type 3 gastric cancer, was not satisfactory even by D2 gastrectomy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is another promising approach. In our phase I study, neoadjuvant chemotherapy of S-1 and oxaliplatin (SOX) had manageable toxicities and good pathological complete response rate (33%) in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer. Based on the results of this phase I study, we initiate a multi-institutional, single-arm, open label, phase II study (Neo G-SOX PII study). The aim of this study is to evaluate the efﬁcacy and safety of the neoadjuvant chemotherapy of S-1 and oxaliplatin (SOX) followed by gastrectomy with D2/3 lymph node dissection; clinical T4; clinically resectable gastric cancer of type 4 or large type 3 (over 8 cm); bulky nodal involvement around major branched arteries to the stomach Methods: Eligibility criteria include histologically proven adenocarcinoma of the stomach; clinical T4; clinically resectable gastric cancer of type 4 or large type 3 (over 8 cm); bulky nodal involvement around major branched arteries to the stomach; resectable peritoneal dissemination (pathological CY1 or P1, except for clinical CY1 or P1). Patients receive two cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 (80 mg/m2, p.o., days 1-14 followed by 1 week rest) and oxaliplatin (130 mg/m2 at day 1), followed by D2 or higher surgery with no residual disease. Patients with pathological R0/1 resection received S-1 (80 mg/m2, p.o., days 1-28 followed by 2 week rest) for 1 year as adjuvant chemotherapy. Primary endpoint is curative resection rate. Key secondary endpoints include pathological response, R0/1 resection rate, dose-intensity, overall survival, relapse free survival and safety. We set the threshold curative resection rate at 65% and the expected curative resection rate at 80%. Given a one-sided α of 0.1 and statistical power of 80%, 40 patients was required. Clinical trial information: UMIN000018661 Clinical trial information: UMIN000018661.

Download Full-text

Prognostic value of response assessed by RECIST and WHO criteria to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced gastric cancer patients

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2009.27.15_suppl.e15647 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. e15647-e15647

Author(s):

S. R. Park ◽

J. S. Lee ◽

Y. W. Kim ◽

I. J. Choi ◽

K. W. Ryu ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Gastric Cancer ◽

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽

Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽

Tumor Size ◽

Tumor Response ◽

Locally Advanced ◽

R0 Resection ◽

Who Criteria ◽

Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽

Response To Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

e15647 Background: In metastatic gastric cancer, the response to chemotherapy is assessed by RECIST or WHO criteria according to the change of tumor size. There are no data, however, on the usefulness of those criteria in evaluating tumor response in the setting of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy-as assessed by RECIST and WHO criteria-and clinical outcome in locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) patients. Methods: This study recruited LAGC patients who, from January 2003 through November 2005, entered the neoadjuvant arm of prospective randomized phase II trials comparing neoadjuvant chemotherapy to adjuvant chemotherapy. LAGC was defined as stage III or IV (M0) disease based on computed tomography (CT) according to the Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma. Patients with measurable lesions received 3 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy consisting of docetaxel (36 mg/m2) and cisplatin (40 mg/m2) on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks, followed by surgery. Results: After chemotherapy, 40 (95%) patients underwent surgery and the remaining 2 patients showed new distant metastasis on CT scan. Thirty-five (83%) patients had curative R0 resection. Twenty-eight (67%) patients had a clinical response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy according to RECIST/WHO criteria. Although R0 resection rate (93% vs 64%, P = 0.03), median relapse-free survival (RFS) (43.2 vs 7.5 months, P = 0.14), and overall survival (OS) (not reached vs 27.0 months, P = 0.10) were better in responders than non-responders, they did not differ significantly in the subgroup that subsequently underwent surgery. When we redefined the decrease in tumor size judged as a response by RECIST (≥60% rather than ≥30%) and WHO (≥75% rather than ≥50%) criteria, response correlated significantly with both RFS (P = 0.03) and OS (P = 0.02). Conclusions: In the neoadjuvant setting, which frequently involves smaller measurable lesions than the metastatic setting, larger changes in tumor size than those specified by RECIST and WHO criteria are needed to predict postoperative outcome. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Download Full-text

Phase II trial of S-1 combined with oxaliplatin (SOX) as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2011.29.4_suppl.122 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽

pp. 122-122

Author(s):

L. Chen

Keyword(s):

Gastric Cancer ◽

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽

Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽

Phase Ii ◽

Response Rate ◽

Phase Ii Trial ◽

Locally Advanced ◽

High Response Rate ◽

R0 Resection ◽

Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer

122 Background: Previous phase II trial with combination therapy of S-1 plus oxaliplatin (SOX) demonstrated high response rate and well tolerability in patients with untreated advanced gastric cancer. The aim of this phase II trial was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SOX as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer (AGC). Methods: Eligibility criteria included a histologically proven AGC with stage IIIb, IIIc (AJCC 7th edition), at least 1 measurable lesion, no prior chemotherapy, ECOG 0∼2, adequate hepatic, renal, and bone marrow function. Enrolled patients were staged by EUS and CT. The neoadjuvant chemotherapy consisted of 3-4 cycles of oxaliplatin (130 mg/m2) on day 1 and S-1 (80 mg/m2/day) for 14 days with 7 days rest. After chemotherapy, the patients underwent surgery. Results: From Dec 2009 to Sep 2010, 35 patients (IIIb; 19pts, IIIc; 16pts) were enrolled. The median age of the patients was 54.6 years (range; 20-72 y). All patients were available for evaluating the clinical responese and adverse events. The overall response rate was 68.5% (1CR, 23 PR, 9 SD, 2 PD). 32 patients underwent surgical resection. Of them, 27 patients underwent standard D2 surgery and 5 patients had palliative surgery. 25 patients had R0 resection. Postoperative pathological examination showed that most of the surgical patients were in T4a stage. According to Lauren classification, 71.9% patiens (23/32pts) were diffuse type, SOX showed higher respons rate (1CR, 20 PR, 2 SD, RR: 91.3%) among these patients. Major grade 3/4 hematological toxicities were anemia (5.7%), neutropenia (5.7%) and liver dysfunction (8.6%) and non-hematological toxicities were anorexia (5.7%) and vomiting (11.4%). But most of the adverse events were managable. Conclusions: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 plus oxaliplatin (SOX) showed high response rate and and R0 resection rate for locally advanced GC, especially for diffuse type patients. All the patients did not have severe toxicity during the process of chemotherapy. This is the preliminary results, and the survival benefit in locally advanced GC patients that respond to SOX neoadjuvant chemotherapy needs to be addressed by a randomized-controlled trial. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Download Full-text

Final results of a phase II multicenter study of neoadjuvant S-1 and irinotecan in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2013.31.4_suppl.65 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 31 (4_suppl) ◽

pp. 65-65

Author(s):

Masanori Terashima ◽

Zenichiro Saze ◽

Ryo Hosotani ◽

Masahiro Takahashi ◽

Akinori Takagane ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Gastric Cancer ◽

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽

Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽

Combination Chemotherapy ◽

Tumor Response ◽

Locally Advanced ◽

R0 Resection ◽

Curative Surgery ◽

Term Survival ◽

Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer

65 Background: Combination chemotherapy involving S-1 and irinotecan (IRI-S) has failed to demonstrate a survival benefit over S-1 alone in metastatic gastric cancer. However, the tumor response rate was significantly higher with I-RIS. Therefore, we evaluated the effect of I-RIS as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer. Methods: Patients with locally advanced gastric adenocarcinoma, T3-4, N0-3, M0, for whom curative surgery was planned after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, PS 0-1, with adequate organ function were enrolled in this study. Patients received irinotecan 80 mg/m2 on days 1 and 15 and oral S-1 80 mg/m2/day on days 1 to 21. Treatment was repeated every 28 days for 2 courses. Patients then underwent gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy. After surgery, patients resumed treatment with S-1 alone for 1 year. Results: Of the 39 patients enrolled, 37 were eligible. Two cycles of chemotherapy were completed in 34 patients, and surgery was performed in 33 patients. Of 27 RECIST-evaluable patients, 16 (59%) had a partial response and 9 (33%) had stable disease. Major grade 3 toxicities were neutropenia in 6, anorexia in 4, nausea in 3, diarrhea in 2, and fatigue in 2. Resection was performed in 32 (86%) patients and R0 resection was possible in 20 (54%) patients. The reason for R1/R2 were cy+ in 6, M1(LYM) in 5, M1(PER) in 4, M1(HEP) in 1 and PM+ in 2. Postoperative complications were observed in 13 (39%) patients. There were no treatment-related deaths. Pathological response was observed in 13 of 32 patients (41%); 2 patients had pathological CR. Median survival time was 15.9M and median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.9M. Overall survival and PFS were significantly better in patients underwent R0 resection (p < 0.0001). Neither objective tumor response nor pathologic response predicted the survival. Conclusions: These results show that neoadjuvant S-1 and irinotecan combination chemotherapy was active and feasible for treating locally advanced gastric cancer. R0 resection is essential to achieve long-term survival. Therefore, careful diagnosis with staging laparoscopy before surgery is mandatory to avoid non-curative operation. Clinical trial information: NCT00134095.

Download Full-text