Final results of a phase II multicenter study of neoadjuvant S-1 and irinotecan in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 65-65
Author(s):  
Masanori Terashima ◽  
Zenichiro Saze ◽  
Ryo Hosotani ◽  
Masahiro Takahashi ◽  
Akinori Takagane ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Combination Chemotherapy ◽  
Tumor Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Curative Surgery ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer

65 Background: Combination chemotherapy involving S-1 and irinotecan (IRI-S) has failed to demonstrate a survival benefit over S-1 alone in metastatic gastric cancer. However, the tumor response rate was significantly higher with I-RIS. Therefore, we evaluated the effect of I-RIS as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer. Methods: Patients with locally advanced gastric adenocarcinoma, T3-4, N0-3, M0, for whom curative surgery was planned after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, PS 0-1, with adequate organ function were enrolled in this study. Patients received irinotecan 80 mg/m2 on days 1 and 15 and oral S-1 80 mg/m2/day on days 1 to 21. Treatment was repeated every 28 days for 2 courses. Patients then underwent gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy. After surgery, patients resumed treatment with S-1 alone for 1 year. Results: Of the 39 patients enrolled, 37 were eligible. Two cycles of chemotherapy were completed in 34 patients, and surgery was performed in 33 patients. Of 27 RECIST-evaluable patients, 16 (59%) had a partial response and 9 (33%) had stable disease. Major grade 3 toxicities were neutropenia in 6, anorexia in 4, nausea in 3, diarrhea in 2, and fatigue in 2. Resection was performed in 32 (86%) patients and R0 resection was possible in 20 (54%) patients. The reason for R1/R2 were cy+ in 6, M1(LYM) in 5, M1(PER) in 4, M1(HEP) in 1 and PM+ in 2. Postoperative complications were observed in 13 (39%) patients. There were no treatment-related deaths. Pathological response was observed in 13 of 32 patients (41%); 2 patients had pathological CR. Median survival time was 15.9M and median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.9M. Overall survival and PFS were significantly better in patients underwent R0 resection (p < 0.0001). Neither objective tumor response nor pathologic response predicted the survival. Conclusions: These results show that neoadjuvant S-1 and irinotecan combination chemotherapy was active and feasible for treating locally advanced gastric cancer. R0 resection is essential to achieve long-term survival. Therefore, careful diagnosis with staging laparoscopy before surgery is mandatory to avoid non-curative operation. Clinical trial information: NCT00134095.

Prognostic value of response assessed by RECIST and WHO criteria to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced gastric cancer patients

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15647-e15647
Author(s):  
S. R. Park ◽  
J. S. Lee ◽  
Y. W. Kim ◽  
I. J. Choi ◽  
K. W. Ryu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Tumor Size ◽  
Tumor Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Who Criteria ◽  
Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Response To Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

e15647 Background: In metastatic gastric cancer, the response to chemotherapy is assessed by RECIST or WHO criteria according to the change of tumor size. There are no data, however, on the usefulness of those criteria in evaluating tumor response in the setting of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy-as assessed by RECIST and WHO criteria-and clinical outcome in locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) patients. Methods: This study recruited LAGC patients who, from January 2003 through November 2005, entered the neoadjuvant arm of prospective randomized phase II trials comparing neoadjuvant chemotherapy to adjuvant chemotherapy. LAGC was defined as stage III or IV (M0) disease based on computed tomography (CT) according to the Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma. Patients with measurable lesions received 3 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy consisting of docetaxel (36 mg/m2) and cisplatin (40 mg/m2) on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks, followed by surgery. Results: After chemotherapy, 40 (95%) patients underwent surgery and the remaining 2 patients showed new distant metastasis on CT scan. Thirty-five (83%) patients had curative R0 resection. Twenty-eight (67%) patients had a clinical response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy according to RECIST/WHO criteria. Although R0 resection rate (93% vs 64%, P = 0.03), median relapse-free survival (RFS) (43.2 vs 7.5 months, P = 0.14), and overall survival (OS) (not reached vs 27.0 months, P = 0.10) were better in responders than non-responders, they did not differ significantly in the subgroup that subsequently underwent surgery. When we redefined the decrease in tumor size judged as a response by RECIST (≥60% rather than ≥30%) and WHO (≥75% rather than ≥50%) criteria, response correlated significantly with both RFS (P = 0.03) and OS (P = 0.02). Conclusions: In the neoadjuvant setting, which frequently involves smaller measurable lesions than the metastatic setting, larger changes in tumor size than those specified by RECIST and WHO criteria are needed to predict postoperative outcome. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

A single-arm, phase II feasibility study of neoadjuvant docetaxel, oxaliplatin, and S-1 (DOS) chemotherapy in potentially resectable gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 96-96
Author(s):  
M. Ryu ◽  
Y. Choi ◽  
B. Kim ◽  
Y. Park ◽  
H. Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Grade 3

96 Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate feasibility and safety of neoadjuvant docetaxel, oxaliplatin, and S-1 (DOS) chemotherapy in patients with potentially resectable adenocarcinoma of stomach or gastroesophageal junction. Methods: Forty-one patients with clinical stage T3-4N0M0 or T2-4N+M0 determined by CT, endoscopic ultrasonography, and laparoscopy were enrolled between DEC 2008 and MAR 2010. Gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection was conducted after 3 cycles of DOS chemotherapy. DOS chemotherapy consists of docetaxel 50 mg/m2 iv (day1), oxaliplatin 100 mg/m2 iv (day1), and S-1 40 mg/m2 po bid (days1-14) at 3 weeks interval. After curative gastrectomy, the patients were given 1 year of adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 (40 mg/m2 D1-28, every 6 weeks). Results: All patients finished the planned neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Twenty-three (56%) patients achieved a partial response, and the remaining 18 patients had stable disease by CT scan after 3 cycles of DOS chemotherapy. No disease progression was observed during the neoadjuvant chemotherapy. A median 4.7 weeks (range, 4.0-7.6) after the start of the 3rd cycle of DOS chemotherapy, 39 (95%) patients underwent R0 resection with no pathologic residual disease in 4 (10%) patients. Hematologic toxicities were common including grade 4 neutropenia (32%), grade 3 thrombocytopenia (17%), and febrile neutropenia (10%). However, hematologic toxicities were generally transient and manageable. There were no grade 3 or 4 non-hematologic toxicities with frequency > 5% of patients. With all toxicities taken together, 21 (51%) patients experienced grade 3 or 4 toxicities (except grade 3 neutropenia). There was no treatment-related death, and surgical complications included only mild wound problem in 4 (10%) patients. Conclusions: In this study, neoadjuvant DOS chemotherapy could induce a sufficient down-staging and R0 resection of locally advanced gastric cancer with mild and manageable toxicities. A phase III randomized trial is planned for evaluating the benefit of neoadjuvant DOS chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer. [Table: see text]

Phase II trial of S-1 combined with oxaliplatin (SOX) as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 122-122
Author(s):  
L. Chen
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
High Response Rate ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer

122 Background: Previous phase II trial with combination therapy of S-1 plus oxaliplatin (SOX) demonstrated high response rate and well tolerability in patients with untreated advanced gastric cancer. The aim of this phase II trial was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SOX as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer (AGC). Methods: Eligibility criteria included a histologically proven AGC with stage IIIb, IIIc (AJCC 7th edition), at least 1 measurable lesion, no prior chemotherapy, ECOG 0∼2, adequate hepatic, renal, and bone marrow function. Enrolled patients were staged by EUS and CT. The neoadjuvant chemotherapy consisted of 3-4 cycles of oxaliplatin (130 mg/m2) on day 1 and S-1 (80 mg/m2/day) for 14 days with 7 days rest. After chemotherapy, the patients underwent surgery. Results: From Dec 2009 to Sep 2010, 35 patients (IIIb; 19pts, IIIc; 16pts) were enrolled. The median age of the patients was 54.6 years (range; 20-72 y). All patients were available for evaluating the clinical responese and adverse events. The overall response rate was 68.5% (1CR, 23 PR, 9 SD, 2 PD). 32 patients underwent surgical resection. Of them, 27 patients underwent standard D2 surgery and 5 patients had palliative surgery. 25 patients had R0 resection. Postoperative pathological examination showed that most of the surgical patients were in T4a stage. According to Lauren classification, 71.9% patiens (23/32pts) were diffuse type, SOX showed higher respons rate (1CR, 20 PR, 2 SD, RR: 91.3%) among these patients. Major grade 3/4 hematological toxicities were anemia (5.7%), neutropenia (5.7%) and liver dysfunction (8.6%) and non-hematological toxicities were anorexia (5.7%) and vomiting (11.4%). But most of the adverse events were managable. Conclusions: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 plus oxaliplatin (SOX) showed high response rate and and R0 resection rate for locally advanced GC, especially for diffuse type patients. All the patients did not have severe toxicity during the process of chemotherapy. This is the preliminary results, and the survival benefit in locally advanced GC patients that respond to SOX neoadjuvant chemotherapy needs to be addressed by a randomized-controlled trial. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

scholarly journals The Safety and Efficacy of Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Patients with Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lihang Liu ◽  
Feng Li ◽  
Shengtao Lin ◽  
Yi Liu ◽  
Changshun Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Laparoscopic Gastrectomy ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Resection Rate ◽  
Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background: Limited researches focused on the application of laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) in locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) patients following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). In this study, we aimed at illustrating the surgical and survival outcome of LG in LAGC patients following NACT.Methods: We performed a retrospective study of patients with LAGC who received either LG following NACT or upfront LG at Fujian Provincial Hospital between March 2013 and October 2018. Perioperative parameters, short-term and long-term outcomes were compared. The Kaplan-Meier estimator was used to describe the survival curves, and the differences were examined by the log-rank test.Results: In total, 76 consecutive patients were enrolled into the NACT-LG (41 patients) and LG (35 patients) group, respectively. There was no significant difference between the two groups for baseline characteristics, including age, sex, BMI, Eastern Clinical Oncology Group performance status, tumor size, location, Borrmann type, Lauren type, differentiation, cT stage, and surgical type (all P>0.05). The surgical trauma in terms of incision length and blood loss, and postoperative recovery in terms of first aerofluxus time, first time on liquid diets, drainage duration, and hospital stays were similar between the two groups (all P>0.05). The operation time was significantly longer for NACT-LG than for LG (286.5 vs. 248.9 min, P=0.008). There was no significant difference in surgical morbidity (19.5% vs. 22.9%, P=0.721) between the two groups. No patient died of postoperative complications in the NACT-LG group, and one patient (1/35, 2.9%) died of postoperative complications in the LG group (P=0.461). After NACT, the R0 resection rate was significantly higher (95.1% vs. 77.1%, P=0.049), and metastatic lymph nodes were less for NACT-LG than for LG (1 vs. 8, P=0.001). Compared with the LG group, the NACT-LG group had a significantly better DFS (59.4% vs. 14.4%, P=0.034) and better OS (69.0% vs. 37.4%, P=0.009) at 3 years.Conclusions: NACT does not decrease safety of LG for patients with LAGC and offer higher R0 resection rate and better disease-free and overall survival. For patients with LAGC, LG following NACT should be the priority treatment.

Safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 and oxaliplatin plus apatinib for locally advanced gastric cancer.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15503-e15503
Author(s):  
Ya'nan Zheng ◽  
Xiao Yang ◽  
Zhentian Ni ◽  
Zhenglun Zhu ◽  
Wei Xu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Neoadjuvant Therapy ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Resection Rate ◽  
Surgical Morbidity ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer

e15503 Background: Locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) has a poor prognosis. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy can reduce tumor loading, degrade staging and increase possibility of complete resection, thus prolonging the survival of LAGC patients (pts). We conducted a phase II trial to assess the feasibility of SOX regimen in combination with apatinib (an anti-angiogenic agent) as neoadjuvant therapy in LAGC. Methods: This study recruited untreated LAGC pts with pathologically and/or cytologically confirmed adenocarcinoma. Treatment included three 21-day cycles of apatinib (oral, 500 mg qd; discontinued in the last cycle), S-1 (oral, 40-60 mg, bid, day 1-day 14) and oxaliplatin (iv, 130 mg/m2, day 1), followed by radical surgery after 4 weeks. The primary outcome was neoadjuvant therapy related toxicity, and the secondary outcomes included tumor response, R0 resection rate, postoperative pathological evaluation and surgical morbidity. Results: Between December 2, 2016 and August 1, 2018, 31 patients were enrolled. Total 29 patients were eligible for safety and efficacy analyses of SOXA as NAC. During NAC treatment, the incidence of adverse events (AEs, any grade) was 100%, and the incidence of grade 3/4 AEs was 34.48%. No treatment-related death. The ORR of 79.31% (95%CI, 60.28-92.01%) and DCR of 96.55% (95%CI, 82.24-99.91%) were achieved. One patient was evaluated as PD with hepatic metastasis after 3 cycles of preoperative chemotherapy, and this case was inoperable. Resection with curative intent was undertaken in 28 patients with R0 resection rate of 100%. Operative morbidity was observed in 12 of 28 patients including fever (9, 32.14%), anastomotic leakage (1, 3.57%), fat liquefaction of post-surgical incision (1, 3.57%), and gastroparesis (1, 3.57%). Additionally, after surgery 1 patient had pulmonary infection and 1 patient had pleural effusion. The median tumor regression was 90% on pathological findings after surgery. Conclusions: Neoadjuvant therapy with apatinib plus SOX for LAGC showed acceptable toxicity and promising efficacy.

scholarly journals Optimal Timing to Surgery After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yinkui Wang ◽  
Zining Liu ◽  
Fei Shan ◽  
Xiangji Ying ◽  
Yan Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Survival Benefit ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
The Impact

BackgroundThe relationship between time to surgery (TTS) and survival benefit is not sufficiently demonstrated by previous studies in locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC). This study aims to assess the impact of TTS after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) on long-term and short-term outcomes in LAGC patients.MethodsData were collected from patients with LAGC who underwent NACT between January 2007 and January 2018 at our institution. Outcomes assessed were long-term survival, pathologic complete response (pCR) rate, and postoperative complications.ResultsThis cohort of 426 patients was divided into five groups by weeks of TTS. Under cox regression, compared to other groups, the 22–28 days and 29–35 days groups revealed a better OS (≤21 vs. 22–28 days: HR 1.54, 95% CI = 0.81–2.93, P = 0.185; 36–42 vs. 22–28 days: HR 2.20, 95% CI = 1.28−3.79, P = 0.004; 43–84 vs. 22–28 days: HR 1.83, 95% CI = 1.09–3.06, P = 0.022) and PFS (≤21 vs. 22–28 days: HR 1.54, 95% CI = 0.81–2.93, P = 0.256; 36–42 vs. 22–28 days: HR 2.20, 95% CI = 1.28−3.79, P = 0.111; 43–84 vs. 22–28 days: HR 1.83, 95% CI = 1.09–3.06, P = 0.047). Further analysis revealed a better prognosis in patients with TTS within 22–35 days (OS: HR 1.78 95% CI = 1.25−2.54, P = 0.001; PFS: HR 1.49, 95% CI = 1.07−2.08, P = 0.017). Postoperative stay was significantly higher in the ≤21 days group, while other parameters revealed no statistical significance (P &gt; 0.05). Restricted cubic spline depicted the nonlinear relationship between TTS and OS/PFS.ConclusionPatients who received surgery within 3−5 weeks experienced the maximal survival benefit without an increase in postoperative complications or lowering the rate of pCR. Further investigations are warranted.

Long-Term Outcomes of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer/Esophagogastric Junction Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Feng Wu ◽  
Jiaze Hong ◽  
Nannan Du ◽  
Yiran Wang ◽  
Juan Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Esophagogastric Junction ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Esophagogastric Junction Cancer

Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has been defined as any preoperative chemotherapy scheme aiming to reduce tumor staging and to control preoperative micrometastasis, which has been extensively used as a treatment for resectable gastric cancer. However, its effect on the long-term survival of patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (AGC) or esophagogastric junction cancer (EGC) remains unknown. Objective: This study aimed at investigating the long-term efficacy of NAC in locally AGC/EGC. Methods: The following databases were searched for articles published from their inception up to April 2020: PubMed, Web of Science, EBSCO, and Cochrane library. The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Results: A total of 19 articles were included in this meta-analysis, with a total of 4,446 patients. The results showed that NAC increased the patients’ 3-year OS (HR, 0.56; 95%CI, 0.21-0.91; P<0.001), 3-year PFS (HR, 0.76; 95%CI, 0.66-0.87; P<0.001), 5-year OS (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.64-0.78; P<0.001), and 5-year PFS (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.61-0.79; P<0.001) respectively. Besides, subgroup analysis showed that Asian countries have benefited significantly from NAC (HR, 0.65; 95%CI, 0.55-0.74; P<0.001), and other countries have also benefited (HR, 0.79; 95%CI, 0.68-0.89; P<0.001). Conclusions: Compared with adjuvant chemotherapy and surgery alone, NAC can improve the long-term survival outcomes (OS and PFS) of patients with resectable AGC or EGC.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document